Sledgehammer Games, in the newest issue of OXM, spoke on the topic about how the team is showing off Advanced Warfare thus far. Michael Condrey says that everything we’ve seen is actually in hardware, Xbox One gameplay; not high rendered PC footage.

“We’ve always had a commitment to delivering at target spec,” Condrey told me in an interview you’ll read inΒ the latest issue of OXM, which is on sale now in the UK. “We’re not a studio that’s just going to go out and show off some flash in the pan, high-end PC demo that we’re never going to be able to put on a console.”

Condrey also stated that Sledgehammer Games has been working throughout the three years closely with Microsoft on how Xbox One will turn on, as development for Advanced Warfare began before next-gen consoles were given out to developers.

“We worked very closely with Microsoft throughout the whole three years to understand where they were going and stay right in parallel. As [co-founder Glen Schofield] said, nothing’s effortless, but Microsoft was a great partner to Call of Duty.”

One of the reasons the graphics, and basically all aspects of the game’s engine has been able to reach this new level is because SHGames has been working on the next-gen (PS4/Xbox One) & PC versions only. As previously stated, another studio is working on the Xbox Β 360 and PS3 versions of the game.

“We really have to thank Activision, not just for the extra year, but for the singular focus,” observed Condrey. “Three years to get to next gen. The current gen game – and there’s more news to come about that – never got in the way of our ambitions, it never stopped us from being super-creative about taking full advantage of the next-gen hardware.

“It decoupled us from worrying about having to do a split-platform year, like titles had to last year. So that was really refreshing, and gave us some freedom to really go after this one.”

As we reported earlier today, Advanced Warfare is currently reported to be running at 900p, but the frame rate seems to be an issue as of now.

SOURCE:Β OXM

SHARE
  • jordanxbrookes

    Well it looks absolutely beautiful on Xbox One. And it will look even better on PC, and slightly better on PS4. I say for anyone who has these platforms, you’re going to have an awesome time with this game.

    • Guywithbrains

      Count me in, bro!

      • jordanxbrookes

        πŸ˜€

  • fires

    i wonder if the current gen will look anywhere near the next gen, since i wont be bothered to pick one up until ps3/360 is not supported. Ill be busy playing the new smash bros until then πŸ™‚

    • RockerxxRicardo .

      The only thing is the textures will be downgraded a lot. Also last gen is being made by another team not Sledgehammer.

    • Siftblade of Rivia

      It’ll probably look pretty bad on PS3/360. Look at Ghosts on current gen vs. old gen, and that game doesn’t look nearly as good as AW.

      • jordanxbrookes

        Exactly, when I went back from XB1 Ghosts to 360 Ghosts, I literally laughed at how downgraded the graphics are, and like you said, the graphics of AW are better than next-gen Ghosts.

        • Siftblade of Rivia

          Especially Extinction. The PS3 textures on Extinction are terrible, especially on the drill or other players.

          • jordanxbrookes

            Yeah.

        • TheShadowReaper

          well, Ghosts was a game that wasnt in development for the next gen in the first place. in a 2 year development cycle imagine someone coming after the first year from ATVI and telling you “here, make your game work on this”. i cant imagine the horror.

  • bsktballmsu1

    I think aw is going to be like titanfall where it will be far better on xbox one and on the 360 it will have some problems

    • Guywithbrains

      This is the way to get people buy next gen consoles. πŸ˜‰

  • Ed

    seeing how the frame rates aren’t very smooth, yet, in those demos, i’d have been even more worried if it was running like that on a pc. i’m hoping the overall specs aren’t held back by a certain consoles limitations.

  • Guywithbrains

    If that was on Xbox One, that was really impressive. Also this is only in alpha stage, so in release it might be even better. SHGames really did great job already in visual part and seems like it did like that too in story part. Now just if we could have more information about multiplayer… if we get exoskeleton perk system, fast pacing and colorful small to medium maps, I’m already sold!

  • cookie
    • Xecho

      Oh boy

      • RockerxxRicardo .

        Advanced Warfare isn’t even out yet…this is the same thing as the COD zombies edition game. FAKE!

    • kyr95

      I want it to be real but…

    • jordanxbrookes

      The box art backdrop makes no sense. It’s just clouds at night. Then again it might not actually be the official backdrop, just a placeholder. But interesting anyway, but like they said, take it with a grain of salt.

      • HEY BNB GET ON SKYPE I GOT SOME BAD NEWS FOR YOU!!

        • jordanxbrookes

          lol

    • Siftblade of Rivia

      I would love this if it meant bringing back gore to COD. I want to shoot people’s arms and legs off, damnit!

      • kyr95

        Its most certainly fake, but the only thing that makes me think theres 1 % possibility for it to be real, is the very detailed logo πŸ˜›

        • Siftblade of Rivia

          Oh yeah, I know it’s fake. Just saying that the only reason I would want WAW2 to happen is for the return of gore.

  • Siftblade of Rivia

    Good, graphics looked pretty amazing for a COD game either way. πŸ˜›

    • kyr95

      And remember its still being polished. Imagine the final version in 4 months :O

      • Guest

        As good as it looks to me on a youtube video just imagine playing it on your own tv.

        • kyr95

          Indeed. The experience is totally different and much more immersive.

      • NuttyTheSquirrel

        It will look the same. Graphics NEVER GO BETTER in just half a month. + They don’t have the budget to waste on improved graphics now.

        • LovekillerX

          Sledgehammer Games know what they are doing and this is their first own Call of Duty. They have many monts to make it look a little bit better or even more better. But right now those graphics are stunning so I don’t care if they keep those graphics. Right now they have done a huge step from Ghosts and I can’t wait to see the actual game when I get my hands on it.

          Hopefully they can fix the framerate problem though. I don’t really think that they would give us “unfinished game” with dropping framerate. Sledgehammer Games have proved that they really care about CoD community.

        • kyr95

          Ummm what? You do realise that theyve been polishing the game since May, right? ( not half a month- they have another 4 months)

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            You know what polishing is/means right?

        • jordanxbrookes

          Why do you always seem to put a downer whenever a new Advanced Warfare post is made? And don’t say you don’t because it’s not just on this website.

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            What?
            And I can guarantee you that it WILL look the same. Why would they even change it?

            EDIT: And how is that even a “downer”? 99% of games don’t improve their graphics when the game’s 5 months away from launch. And I actually said really good things about this game aswell, but your brain only seems to remember the bad things huh…

        • RdJokr

          I don’t know about that. Black Ops II looked a lot better in the final game compared to the E3 demo. But that may be because of the crappy livestreaming.
          And PC version WILL look better than the X1 version, I guarantee it.

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            Ye, I’m sure of that. But right now I just want a GOOD CoD (MW/MW2 good) and I want it to be a good PC Port.

    • TheShadowReaper

      and i cant wait to run this one on my PC. if it looks that good on an XB1, imagine PS4 and PC. (hopefully the PS4 and PC versions not being just a hard port with no love put at them)

      • kyr95

        SHG has been working only on them and xbox one for 3 years, i think there will be plenty of love πŸ˜‰

        • TheShadowReaper

          i guess so. lets see what the August MP trailer has to say first though. πŸ™‚

          • kyr95

            I want a second single player trailer too!!!! πŸ˜€

          • LovekillerX

            I think that we are getting a new single player trailer sooner than we think. But I might be wrong.

          • thebulky1cometh

            Do we know approximately when in August we’ll get the MP trailer?

          • Damienjohnnn

            Mid to late august.

          • TheShadowReaper

            i’d wager around 10th – 20th of August. in this 10 day time period. but dont take my word for it.

          • Wiz

            Gamescom

        • NuttyTheSquirrel

          Well, the original Dead Space is one of the worst ports I’ve ever played on PC sooo…

          • TheShadowReaper

            what? its one of the best PC ports you have ever played. i could play both Dead Space and Dead Space 2 maxed out 1080p on an Nvidia 430 GT! and that’s a low end card. you’re a moron. simply put, a moron.

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            Nice attack stance, you do that often.

            I don’t give a flying fuck about maxed settings if I can’t even aim properly. Dead Space 1 was a bad port, and a port can be from optimization to controls, so no, I don’t think I’m the moron here.

          • TheShadowReaper

            you being a bad player in a game isnt a reason for a game to be considered a bad port. that means you dont have skills. not that the game is poorly optimized. there is also a difference between controls and badly optimized controls. its obvious that you can tell which one is which. as i said earlier, simply put, a moron.

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            You’re an idiot. When the most important thing DOES NOT WORK, it is not a good port. A good port is not about optimization. IT’S ABOUT EVERYTHING. From GUI to fucking graphics. You’re always rambling about shit you don’t understand…

            And I don’t know what that “bad player” bullshit means. The game’s mouse controls are crappy, the frame-rate was locked.

            EDIT: Oh look what I found… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYKIubOQ-rU Skip to minute 6:34…

          • TheShadowReaper

            the most important thing you’re talking about works fine for me so…you’re pulling stuff out of your ass as usual.

            also, your friend in the video doesnt specify why its a bad port. well…he cant. the port was pretty solid. didnt knew about the “locked fps” but i’ll look into into. but aside from that, it still is one of the best ports i’ve ever seen for PC. works on a 10 year old machine if you need it. not many games can do that.

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            Well, it runs good, but I can’t play the game without a controller… Dead Space 2 and 3 were solid ports, I wouldn’t say good ports, but they were certainly better than the original.
            Also the game design is very claustrophobic, which helps A TON with frame-rate issues. I don’t know if you ever noticed that, in some games, you can talk to an open door and see that that next room has not been loaded yet, and it just loads in when you walk through that door. They probably used that A LOT. The game is really simple in terms of pretty much everything performance-wise. There isn’t many AI processing since there aren’t many AI’s at a time, there aren’t many visual effects, there aren’t many particles, there aren’t many light sources, etc… It is an amazing game nonetheless.

          • TheShadowReaper

            i have completed Dead Space like what…5 times using keyboard and mouse. i believe its one of YOUR disabilities not being able to play it without a controller. sry man but i havent heard anyone else talking about this controller stuff so i cant take you seriously about it.

            the game was claustrophobic.yeah, thats Dead Space, the claustrophobic environments is what makes Dead Space. i dont understand where you want to go with that.

            framerate wise i havent checked but i will and i find a limiter i’m gonna get mad. still one of the best games i’ve ever played though.

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            I play with a controller because I can’t play with my mouse, due to the mouse aim problems…

            Where I was going with the environments is that I was explaining why the game runs so well.

            I don’t know if it still has locked frame-rates, but I know it had (the frame-rate wasn’t locked below 60fps though).

            And yes, it is a remarkable franchise. And I loved Dead Space 3 aswell. I don’t understand why people complain about that game. Yes, the environments aren’t as claustrophobic and there’s way more shooting involved, but it still scared the shit out of me when it wanted to.
            I already knew from the start (original Dead Space) that, if this was going to turn out as a franchise, some version of the game WOULD HAVE TO HAVE humans shooting each other… The game had to “innovate” in some way…

            But my favorite game from the franchise is, without a doubt, the first one. It’s scarier than the other ones. And MAN, when you return to the Ishimura on the 2nd installment. UUUUUUUUH BOY!

          • TheShadowReaper

            i’ll have to agree, the first game is certainly the best. but i dont want to sound unfair to the second game, its a diamond as well. as for the third game…well, fuck EA. that’s all i have to say. and yeah, the return to Ishimura on the second game is indeed the best part of the entire franchise for me.

            its not “innovation” as much as it is evolution. too bad the evolution route they chose was shit. shooting humans? that’s stupid. the environments arent even scary anymore. its just a shoot them up with the Dead Space name slapped on it.

      • Brady the Defiled (sillibk)

        Call of Duty hasn’t been good on PC since World at War.

        • TheShadowReaper

          no, thats not correct. BO had some issues but were fixed after some updates. MW3 was great, BO2 was great. i mean you can talk about Ghosts but that’s the only PC port that was so bad its nearly unplayable on some systems. no COD was ever like that. not even close.

          • Brady the Defiled (sillibk)

            In terms of popularity, I disagree. All games since BO1 had no dedicated servers. MW3 had dedicated servers, but they weren’t ranked. There was also no mod support, so playing the games on PC were pretty much pointless. CoD is now a console game, and there’s no denying that.

          • TheShadowReaper

            we were talking about performance. not the overall port. as for no (ranked) dedis and no mod support yeah, COD has been a console game, i completely agree. but i believe its not up to the devs, its up to ATVI.

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            It’s up to Activision, but it’s not up to Activision to tell them whether or not the PC gets a good version. Look at Black Ops 2, it is the best PC version of CoD. (CoD 4 and World at War aside)

          • TheShadowReaper

            yeah the PC port is up to the devs performance wise. as for the features like dedi severs that’s ATVI’s call unfortunately.

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            Yup, servers cost money.
            But I think that talk “We’re gonna have Dedi servers” was something that they had with Microsoft, because Microsoft is or was providing dedi servers for Publishers/developers, back when XBONE (or should I say Xbox720p) was launched.

          • TheShadowReaper

            what? come on Nutty. you’re giving MS too much credit. MS providing server for their 3rd party games? nope, not in a million years. that’s ATVI. thank them! πŸ™‚

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            No, if they have an agreement, MS provides them servers. Titanfall is one of those games. I think it’s called Microsoft Cloud Vision or something.

          • TheShadowReaper

            Titanfall is a 1st party game on Xbox. COD is not. MS does not provide any kind of servers for their 3rd party software. else they would be losing money. they have made an agreement with ATVI but its for the timed exclusive, not for servers.

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            That I don’t know.

          • TheShadowReaper

            now you do. πŸ™‚

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            CoD has been a console game since MW2.

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            MW3 was great? And I’m the moron…

            P.S: Black Ops wasn’t great either, that game ran like shit.

            BO2 was pretty good thought.

          • TheShadowReaper

            i dont remember any problems with MW3. it run fine. BO was a rough ride which was fixed rather quickly. yet people still complain for that one fucking month it run like shit. completely forgot about all the rest months when it was running just fine.

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            No FOV slider, mouse problems that still occur, stutter…

          • TheShadowReaper

            didnt had mouse problems myself, and stutter was wiped off after the first patch. but yes, FOV slider is still missing.

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            I have to go to my Task Manager and change its priorities to “normal”, if I want to play the game without any random acceleration. And I still don’t know why there isn’t an “RAW Input” option in CoD. (I think some games had it, gotta boot some up and see.)

          • TheShadowReaper

            what are you running your games at? a toaster? dont want to insult your precious tool (we all do love our PCs after all) but wth man. normal priority on task manager? that’s like a last resort for me…

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            I have to change it to fix the mouse. If you look it up, many people have this problem.

            http://i.imgur.com/R3ZM2O1.png

          • TheShadowReaper

            well, apparently not me. i’m blessed with one of the best systems. and not because its super strong or whatever. you have a 780ti there, way stronger than my 570 OCed. its just that every component matches with each other. rarely had any problems except the obvious ones like BF3 launch. but that mouse problem, first time i see that.

  • Ryumoau

    i really can’t wait to see PS4 footage of the game.

    • Freeze

      Just got mine and ghosts looks amazing.

      • exeterman2

        Ghosts does NOT look amazing. It is by far the worst looking game on next gen.

        • Freeze

          Well I understand that the textures are lacking if you get to close, but the 1080p is noticeably better than the XB1. I have never played on a high end PC, and all next gen games I have (apart from PS4 ghosts) are 720p (Dead rising 3 + titanfall).

          • exeterman2

            I have a ps4 and have had 7 actual games on it. Ghosts is THE worst graphically and gameplay wise.

          • Freeze

            What other games? I have KZ:SH and Ghosts for ps4.

          • exeterman2

            Bf4, Nfs, Fifa, KZ, Watch dogs, AC:IV

          • Freeze

            Yes those are great looking games, for me the really hd pixely look is nice looking so I personally like ghosts graphics. Yes those all look amazing though.

          • TheShadowReaper

            its actually a really beautiful game on the PC. (if you can get it to run. this thing is so shitty ported that it makes Crysis and Metro series look like stupid when it comes to heavy load on the GPU)

  • LovekillerX

    Finally game developers show us footage from a console. This far games have been shown from high end PC but luckily this E3 demo was shown from console. Just wondering what PS4 version looks like if this is from Xbox One.

    People can’t now say that these graphics haven’t “moved forward” from last Call of Duty.

    • NuttyTheSquirrel

      What are you talking about? There are plenty of games that show console footage.

      • LovekillerX

        Yeah but I’m talking about those who are being caught from lying. There are some cases where people have stated that “this game is captured straight from console” but after all it is high end PC. So I didn’t mean that all games have been captured from PC.

        • NuttyTheSquirrel

          Yes, but look at Ubisoft for example, 90% of their games/demos are/were from Playstation 3/4. There’s the exeption of Siege, which was actually on a PC, but they openly said that.

          • LovekillerX

            Yes but those PS3/4 were developer kits which makes it look better. Like in Watch Dogs they used a developer kit because they wanted to show us better looking footage so people would buy it. After all it was revealed that there was downgrade in graphics and people became angry.

            I don’t know if you have read about the guy who found some cool information from the codes and made people think that was the downgrading done on purpose.

            But as I said to other guy already I’ll say the same to you. I don’t want to go to offtopic so if you’re interested more you could check the Internet.

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            No, they clearly showned us console footage. In 2012 it was PC footage, since the cureent-gen wasn’t even announced yet. And they didn’t really downgrade the graphics, they just removed some effects.

          • LovekillerX

            It was revealed that it was developer kit in the article which can be found below. And there was a downgrade you can see it by your own eyes. You can check out how they confirmed the dev kit footage used for example in “Welcome to Chicago” trailer from Watch Dogs.

            Here: http://www.gamespot.com/articles/latest-watch-dogs-trailer-used-ps4-dev-kit-footage/1100-6418647/

            EDIT: Remember that I’m not saying it was PC footage. I know that it was the console but developer’s version from it to look better.

          • DanDustEmOff

            Let’s not gloss over what Ubisoft did. They took a conscious decision to hold back the PC version, by removing effects, dialing back fidelity and removing performance improvements.

            All so the PC version doesn’t make the consoles look like the PoS that they are. Installing the worse mod makes the game look a million times more stunning and has no impact on performance.

            Ubi even had the bare faced cheek to say that the settings were held back because of performance impact even though there isn’t one. Even worse is the fact that they plan on doing the same for Far Cry 4 and the Division, just to apease the console makers.

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            Who said they plan on doing the same?
            Let’s just wait and see… I mean.. It’s their game after all…

          • DanDustEmOff

            http://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonevangelho/2014/06/17/with-this-far-cry-4-news-ubisoft-seems-determined-to-alienate-their-pc-fanbase/

            http://www.gamrreview.com/news/91692/rumour-the-divisions-graphics-downgraded-for-console-parity

            Ubisoft have gone on record and stated Far Cry4 will look as good on the PS4 and the PC. A Massive employee has also said that the PC version of the Division is getting the Watchdogs treatment, because of performance and platform politics. Sony are obviously paying Ubisoft to tone down PC versions of their games so that they don’t show their console up.

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            Well, If you say so ;)… But I never heard of anything like that.

          • DanDustEmOff

            I’ve edited in some links above : ) Don’t just take my word for it. Ubisoft are making some really dodgy decisions atm. I won’t be buying a single Ubi title till they sort their shit out.

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            And that’s why I hate consoles… (Not their games though, PS has the best exclusives I’ve ever played, PC Exclusives included)

          • TheShadowReaper

            well, i’m too tired to explain right now but Watch_Dogs is a really long story of a huge Ubisoft fuck up and for that you should hate them. after all, they lied to all of us, not just PC gamers.

    • MichiganerE

      “Just wondering what PS4 version looks like if this is from Xbox One.” It’ll look the same on PS4, just like the last generation. Why do people always say, “Imagine what it’ll look like on PS4.”?

      • LovekillerX

        It has been proved that PS4 is slightly or even a little bit more better because of slightly better components. Or why do you think that many games is 1080p on PS4 but on Xbox One 720-900p?

        You can check from the Internet if you’re interested more. Don’t want to go to offtopic.

        • MichiganerE

          That doesn’t matter, there’s barely a difference in what multiplatform games look like on both the Xbox One and PS4.

          • Guywithbrains

            Multiplatform games look basicly slightly different. But you’re right about that these multiplatform games look almost the same, because if I’m not totally wrong, these games are made with the weaker console’s conditions, right?

          • MichiganerE

            I guess. But remember this, during the 7th gen of consoles, all games looked identical on the Xbox 360 and PS3.

          • Guywithbrains

            That’s right. I think that this gen is not going to be any different.

          • K

            The PS4 is a reasonable (but not massive) amount more powerful than the Xbox One.
            The biggest difference you will likely see though is either in resolution, such as with Battlefield and Ghosts, or with frame rate, like in Tomb Raider. The PS4 version of Ground Zeroes also uses more advanced technology to draw the sky than the other versions. I’m sure we can all agree though that none of these change the games drastically.

            People will play what they want anyway. I don’t see why anyone should give a crap on what logo somebody has on their computer game box. Kids get too aggressive about shit like that. Whether you’re on Xbox or PS4, AW is looking great.

          • Guywithbrains

            Well I am on Playstation 4 and going to play AW on that one. πŸ˜‰

          • MichiganerE

            Yep.

        • That’s because XB1 is a little harder to develop on. Both consoles have their ups and downs hardware wise. PS4 has a slightly better graphics card while XB1 has a slightly better CPU.

        • DanDustEmOff

          That’s more than likely a software issue not a hardware issue. The X1 desperately needs a low level api, which is what DX12 will deliver. The PS4 already has a low level api which I suspect is why the PS4 has higher resolutions.

  • Super_Deluxe

    Then we can expect alot better graphics on the PC if that was Xbox One footage.

  • FeboooH

    Fuck Xbox
    *grabs popcorn*

    • Siftblade of Rivia

      nice b8 m8

    • Xecho

      i r8 8/8

  • Kap

    Hate to say it but its going to look better on ps4 unless they purposely dumbed down the version just to save the under performing xboxone and thats not an opinion thats a fact.

    • Guywithbrains

      You are just telling the truth. I don’t see anything bad about that.

    • Trizay

      While you are right that it will look better. It won’t look much better. More than likely the only way you’ll be able to tell the difference is if you have the two of them right next to each other and labeled.

    • LovekillerX

      SGH have said that some of the technology in Advanced Warfare won’t be possible on PS3/Xbox360. I might remember wrong but I remember that I read yesterday from somewhere about this. Let me know if this is false information.

  • jordanxbrookes

    What do you guys think? Real or Fake?

    • Guest

      Does it matter

      • jordanxbrookes

        Not really since we have AW to look forward to.

    • Epicsand

      The box art is fake, but Treyarch could be making a WW2 game. If Treyarch was making a WW2 game, it would not have to be a spin-off of WaW, and could be the next entry in the main series.

    • JordanxbrookesIsaVIRGING

      you need a girlfriend ASAP!!

      • Freeze

        Why is your comment necessary, or relevant. I am assuming a troll like you will stay a virgin, trolls are friggen ugly.

      • jordanxbrookes

        Oh look a troll, I think I’m gonna cry now weh weh, and you spelt virgin wrong you virgin.

      • Abraham
      • NuttyTheSquirrel

        “VIRGING”

    • Batman

      Completely fake
      BO1 is a WaW sequel

      • LOL

        BO1 is not a sequel to world at war , its more like a game In the same universe as world at war.

      • NuttyTheSquirrel

        Yes/No. That’s why it is called Black Ops and not World at War II.
        EDIT: Black Ops is set in the Cold War.

        In terms of Universe, yes, it is a sequel. But since it was AFTER World War II, it isn’t called Wolrd at War.

        • TheShadowReaper

          its a sequel to WaW, its not decided by the name. it just happens that Treyarch uses bigger time skips than IW does in their games. that’s roughly 20 years after all.

          • NuttyTheSquirrel

            As I said… Yes/No…
            It isn’t a sequel, but it is…

            It’s not a sequel because it doesn’t have anything to do with World at War, other than it happens in the same uniserve.
            If World at War (story) didn’t happen, Black Ops could still happen. That’s why it isn’t really a sequel. A sequel usually follow the older’s project events (WaW) and Black Ops doesn’t really follow WaW’s events… The only thing that proves us that WaW and Black Ops happen in the same Universe is when Resnov talks about what he did in World at War (last mission), other than that, the game doesn’t mention anything from World at War.

            I don’t see it as a sequel. But this has to be fake, since World at War’s storyline ended in World at War… And there’s not really much to tell there, neither is there a timeline for that story (assuming it will be a WW2 game).

    • Kill Denied

      Real

    • xRomeo

      Fake. The website that leaked the nonsense didn’t even cap or link in the Amazon site. Probably just another website farming for views preying on weak-minded fanboys who gulp up garbage.

  • Derrick Wingler

    Isn’t that what Ubi said about Watch_Dogs?

    • TheShadowReaper

      Watch_Dogs was running on a dev kit on a ultra high end PC that even NASA guys will blink when purchasing. AW was running on an XBoxOne. not the dev kit, an actual XBoxOne.

  • Connor Williams

    Dammmnnn… PS4 and PC is going to look great!

  • idc219

    I hope they fix frame rate. The YouTube vid I saw by digital foundry showed the frame rate was horrible. They still have time but looking at the demo they have long way to go

  • ahmedt361

    And this is lie of the year

    • Bigi345

      You have any prove?

  • iKasai

    All game devs say that yet when you actually get the game for yourself it looks nowhere near as good

  • MichiganerE

    Ubisoft said the same thing about Watch Dogs and look at how that turned out.

    • kyr95

      Yeah, because SHG is the same company as Ubisoft -_-
      Dont make assumptions and just wait to see the results man.

      • MichiganerE

        It doesn’t matter if SHG is a different company. Both develop games, and considering IW lied about Dedicated Servers and Quickscoping, I’m not trusting a thing any CoD developer says ever again unless they can prove that they’re truthful.

        • LovekillerX

          Well we all now Ubisoft. But we don’t really know that well Sledgehammer Games. And everyone has their first chance to prove that they can be trusted. This is their first Call of Duty so we should give them the first chance. They have proved that they listen to the community so we as customers are being listened.

          But it is okay if you don’t trust them yet. I really hope that SGH can gain your trust back. We just have to keep our thumbs up and really hope that the final game pleases as many as possible.

          • MichiganerE

            The main reason that I don’t trust SHG is because of the Angry Joe interview with Glen and Micheal. They were constantly avoiding Joe’s questions which is very worrying. Meanwhile, the developers in his all of his other interviews were very honest and weren’t afraid to answer any of his questions.

          • Guywithbrains

            Everyone from game developers to politicians do the same. In this case, they might do that, because they don’t want to tell too much new information before it is right time. Last gen versions for example… I am sure that they doesn’t look great and also there might not be all new features, which next gen has. They must keep up the hype to the end. πŸ˜€

          • kyr95

            I dont want to sound ridiculous, but thats kind of an unfair reason to not trust SHG. Why they were not revealing stuff about the game? Well, mainy because this game is one of the biggest changes in a franchise and they want to keep the surprise until multiplayer ( almost everything Joe was asking was multiplayer related ).

          • MichiganerE

            One of the questions he asked was how long the campaign was going to be, and their answer was, “You’re going to like the campaign.”

        • Devin Wolfe

          IW never lied about quickscoping. They said it was gone in its current form but would not be impossible get your facts straight.

          • MichiganerE
          • Devin Wolfe

            http://www.gamespot.com/articles/call-of-duty-ghosts-tweaks-sniper-rifles-and-alters-quick-scoping/1100-6414194/

            “However in re-envisioning sniper rifles some aspects, such as sway timing, have changed the way sniper rifles function and so traditional ‘quick-scoping’ has been affected. Is it gone completely? Maybe. It certainly won’t be viable in the way it previously was.”

            Care to try again?

          • MichiganerE

            They put up the video first; therefore, they lied.

          • Devin Wolfe

            IW didn’t put the vid up.

          • MichiganerE

            So what? IW and Raven Software both worked on the game. Not only that, but Raven did most of the work for multiplayer.

          • Devin Wolfe

            And that a problem why?

          • MichiganerE

            Because they’re both involved with the game.

  • I’ll believe it when I see it. There’s no way Xbox One can look that good. Remember when Ghosts said it was captured on Xbox One? Yeah.

    • Bigi345

      Really? All the Ghosts demos looks exactly like the xbox one version

  • Guywithbrains

    http://gamingbolt.com/call-of-duty-advanced-warfare-aiming-for-resolutionfps-parity-on-ps4xbox-one-engine-detailed

    Seems like SHGames wants that both consoles have good performance. Although this might mean yet again that in this case, we are getting downgrade. But if that gameplay is great, I’m fine with that.

    • kyr95

      Who knows? They might even achieve 1080p on xbox if theyre able. The least we will get concerning the xbox though will be 900p 60fps, i dont see a problem there.

      • Guywithbrains

        I don’t even see any difference between 900p and 1080p, sometimes it is hard to see difference between 720p and 1080p. I don’t know, but resolution bullsh*t talk is ridicilous. πŸ˜€

        • kyr95

          Yeah i mean come on people, be grateful for what you already have!

          • Guywithbrains

            Nowadays people will never be grateful for anything. We are living in a world, where nothing is enough.

          • kyr95

            True, i mean look at the comments below! They dont even give SHG a chance! ” Ohh the gameplay was xbox everyone developer lies! We’ll get big downgrade ! They lied! Boohoohoo!”
            I mean, wow. There are some people who ive been constantly seeing in this site posting negative and pessimistic comments in every article concerning AW.

  • RdJokr

    “We’re not a studio that’s just going to go out and show off some flash
    in the pan, high-end PC demo that we’re never going to be able to put on
    a console.”
    Gee, that sounds like they’re taking shots at a certain studio with a certain game *coughubisoftmontrealcough* *coughwatchdogscough*

    • Guywithbrains

      I can only hope that Ubisoft didn’t use high end PC to show Assassin’s Creed Unity… that looked great, but so did Watch Dogs in E3 back then. πŸ˜‰

    • exeterman2

      I don’t get why people continue to bash watch dogs. The graphics are still very good and the gameplay is fantastic.

      • RdJokr

        I’m not bashing, I’m actually one of the few people who like Watch_Dogs. But there’s one thing you have to agree on, and it’s that Ubisoft clearly downgraded the game’s graphics (there’s a major difference between the E3 2012 demo and the final retail game), just so it can run smoothly on PS4 while not creating a huge graphical gap between consoles and PC. Also, the fact that the PC version was heavily bugged just shows how much Ubisoft “cares” about PC gamers. The Montreal dev team might care a bit, but the big publisher definitely doesn’t.

        • exeterman2

          I agree with you. My comment was more on how the majority of people view it.

  • GodLikeLeftNut

    these people saying resolution makes no difference have you been living under a rock? 720 has 770.00 pixels 1080 has 2.7 million. easily noticeable any one using a TV or a 24 – 27 inch monitor.

  • ArnieCrockett

    Titanfall 144fps on PC at 1440p

    Advanced Warfare 32fps at 700p on Xbox One.

    Next gen = yeah right!

    • exeterman2

      *Xbone = yeah right!

      • Freeze

        When I play on my PC (not a great one, mind you) there are so many things the said “master race” lacks. Firstly I find it very rare to play with friends, which his sort of depressing and lonely. Most of my friends have consoles, i do too so i play on the console. Also with a PC there is so much dang setup and “know how” to operate them. I can easily build a PC, but many don’t and find it 10x easier and 10x cheaper. Lastly I personally suck at aiming with a mouse, I need my auto aim, except for TF2.

        TL:DR = PC is lonely, complicated, an costly.

      • NuttyTheSquirrel

        Remember how people said the next Xbox would be Xbox 720?

        They were right, the only difference is that it is Xbox720p! xD

  • 111AlaN111

    I’m so happy people thought that it was PC gameplay when it was X1’s.

  • NuttyTheSquirrel

    Remember how people said the next Xbox would be Xbox 720?

    They were right, the only difference is that it is Xbox720p! xD

    *grabs popcorn*