In the newest Advanced Warfare’s DLC pack, Supremacy, the new map Compound features an easter egg: if you enter spectator mode (in private match) and go out of the map, there’s a full re-creation of Modern Warfare 2’s Rust map just outside the playable area of Compound.

It’s not clear as to whether Sledgehammer Games is hinting that Rust could be coming to Advanced Warfare or if this is just an easter egg for fans to discover.

YouTuber PrestigeisKey made a video on this showing the location of this easter egg:

SHARE
  • ShankSquadIII

    Lets hope they do remake, Rust.

    • Too small.

      • derrrrrrrrrrrrr

        Too action packed

    • Drasadex

      Let’s hope they don’t.

  • Matthew

    I had an idea where Rust was going to be a map, but scrapped it and left it where it is. But it could be an easter egg or hint for later.

  • XLKILLA

    Who cares game is washed up trash.

    • You go try and make a Call of Duty title. In my opinion AW is a great game, even though BO2 is better.

      • Matthew

        I just love this thought. It just counters the idea of a game being “trash”. I’d like to see people who think like this team and make a better game with their current knowledge.

      • Thatlazykid

        I don’t really like AW but it was a good game and that it was sledgehammer’s first call of duty to make so i gave them a chance 🙂

  • Juses

    Fak eye thught eye wuz gunna b furst

    • You really should start to learn real Dolan. http://dolantranslator.com/
      You’re close though!

      • Juses

        Noe, am Juses Crust er lurd n saviour. I do wut eye wunt

        • Fair enough!

        • ccrows

          Yet you said in the past that your alias had nothing to do with Jesus Christ. It was just that your first name was Juses, which is why you did the “Juses Crust” thing.

          Seriously, between this and the comment you forgot yesterday, do you even remember half the stuff you say, or do you just say whatever because you’re bored?… *SMH*

          http://a.fod4.com/misc/palinraisetheroof.gif

          • Juses

            Wut?

          • ccrows

            What I wrote does not need any further explanation…

          • Juses

            Yus et dose. Yur rully dum

  • Rav

    Just to let everyone who thinks nobody cares about Advanced Warfare anymore, I would like to say that I still care. Thank you in advance for hating on this comment. Have a good day 🙂

    • Juses

      …k

    • Matthew

      Have I finally found someone else who cares? 😀

      • ccrows

        I care too.

        Probably won’t after BO3 launches, but from now till the launch of BO3, I care… 🙂

      • I care!

      • Daniel

        I care too, I love this game

      • Ak74u

        I care for AW too

      • Pirates

        I do too bro! Fifth prestige going on sixth!

        • tarfeef101

          32nd. Yeah! You’ll get there. Eventually

    • imBATMAN

      OH WOW YOU LOSER! HAHA AW IS DUMM!
      – Every person who complains about the comment section

    • Brad

      I would care but SBMM is there so I kind of don’t…

      • Why don’t you like SBMM? You don’t seem to have any reasoning.

        • derrrrrrrrrrrrr

          Because he misses going 100000-0 and the other team going 1-2000

          • Guywithbrains

            “But… but… AW is so unfair! I can’t go 100000-0 now by killing little kids with no thumbs! How am I going to upload skilled gameplays to my YT channel now?!”

            Joking…. but also true. *runs away*

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            Think about it. There’s SBMM… in a casual franchise. Forcing a challenge on me is flawed design. Condrey having the logic of noobs not being able to do well is BS. Why should the rest suffer? Why can’t I just go into a lobby, and play without focusing too much and with less of a care in the world? That’s what past games were. Now it’s not even that entertaining, let alone adrenaline-inducing, action-based fun. SBMM isn’t the only problem. There are obvious other design flaws that should be tweaked/removed. SBMM is just the worst contender.

          • Smayo

            Just give up, you present them with valid points why AW is a piece of shit game and the only replies you get are the typical “you suck at the game” “you can’t destroy noobs” etc BS replies of these dickriding SHG fanboys, there’s no point in trying to have a decent conversation with those muppets, they’re defending this game to the ridiculous because deep down they know they’re wrong, they just don’t want to admit it…

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            I shut him up quickly. Throw some logic at someone, and they STFU.

          • modernpoika

            So true

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            What’s more fun, winning a balanced game, or losing against tryhards unfairly? It’s not even remotely entertaining, let alone fun. This game was more of a lesson for me. I should have gotten Shadow of Mordor in December than Advanced Chorefare.

          • jordanxxxbrookes

            If you’re playing “tryhards” then you technically are statistically as good as they are which is what SBMM is doing. So you’re saying you have the stats you have from playing some arbitrary honorable way but their stats are from pure tryharding?

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            Which isn’t fun, and why it has to be removed. Why the hell are you excusing it when it breaks the game? When did I say I wanted to play bad players, btw? I don’t earn ad revenue from YouTube. I couldn’t care less about how good or bad I am. I just want to have fun without flawed balancing and matchmaking. Is that so hard to ask? Now I know what sledgehammer will want in their games, so I won’t buy their next one. Problem solved.

          • jordanxxxbrookes

            Yeah, I’m totally sure you’re the guy who doesn’t care how good or bad he does. That’s why you use terms like “fanboy, tryhard and are on CharlieIntel every day of your existence. Yes guys like you don’t care how well they do as long as they have fun(which is dependent on how well you do.) There is no evidence that it is “GAME BREAKING”, wtf. Why can’t you have an opinion without trying to make up millions of others that feel like you? Why can’t you have an opinion without implying that Call of Duty is losing sales(even though it’s still #1). Why can’t someone actually speak to your arguments without defending Activision or being a fanboy? Activision being money hungry idiots and you being a lil bitch scared of competition and honestly believes COD is going to be Jesus once last gen is gone aren’t mutually exclusive. You being so passionately against SBMM on a 7 month old shitty game leads me to believe that you call people N words, kids and tryhards in pre game lobbies.

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            You being such an idiotic troll excusing SBMM makes you a fanboy.

            You’re an idiot. End of. *Cod is a casual game, competition doesn’t belong*. This is fact. Now stop replying with your trash

          • jordanxxxbrookes

            How the fuck is saying competition doesn’t “belong” in COD a fact? Are you even serious anymore? How am I being idiotic when you’re just spewing opinion, and claiming to be open minded yet all you spew is close minded things.

            Again not once do did you see me excuse SBMM. Not once did you see me say I love Activision, COD, defend their shitty DLC system or anything. All I said is you are a bitch who only wants to play noobs and can’t just have an opinion without trying to reach. So real simple…SBMM more cons than pros. Last Gen systems aren’t hurting current gen. YOU ARE A FUCKING PRETENTIOUS BITCH who can’t have an opinion without pretending millions agree with you and those that don’t are “fanboys”…At the end of the day you’ll still buy COD every year and keep refreshing this page like the faggot you are.

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            Says the one being close minded. I’m done with you. All you do is spread ignorance and hate.

          • jordanxxxbrookes

            SBMM is actually meant for casual gamers you dumb fuck. Casual means you may play a couple hours a week. SBMM is meant to keep those players from getting demolished so maybe they’ll play more. Casual doesn’t mean, “easy, fun mode for faggots.” Any COD vet that has played 3+ years and posts on COD related articles aren’t casual anymore. You sound like a bitch that drinks a bottle of wine a night saying she is a social drinker.

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            CoD is a casual game. Get over it. I highly recommend you to look up the definition of casual.

        • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

          It’s illogical to like it and have an entertaining experience.

          • But it shouldn’t make you not play the game.

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            Why not? I don’t like it. It isn’t fun to me, therefore, it makes me not want to go on it and play it, because it’ll only make me mad. It’s literally game breaking.

          • denverfan92

            So you want a game that makes you feel like a god by matching you against people who are way below your skill level? I imagine you also hate the fact that you have to work for money instead of having a magic genie who grants your every wish without you having to lift a finger? Not having SBMM is like matching up a high school football team with an NFL team just to make the NFL team feel good about themselves. SBMM is good for the franchise. It makes the game fair for less skilled players by letting them play people at their skill level, and it makes it more rewarding for skilled players, because when you win against other skilled players, you actually get a feeling of accomplishment.

          • Henry Greenshields

            I feel that SBMM is a good idea just implemented in the wrong way. If SBMM was only used for playlists like Ranked it would be fair. It should be taken out of Pubs so that everyone can play like they used too, and for people who want to challenge themselves can go on ranked.

          • denverfan92

            That would be fair but I’m sure that there would be just as many complaints about the game, just from the other side of things lol. The gaming community is so toxic that no matter what they do, somebody is going to hate it and be vocal about it. The people who complain make me laugh. Nobody is forcing them to play the game, so if they really hate it so much, then why do they even care? They must secretly like the series, and they are just mad that things aren’t going the way that they think that they should be going.

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            Where did you get this ignorant logic from?

            Call of Duty is a casual game, not a competitive, tryhard one. BUT, that doesn’t mean I want to face bad players all the time. I have no idea how you came to that conclusion. Perhaps because that is the stereotypical assumption every CoD fanboy has? Even if I had that opinion, CoD is BUILT to be easy. Just because I’m average or above average, doesn’t mean I have to suffer. It is flawed design.

            I have to work for everything in the game? Thanks for proving my point as to why I call it “Advanced Chorefare”. Games are supposed to be fun, not chores. You can have balanced lobbies without SBMM, and arguing about sports is stupid. It’s an apples to oranges comparison.

            HA. Balanced =/= fair. Life’s not fair. I don’t want a fair game, I want a fun, balanced game that’s casual where I’m not forced to focus and try every game. This is an ignorant philosophy to have, and that kind of logic should be abolished.

            A lack of SBMM doesn’t mean no challenge nor reward. It wasn’t in the older Call of Duty games. If it was, then it was minor. Again, CoD will never be a skill-based game, nor does any game require skill, really. It’s an easy game to pick-up and learn. Sledgehammer ruined this and the franchise’s routes, which is why they’ve made one of the least enjoyable Multiplayer experiences I’ve ever played.

          • WrasslingFan

            What he accused you of is true. You can try to justify not wanting to play equally or more talented players as the “game being casual” and I guess the tone of what he said makes you feel worse but it’s the truth. What you’re doing is akin to being a really good basketball player who plays at the local fitness center but you stop playing the minute other equally talented or more talented guys come along. Sure you may only want to casually play but casual shouldnt’ mean “easy”…As casual as COD in general is meant to be you or no one here is a “casual” player. Casual just means ease of use and a game not so difficult that a novice couldn’t have some fun. Casual doesn’t mean veterans get to beat up on noobs…I’m not a fan of SBMM either but I’m at least man enough to be honest and say, “I just wanna play bad players.” You’re trying to bs. The game is still casual however, the players you play are veteran like you.

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            Not at all. You both say the same tired crap that CoD fanboys have. Defending game-breaking crap.

            I never said I wanted to play bad players, I said it’s boring playing against tryhards every game. You paid $60 for this shit?

          • WrasslingFan

            I don’t even play AW anymore at all because it’s garbage. I’m new here so let me tell you something, everyone that has a differing opinion isn’t a fanboy. You seem way too intelligent to just call someone a fanboy for calling you out. No where did I mention my opinion on the actual game or publishers at all. I even stated I am not a fan of SBMM. Difference is unlike you I can admit that best case I don’t wanna have to play guys as good as me all the time but worst case I’d prefer an organic mix of all skill like prev COD games…..You’re being like the guy who is like 100-10 on MKX yet the minute he sees a 100-10 opponent he rage quits and files it under, ” it’s not that I can’t win, just that I’m a casual gamer.” You don’t like playing competitive matches all the time. I don’t like when girls don’t put out on the first date, but I’m not going to rationalize trying to get them drunk so I have easier time getting laid as anything more than what it is lol. AW sucks whether SBMM is in it or not.

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            Fanboys are fanboys BECAUSE of their opinion. It doesn’t matter if you like the game or not, you’re still defending it. I don’t care about my score. I care about how much fun I’m having on a $60 game. Bad spawns are bad enough, but give that to a tryhard, and it gets downright annoying. People who complain about SBMM isn’t about skill, it’s about fun. CoD never was a game you focused on for hours. It’s impossible for any game. Now we have a forced challenge, which is flawed design.

          • WrasslingFan

            I’m not defending the game at all. I’m simply saying you should just be honest with yourself and that you don’t like SBMM because you have to play skilled players which isn’t fun for you. You don’t wanna just admit that so you oversimplify it. If you wanna say that I’m a fanboy or defending the game just because I think you just don’t want a challenge but you sugarcoat that by making up doom and gloom COD is dying scenarios then so be it. At least a fanboy’s motivation would be getting news because they like the game. Someone frequenting Charlie Intel just to keep reminding people how much that hate a game is actually probably worse. And yeah I like to give girls liquor on dates because I want to make sure they have wine in their system for their health not because I want an easy lay, sure buddy….Keep telling yourself you’re casual.

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            It’s pointless to reply to me when you have no clue what I’m saying.

            It’s natural in any online PVP game to have a match or two every session that’s NATURALLY difficult. My point is, is that this adds a forced challenge to better players, and a handicap for noobs. It was a big issue in BO2 for a reason. SBMM not only ruins the game for all players; it also adds a Domino Effect.

            Why add it in the first place? To make noobs feel more comfortable? Who cares? They’ll enjoy the game whether they’re good or not. They’re just making millions of people angry, like me. It’s flawed. Not because I’m bad, but because the overall design is flawed and makes it even worse.

            Yeah, I got the game for $40. It was a learning experience, and a wake-up call. For what, you may ask? To never buy a Sledgehammer product ever again. They’re done.

          • jordanxxxbrookes

            He may not know what you’re saying but I do, you’re a bitch looking to beat up on noobs. You guys that were great back in the MW2-MW3 days love trying to come up with any excuse to beat up on noobs whether it’s claiming your maintaining a 2.0kd and beating them down is necessary for them to “become a better” player or this rubbish you’re spewing talking about how this is some “big issue” and is hurting “millions” of players. STFU there aren’t millions of little fucking bitches like you still crying about SBMM 9 months later. You don’t give two shits about helping noobs get better through domination nor do you give two shits about if COD somehow is losing sales by SBMM, you only care about YOUR enjoyment which comes from beating up on people who aren’t very skilled because that’s what bitches do. Also there are far more COD players who are bad than good. So if anything SBMM makes it so those bad players don’t have to play good players thus when they get better they’ll get that same adrenline of doing well off bad players that you’re faggot ass is missing. STFU with the excuses and go play BO1 so you can beat up on foreign kids who just got enough money to afford a console you girly bitch.

          • jordanxxxbrookes

            *your, autocorrect changed that. Maybe SBMM is why I can’t upgrade my phone for 3 more months…P.S. you don’t like SBMM because you’re a bitch. Why the fuck are you still on these articles if you hate SBMM so much? Because you’re a bitch and probably still play AW because you just can’t live without COD. There are other good shooters you could play and they don’t have SBMM…But I guess you’d be the noob on the new shooter and people would rape your faggot ass same way you wish you could do to people on AW. Quit lying and making excuses you bitch. You don’t care about the “millions” of bitches that hate SBMM. I bet you still buy DLC and just file it under, “I just wanted zombie maps” well newsflash they are still getting your money so are you are is empty threats.

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            Gotta love sock account trolls who like to talk trash 24/7. Make up a real argument then reply, k? K bye.

          • jordanxxxbrookes

            I’ll make a real argument when you stop pretending COD’s potential loss of sales or the game being casual is the reason you want SBMM gone. Next you’ll make up some argument about how SBMM is leading to an increase in suicide because players have to struggle and “tryhard” every game thus making the removal of SBMM necessary to save lies. Quit making up bullshit you bitch. You just wanna play noobs, case closed you girl

            What benefit of making a “real account” is there? It’s not like it’ll be real information, so logging in with a fake name and pic makes what I’m telling your girly ass better?

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            So you’re going to defend SBMM? Shows how much of an argument you really have. Please, oh wise one, tell me how SBMM is beneficial, without saying it helps noobs and egotistical competitive players.

          • jordanxxxbrookes

            How about YOU provide a non superficial reason SBMM is bad. We know it hurts connection and isn’t organic at all and hurts matchmaking. But the reason YOU hate it is because you can’t dominate noobs. All these other reasons are just trying to justify being a bitch.

            If the company didn’t think it was beneficial they wouldn’t do it, but okay I’ll explain three reasons why.

            1.) It allows newcomers to the series a chance to learn how to play or if they are longtime bad players it gives them the chance to learn the movement and deal with the increased speed.

            2.) it prevents vets and full parties from just slapping on an ASM1 or BAL and ripping them a new one.

            3.) It allows Activision to get new players hooked. These new players don’t have to deal with vets kicking their asses so they’ll get a false sense of confidence and keep playing/buying DLCs…This is the false sense of confidence and skill they are taking away from your bitch ass.

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            Yep, more sugarcoating. I should expect much from a troll.

            1. A game should never appeal to a specific fanbase, this way, other players are not affecred. SBMM doesn’t help noobs get better, and the latter for the opposite. The movement doesn’t require a learning curve.

            2. But it’s okay when it’s done to veteran players? Flawed logic. And, they’d use those weapons, anyway, because the game design is flawed.

            3. Okay, idiot, please tell me how many new players bought Advanced Warfare, because it’s the lowest selling CoD since World at War.

          • jordanxxxbrookes

            You honestly think SBMM is the reason for the low sales? And low is relative since COD AW was the best selling game of 2014 according to Forbes. AW and Ghosts are clearly not to the standards set by MW2, BO2 and to some degree MW3. Yet you want to be myopic and say that SBMM somehow is the reason for the BEST SELLING GAME OF 2014’s low sales? Again just speak for yourself and bitches like you. There are a number of factors that could factor into AW’s lower than normal sales most noticeably backlash from how bad Ghosts was or how fast paced and different AW is. But you’re probably right bro, it’s totally SBMM and last gen gaming…Every other gaming franchise would kill to have AW’s sales figures.

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            1. The lack of sales is because of constant weak games since Black Ops 1. Black Ops 2 was greatly received by fans, however, and had the most sales in its first week in CoD history. From then on, it went to crap. Sales have decreased by 12 million since MW3, which sold around 25-30 million. Ghosts sold approx. 20-22 million. AW sold 18 million. People are tired of this franchise. For no other reasons besides franchise fatigue, really. SBMM just caused people to return the game, or stop playing. Which is why it doesn’t have a big population. OH WAIT. They took out that feature. I wonder why? Do you have an excuse for that?
            2. Yes, it was the best selling game of 2014, but it’s still the worst selling CoD since World at War. It’s the first game in the franchise to sell under 20 million in, what, 6-7 years? People didn’t like what they saw, apparently.
            3. Don’t put words into my mouth. Last time I checked, I’ve mentioned that last gen made at least half the sales. I said they hold the series back from doing bigger and better things.

          • jordanxxxbrookes

            Key point, people TOOK BACK the game which means they still bought it. Player Count only actually hurts the community playing not actual sales same way when you pay for a movie ticket the theater doesn’t lose that money if you fall asleep and don’t actually watch movie.

            What bigger and better things do you honestly think Activision will allow their publishers to do? You think they’ll allow us to have 20-25 mutliplayer maps at launch? You think they’ll add dedicated servers(not Listen) if last gen wasn’t around? You think they’ll give us a new engine? If anything the loss of last gen dollars will be their excuse for not improving things. Hell they are getting all this extra micro dlc revenue coming in yet don’t give that to the community at large and will instead add that to Esports pots….So again even IF last gen is gone Activision shouldn’t be trusted to do anything to improve the franchise itself. Plenty of games have shown that they are very good despite their being last gen versions.

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            A player base helps you get into more lobbies, and less populated game modes that you’d want to play.

            Defending ancient hardware like last gen already? Give up. What is your point? It’ll make the game more successful, but at a cost of quality of the game FOR last gen. Activision stated they’re holding back content and features ON last gen, not FOR it. I’m defending both sides of the spectrum. What are they paying $60 for? A lesser game. Whether it holds back current gen or not objectively speaking is something we will have to find out. I doubt it will. It just means that the two studios working on last gen will also not be able to work on other projects. There are many factors.

          • jordanxxxbrookes

            AW isn’t that bad of a game unless you suck or are used to going 50-2 every game

          • WrasslingFan

            This place is worse than Reddit. You accuse someone of being a “fanboy” and use terms like ,”tryhard” wow. How calling someone out for trying to oversimplify or justify not wanting to play better competition means someone is a fanboy, is ok with SBMM and wasted their money is laughable. AW is a shitty game but even if I could drop 50-2 every game I would still not play this game. Ghosts was terrible despite the better hit detection and no over the top SBMM. No need for name calling. I suppose on BO2 and even Ghosts when us vets are going 30-3 and 70-8 we weren’t trying at all lol. The OTHER guys with the same skill level as you are the tryhards, you’re just a “casual” gamer with probably a 2+kdr on every prev COD game.

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            I don’t know if I called you any thing, I was speaking generally about the AW player base. AW is a shitty game because of flawed design. SBMM is part of flawed design. No game should have it. Making a casual game competitive will kill it. That’s the major issue, as well.

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            In short, stop jumping to conclusions, and have a more logical mindset.

          • cesc-2007

            Thats all fine and dandy but conection based matched making is by the best. If SBMM and conection based could be run at the same time then everyone could be happy. Im sick of laggy matches because someone has poor conection.

          • tarfeef101

            Or you could play a VARIETY of players. Like the older games, you know the ones that built this franchise up into something popular. The ones everyone loved and wish weren’t hacked to pieces now. They were successful without SBMM, because lobbies were just connection based, introducing a variety of players into the mix, and then teams were balanced within the lobby as much as possible. That was a great system, because it had variety, kept the game from just being try hard wars, and still kept an element of fairness the vast majority of the time.

          • WrasslingFan

            This 100% An organic environment where some lobbies will have lesser, other lobbies will have equal or better. THAT is ideal. Just playing noobs or just playing really good players shouldn’t be forced.

    • YoungMurf

      I care about this game also, I think it’s a great addition to the franchise.

    • Koolz

      So I’m not the only one on this site? Yayyyyy…

    • Spodermen

      I cur 2 mai I gut 21 ubvutez

      • imBATMAN

        Spodermen I hurt my ankle…which ankle you may ask?
        Ankle Ben
        😀

        • Spodermen

          whurez ur paruntz butmun oh waet dud lol

          • imBATMAN

            errmuhrrgurd!! YOU! ):

    • Hunter

      I care too. It’s a really fun cod. The one cod I’ve played the most. Got 7 days on it right now.

    • Walter Iego

      Good for you.

  • MurkN101

    The only bright side about this is that eventually the people that work at Infinity Ward, Treyarch, and Shithammer Games will eventually have to actually make a decent fucking map once they reuse all the good maps from old games.

    • Daniel

      AW has some of the best maps ever made

      • Brad

        No…just no.

        • Epicsand

          That is your opinion.

      • Thatlazykid

        I just stood there in shock for about 10 seconds on what u just said -_-

    • Brad

      Shithammer games LMFAO couldn’t agree more

    • NumbCorns

      The old Infinity ward. not IW 2.0

  • ccrows

    I hope they don’t do Rust, way to small for EXOs.

    Hopefuly this is an Easter Egg just like Backlot was in MW2 on the map Karachi…

  • Spodermen

    sweg

    • imBATMAN

      Luh you spodermen!

      • derrrrrrrrrrrrr

        spodermen am subscribd to evry on ov ur vidoes

        • imBATMAN

          muh vids? tank u tank u!!

          • derrrrrrrrrrrrr

            nu fag, spodermen

          • imBATMAN

            den y u rupli tu me seyin utub?

          • Spodermen

            dank 4 ur support. Fagit

          • derrrrrrrrrrrrr

            ty

  • Anthony

    Man, I really been thinking about Modern Warfare lately. I hope Infinity Ward does like a remake for all the MW and puts them in a Modern Warfare collection or at least does Modern Warfare 4 next year..Ghosts was a failure..and I highly doubt anyone wants to see Ghosts 2.

    I just felt like rambling.

    • RdJokr

      It doesn’t matter what title IW’s next game is. If they don’t step up and properly innovate their game, then MW4 will still fail terribly.

      • Brad

        At least if it’s MW4 they will have the same game philosophy as the first 3 modern warfares. Ghosts has a completely different style to it and it’s a failure. I’m hoping for MW4. Also hope they scrap Extinction and go back to the spec ops missions which could be very fun to try to complete.

        • Anthony

          This ^

        • RdJokr

          Spec Ops is fun and all, but I’d prefer that IW try to get out of their comfort zone, and make an odd co-op mode. Treyarch and Sledgehammer are both doing Zombies already, and I don’t want IW anywhere near that. So either more Extinction (which is totally likely, now that Neversoft has merged with them), or an entirely new co-op mode that involves non-human enemies.

      • Anthony

        That’s kind of missing the point of what I was talking about, but okay.

    • Matthew

      But that cliffhanger though, I need a Ghosts 2. Plus it was the easiest COD.

      • JoZer805g

        Maybe include Ghosts 2 campaign in the MW collection.

        • Xx_COLSEY_xX

          I reckon the next IW game will be the best one in my opinion, if it’s Ghosts 2. Ghosts was horrible because the maps were way too big, which you were forced to play defensivley or camp. But the guns were awesome and the perk system was the best thing that ever happened in CoD in my opinion. It gave you freedom of choosing your perks. To make Ghosts 2 the best CoD is “Copy and paste” all the weapons and perks. And make the maps smaller and improve pointstreaks more useful. And not to make support streaks as OP as they were. And make specialist as the same as it was back in MW3 where it gave you ALL the perks instead of limiting it. I know they didn’t want to make specialist to be OP by giving you all the 36 perks, but it would have been worth it and rewarding to earn specialist bonus. It was quite hard to get K.E.M strike on that game as it is with all campers. They focused too much on the sound and graphics rather than gameplay and that’s why Ghosts didn’t pay off.

    • Rorke File

      They got the old map designer of MW2 and COD4 back, hope he does something about the maps after Ghosts. The MW3 MP was better than Ghosts I founded that was because SHG helped them.

      • Smayo

        If that was the case, why SHG f***ed up AW MP so badly ? by far the worst and boring MP to date in CoD…

        • Rorke File

          May because they had exo’s now to deal with, and they are better in games with boots on the ground. I’d like to see again a modern game like MW3 from them but now better made. And IW can have also some better maps after Ghosts.

        • Rorke File

          They did MW3 sort of right, I found as first project with IW.

          • Smayo

            Far from right but yes indeed a hell of a lot better then AW, shame they didn’t continued on that path, but instead changed the entire feel of an proven installment

          • Rorke File

            Look at IW’s game now with out SHG named Ghosts, I think they had to make a game again like Mw3 but better and learned from there faults.

          • Smayo

            I agree with that, to be fair ghosts had potential, single player was surprisingly good imo and extinction was a good shot to create a similar experience like zombies.

            multiplayer wise however they did everything wrong they could do wrong, the choices they made there made it a stall, slow and a boring/campy snoozefest,

          • Rorke File

            I didn’t like the Multiplayer so played the campaign first and after tried again but didn’t like it and my friends also didn’t did like Mw3 more.

    • JoZer805g

      I really like to all the Modern Warfare games remastered but for MW4, it would be really impossible to continue the story since a lot of the characters died and Makarov is dead.

    • LovekillerX

      Ghosts was okay, not best but also not the worst in my opinion. Sure I understand why some people hate Ghosts and it is okay to hate it, not everyone likes it. However I don’t care if they release Ghosts 2 because I’m going to buy it anyways. Ghosts’ campaign was nice, especially “Federation Day” and those last missions starting from the carrier mission.

      But yeah… Modern Warfare collection would be really cool. I would like to see at least MW2 and MW3 in same package with remastered graphics. MW4 would be really cool too but I think they ended the series if you have seen MW3’s ending.

      • Anthony

        I’ll probably skip next year if its Ghosts 2, unless Infinity Ward blows me away in
        some way. The campaign was nothing special to me besides the ending. So it was alright I guess. The multiplayer was good..for the first two months when the game was out. To me, it got ruined with DLC with all gimmicky bullcrap they added. Like I understand trying to different, but there is a difference in trying something new and being borderline stupid. Really? Michael Myers? Actual ghosts that shoot weapons? Come on. Even though I hate Advanced Warfare, that’s different and trying something new for the series

        • Stefan Lang

          Or if Bo3 has the same lasting factor BO2 did. I really like the idea of having a MW collection. Id take that over Ghosts any day.

    • PandaMan

      The only reason I would want a Ghosts 2 is to finish up the Rorke campaign story. He was a damn good villain imo

  • imBATMAN

    No lie though, i’d pay over 150$ for a single CoD game that involves all three developers working together on one game with fan favorite maps.

    • imBATMAN

      first btw 😉

      • You could have just edited your original comment…

        • Joshwoocool

          He is Batman.He doesn’t obey the rules.

        • imBATMAN

          I meant first to comment on my comment
          You sir have this weird obsession with me heuhheuh

  • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

    Most importantly there’s more and more evidence that there is no more Xbox deal for Call of Duty and will always be the case, at least for 3 years. http://assets.vg247.com/current//2015/06/xbox_store_exclusive_tag.png

    Notice how The Division says “Content First”. Now look at Black Ops 3.
    http://assets.vg247.com/current//2015/06/xbox_store_exclusive_tag_1.png

    • RdJokr

      Wow, Ubisoft used to make deals with Sony, now they’re switching sides too. It’s a mad, mad world.

      • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

        Hmm? They’re only making deals with Microsoft for The Division. Sony has Syndicate this year. Microsoft had Unity last year.

        • RdJokr

          I wasn’t aware of that. Most Ubisoft games I’ve seen have been giving Sony early exclusives. This is the first time I’ve seen Microsoft get anything early from Ubi.

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            Yeah they got a couple.

    • ccrows

      TBH I really don’t care either way.

      I never rubbed “Content first” in a Sony console owner’s face because I think getting content early is stupid for ANY console…

      • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

        Third party deals benefit the console. It may not benefit the other platforms, but ticked exclusivity pushes units. This is smart on Sony’s part. They’ve just taken a nearly 10-year-old crown and rubbing it in Xbox’s face. It will be a nice, bloody, controversial rivalry at E3.

    • Rorke File

      Good found, It’s for sure Xbox will focus on other things this year or they need to release a new contract.

      • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

        It’s going to PlayStation.

        • Rorke File

          You don’t now for sure may it will release the same time on both consoles, I think PlayStation isn’t to go investing in it. And just let it come out the same time, in the past they also didn’t had interest to do that.

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            Sony has no big budget AAA holiday game, so they invested into timed exclusivity in third party. Black Ops 3 was one of them. It’s not equal, sadly.

          • Smayo

            Well in the meantime xbox owners like myself can play other good games while the 30 days go by, plenty of those coming out this end of the year.

            I could care less if ps4 gets it first, I haven’t bought a single CoD DLC the last 2 years and I dont expect Bo3 to be that great, I’ll just wait and see how it turns out…

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            I’m getting Zombies DLC. All I’m getting it for.

          • Smayo

            Yeah, if the beta turns out good and I decide to buy bo3, that will probably be the case here as well, zombies have almost never disappointed me (except the ‘die rise’ map)

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            Yeah a couple of BO2 maps were meh. But I can play them for hours, still.

    • Guywithbrains

      Maybe Microsoft put all their money on Fallout 4. Much more hyped game than Black Ops 3 for now.

      • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

        Not sure, yet…

      • Or maybe Microsoft are just more ahead of the game than Activision are and know that CoD has been on steep decline since BO2 and aren’t willing to invest in a franchise that seems to have had its day.

      • Siftblade of Rivia

        Pretty sure Fallout 4 will not be exclusive.

        • Xx_COLSEY_xX

          I just had some chocolate chip cookies and they were delicious as fuck!

        • Guywithbrains

          I meant they will get content first such as DLC. But we’ll get to know more at E3 (hopefully).

          • Siftblade of Rivia

            That wouldn’t really a big win for Microsoft. Bethesda doesn’t really do lots of DLC. I think Skyrim had 2 major DLCs and 1 minor one, and even then they weren’t that big of a deal. It’s just a rumor, I doubt it will happen.

  • Drilon

    I played ghosts today… and it was the worst cod ever… it was soo slow and like 9/10 people in the lobby were camping/head glitching.. idk why ppl still hate aw.. with exo suits we can finally kill those campers 😀

    • LovekillerX

      I don’t get the hate either. They brought us the change we asked and they took a huge risk by bringing us new movement system. Now people want to get back to roots. When that happens, people beg for change. I guess people can’t decide what they REALLY want.

      • Blaine

        I don’t think many people wanted the movement changed… Plenty of other things about COD needed and still need change, movement wasn’t really one of them.

        • Xx_COLSEY_xX

          I know this is off topic but oh well…This is how I’d like BO3 to be set, some of you will agree and some of you will disagree.

          Maps: Make the maps like BO2. Three lanes (I know they already said they are doing the three lane map design) middle lane suitable for SMGs, Shotguns and high rate of fire Assault rifles. The other two lanes best for medium to long engagements. Best for Assault rifles, LMGs and Sniper rifles. With good sniping hideouts.

          Weapons: SMGs should be dominant in CQB. SMGs should also have fast mobility while running, fast reload speed and short hip fire spread. Assault rifles should be very good at range. It should have a 5 shot kill max at the maximum range. Sniper rifles should be a one shot kill if you shoot your enemy at the waist above (Bolt actions only) It should make quick scoping as hard as it was in BO1. Handguns should be 4 shot kill. Except revolvers which they should be 2 shot kill point blank. Shotguns should only be a one hit kill if you hit your enemy point blank.

      • Koolz

        Cod devs can’t ever satisfy this horribly toxic community (for the most part). No matter what the community asks for, they still complain.

      • Stefan Lang

        I dont think the exos are a problem but when you’re constantly playing people that are as good as you its gets frustrating. Like I get some good lobbies when i can play in a party but good where the enemies are mixed. Some suck, some dont. And that’s the way it should be. Nobody should have to go into a game when playing solo and face a full team of 6 sweaty ass kids. Like AW is fun when you’re doing good but not when you constantly go 30/30 every game.

        • stephan lang is trash

          Hahahaha this kid just summed it all up right here he hates the game because he plays against good players and not horrible ones hahahahahahah what a joke

          • Stefan Lang

            Fuck no you idiot. Ask anyone who’s a decent to great player and they’ll tell you SBMM is shit. Who the fuck do you know as a pub player wants to play sweaty ass kids every game? Even the pros dont like sbmm and they fucking play competitive 90% of the time. And another idiot point for spelling my name wrong you dumb child. You’re probably like 13.

      • denverfan92

        I think that there’s just a lot of whiny spoiled brat babies out there that throw a fit when they don’t get what they want lol. Game devs have to sort through all of that crap and try to figure out what the majority of people want and then make that game, or if it isn’t clear, they just have to make an executive decision about things. It’s gotta be a rough job to try and please everybody, when everyone thinks that their voice should take priority over others.

      • Siftblade of Rivia

        We wanted it to be fast paced, not chaotic. My only problem with AW is that it’s super random and chaotic, and the gameplay has no flow. The new movement system and the map structures contributed to this. I don’t want it to be slow like Ghosts, but I also don’t want it to be random like AW. Fast but organized is what I prefer. BO2 did this really well. Hopefully BO3 does too, we’ll see in the BETA.

    • ben wills

      Ghosts actually requires that you aim your gun.

  • ben wills

    > Makes map

    > Doesn’t let people play it

    > Still doesn’t fix game

    • FazalGaming

      lmfao

    • Xx_COLSEY_xX

      Call of duty Advanced Warfare is very similar to Battlefield 4. On both games you get killed around the corner plent of times A.K.A shit netcode. And you freeze way too much.

  • Ryumoau

    Thats pretty cool that they put that in there. This game seems too fast paced for that map to be brought back, but it makes a great easter egg. 🙂

    • Spodermen

      no1 eber seemz 2 repli 2 u so am goen 2 sae hi

      • Juses

        Er rite faek spodermen

        • Spodermen

          Stahp juses am reel lust chacne 2 beliebe me ur well kel u wet sweg

  • Technifyy

    I care too. I was going to give up on CoD after the failure that is Ghosts, but then Advanced Warfare was announced. This game has changed it all, and to be honest, has probably become my favorite Call of Duty. I love Exo Suits, and the immensely fast-paced style of this game. I do admit, Exo Zombies could’ve been a lot better, but it’s still fun, and hey we’re gonna be having even more insane action like this in Black Ops 3 because of AW, and that’s great. It’s a breath of fresh air to the franchise.

  • james lamberson

    I care,i luv AW.Yeah i rage at certain things like everone else,but why throw the baby out with the bath water.

  • Treyarch #1

    Rust was a forgettable map from MW2 but it’s weird how a dud company like Sledgehammer try to feed of the franchise’s history because the current games are awful. MW2 should be a memory and despite putting this game to shame over 5 years on; Sledgehammer shouldn’t have been allowed to use Highrise to milk their poor game to the few people left who still play it.

  • Uzair Chief

    They are running out of idea’s…

    • GinsuVictim

      How does that even figure into the topic?

      • Uzair Chief

        The same question could be ask for the re-created mw2 rust in the background.

        But giving an answer to your question:
        I found it weird that they re-created a mw2 map.

        • GinsuVictim

          How does that equate to running out of ideas? It’s an Easter egg in the background that a lot of people think is pretty cool. If they only released map remakes instead of originals, then you’d have a point.

    • jooker-jr

      Then go and give them some.

      • Uzair Chief

        Idiot

        • jooker-jr

          Ok, thanks.

  • Swiss Mike

    Why can’t they focus all their efforts on new maps/actual content than re-skins of exo suits, doesn’t bring anything new to the game. Its a good game but there is so much wasted effort.

    • GinsuVictim

      It’s not the same people doing both.

  • NOVA_POLARIS

    Sledgehammer does this- They suck they are out of ideas
    Treyarch does this- Genius!
    Sorry guys but its true but don’t worry since I am a treyrach fan boy to 🙂

    • LovekillerX

      Remember Vondy is a beast and nothing he does is wrong.

      • Drasadex

        Vondy is love, Vondy is life

    • LLORT

      Treyarch have their own unique ideas and don’t need to feed of franchise scraps to sell content of a failing game. They are the best in the dying franchise and it’s no wonder companies like SHG have to rob their ideas to salvage what’s left of their pitiful game.

      • Guywithbrains

        How can one rob an idea from someone who does the same series (Call of Duty games). I bet they know about each others’ projects so I am pretty sure Treyarch would have already sued Sledgehammer Games if they had a problem with Sledgehammer Games using WORKING IDEAS in their game.

        Also one could say that Treyarch “robbed” an idea of advanced movement from Sledgehammer Games. Another “robbed” things are specialists because they sound too much like Destiny characters.

        ^ In a nutshell: Treyarch might have it’s “unique ideas” but they do same things as other studios (using ideas from inside and outside of Call of Duty games).

  • This game is just like a booty call to me. When BO3 releases I think I’m gonna marry it.

  • It doesn’t matter how many maps from MW2 they bring back it wont change the fact that this game is BAD! BTW you’re game interface is like BOPS2! SHS games has no identity !GHOST>AW

  • Alex

    Really running out of ideas now. The people who played rust are not playing AW. The series in general is stale, uninspiring and down right boring. I hate to break it to you all ,no developer will recapture the old cod feeling. Move on gentleman

    • WrasslingFan

      Part of that is they’ve lost the essence of what made the games great and another part is we’re all older, more jaded gamers who care more about weapon balancing and making sure one gun doesn’t have 1/100th of a second faster ADS time as opposed to enjoying the game. I feel like even if they did the popular thing and remastered MW2 we’d just complain because that’s what we do now.

  • OMG its FPSBroski

    They are genius i mean, everyone is like omg highrise is in the game and stuff, but now people dont have a excuse for not having a rust remake in aw XD

  • some2example2

    unbelievable, how can modern warfare 2 on the ps3 have better graphics, mechanics, hit detection, fun factor and everything else over aw and next gen.

    those screenshots of aw look like they’re either the n64 or the xbox one, not a next gen console.

    look at the detail and effort put into rust on mw2, and that’s exactly how it translates into the game, and look at the “easter egg”, it’s sad.

    it’s good though, you can save yourself $15 and not pay for half hearted efforts.

  • Aaron

    I think it would be fun as hell if they added Favela From mw2, Or if they made a zero gravity map where everyone can float around or a moon map sumthin like dat also does anyone like nutella? i mean htf invents that kind of shit