A new Nvidia Tech trailer reveals some of the graphical advancements that the PC version of Call of Duty: Ghosts uses with new Nvidia Drivers.

The video discusses some of the features the PC version has. You can watch the video below.

SHARE
  • Smart Smoke looks sick, now if only my PS4 could do that…

    • Korflock

      The PS4 is more than capable of doing these things, but again 2 year development of games prevents work on things like this. Now with a 3rd developer in the cycle, more high quality work of games can be released (HOPEFULLY).

      • NuttyTheSquirrel

        I think it doesn’t prevent anything. And I wouldn’t say that it is capable, because the technique they use on the smoke is, instead of smoke being just an image, it’s “millions” of particles/”bubbles” that move away when something collides with them. It’s very CPU intensive (at least on PC), and it’s a thing that only Nvidia has (PhysX, Turbulence, etc). I don’t think that the current-gen consoles can handle, since they’re not powerful at all. We can clearly see that the current-gen is already “worthless” in terms of innovation. They should run every single game that came out at native 1080p at 60fps without a problem. Instead, they run at resolutions that I never even heard about before on consoles. (960p, etc) It is unexceptable and by the next year, games will look the same because the current-gen aren’t poerful enough to let developers innovate that much. I mean, look at Ghosts, it isn’t graphically amazing, but the XBONE can only run it at native 720p.

        • mike

          What are you talking about? Current-gen (if you’re referring to PS4 and XB1) are much capable most games on 60 FPS and 1080p. PS4 runs ghost on these setting and although Xbox one runs 720p on 60 fps I believe that It can run on a higher resolution. There are other games that are on 1080p and 60 FPS like battlefield on both consoles. I just think developers just need more time to develop the game and it’ll run probably even 4k settings. I’m not a very tech person so I’m not quite sure if we can see PhysX in the current gen soon and the other NVIDA features I can certainly say that the current gen doesn’t just run ‘ 960 p ‘ .

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            “What are you talking about?”???

            Battlefield 4 runs at 960p on PS4 and at 720p on XBONE. And I’m really sorry to tell you this but, no! Current-gen will never run 4k, ever! (maybe 8-bit games…Like the 90s Super Mario games for the original GB).
            They don’t have the power to do so. When the X360 and PS3 came out, they had better specs than every PC at that time, they had GPU’s and CPU’s that were more powerful than the ones on the market (for PC). That’s not the same case with the current-gen. The current-gen consoles have an AMD processor similar to an AMD FX-8150. The PS4 has a GPU similar to an HD 7790 (2GB), while the XBONE has a GPU similar to an HD7770 (1GB). The XBONE is significantly worse than the PS4, and both are just bad in terms of specs.
            If the PS4 ran BF4 at 1080p, it would get around 50fps with some drops on intensive fights (explosions everywhere, etc), so they downscaled the resolution to run at 60fps almost constantly. The current-gen has very similar architecture that a PC does. Which means that they don’t need to “learn” how to improve the experience without compromising the frame-rate. Before, consoles had their own architecture, which made DEVS feel obligated to learn how the architecture works and how to improve the frame-rates. But that’s not the case with this gen.

            In terms of PhysX on current-gen I don’t think that these type of things will ever appear on consoles because APEX is the only company/dev that (was able to make/)made this kind of stuff, I never saw any other PhysX alternative other than PhysX itself, and NVIDIA bought APEX a long time ago.
            Devs can still make this effects on their engine, it just depends if the engine itself has the power to handle those kind of effects. The CoD engine doesn’t have the power to do that. While engines like Frostbite, CryEngine, Unreal Engine, etc – have the power to do that. DICE has their own destruction, water simulation and particle system on Frostbite (Battlefield), and Crytek has their own Particle, Water simulation, Destruction and cloth simulation system on CryEngine.

          • K

            It’s not as simple as saying “consoles are X powerful so they can have this performance like a PC with the same spec”.

            The Xbox 360 had 512mb of RAM. You try and run Call of Duty Ghosts on a PC with that!
            Because consoles
            A) Have barely any background processes
            B) All have the same hardware (in terms of every PS4 is the same and every Xbox One is the same), it’s several times easier to perfect performance. Especially when compared to PCs when you can have any combination of memory and any combination of CPU / GPU to work with, it’s hard and expensive to optimise for every potential system.

          • Battlefield doesn’t run 1080p on either consoles.
            Xbone: 720p
            PS4: 960p

          • CGkillZ

            The xbone can’t handle it but yes the ps4 can.

  • Avery Horton

    Ha, Ghosts as the ultimate FPS, what a joke, maybe like the slowest and most boring fps ever made

    • HenryDF

      Oh Avery…if you dislike CoD so much, why are even on here?

      • TheShadowReaper

        he dislikes Ghosts, not COD. thats exactly what i do too. Ghosts is terrible. but i still play all the rest COD games. you’re missing the point Henry…

        • kyr95

          Unfortunately i have to agree with you too :/ ghosts is by far the most underwhelming cod, although i cannot but agree that infinity ward had some fantastic ideas that werent implemented right, this can happen to every developer of course. Im really looking forward to SHG’s Cod, i have faith in them ;). And i will still love cod until it decides its time to move on. To me its one of the very few FPS that delivers fantastic storyline and competitive multiplayer almost every year focusing on gameplay whereas other games focus more on graphics ( e.g. Bf4 feels to me more of a Bf3 expansion, but thats only my opinion 🙂 ).

          • TheShadowReaper

            yeah, pretty much. COD is still strong with the exception of Ghosts. but i have lost faith in IW after so many failures. SH Games is a new direct to the series i hope. lets see what they come up with.

            and about other FPS games focusing on graphics and BF4 being just an expansion of BF3. its not just your opinion, its common sense. anyone can see that they have stopped trying and try to milk BF as much as possible. thats EA after all. everyone can see that except fanboys. they wear the protective glasses of fanboism so common sense wont work on them. 🙂

          • kyr95

            oh i thought it was only me :P.
            Well im certainly gonna give one last chance in IW in 2016 😉 just for the good old days. As for SHG im really intrigued as i dont know absolutely nothing about it. Rumor has it that it could be mw4, which to tell you my honest opinion, would be fantastic. What better way to reinvent the franchise by returning to what made it famous??(Also PRICE!!! :p )Although i know itwould be also good to start off with new characters and setting, but only time will tell 😉 . the one thing im sure about is that the multiplayer will be great. Judging by their twitter conversations SHG clearly listen to the community 🙂

          • TheShadowReaper

            *you dont know absolutely anything about it or you know absolutely nothing about. just helping out, english isnt my mother language either. ^^

          • kyr95

            Lol thanks man i just witnessed my mistake.hahaha 😛

          • Josh

            Your profile pic looks kinda like a pedo

          • kyr95

            hahaha :PP

          • Shooter

            The only reason BF is starting to get milked is because Activision has been milking COD for years now, so EA want’s a slice of the pie. Plus it’s been rumoured that SH is creating MW4 which I think is a terrible idea. The MW series is done so why do they have to carry it on? To get more money andthe last game SH worked on was MW3 which sucked almost as much as Ghosts does so I’m not expecting too much. Treyarch seems to be the No.1 COD developer at the moment even though BO2 wasn’t the best but it was better than MW3 and Ghosts. I guess we’ll just have to see but I really hope they don’t carry on the MW series, it’s done.

          • CGkillZ

            There is so many new big games that nobody will really play cod anymore, kinda sucks but oh well, As long as destiny’s good.

        • George

          So what’s wrong with Ghosts exactly, and how are the other CoDs just SO much better than it when by comparison they have such a low amount of content and quality?

          • TheShadowReaper

            BO2 had way more content than Ghosts alone. not to mention MW3. so yeah your “comparison” is flawed thus an invalid point. go back to your cave troll.

            and when it comes to quality Ghosts is truly outclassed by every other COD game so…yeah. you sound so stupid.

          • DanDustEmOff

            How is Ghosts out classed by every other CoD title. Ghosts has the best graphics of any CoD game to date. It also has the best net code to date, the most perks and the most class variety too. I get that you don’t like Ghosts but to say it is outclassed by every other CoD is a false statement.

          • TheShadowReaper

            when it comes to graphics it depends. Ghosts is exactly the same as BO2 in texture quality and stuff, not to say that BO2 is better cause of the fidelity of textures or some textures outright being absent on Ghosts when BO2 never had these problems. btw i’m playing on the PC and i’m testing these games to their maximum in 1080p. so dont worry i know.

            as for perks, they are more just because they kept them as a small effect rather than this big bonus as it was with pro perks and stuff in previous installments. so they arent more, they are just divided.

            class variety? come on now…really? BO2 destroys Ghosts in that.

            i’ll just assume that you have been playing a different game and not Ghosts.

          • DanDustEmOff

            “Ghosts is exactly the same as BO2 in texture quality and stuff” not really Ghosts has much better texture quality and a much higher graphical fidelity, better physics, better audio, better lighting effects and it has Sub-D thanks to the engine upgrades that were not present in BO2.
            Ghosts was also developed on movie grade computers and ported down to each system. BO2 was developed on an Xbox 360 dev kit.
            How can BO2 destroy Ghost in class variety when it doesn’t even have class specific kill streaks?
            BO2 didn’t have Pro Perks either and you were locked into a 3 tier perk system which also limited variety.
            It’s pathetic that you think that anyone with an opinion that differs from your own is a troll or assume that they have not been playing the game.
            I don’t like to use the phrase much but you are a Treyarch fan boy, plain and simple.

          • Sgtsclark

            It’s all perspective I guess because I have to agree with you, I found both bo1 and bo2 for sure my least favorite COD. I personally think ghosts is the best COD since modern warfare but that’s just how I feel, it’s all about what you like, no rights or wrongs here. Just perspective.

          • DanDustEmOff

            I’m of the same opinion with regards to Ghosts being the best one since MW1. However when he said the graphics are the same he is wrong. I have both Ghosts and BO2 for the PC and Ghosts blows BO2 out of the water in the graphics and connection department.

          • Sgtsclark

            I share that opinion with you as well.

          • TheShadowReaper

            yes i am a Treyarch fanboy. what of it? they make superior experiences to that of IW. ofc i like them more than IW.

            as for Ghosts, its terrible. not as a game but as a COD. it completely misses the point of being a COD game with its big maps and close to no warning of hit detection. IEDs and a lot of stuff.

          • DanDustEmOff

            Treyarch can’t even make decent net code or match making so I fail to see how they make superior experinces. BO2 was terrible as a game not just as a CoD title. BO2 was a complete troll by Treyarch that only catered to the eSports crowd.

            As for IED’s being an issue for you pmsl. IED’s are nothing compared to the shock charge betty/claymore, scavenger combo. Or target finder, SVU AS with no kick or flinch, boring symetrical maps, flack jacket that makes all explosives ineffective, easy quick scoping, tac mask that does the same. The game was tailored for campers thanks to Dr Disrespect being hired (a self confesed camper).

          • chris

            listen here 3arc fanboy 3arc don’t make better cod than iw and plus 3arc copies off iw ideas and the people at iw are proud people and while 3arc feeds off them they try changing things to make It better period

          • TheShadowReaper

            really? 3arc just feeds off IW’s ideas? then why 3arc’s game are way stronger thematically? what has IW done? copy Modern Warfare and paste it in MW2 and MW3, and eventually Ghosts. at least when i’m playing 3arc’s games i feel like i’m playing a new game, a new experience. IW is screwed and predictable. period my ass. its obvious that you have no idea what you’re talking about.

          • chris

            iw doesn’t screw up 3arc does for example bo2 had almost all guns patched and the An-94 got patched like 5 or 6 times and bo2 was a childish easy game ghost is a real game where u need strategy unlike bo2 where u just run round the map with op shotguns

          • TheShadowReaper

            “bo2 was a childish easy game ghost is a real game where u need strategy
            unlike bo2 where u just run round the map with op shotguns”

            how is that anything else than straight up opinion? your opinion sucks btw. also, getting weapons patched means that 3arc gave a shit about balancing. cant say the same about IW. *cough* MSBS and Lynx *cough*

            you sound like a 5 year old. sad.

          • chris

            lol 3arc care bout balancing or u mean they had too many op guns that they had to patch them all just stop dude

          • Shooter

            Let’s be honest here, that last COD game that actually looked fantastic was COD4, after that the games graphics have been meh. But gameplay over graphics any day but the gameplay sucks just as much as the graphics these days.

          • CGkillZ

            Bo2 has color in the map, Ghosts is like a blob of the same washed out color.

          • GameGuyy

            Ghosts is very good in the audio and bullet registration department. I honestly have no idea what you’re talking about when you say Ghosts has better graphics and texture quality though…. Maybe on the One and PS4, but Black Ops 2 clearly outclasses Ghosts on the PS3 and 360 graphics and texture wise. On the “last gen” consoles, Ghosts takes like 30 seconds to load up the textures on the map during a public match. That was never a problem on Black Ops 2. Plus, the gun models and everything look very unclear all of the time on my old consoles. On Black Ops 2, the guns and models were always very sharp and clear, not to mention the game looks way better in terms of contrast, color, vibrancy. I can actually see enemies across the map on Black Ops 2. On Ghosts, the enemies blend in. Ghosts looks better than MW3, but not by much, and we all know how hazy and gray that game was. I didn’t start playing online until MW2 was released and it was my favorite Call of Duty, but at this point in time, Black Ops 2 is my favorite CoD title. Not only because it introduced me into competitive Call of Duty with League Play, but it also has very fun maps. The guns were great, the maps were symmetrically balanced, the spawns were easy to master, and the maps were normal and fast paced like the previous Call of Duty maps we grew to love. That’s why people became attached to CoD in the early days because it offered you the fun factor of running into enemies in short periods of times and going on those huge kill streaks were magnificent. I’m not a fanboy at all. In terms of the ones I played online my list goes: BO2, MW2, MW3, BO1, and then Ghosts. I like fast paced action, not camping, so that could also factor into my decision of not liking Ghosts that much. I believe it’s a fun game still, but I believe IW could have done a better job with map design, and at least capitalize on what Treyarch did for eSports. Not only do I believe BO2 was a lot more fun to play, but it was also very fun to watch. Ghosts is semi fun to play and not really all that fun to watch besides when pros play at tournaments. These are just my opinions other then what I see on my screen when playing Black Ops 2 and Ghosts. I haven’t had a chance to play it on the next gen consoles yet, but Ghosts (PS3/Xbox 360) is visually weaker in terms of graphics and texture quality compared to Black Ops 2. Now that Treyarch has more time…. Just watch in 2015, they’re going to release an amazing game with a fantastic net code and it’s going to do wonders for public match players and competitive players. I have high hopes for Sledgehammer as well. Infinity Ward hasn’t been the same since they fired the guys that make up Respawn Entertainment. I get bored playing public matches in Ghosts and competitive isn’t as fun as it was in Black Ops 2. There’s kind of a reason more people are playing BO2 than Ghosts… You have your opinions though and I have mine.

          • DanDustEmOff

            I play on the PC so there is a huge night and day difference between the two games.

          • chris

            the amount of stupidity within you is too much u really need help period

          • GameGuyy

            Get a life. You’re so disrespectful it’s unbelievable. You’re calling me stupid, because my opinion differs from yours? You’re the one that needs help. Go back to school and learn how to type proper sentences. I can’t read what you’re typing because it looks like garbage. Clearly I’m not the stupid one here. The internet is a waste of time. All you see are people like you calling others names for voicing their opinions. I’m done here. Have a good day, sir.

          • chris

            what the I didn’t call u stupid coz of ur opinion I called u stupid coz u said bo2 has better graphics than ghost ur either trolling or just plain stupid

          • chris

            *slowing claps* someone gets me

          • chris

            quit blabbing bout bo2 it wasn’t even good and zombies was bad

          • George

            How do you figure that Black Ops 2 had more content? I for one don’t see it. I’m not getting a drastic enough difference in quality either.

          • CGkillZ

            Just play Ghosts the gameplay is just fucked. If I play BO2 or mw3 its fast paced I actually enjoy the run/gun gameplay. In Ghosts you die to quick to do anything. Also the people that play it seem to be Douchebags. Maybe its just me getting into shit lobbies but watever I guess

          • Sal

            You die too quick because the netcode doesn’t give you rubber bullets.

          • Daniel M

            I don’t understand this to be honest you must be bad at cod, I can run and gun and get good killstreaks and kD/R fine on ghosts. I’ve played every cod since cod 4 and i run and gun on all of them i do fine lol you must be stupid and just run out in the middle of the map or something. My KD/R on all cods is 1.50+ and all i do is run and gun 🙂 (my cod ghosts kdr is 1.95)

          • CGkillZ

            No im not bad the games just shit. I think my kds bout 1.60 i believe. But you can’t run and gun like you could on bo2. You die instantly so it makes people to be more cautious and camp more. But this game sucks that’s why only 140k people on ps3 play and 70k on ps4. Not that many people play Ghosts compared to other Cods. Cods killed itself, the other badass games that are coming out wont help there #’s either

          • George

            Despite the slower gameplay, you’re describing every other CoD. I don’t mind the bigger maps and somewhat slower pace in Ghosts, but I guess I’m not the particular player it affects or something. Unlike most gamers, I can adapt to change.

        • DanDustEmOff

          I felt the same about BO2.

        • Avery Horton

          Thank you for being reasonable, unlike every other COD fanboy in this forum. I love COD and have played all of them, ghosts is just a huge let down for any of the COD players that have been playing the game for a long time. If you are new to FPS games, ghosts is great and unlike anything else, but after playing all the previous games, ghosts is a huge step backwards for the franchise

          • TheShadowReaper

            the ridiculous thing is that people say that this is a good game for the franchise, better than any BO2 or MW game that we have seen and has so much content and is really good and so much bullshit its sickening. good for new players yes but its the old players that talk all this bullshit. people are stupid.

            you’re welcome btw. i’m fairly reasonable i believe.

          • CGkillZ

            See atleast in bo2 you can run around the map without being assraped like Ghosts. If I try to move in that game ill die by an ied or killed instantly by 2 bullets.

          • Duke of hazard

            Fairly reasonable? You just claimed that you’re a fanboy of treyarch, you disregard all the shit BO2 has, but you’re willing to jump on the hate train when ghosts has some shit. You’re even crying about Ghosts playing different than BO2 when clearly those are 2 different games. What the fuck makes you reasonable? Oh and lets make this one thing clear. The “dying too fast” In Ghosts? It’s called BETTER NETCODE. You know, the one you people kept bitching for to get better for the past how many years?

          • TheShadowReaper

            its called worse hit update. when the red indicator flashes to tell you that you take dmg? yeah that happens like…exactly when you die! so there is no feedback about you taking hits! good job on that one.

            BO2 has its own sins, but its was a fairly enjoyable game. ofc not as good as the first BO but fairly good. Ghosts feels like a chore to play. and when a game does that its no longer good imo. and there are tons of reasons why Ghosts feels like a chore to play.

          • Sal

            That’s you. I can run and gun perfectly and do everything I did on BO2. Except better and without any kind of bullshit like shooting a guy on the back to get insta-killed in response.

            Ghosts still has space for run and gun. I have two friends that are masters at it and they always get around 20 kills per game without fail while dying 3-7 times.

          • TheShadowReaper

            really? i mean seriously? who cant get a 20-5 game in Ghosts? its not that hard. but the game is doomed and a huge letdown for the franchise. arguably the worst COD ever made. that doesnt make it a bad game but it makes it a bad COD game. and i wanted to play COD not a generic FPS with COD feel, which is what Ghosts is atm.

          • Sal

            Nah. None of other FPS on the market look like Ghosts. It’s stil the same basis.

            >who can’t get a 20-5 game on ghosts

            Retards… because that’s what 90% of the players are. The worst CoD made is the third one, it was console exclusive and was a carbon copy of Battlefield 1942’s multiplayer.

            Also, 600k people on all platforms tells us otherwise. Whatever, next year people will be shitting on the newest CoD and praising Ghosts. Keep the circlejerk, you guys are retardedly predictable.

          • TheShadowReaper

            i was talking about Ghosts…being a generic FPS with a COD feel. well, whatever.

            i dont know about you but i certainly didnt found myself bitching about BO2. it was a good game. unlike Ghosts. you are the retard here praising Ghosts for its unoriginality and copy and paste of MW feel. gj continuing the circlejerk of retards.

          • Sal

            Neither I bitched about BO2, but literally EVERYONE ELSE did. Always the same things. People are just USED to bitch about the current CoD.

            Even through I like Treyarch more, Ghosts is much more fun for me. I’ve got a much better K/D because bullshit deaths are much less common due to the GOOD netcode.

          • TheShadowReaper

            well at least none of us are in the bitching side of the COD community. i have literally lost days defending BO1 on YT from idiots that were bitching about it. but i couldnt have known that these are standard, i was younger.

            good for you. i have found some enjoyment from Ghosts but it doesnt cut it for me as a COD game.

          • Sal

            Then just play it as it is a random FPS that happens to have the name Call of Duty on the title? Ghosts isn’t really a bad game.

          • Sal

            Nope. I defended BO2 like the plague but then I admitted the game had a lot of bullshit.

            Ghosts is a much better game balance-wise and has actually people variating guns instead of the same MSMC, AN-94 and PDW spam every game.

          • chris

            yep bo2 was bs almost all the guns in the game got patched and the An-94 got patched like a 100 times *sarcastically speaking*

        • asshole mcpussylicker

          then why the fuck do you comment on ghosts news if you dont like it?

          • TheShadowReaper

            because i play COD? duh? most stupid question in the universe. its not like i am a BF fanboy or a Titanfall fanboy to hate on Ghosts. Ghosts is simply downright a bad COD game, not up to par to what we’re used to with previous installments.

        • Sal

          Ghosts isn’t terrible. I’ll use a word that people will probably get mad at. It’s -cue dramatic drums- DIFFERENT.

          It’s not a run-and-gun fest where the one who runs more like an idiot with an SMG wins. You have to use the right guns for the job, not take just one gun on every map and dominate with it.

          • TheShadowReaper

            sorry to burst your bubble but thats pretty much every COD game except Ghosts. if you want to camp your ass off and play “strategically” why dont you go fuck yourself with a BF4 copy, huh? every COD is a run and gun fest. BO2 gave a little more power to the small guys, the SMGs, whereas every other COD before that gave more power to either ARs or Snipers. as for Ghosts, yes its different and thats why it fails as a COD. you do enjoy stating the obvious and presenting them as actual counter points huh? x)

          • Sal

            Difference is. Ghosts takes the most skilled to run and gun. On BO2, it’s about whoever has better connection.

          • chris

            sorry to bust ur bubble but bo2 was the easiest cod ever made just take an smg and run round the map like a headless chicken while hip firing everyone in sight a 5 year could easily do that period

      • Rorke File

        I miss the old times ……

    • nordicus

      Actually at the end he says activision is the ultimate fps, not ghosts.

    • GinsuVictim

      It’s times like this I hate Disqus for taking away our downvoting.

    • You are so smart

      I’ve never heard this before. Really. It’s a well thought out, totally original, and not baseless opinion. Sure, it sold more than any FPS of it’s time… and currently sits at one of the most played current gen and last gen consoles… but clearly your opinion, which differs from SO many other INTELLIGENT and upstanding denizens of the interwebs, is %100 concrete fact. Thank you. ILY<3

    • Avery Horton Is Dumb For That

      you make it too easy

    • Josh

      Your a joke! “The slowest and most boring” I think you’ll find you’ve just described Battlefield. COD is a fast paced game, have you even played the game? You cannot really get a much better fps besides BF and Titenfall that is about to launch.

    • Duke of hazard

      You clearly haven’t played any other fps then.

  • 1st thing is this game has fps drops even on latest nvidia GPUs, and 2nd one is can all these technologies bring back player base?

  • Guest

    Great looking DLC… Where are the dedicated servers as promised at launch?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    • fires

      They mentioned it already, its a mix of dedis and hosts, and is decided by connection of the lobby.

  • Rorke File

    They have to change COD graphically , the effects are cool I think they will do with “Black Smith “

  • applebutter180

    This doesn’t help when the game still has stuttering issues on any driver setup on high end equipment and when it’s impossible to run extra texture resolution and still get a solid 60 frames per second (I have an R9 270x, YMMV on that last part).

    • NuttyTheSquirrel

      I have an ASUS GTX 780 Ti (Overclocked Edition — best single-GPU on the market) and an i7 4770k. There are times where I get 40fps, which is unacceptable since the game isn’t graphically demanding. It’s just really, really poorly optimized (PC version). My frames can go up to 130fps while playing the game, but there are times where I get really poor frames (40fps as I said). IW shouldn’t do PC games, and I fucking hate how they lied to us, I remember when they said that the PC version would get love, that it would be the best version (since it’s a PC) and that they would give much support to the PC community/version. It’s was just all a bunch of lies, the game is unplayable unless you have pretty much the latest PC components, and this fancy stuff shown here (PhysX, APEX Turbulence, Fur, etc) it’s just for NVIDIA users. You can still use it if you have an AMD card, but it would run on your CPU and not on your GPU, and it would “stab” your frames “to death”. (NVIDIA cards have a separate chip for this kind of stuff, such as PhysX; APEX Turbulence/Particles/Destruction/Clothing, Fur and all that jazz.)

  • cod1 nostalgia

    les b honest her ghost is suk af ye we al kno ye k an obvs cod1 wos bst rembr thos deys ye no terget finer or watchamadoohikey dos wer da deys

    • Guest

      Wow. Did they teach you anything in school?

  • Tony Rambo

    Same the game runs like shit…

  • WhyDDOS

    Just stop, just fucking Stop! Infinity ward no one plays your game anymore, Worst Cod up to date. Just stop. All those updates and none of them fix your game!

    • Sal

      IED nerf, MSBS nerf, AK-12 nerf, Maniac bug fixed, operations change, Riot Shield nerf, FOV included. flawless netcode, 600k people playing the game at peak counting all platforms… Yep, if it’s dead, it’s the most awesome zombie ever.

      • CGkillZ

        Umm 600k??? It used to be bout 600k on just the ps3. So it has less fans.

      • CGkillZ

        The game is total shit, you can’t fix this game. They’ve added stuff to make the game abit more playable. But you can’t fix the maps and gameplay. Unless they add more health than its not fun.

        • Duke of hazard

          It’s called a better net code than the previous cod. Get used to it.

          • CGkillZ

            No i know that but is that fun? instantly dying isn’t very fun. Not that many people truly enjoy it. I used to like it the 1st month it was out but it gets boring too quick.

  • ProlificMF

    Thats awesome. makes me want to make the change to pc gaming

  • Stick Man

    I have noticed all these things. Too bad it’s so poorly optimized for me to enjoy any of it. PC Ghosts = Fail.

  • NuttyTheSquirrel
    • Xecho

      I found it funny. But Titan Fall can’t beat BF4.

      • NuttyTheSquirrel

        Unfortunately, BF4 is so fucking broken, that when Titanfall comes out, I won’t touch BF4 ever again. (Unless they fucking fix the game once and for all.)

        • Sal

          You’re asking for pigs to fly. At least IW tries to fix the shit instead of breaking something when fixing another every fucking time… lol

  • Abd3l4l

    And my friends keep asking why am i getting a Pc and not a PS4! Thats Y!!

  • Abd3l4l

    And My Friends Are Surprised I am Getting a PC not a PS4!

  • Abd3l4l

    LOOKS SO GR8t!

  • I go by Steve

    I love reading the comment section on this site, just to see how fast the the conversation goes off topic. “Oh Black Ops 2 had better graphics”, “No way ghosts is newer so it’s better” “Battlefiled is better” (because it’s apparently a Call of Duty game). next post see how many comments it takes to go into a fanboy war.

  • TittyFlop

    Look ofcourse ghosts is better than BO2. The Best COD ever made was Black Ops (My Opinion Not Fact) but BO2 dropped major goose eggs, but it was because when making BO1 Treyarch had the whole team working on it while BO2 was being made along side another game. Not only that but IW has ALWAYS had the entire team working on ONE GAME and all the games were COD games nothing else.Thats the major reason why Ghosts is WAY BETTER than BO2. Also Black Ops 3 I HOPE that Treyarch in the Past im TIRED of all these future CODS, MW3 was years in the future, BO2 2025, Ghost is the near future. AND ALL SUCKED COMPARED to WaW and Black Ops (again my opinion not a fact) because of the “this is set around events that ACTUALLY HAPPENED” feeling I got when playing. Not a bunch of WW3 scenarios, actual events. But thats my opinion not fact so dont take any of this as fact.