Eurogamer is reporting that the Xbox One footage shown in the Call of Duty Advanced Warfare trailer was running at a native 900p resolution. If true, this is quite a significant jump from last year’s Call of Duty Ghosts which was 720p native upscaled to 1080p on Xbox One. For comparison, Battlefield 4 on PS4 was 900p upscaled while the Xbox One version was 720p, and it’s our opinion (having owned both versions) is that theres a significant difference between 720p and 900p native resolutions.

The question is to what extent Sledgehammer has managed to extract more performance from the Microsoft hardware – our initial impressions based on the overall presentation suggested something close to 900p…

…A Kevin Spacey cut-scene towards the end of the video gives us our long vertical edge – used for ascertaining horizontal resolution. Here we find a ratio of 49/60 – giving us a provisional measurement of 1568 rendered pixels contained in the 1920-wide sample. Assuming that the upscale is the same in both x and y directions, this gives us 882 pixels on the vertical – unfortunately even the higher quality trailer doesn’t give us enough in the way of long horizontal edges to work with in producing a definitive result, and in an ideal world we’d have more viable shots for analysis on both axis.

We’ll update should more media becoming available, but we’ll go with a ballpark 1568×882 for now. The game gives the impression of a 900p title with post-process anti-aliasing, but the framebuffer appears to be slightly lower than that, representing a 50 per cent boost in overall resolution compared to Ghosts, but only 67 per cent of the pixel density of a full 1080p presentation. Bearing in mind that Xbox One optimisations tend to carry across to PS4 with its larger GPU and fully unified RAM, a native 1080p resolution for that version of the game isn’t out of the question. However, we should remember that Advanced Warfare is still deep in development and could see substantial changes before it is released – though for a game like COD where a sustained 60fps is so important, we would hope for solid frame-rates taking priority over resolution increases.

SOURCE: Eurogamer

SHARE
  • LUL.

    “next gen” not even 1080P with 60fps

    • smayo

      Rather have 60fps then 1080p, both is nice but if resolution has to be sacrificed for 60fps so be it

      • LUL.

        100% agree, but a “next gen console” should do both on every game.

        • smayo

          True, this generation doesn’t feel really “next gen”

          • dat guy

            Many games of “Next Gen” are 1080p, CoD franchise is more biased (and it needs to be) to 60 FPS, since the Engine works at the base of the FPS the game is at, if we have 40-60 FPS bumps, we would see rare things like:

            -Fire Rate being unstable and changing everytime
            -Soldier Speed not being 100% all the time
            -Unsmoothness while moving the camera.

            and many, many more, just because in CoD having 60 FPS is more important than in other games…

          • smayo

            Agree, i prefer a 60fps over high resolution too in cod, i just feel there is no wow factor this generation launch as there was last gen

          • Siftblade of Rivia

            You have to wait for the true next gen games. Ones that are fully developed on next gen, and do not release to old consoles.

          • smayo

            I know, but i remember with the launch of the xbox360 i saw that game where a ball or something was rolling through hundreds of trolls, i really was like wooow this is never possible on the ps2 or xbox, i did not have that feeling this generation, maybe we just spoiled to much

          • Siftblade of Rivia

            Because so much is already possible on PS3. The gap between PS2 and PS3 was crazy, it introduced so many things, even online. But since PS3 has a lot of things already, they couldn’t do much to the PS4 except upgrade.

          • smayo

            Agree, same goes for ps1 to ps2, when i saw tekken tt for the first time back in ’99 i was like damn look at those reflections on the ground, but technology advances so fast now i think we never going to get wowed again by new consoles, pc is already miles ahead when a new console releases instead of trailing behind it the first year like in past was the case, but maybe who knows what the future holds

    • 111AlaN111

      Neither PS4 nor X1 are “next gen”. PC achieved 4000p before they were launched, so if you love graphics and resolution go to PC.

      • TheMostManlyMan

        4K isn’t actually 4000p, it’s 2160p, still 4X the pixels of 1080p, but I’m just saying it’s not quite the same.

        • 111AlaN111

          Yeah, but people claim that the new consoles are “next-gen” when both aren’t close to next-gen.

          4K should be next gen.

          • TheMostManlyMan

            IW actually mentioned that they ran Ghosties on their 4K tv, part of the problem is that most 4K tvs are only 30hz, even if they had a higher refresh rate I doubt many games could run at any higher even if the consoles waited another year for technological advances.

          • 111AlaN111

            2K?

          • TheMostManlyMan

            4K resolution refers to the horizontal dimensions whereas normally (1080p for example) it’s the number of virtacle pixels.

            4K resolution is 3840 by 2160, or simply 2160p.

          • 111AlaN111

            I don’t care. I know consoles can do more than 1080p.

  • jordanxbrookes

    This gives me a sign that it could 1080p by the time the game is out.

  • I’ve said it already and I’ll say it again – as long as CoD is running buttery smooth at 60FPS, the resolution can be 480p for all I care.

    That said, the upscaler won’t have too much trouble with this resolution .

    • Willian Brasbiel Martins

      Truth. I believe SHGames will achieve 1080p/60fps on both Xbox One and PS4.

    • Iuvyvuyuy

      Amen. Run smoothly and it’ll be fine.

    • Siftblade of Rivia

      480p would look like absolute shit.

      • And yet, that’s how games were developed pre-Gen 7 and there were some wonderful stuff put out.

        • Siftblade of Rivia

          Yeah, they could still be fun, but they’d look like absolute shit. The standard back then was low, so when you got 480p, it looked good. Now, if you release a game at 480p, so little people would buy it.

          • Minecraft’s popularity denies your whole argument, bud.

          • Siftblade of Rivia

            Minecraft and COD are completely different. I would not buy a COD if it was 480p 60FPS. Minecraft, on the other hand, is just a block game. You don’t need good graphics for Minecraft, so they don’t have it.

          • Mr Doge

            I don’t think MC is 480p or less? There are some parts where the pixels are really small. Also you can get Texture packs which give blocks double or even more the amount of pixels. Just sayin’.

    • 111AlaN111

      I think that the difference between 60fps and 30fps is unnoticeable. I saw some articles. The human eye can’t detect the difference.

      • Noticeable between 60FPS and 30FPS but not between 60 and 120.

        • 111AlaN111

          The difference is still little. I would be happy with STEADY 30fps, but I would prefer 60fps, but if that isn’t steady, then 30fps.

      • TheMostManlyMan

        It is definitely noticeable, and maybe it’s just the smaller screen making it look smoother, but my PC running something at 75fps looks WAY smoother than 60FPS on a console.

        Anywho, I really don’t think that the framerate is as important as resolution. My line has been “high framerates are until you get used to it, but jaggies are forever”. And that’s just how it is, when I first got my X1 Battlefield 4 looked like the smoothest thing ever, but now that I’ve gotten used to it it doesn’t seem awe-inspiringly smooth anymore.

      • Bigi345

        There’s a huge difference between 30 and 60

  • MuscledRMH

    Microsoft released a new SDK (software development kit) earlier this year which gave the Sniper Elite devs the ability to make Sniper Elite 3 native 1080p on the Xbox One just like the PS4 version.

    It is very likely that the Xbox One version will be native 1080p just like the PS4 version thanks to the new SDK Microsoft released. I hope this is true because I’m getting sick of all the PS fanboys being toxic towards Xbox.

    Here is the link: http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/02/10/sniper-elite-dev-explains-xbox-one-1080p-difficulties

    • The Pope

      And how many xbox fanboys were toxic to the ps3…

      • MuscledRMH

        Look, I’m trying to start an argument here or any hate I’m just saying this hate towards each other should stop. As long as we fight over consoles their will never be a good community. It is sad the way people respond to others, but the PS community is being very toxic atm.

        • The Pope

          This is because because they finally have something which is the best. xbox guys have had their turn and now it is time for ps guys to have theirs.

          • 111AlaN111

            Their turn on what? Slightly better graphics?

            X1 has more stuff if that’s what you mean, more games.

            PS4 has indies that cost less on PC.

          • Siftblade of Rivia

            Actually, PS has quantity, and quality, exclusives compared to Xbox. PS4 also has pretty much the same, if not more, games. Third party games go to all consoles (usually). That means PS4 and Xbox One would have around the same games. Then you look at the exclusives. If PS4 exclusives are going to be anything like PS3’s, it will be a must have. Especially for people who like to play games with an immersive story, etc. Not just FPS.

          • 111AlaN111

            X1 has more games until now. Most of the PS4 games are indies wich I could happily play on my laptop for less money.

            X360 had more exclusive games than the PS3. I know that PS3 AAA exclusives are mostly Singleplayer games, wich are great, like TLOU and Uncharted, but they lack of freshness at the time to replay the game, wich makes them a MUST-RENT.

          • Siftblade of Rivia

            More games =/= better. PS is known for exclusives, PS4 exclusives will come later, because exclusive games actually take time and work for developing engines, etc. and making it as good as possible, so of course there are no good launch PS4 exclusives. 360 does NOT have more exclusives as of now, nor has it ever. Not only that, but the quality of PS exlusives are like 50x better than 360 exclusives. God of War, Uncharded, TLOU, Heavy Rain, Infamous, Beyond Two Souls, and much much more. On Xbox, the only good exclusives are Halo, Gears of War, and Gran Turismo. All of the others are 90% kinect games. Plus, Halo is already going to die out, since it stopped being good after Halo 3 for me, and Destiny is coming out, which will essentially replace Halo. Even Xbox fanboys are logical enough to admit that PS has way better exclusives, are you? BTW you’re seriously telling me games that have gotten 10/10 ratings and have been awarded Game of the Year, like TLOU and Uncharted, are not good? Must rent games don’t win GOTY. I still play TLOU from time to time, and the story is so immersive that I still feel like I’m part of the game, even when replaying it.

          • 111AlaN111

            360 has more exclusives, search for it.

            90% of Xbox games are Kinect? LOL, and you want to be taken seriously. FACT: 90% of PS games are indies.

          • Siftblade of Rivia

            There’s no point arguing with you, since you obviously have no idea what you’re talking about and/or a troll. Believe what you want, you delusional man.

          • 111AlaN111

            OK, so stating the truth is delusional. Look at any website, X360 has more exclusives. Sony fanboys made a chart of the last 3 years when MS released very little exclusives, but in overall, X360 has more exclusives.

            And you stating 90% of Xbox games are Kinect games is just stupid.

          • Siftblade of Rivia

            Sigh. Just.. watch this. http://youtu.be/m-1llEn4Wl8?t=5m25s

          • 111AlaN111

            I’ll pass. I don’t want to find out my time was wasted by a possible fanboy. Look at any place and there will say X360 has more exclusives.

            I saw some part of the video. 60 games vs 96 games.

            I saw on other websites both consoles had more than 200 overall exclusives, so I guess he takes in account a period of time.

          • Siftblade of Rivia

            No. He took ALL exclusives ranked 70 or higher. That means he measured quality, too.

          • 111AlaN111

            There’s a reason for anything: INDIES.

            And from where did he got the ranks? Sonyfanboys,com?

          • Siftblade of Rivia

            Jesus, there is literally no point in this. You’re calling me a fanboy, yet you refuse to accept the facts. The ratings are from a website that combines all outside ratings into one average rating. How much more ignorant can you be?

          • 111AlaN111

            Well, Flower (a shitty indie) got 9.5. So if he counts games that got 7 or more, shitty indies like that will be counted, so I don’t care.

          • Siftblade of Rivia

            Obviously it wasn’t shitty since it got 9.5. Minecraft is an indie game, btw. Not all indies are shit.

          • 111AlaN111

            I know not all indies are shit, but no one will really play flower.

            It got a 9.5 because: Indie games are ranked more softly and the game completes the purpose of: relaxing.

            There are great indies, but anyone can make the worst game ever, publish it and leave it there. So indies mostly are supposed to be bad. On the other hand, there are some indie developers who take their job more seriously.

          • Josh

            I think you’ll find you got your percentages severely wrong and you replied to someone “And you stating 90% of Xbox games are Kinect games is just stupid.” Yet you post it yourself, that makes a lot of sense, doesn’t it.

          • 111AlaN111

            I know the percentages are wrong, but this idiot says 90% of Xbox games are Kinect. I think you misunderstand the situation.

          • The Pope

            no, their turn on having the better console, the better games and the better fans.

          • 111AlaN111

            I don’t think the “better console, better games and better fans” apply.

            Mostly all PS4 fans are pure fanboys, so I could say “Biggest fanbase” for sure (7million)

            Until now, X1 has more games, but the PS4 wins the title for “Biggest indie collection”.

            PS4 is “The most powerful console” but not the best. I think that is more of opinion.

          • TheShadowReaper

            meh, none of it matters cause Xbox fanboys just completely do not give a shit even when someone presents facts to him. its factual that the PS4 is stronger than XboxOne, its factual that the PS4 has more exclusive content on 3rd party games, its factual that the PS4 is a better deal cause of starting price, its factual that the PSN is a better deal than the XboxLive…does it matter to fanboys? no, they are deaf to such things cause they are fanboys. plain and simple. so no its not more of an opinion, its more of stupidity than opinion.

          • wolfshadow

            for the most part its all opinion I had a PS3 played all most all the exclusives and only liked MGS4 and for the multiplayer I could not handle the grainy graphics but I cant say much on the PS4 I don’t have it and have not played it

          • TheShadowReaper

            nope its not opinion. i can easily debate for all of them if you so wish i do.

          • TheMostManlyMan

            Wait, so dedicated servers aren’t the best? How about DirectX 12, is that better than DirectX 11? I’m not seeing a whole lot that they have over us other than some pixels and even that is going away.

          • The Pope
          • TheMostManlyMan

            But does PS4 offer dedicated servers for every online game?

            Fair enough, we’ll just have to wait for games fully developed on DX12 before anything decisive can be said about it.

          • The Pope

            does xbox one offer dedicated servers or every game – yes but does it show it – no. just because there are dedicated servers doesn’t guarantee a good experience.

          • TheMostManlyMan

            But it does guarantee less lag and no host migration/host privileges which certainly helps.

          • The Pope

            there is always going to be lag until the internet has no lag and it is completely perfect…which it isn’t so it doesn’t really help- look at ghosts on next gen.

          • Guest

            Yeah because publishers or developers can’t offer it themselves like BF4 or every other game /facepalm
            don’t be stupid, I mean, not every game is based around online, and not all of them are shooters (first person) that require good connection

            Anyway, every multiplat game that has dedis on Xbox One has dedis on PS4
            and exclusives like Killzone also has dedicated servers

            You seem very desperate to justify your purchase, it;s pretty pathetic, if you enjoy it good for you, but you honestly have to say if PS4 offers it. PS4 offers many things and have their shit straight which is why it’s booming. It doesn’t need false pathetic PR stunts or dedicated servers to help it be better. I mean I could list many reasons why, but I don’t need to prove anyone anything, so it’s best to keep things to yourself if you’re content with your purchase.

          • The Pope

            well said.

          • ihaveabigpsnboner

            dude, we had ps2 and psx locked the fuck down compared to microsoft, back in the days of shadow of the colossus.

          • The Pope

            yeah, it was our turn with the ps2, then their turn with xbox 360, and now its our turn again with the ps4 🙂

    • Connor Williams

      The reason PS4 fanboys are toxic towards the XBox One is because Microsoft is always trying to make exclusives out of everything.

      • MuscledRMH

        Which is a damm good business move if you ask me.

        • smayo

          To bad that us as gamers don’t benefit from it most of the time

          • MuscledRMH

            I’m a Xbox Gamer so I benefit from it all the time

          • smayo

            Good for you, but the fact is that say 50% of the cod community is left out the first month, i play xbox too but my experience would be ruined a bit if i already saw all of the new maps and extras, this goes specificly for zombies, and the same is the case for all other titels out there, regardless what system you on

    • Blaine

      Lol… it’s not like a new SDK is gonna make the GPU faster…

      It’s gonna run at 900p, plain and simple. Getting it to run at 1080p on the XBONE would require a significant decrease in the level of detail.

      • MuscledRMH

        No it wouldn’t. Xbox One is more complicate to develop like the PS3 was at the beginning so Xbox One will run at native 1080p like Forza 5 which is native 1080p.

        Not saying it this years COD will be native 1080p on XB1 but most games will be native 1080p on the Xbox One just like the PS4! Especially after DX12 will release and the new SDK makes it already possible. (the Sniper Elite devs achieved native 1080p with SE3 thanks to the new SDK)

        • Lord Madara

          But the difference is the ps3 had better specs than the 360.
          Ps4 has slightly better specs than the Xbox one which is good enough to be50% stronger than one. The xbox one will hopefully be able to improve to 1080p on all games but dont think devs arent going to learn how to use the ps4 hardware and software to the fullest either. The Ps4 will improve as well the more they get used to it.

          • Ben

            “ps3 had better specs than the 360”

            You mean the heterogenic CELL processor which was never used by 3rd party developers? 😀 You really should look after some things… RSX was weaker compared to Xenos, that’s why some games had lower resolution and framerate in the previous generation.

            The same will happen with the Xbox One, PS4 is stronger in almost every terms.

          • Grenada!

            that 50% more powerful thing is bullshit though, who ever said that is talking out of their ass. Anyway the PS4 will always be more powerful than the X1, so the PS4 will always look better but the 50% more powerful, in Sony’s dreams.

        • Guest

          Yeah and Forza had massive downgrades to get 1080p 60fps so your point is invalid
          However much you think that DX12 will help, it’s limited, and won’t polish the inferior hardware. Face the facts

    • Ben

      Yeah, I’m expecting that too… from what I heard their devkit back in 2013 was plain simple, no suprise why they wanted to release the console in 2014 (or 2015?).

    • Jack Meoff

      Its funny that AFTER YOU PAID 500 BUCKS you have to go and wait for updates to make the system and game run better

  • Connor Williams

    I believe that SH will achieve 1080p on the PS4 but 900p on Xbox One, scaled up.

  • CoDforever

    Am i the only one amazed by the graphics?

    To me, it looks at the same level if not better than Battlefield’s graphics
    Not too mention that all Battlefield trailers are all on high end PC’s running at max settings while Call of Duty Advanced Warfare was shown on the XBOX ONE and it looks god damn stunning

    I also find it weird how news outlets on youtube barely talked about the amazing graphics ..

    Haha and remember all the BF4 fanboys making fun of the Ghosts Graphics

    Where are they now?

    • But it’s still not a new engine 🙁

      • CoDforever

        Who cares! Can you tell this game looks similar to previous cod games graphically? Hell no, this looks “Above and Beyond the Battlefield”

        • Michael

          Yeah I can totally agree with you on that. In multiplayer for battlefield 4, frames drop when your scoped with a sniper. If your aiming from a long distance in bf4, the graphics are wonky looking. At least COD can keep the graphics at the same rate even when your at such a far distance. But just in general, the graphics in advanced warfare look “above and beyond battlefield’s” in my opinion.

          • exeterman2

            You have no idea about the distance thing in this new cod. Here’s why:
            1. This is only SP (always looks better)
            2. There are no snipers shown
            3. Cod doesn’t have maps the same size or with the same number of players as battlefield.
            4. There is no framedrop and far away objects look fine on ps4

          • Michael

            Right, but your talking next-gen. I was talking about current-gen. Xbox 360 specifically. I have problems were the frame rates drop when your scoped in with snipers at extremely long ranges. And many people are having this problem on the current-gen systems.

          • exeterman2

            And like I said, the distances in cod are much smaller

      • Ryumoau

        do we know for sure yet? I’d saw we should wait till they release full out gameplay footage. But i personally like the controls of CoD because it feels different from any other shooter. I’d be scared if they decided to change everything.

        • You can see it’s the same, look at the shadows at this picture.
          http://www.charlieintel.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/BlacksmithACTUALFULLSIZE-620×400.jpg

          • CoDforever

            If this game didnt have “Call of Duty” on it, everyone would go insane saying how amazing it looks. They be like “NEXT GEN IS HERE!”

          • kyr95

            You know most people that i saw reacting on that image, didnt know what it was and instantly said “OMG, its Battlefield 5 ,Cod is doomed!”. I mean… sigh -_-

          • Yeah, and if Respawn was making it, everybody would say it’s the best game to ever exist and how it’s going to revolutionize the sun.

        • Ben

          I’m pretty sure they’re using the same engine… well, not completely same because they revamped it a bit, but yeah, they’re not using a completely new one.

        • fires

          they never use a “new engine” just an improved engine. The engine they created “IWEngine” a custom cod engine, is a heavy modded quake engine, which is why its so fluid, and fast paced. Unless they are doing something stupid like licensing a unreal engine or some other commercial engine(which they have never done) no worrys friend.

      • 111AlaN111

        I think they made a new one

      • Kirby5722

        You don’t use a new engine evey game no devs do that. The engines get updated as time goes by.

      • Tayler Hammond

        You don’t even know yet if it’s on a new engine. Judging by the gameplay, it looks as if it’s running on the new Cry Engine.

        • bobby

          they wouldnt use another engine besides one they created. Activision wouldnt do that, they would stand by their own engine, which is probably the Acivision engine

      • Jason

        It is a brand new engine, check out the video on YouTube. It’s called the Activision Engine. It was revealed at GDC 2013.

      • Bigi345

        There’s no proof of that, for all we know it might be the valve source engine

        • fires

          VALVE ENGINE. You know its the valve engine when everyone has wet skin that shines.

          • Bigi345

            I’m just showing my point that we don’t have any confirmation on the engine

    • jordanxbrookes

      I know man. LOOK AT DOSE GRAPHICS!!!

      • jooker-jr

        GRAPHIIIIIIIIIIIICSSsss !!!

    • kyr95

      Not only that but 50 % keep saying the “same shit,different name” thing, and that the graphics are the same and awful. Its ridiculous -_-

      • Pickles

        The GameSpot community gets really toxic about CoD every time a new name comes out… I’m sick of it

        • kyr95

          Dont forget IGN’s :/

          • Celest1ne

            The ENITRE community not just a couple of website’s. People REALLY hate cod and people are finally starting to say enough is enough that they are actually good games.

      • Cod4ever

        This what I say’d once. A similar comment like many others!!!

    • Siftblade of Rivia

      The graphics are impressive, the only difference between 900p and 1080p is smoother edges and stuff. Also, BF4 was a launch title, just like Ghosts, so it was reasonable to compare the two graphically. This game is more focused on current gen, it will obviously look better.

      • CoDforever

        But have you ever expected Call of Duty to look THIS good?

        • Siftblade of Rivia

          No, I haven’t. Waiting for the MP reveal though, because usually there is a pretty big difference between MP and SP. It’s still impressive though.

          • TheMostManlyMan

            That is very true, if you look at Black Ops 1 the campaign looked just as good as any of the other CoD’s campaigns but the MP and zombies were a bit lacking in the graphics area (which was totally made up for by the insanely awesome MP).

          • kyr95

            Well if the same happens in Advanced Warfare, then i dont have a problem. The gameplay is more important than graphics in MP.

          • TheMostManlyMan

            Exactly! And gameplay is the one thing that the last few CoDs have been lacking in, so that’s why I feel that this bandwagon…I mean hype train is so stupid, because all we’ve see so far are good character animations, general graphics and some things that Titanfall had that everyone thought was so revolutionary!

          • kyr95

            Well, you never know though right? This Cod might as well be one of the best. Personally i have total faith in Sledgehammer Games. We’ll just have to wait and see 😉

          • TheMostManlyMan

            Agreed, as much as I hated MW3 it was their first Call of Duty and it wasn’t exactly ideal circumstances. They did create DeadSpace (which I haven’t played but it is a highly praised franchise) and Activision told them “you know what makes a game great, make it your way” more or less and that’s what West and Zampella were always asking for, no 2 foot leash so I think that this game will make or break Call of Duty. If it flops like Ghosties then it may as well be the end, if not then Treyarch will have to step it up in order to ensure it’s survival.

          • Grenada!

            We all say that “this CoD might be the best yet” but honestly we have to wait until we get our hand on the game and play it for a good while until we can say anything like that again after the last few games.

          • kyr95

            Thats what im saying. We’ll wait and see 🙂

          • MIKKEtheMIDGET

            But it’s good that people don’t immediately say that it will be horrible. We want to give SH a chance

      • Mr Doge

        The graphics will be a lot better because of the 3 Year Cycle. I’m guessing Treyarch’s game will be amazing graphically next year.

      • Cod4ever

        I know right!

    • Batman

      Frostbite is 40% lightning effects, while CoD is truly good graphics

      • kyr95

        Frostbite is J.J.Abrams production 😛

      • K

        It doesn’t reallllly work like that.
        The next big step in improving graphics is in lightning (and particle effects). Just look at any demo for the new Unreal, check out the lighting, shadows and reflections.
        CoD does have better textures, but they’re a lot easier to create when you don’t have a complicated lighting system behind them, and they don’t look as good as a result.

        I wouldn’t worry though. Who plays CoD for the shinies? I don’t. CoD is great for other reasons, and the new trailer still looked cracking anyway.
        Plus, with three years of dev time behind this, I’m sure extra effects will be added and will look good.

      • BF in a nutshell

      • Cod4ever

        Agreed!!!!!

    • Silentnova

      Yeah. Looks like a little better version of BF3, because the face models were good.

    • TheMostManlyMan

      Where are we? We’re just sitting here, waiting for their servers to stop giving us the black screen of death *sobs*

      • fires

        is that real on ghosts?

        • TheMostManlyMan

          I was referring to Battlefield.

    • | Coop X

      Cant wait for this game on my ps4 running 1080p! And damn those 900p graphics were amazing too… just wish both systems got dlc at the same time

    • kyr95

      For the first time cod seems to going into a new and good direction, but the complains havent stopped. Heres a list:
      1)Crysis copy ( apart from the exoskeleton, i dont see how it looks like Crysis, theres not even aliens)
      2)Halo copy ( so every game set in the future is copying Halo? people are mostly saying it copied it, cause of the hoverbikes, but thats only for a mission in the game, i dont see how it affects the whole game)
      3)Titanfall copy ( what i said in my previous comment)
      4)Same graphics (Are they blind? Graphics have drastically improved over ghosts and they look pretty amazing, maybe not as good as other games but still they look truly next-gen)
      5)Why is cod released every year? ( are they forgetting that there are 3 studios developing these games which takes more than 2-3 years and not 1? )
      As for the people, that say they dont like this cod , cause of the future setting, i respect their opinion, but those who keep saying “same shit, different name” seem to notice that on cod alone( e.g. i dont see how bf4 is different to bf3, despite graphical improvement and i speak as a both cod and bf fan)
      Anyways, i hope this Cod does well, which i have a strong feeling it will, i have faith in SGH. Lets wait for the MP also and see 😉

    • TheShadowReaper

      thats because the Frostbite Engine has been built upon the previous gen tech. so of course they are worse than this, AW is running on an engine made on the next gen consoles. but when i was telling everyone that the BF games arent build on PC but on consoles instead and they were lying to us i was getting hated upon. if Frostbite was build on PC instead of the gen7 consoles it would have graphics like those but yeah…i was out of my mind it seems! ^^

      • kyr95

        And yet still they say cod has awful graphics. Well haters gonna hate. But seriously im getting tired of all the bullshit happening on the cod trailers on youtube. Just look at AW’s trailer. I mean most of them go there just to hate. Its disgraseful :/

    • WelshGamer69

      Imagine The PlayStation 4’s Graphics :O Just Look At The Box Arts And You Can See a Huge Difference No Joke, PlayStation Owns It!

    • exeterman2

      Bf4 on ps4 still looks more detailed than this. However, I do not expect the hyper-realistic bf4 style graphics in cod.

      • fires

        Heres the CZ805(BF4), and SA805(Ghosts) the SA-805 being a renamed CZ805, I tried to find a pure picture of the weapon from BF4 to no luck, decide yourself which looks better, i think ghosts looks better in my opinion.

        • exeterman2

          That photo is with low res textures in bf4, once the texture actually loads in it looks better

    • fires

      Battlefields graphics arent really all that anyways, since most of the maps are less detailed due to size, and most guns are left more flat and boxier than cod variants because of the amount of guns. its like quality vs quantity. but in the big picture, battlefield looks pretty gorgeous if i do say so myself.

    • Mr Doge

      Haha so true they always made fun of us but if this game’s graphics turns out to be better than BF4 I’m going to laugh. They will probably start making up bad excuses like “BF4 was made 1 year before this game” and so on. Also I expect the CoD games to start getting better graphics probably just as good or even better than BF because of the 3 Year Dev time and considering a BF game comes out every 2 years you can see the difference there. It’s gonna be REAL interesting next year between Treyarch and DICE but knowing how greedy EA is they will probably rush BF again to compete with CoD.

    • Wish Chaos

      Because graphics make a good game… smh.

    • SPAWNST4R

      Cutscene means nothing, look at few frames of actual FPS screens and it just looks like any other CoD, these press released “screenshots” and cut scenes are not to be trusted. Dont fall for the hype, wait and see what actual real gameplay footage looks like, which more than likely will just be a tweaked last gen engine like Ghosts..

    • Cod4ever

      Well they probably got scared of these graphics. Nearly everyone agrees that cod advanced warfare has better graphics and that bf4 has just lighting. Bf4 has bad textures and the Netcode is so bad. Cod on xbox one is 900p while bf4 on xbox one is 720p…… Bf4 on ps4 is 900p like cod advanced warfare is on xbox one!n !!

  • Byuguy

    NOBODY will care about resolution when the game comes out. Do you see anybody crying that Ghosts’ on Black Ops 2’s resolutions are too low on current or last gen? No.

    • Ryumoau

      i see what you are saying. the actual game performance is whats most important. But tohse of us with next gen consoles would like to feel better knowing the game is taking advantage of the hardware visuals wise.

    • Ben

      Agreed.

  • Ryumoau

    The game looked amazing at just 900p. Can’t wait to see the 1080p ps4 version footage later this year. 🙂

    • Lol

      You’ll probably see it in a month…im assuming your used to that by now?

      • Chris Mason

        I don’t know who you are, and I don’t mean to poke fun at PlayStation owners, but that genuinely made me laugh my ass off.

      • Mr Doge

        Haha

    • 111AlaN111

      I guess you’ll see the same trailer once again, so better not to wait.

  • Just for your information guys, on consoles, Black Ops 2 was 880 x 720.

  • Buy I

    Oh cool.

  • Hybrid

    Lol, why is there a war going on about graphics lol?

  • Gi guru

    3 words. Game better work.

  • HenryDF

    It’s going to be 1080p on Xbox One by release, without a doubt. And this comes from a PS4 owner.

    • Siftblade of Rivia

      Not if they’d have to sacrifice 60FPS for it. If it is 1080p, all the better for everyone. But we’ll see.

  • Jack Lame

    Uh my gud this game sukz it is the same as last yr, #bf4.

    • 111AlaN111

      Don’t know if this comment was made on purpose or if it was a fanboy comment

      • kyr95

        I think its supposed to be sarcastic

      • Jack Lame

        Bru cod isnt even next gen, pc is master race, like battfuld and stuff.

        • 111AlaN111

          PC isn’t master race! Search on google: “Xbox better sex” and there will appear the fundaments that state Xbox gamers are the MASTER RACE!!!

  • idc219

    I have both systems and use x1 more because I watch tv as well as game on it. I don’t know why people are surprised how good graphics are on x1. It is a powerful machine all the debate about resolution is about marketing and makes good headlines. The ps4 was easier to develop for this first year because they went with an easy architecture that devs were familiar with. The esram caused bottleneck on x1 cuz a lot of devs didn’t know how to use it. Now that dev kits have been improved you see more games are being developed at higher resolution on x1. I for one don’t understand the hate. We should want both systems to do well. You buy consoles for exclusives not graphics. Graphic minded people should buy a PC. These new consoles will have great graphics but x1 will probably have better exclusives because Microsoft has the money to pay for them. That is why Sony is pushing for all this indie development they simply don’t have the cash like ms. Most people on here arguing about consoles must be kids, cuz as an adult an gamer, I see gamers winning this gen with two great consoles on the market

    • Jack Lame

      Xbox One or PS4?

    • Mitch

      ”but x1 will probably have better exclusives because Microsoft has the money to pay for them.” MS also had that money last-gen, but most people prefered PS3 exclusives over X360 exclusives.
      Have you also seen the amount of studios Sony owns? Fucking insane!

      • idc219

        I know they just recently got rid of three of them in uk. But my comment is not a console war comment. X1 got a lot of bad press so they will throw money at exclusives and they had 20 billion in revune this year when Sony posted 1.2 billion loss. I am stating that money will play factor this gen

        • Mitch

          ”I know they just recently got rid of three of them in uk”
          They laid of people, not one whole studio.
          And if MS will push their profits into the Xbox division is a huge question mark since it’s one of their worst divisions.

      • Ben

        Microsoft has an contract with Remedy Games, which is enough for me. 😛

        I’m sure they will buy more studios with talented people.

      • Killer!

        That amount is slowly decreasing though and Sony is sacking a lot of people in their 1st Party studios which is never good.

        • Mitch

          I know about one team within SSM which got kicked out, which according to the rumors was great. 3 years, $100million, game was supposed to be out and was nowhere finished.

    • Kenith

      It isn’t like ps4 div kits wont improve psshhh no its just gonna stay excactly the same -__-
      as much as the xbox will improve so will the ps4.

  • Daniel M

    I think the only reason why resolution is the big thing in this console war is because the consoles are pretty much the same and they have to nit pick the smallest of things just to make news and headlines for viewer bait.

  • Donny

    To the mods from charlieintel, by advanced warfare’s confirmed list it says that the time set is 2025, but it is 2054 right?

    • Mitch

      yes, it’s 2054

    • Ed

      2025 was black ops 2’s timeline, i believe.

  • Grenada!

    Graphics are on par with Battlefield’s or just slightly under which is a huge step for CoD imo since Ghosts looks like crap.

  • AcePhoenix007

    900p is what my monitor’s resolution is at lol (1600×900)

  • jooker-jr
  • PCmasterraceFTW

    I’ll be running this at 4K on PC. 900p is sooooo 2004.

  • cesc-2007

    Ha…. 900p for xbox… 1080p for PS4….
    Great nob xbox.

  • Jack Meoff

    You have to love all the people saying omg this looks like the best COD every it has the best graphics and the best part about it is everybody said the same thing about ghosts and when the new cod comes out i cant wait to see all the same people complaining about how they die to fast how the game just sucks

  • Jack Meoff

    And it is so funny how money rules everything Activision has this new
    cod coming out which the graphics are going to be good and the game was
    made to work and play really well on the PS4 and Xbox1 but they chose to stay with xbox which the game is only running at 900p so the game is not even running at its best

    • Jack Meoff

      Oh i forgot Xbox will get a UPDATE when the game comes out to help it run and look better how bout that you pay 500 bucks and then after the games come out you got to run updates before you even play it to make it run and look better

  • Celest1ne

    I’m more surprised there aren’t PS4 people shouting up and down how their console is better in the comments.

  • Adam

    Actually it’s 720p because YouTube secretly compresses every video to 720p…even the “1080p” ones.

  • Минас Гадалла

    meanwhile on xbox one
    900p

  • Dani

    The cod ghosts graphics were very bad in xbox one I hope this time it will better