A new rumor has started floating around the web recently claiming that this year’s new Call of Duty title will be called ‘Call of Duty: Bloodlines.’ The rumor originated from a source who has leaked previous information regarding Nintendo platforms correctly, but we don’t buy his rumor on Call of Duty: Bloodlines.

His alleged leak states the following:

  • Activision plans on bringing Skylanders at launch to the NX along with the next Call of Duty game called “Bloodlines” in Fall 2016. In 2017, the company will team up with Platinum Games to launch Spider-Man: The First Avenger which will tie into the MCU movie and universe. Activision is also being given “hard bargains” by Nintendo to have BETA access to “Beyond Destiny”, the sequel to Destiny which plans to launch Holiday 2017.
  • Activision is interested in bringing Beyond Destiny to NX due to the fact you can play local and online multiplayer between units at the same time as well that the new mainline Pokémon games will not only guarantee a big NX user base but a new type of audience they can bring into the franchise. If this deal comes into fruition, Activision will release a “complete” version of the first Destiny game on NX in early 2017.

Now first and foremost, his claim that Skylanders could come to Nintendo’s newest platform shouldn’t be a surprise. Activision’s Skylanders franchise has always been on all Nintendo platforms, so them planning on bringing it to their newest platform is a no brainier, really.

Now, his second half leak is where we see things start to be false. Activision and Bungie have not even announced a possible PC release for Destiny; why would they go out of their way to make a NX version? It could be another studio handling the development of that, but after Call of Duty: Ghosts, Activision has not released a shooter title for any Nintendo platforms.

Call of Duty has never really succeeded on Nintendo’s platform. Activision has released previous Call of Duty titles for Nintendo platforms, but stopped releasing them after Ghosts because lack of player counts. In fact, Wii U versions of Call of Duty got very minimal post-launch support. There are few patch updates to fix bugs, and maybe a pre-order bonus map added in, but that’s it. The support is nothing compared to how they support the other platforms.

While this leaker may have previously posted accurate leaks, we do not think this is true. Calling a Call of Duty title ‘Bloodlines’ just seems odd. It does not really match up with any naming schemes for Call of Duty’s before, and with a name like that, it’s hard to explain what the game is. Call of Duty game titles normally define the game: Modern Warfare being a game about modern warfare; Black Ops being a game about black ops; Advanced Warfare relating to the futuristic setting; Ghosts relating directly to the theme of ghosts soldiers.

SOURCE: Dual Pixels

SHARE
  • LovekillerX

    I can’t wait to see what IW delivers this year. What ever they bring, I’m sure they deliver with the campaign unlike Treyarch.

    • MoneyTalks7114

      People still play the campaign lmfao. You want a good story go play the Last of Us. Never look for a good story in a COD game

      • CrazyWolf

        Yeah. People play Call of Duty campaigns. Because they’re good.

        • LovekillerX

          Call of Duty offers best FPS story IMO. I always finish campaign before touching multiplayer. It is a good place to learn basics.

          • CrazyWolf

            Fuck yeah, friend. The campaign is the most important thing for me. If a Call of Duty had no campaign, I’d probably never touch it.

          • Batman

            True

          • Tuby

            Do you really need to learn the basics before toughing the MP ? Are you just started with playing cod?The only game were I needed to fine tune my movement was aw but didnt need the campaign. I only played the campaign of cod 4 and waw.love the chilli suit mission with the sniper in cod 4

          • Smayo

            Chilli suits …?? That would’ve been interesting 😉

          • Guest

            Smayo stands for sperm mayonnaise?

          • Smayo

            Not to my knowledge, but who knows how you call your delicacies…

          • Tuby

            Typo

          • Tuby

            And you are still very bad at cod. How are youre stats at bo 3 ?

        • MoneyTalks7114

          I can’t believe that lmao. I can’t play the same shitty campaign every year. Look there. Shoot that. Drive this. None of them have a good story. I’ve been around since COD4. It’s the same basic ishh every year.

      • Batman

        Yes we do play it, if you dont I respect you, but STFU
        The Black ops games had some of the best stories in gaming industry, but for ppl who are short minded its just “shoot”

        • CrazyWolf

          Amen.

      • ScOott

        Yh, the Last Of Us is such a good fps war game..

        • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

          I thought it was an okay at best game. I’m serious. Extremely boring.

    • Batman

      LOL the story in ghosts was shit full of plotholes
      BO3 had amazing story

      • Guywithbrains

        Amazing story… it could have been if they would have made a sequel to Black Ops 2 story. But instead…

        – They didn’t bring back a single character from previous Black Ops games.
        – There was no true connection to Black Ops 1 and 2. Instead they just put a couple of “references” to previous stories but it didn’t make sense in the situations that these “references” were presented in.
        – The story itself was a total mess. They went too far with attempting to mind f*ck us.
        – Random attempt to please WW2 fans with story mission that didn’t fit to storyline of Black Ops 3.
        – The story was sacrificed in order to make fun gameplay (co-op).

        Compare Black Ops 3 to it’s prequels and you know what we (dislikers of Black Ops 3 story) are talking about…

        • Batman

          I agree with all of your points, no woods fckn s*cked, but the story was good so as the plot twist that is not told in game, you have to think to figure it out.
          WW2 level was random fan service
          NO SWASTIKAS WTF???? They put WW2 in zombies, MP & Campaign but no fckn swastikas??? that piss me off beyond belief

          • Batman

            BTW no WW2 weapons either, not even one.
            Not on the giant or der eisendrache, not on campaign
            And posters & opening cutscenes feature WW2 weapons, where da fuck is my mp40???
            Der eisendrache had no new weapons, the razorback & XR2 were playable in the trailers, but not on the final map WTF 3arc???

          • DEMOLITION12

            they can’t keep putting swastikas in because people are waking up to the truth about ww2

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            Not having Swastikas pissed you off? U wot m9?

        • CrazyWolf

          Well, I think that the story of Black Ops 3 if pretty fuckin’ cool. It’s just that it’s very well hidden. Also, you’re fooled into thinking that something is happening while the truth is hidden right in front of you. Just one man’s opinion. I also think that the WW2 level was just a mistake to put in the game…unless…In Black ops 3 zombies, after the four characters travel through time and end up killing the original Richtofen in 1945 (or whatever the fuck year The Giant takes place in), I THINK we find out that the characters are actually in an alternate universe where The German Empire won The Great War and the nazi party never got created. That’s why the swastika is replaced with the Iron Cross. Now, the question is this: Why are the germans in the WW2 campaign level using Iron Cross flags? If what I said about The Giant is correct (please let me know if I’m wrong), then one thing as simple as A FUCKING FLAG just left us with a lot more questions regarding the story…

          • MichiganerE

            I think the main reason that BO3 has that WWII mission was because it was a metaphor for what happened to us throughout the campaign. But even if it wasn’t necessary, it was still very cool.

          • CrazyWolf

            True. It was a metaphor. Who knows…maybe I’m overthinking things…

        • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

          “The story was sacrificed in order to make fun gameplay (co-op)” yet it’s BAD? Gameplay > story.

      • Gamerazor247

        “Amazing STORY”
        Congrats, m8, you delivered a funny.

      • John Mark

        “Amazing”. LOL, Black Ops 3 was garbage.

    • ScOott

      Any campaign ever made > bo3.. Never played such garbage campaign..

      • Thomas the Tankswag

        Battlefield 4s campaign was on par or worse than BO3s, i think the problem with BO3s was that the characters were boring and we didn’t give a fuck about what emotions they were feeling. If they had used harper/woods/mason/soap/price then it would have been a fantastic emotional story as you’d play as your favourite characters lost their minds and were killed

      • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

        This is the best ever Campaign gameplay-wise. Infinity Ward sucks balls.

    • jordanxbrookes

      I’m scared that IW are making a far future game that comes close to Halo. I have this awful feeling in me. It’s like I’ve seen visions of a dark planetary war. Hopefully I’m wrong and it’s boots-on-ground.

      • Thomas the Tankswag

        There should be no boots at all. All flying people. It could be just jetpacks and because of this call of duty can become the first game to have disabled soldiers to get rid of the stereotype that all soldiers are completely able bodied that other games and movies have enforced on us.

        • Wraith

          Screw it. Why stop there? The characters probably won’t even be human.

      • CrazyWolf

        Nah. I don’t think they’re that crazy. BUT I DON’T CARE! I’d be curious to see how that shit would work out! Reminder: This is just one wolf’s opinion.

    • TheHorror

      I just couldn’t believe that there was little to no tie-ins to the other Black Ops campaigns. Aside from a couple of small references to Menendez and Nova 6 and shit like that, the campaign had fuck all to do with the other Black Ops games. Thats what disappointed me the most about the BO3 campaign. I beat it on Realistic with some friends so the gameplay itself was pretty fun, but only because it was co-op. Not to mention the ending is probably the most unsatisfying ending to any COD game ever

    • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

      Treyarch didn’t deliver? Are you serious?

    • Sexy Mcgee

      Yeah, Treyarch was always horrible at campaigns. I can’t even force myself to try BO3 story mode because of how bad their previous games are. On the other hand Ghosts was the second best COD campaign next to COD4. So even if the MP will likely be pure garbage at least the campaign could be fun.

  • JeronimoPW

    Modern Warfare Zero 🙂

    • MichiganerE

      I remember a few rumors about that back in 2013.

  • Stefan Lang

    Its gonna be Ghosts 2 no doubt about it. I’ll try the MP out but if its anything like Ghosts then back to Bo3 and other games for another year.

    • Batman

      lol why? the cliffhanger? A ton of shows end their seasons w/ cliffhangers and get canceled anyway
      Mark my words:
      *Its not named “Ghosts 2”
      *It probably has some type of advanced movement

      • CrazyWolf

        It’s Ghosts 2. The plot is set in 2030-2031, the american offensive has been stopped, and you’re playing as a new ghost alongside Hesh. Things look more futuristic, but it’s boots on the ground. There. If this is confirmed, I want a giant chocolate chip cookie.

        • Batman

          lol, you are not far away from what it will be LOLOLOL
          But it will not be named Ghosts 2
          Its probably futuristic BTW

      • Tuby

        Boot on the grounds I think

        • Tuby

          Boots

  • lunator100hd .

    Im with Keshav, ”Bloodlines” dosent shound like a cod title but its not imposible ether, we have to wait and see, at the end of the day the name is the least important.

    • CrazyWolf

      Wanna bet it’s Ghosts 2?

      • lunator100hd .

        Its not gonna be ghosts 2.

        • Will WilFredo Mendoza

          It is. Just watch.

    • Wraith

      Unless Bloodlines refers directly to the two brothers from Ghosts. In which case, ayy lmao. Unless they actually think changing the name is enough to convince people they game will be totally different from Ghosts 1.

  • Batman

    LOL CharlieIntel only brought up shitty points
    Nintendo is dying, they have no 3rd party support, thats why they are paying Activision and begging.
    They need to secure Destiny & CoD on their new final attempt NX home console, those games have the biggest player base on the entire industry
    Ghosts wasnt a simple name, most players think in ghosts literally instead of soldiers who wear masks.
    Its not because skylanders release on all nintendo plattaforms ever that new one will as well
    Every single CoD title had partnership with Xbox it was a no brainer to assume that bo3 would be the same….. but it wasnt, same goes to skylanders

    • Keshav Bhat

      It wasn’t a no brainier to think Black Ops 3 was the same. It actually was not at all. When Black Ops 3 was revealed, for the first time in years, Sony put up trailers first before Xbox; and its reveal trailer had no Xbox logos. For every title before, they did. Having no Xbox logos left with two options: no deal or PS4 got the deal. For both Ghosts and Advanced Warfare, they announced DLC on Xbox with the game. Black Ops 3 was very different.

      • Batman

        Im saying that before the official reveal, you cant tell me you imagined CoD+PS, its like DiCaprio+Oscar lolololol

    • Adrix

      It’s always funny when random people on the internet act like they know the entire gaming industry, all the publishers and companies inside out. No matter what you think, Nintendo is very far from dying (also, this is an inappropriate word in this context) and even further away from “paying” and “begging” to Activision. Due to its excellent 1st party titles Nintendo doesn’t need an over the top 3rd party support and thus games like Destiny and CoD are completely irrelevant. Not all Nintendo consoles are very successfull (take a look at the Virtual Boy and the Gamecube), but these “failures” are for the most part not accounted for by a lack of 3rd party support and do not in any way dictate Nintendo’s future as long as they are in a minority. Instead of talking nonsense, think about it for a moment.

      • Batman

        Im just saying wide known facts, Im too lazy too type details but when I say “dying” I mean almost quitting home console area so they can focus on the most profitable areas AKA 3ds, mobile, etc…
        The “despair” means that they want to do something they dont do since the gamecube = 3rd party support, and the best way to get a stable 3rd party is player base, so securing CoD 2016+Destiny would be key to this, since both have large player base

        • Adrix

          I kind of understand where you are coming from, but I really don’t think that Nintendo is trying to secure successful 3rd party titles, especially not such mainstream hits like CoD or Destiny. Yes, Nintendo is changing their approach, but still, it’s more likely that they’ll try to win people over by attempting to innovate the gaming experience once again – at least that’s what they’ve always done. The NX having a handheld part, mobile support, various patents … all of this leads me to believe that increasing the 3rd party support still won’t be their main strategy. Also, I believe most of these decisions were not made due to Wii U’s failure or bad sales. Like I said, Nintendo is still to far away from “dying” to get influenced by things like that.

      • Love the comment

      • John Mark

        All those “excellent” first party titles got the WiiU to sell….what…like 10 million units?

        Face it, they NEED 3rd party support.

        • Adrix

          I think you missed the point of my whole post. Even though the first party titles are not a problem, people act like the lack of 3rd party titles is the main reason for Wii U’s “failure” and that they are crucial for a console to be successful. However, a quick look at the original Wii obviously proves the opposite. The Wii U has been struggling with other issues ever since its release, like:

          – the name Wii U being too similar to Wii (lots of casual gamers would mistaken it for an upgraded version of its predecessor)
          – bad marketing
          – lack of launch titles
          – lack of significant Zelda titles
          – outdated specs

          A better 3rd party support would’ve helped a little bit, but that’s about it, since most people would choose a PS4 or Xbone over the Wii U due to all its other problems.

  • Who Am I To Judge?

    The only way I see this fitting in with any previous story line: Infinity Ward re-branding Ghosts as Bloodlines because of Ghosts ending, and Infinity Ward focusing on trying to get the character back? I don’t remember the name, and that idea is about the best I could think of, I will edit it later to make more sense.

  • Guywithbrains

    It is most likely “Ghosts 2” and set in 2030s. But it is highly possible it won’t be futuristic in terms of gameplay because after all the world (read: USA) has been destroyed and technology is very limited in the post-apocalyptic world (read: USA).

    • CrazyWolf

      Exactly!

    • Smayo

      But what if the federation created something like exo suits or something similar in secret ?? And the ghosts nicked a few of them ??

      • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

        Doesn’t matter. no matter what they come up with, it’ll be terrible. They’ve got the Rareware fever.

        • Smayo

          Lets just hope they keep it down with the advanced movements in the next game, or rather none at all, that’s my main concern right now.

          It’s not really I hate advanced movements but at least if they going that route in the future get a decent engine that can handle those types of mechanisms

  • scrotesmd

    Who the heck cares what it’s called fake or not!

    • Helpful soy yo

      Because if it’s title is for example “advanced warfare” it might suggest something in the future, an easier example for free also is “mordern warfare” which to me at least suggests it’s set in modern times. Name usually gives an idea of what the game will be about. Knowing what game is = people buy game = people care about game

  • Diego Diniz

    I dont care! Just keep the SLIDE and SPECIALISTS…

    • GinsuVictim

      Ghosts introduced sliding to CoD, so that will probably stay (I really hope so!)

      • Diego Diniz

        What about the Specialists??? I really like this feature introtuced by Treyarch. So much FUN on Gameplay…

        • GinsuVictim

          Meh, they’re fine in BO3, but I don’t want ’em back.

          • Diego Diniz

            Dont need to be Futuristic Powers but more “REALISTIC” Specialists like Seraph’s Annihilator…or Flamethrower..Bow and Arrow…MiniGun etc etc etc will be great!

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            They might be coming back.

        • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

          There’s a rumor that they’re coming back.

    • John Mark

      No, the specialists don’t belong in CoD.

      • Diego Diniz

        I mean NEW SPECIALISTS!

  • KING WOLFE

    The 0.90 k/d’s is strong in this comment section

    • DEMOLITION12

      always is hahaha

  • It’s the truth

    People need to realise the call of duty you was once knew and loved is never coming back, every game going forward will cater to esports and futuristic elements/ advanced movements and ridiculously themed map and micro dlc like space cats and gingerbread men.
    There will never be anymore cods like mw1,2,3 and the original black ops.

    The last cod the was even close to realistic in weaponary was ghosts and a few in advanced warfare bo3 doesn’t even have 1 real gun just very futuristic version of guns we see now days or completely made up ones.

    COD is dying and getting worse don’t believe name me one series of games which started of well got worse then got well again almost to the point of what they once was?

  • I know not many people will support what I have to say, but I’m going to say it anyway. I personally feel Infinity Ward should finish what they started, suck it up and create a proper sequel to Ghosts which continues the storyline in a more innovative / intriguing way along with providing us with a better MP experience that fixes everything which was wrong with Ghosts 1. I would also wanna see a nice continuation to Extinction but with that, the game wouldn’t have to be called “Ghosts 2”. I agree with charlieINTEL’s points regarding the industry but like many of you said, the industry is constantly changing and adapting to make the most profit. I simply dont wanna see IW copy and paste the advanced movement or stir away from the Ghosts storyline all together. Sure the campaign was pretty terrible and MP wasnt the best, but they could really fix all of those issues with a proper sequel since they’ve had an additional year to perfect the game. Lets just see what happens

    • Aceshigh87

      Agreed. I actually play the campaigns and while the story was mediocre it did end on a pretty significant cliffhanger so I’m curious where that goes.

      Realistically speaking, Ghosts 2 is just a name, nothing more. BO3 is a solid game but pretty much only shares its name with BO1 and BO2. People seem to be assuming that if the game is Ghosts 2 its going to have all the exact same issues that Ghosts had which is insane. Why would a dev ever spend 3 years working on a clone of a game that people hated?

      At the end of the day the name means nothing. It could be called “Call of Duty: My Little Pony” and I’d still be interested as long as it’s a solid game. Name means nothing and it would not be hard at all to fix the issues they had with Ghosts.

  • DEMOLITION12

    how is bloodlines an unreasonable title? did you forget GHOSTS?

    • Will WilFredo Mendoza

      Ghosts was a terrible ass name. Bloodlines sounds better. Still, its IW, fuck em.

      • GinsuVictim

        I can’t wait for the game to be so awesome you have to swallow your pride and play it.

        • Tuby

          Normally he sucks and swallow sperm of little negro boys

      • Wraith

        Don’t forget Assassin’s Creed: Bloodlines. People would go nuts if 2 of the top yearly franchises starting sharing names.

        Edit: Well, AC isn’t yearly anymore but yeah.

  • Will WilFredo Mendoza

    A lot of idiots hating on black ops 3 campaign yet they don’t even know what the hell happened. Look it up online what the true story is then you will figure it out, jackasses. Treyarch fucked with your mind and you all fell for it and didn’t even do your research or even pay attention.

    • LovekillerX

      Good story = google it up and stop Youtube video to see scrolling text at maximum speed? LOL!

      Linear story >>>>> potato >>>>>> BO3 story.

      • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

        That’s just stupid. Any Campaign is better than the ones leading up to Black Ops 3. It’s the best in years. I’m done with shitty games like Ghosts and Advanced Warfare where I have little to no control and BO3 destroys them in every way.

        • ScOott

          Ur talking about gameplay not story..

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            Lore is part of storytelling, in fact, it’s more than storytelling.

          • Even then the gameplay, level design and set pieces were uninspired and dull as shit. You can read my longer comment to MooCow above, but TL:DR – BOIII campaign was utter shite. Disappointing considering how great the previous two Treyarch campaigns were.

    • Kurama The Nine-Tailed Fox

      Some people are just simple as hell and can’t enjoy the story because they’ve been mind fucked lol.

      BO3 Campaign was actually deeper than people think, the people who can’t be bothered to go deep will be left with no understanding and think the campaign has “no story” when in actuality the story is hidden and must be found. That’s what makes it fun imo.

      • ScOott

        Its pretty poor story telling, if the story has to be found lol.. Some people just like that treyarch dick, and then others thinks it makes them intelligent because they liked bo3 campaign lol..

        • It was a different way to tell the story and the way they told it was fantastic. Not as good as BO1 campaign, but better than Black Ops 2.

          Also, Treyarch’s dick taste great especially when all of their games have been great. I love it.

          • ScOott

            Lmao upvoted for the last bit in ur comment.. Ive already replied to Brady how a fps like cod can’t away with this poop..just my opinion..

          • Kyle Soule

            Yh I know I found that funny too haha ?

          • No way in hell better than black ops 2.

            You gotta be flipping crazy dude

          • Well considering its my own personal opinion, yes it is.

          • OpinionsAreFrownedUpon

            What is this games you speak of? The only good game they’ve made is [email protected] 2 of the 3 worst CoD’s belong to them. AW taking that top price.

          • Lol no you’re wrong. Very wrong

            Good games Treyarch made
            World at War
            Black Ops
            Black Ops 2
            Black Ops 3

            They are by far not the worst CoDs ever nor does Treyarch own a “worst cod” title.

            Get that shit out of here.

        • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

          What? Developers hide their stories behind things all the time… FromSoft games have rich, deep lore surrounding the item descriptions. Thief does a good job at it, too.There’s nothing wrong with having the player find the lore themselves. It’s better than some shitty scripted sequence or some cutscene that you can’t skip. Gameplay > story. They did it right.

          • ScOott

            Gameplay >story ? Neither should be compromised in a CoD title.. Some games are ment to flow like that, the new ghosts recon coming out if that doesn’t have a story, it won’t matter it would still be an epic game, same with hitman if the story flops it doesn’t matter because who buys hitman for the story..

            An fps game on the rails no open word needs a good story to help it progress.. If it doesn’t have a well scripted story it’s a fail.. Its that simple.. Any one saying u just didn’t get it, is just a weak argument..

          • Multiplayer has a better story, and still has a big mystery people can’t figure out.

          • Eddie Tupy

            You are totally wrong here scott there are alot of books that people dont understand and write them off as garbage yet othe rpeople realize the true story. i havent played campaign yet but i believe this could be the case here.

          • ScOott

            What? I understand the campaign.. The fact that they left stuff out of it, so u had to go research the game after u completed is what’s bull shit.. Im all for complicated story telling as long as they can fit into the game with out having to go to YouTube and read comics..

        • Kurama The Nine-Tailed Fox

          No one gives a fuck about “traditional COD story telling” any more it’s boring, has been done a hundred times before and constrictive and linear in terms of the possibilities. Not to mention the further we go into the future the more impossible it becomes to maintain characters from past COD’s. That’s why we need story telling that is deep for true fans willing to dig up the story and enjoy figuring out the puzzle.

          You can tell this campaign has been touched by the Zombies team and Zombies hasn’t had any “direct linear story telling” you have to find out the story yourself through the gameplay and the story is open to various possibilities. Campaign gameplay has been amped up with customisation and cybernetic cores making Campain more personal to how you like to play.

          This type of story telling makes sense for co-op and allows the Campaign to now be taken in many interesting and endless directions just like Zombies and that’s a good thing because we can go to insane places whether its in the future, present or past. The story telling is not poor it’s just deep and you can’t go wrong with a deep story, go do your research Scott. 😛

          • ScOott

            Lol.. they don’t have to stick with the same old same old.. Their is plenty more options they could take a CoD story, nothing in the rule book says we have to be a bad ass solider and blow everything up, I can think of so many great ideas for a CoD campaign..

            So many better ways to mix up the Cod camping than go to YouTube and slow down text to see what’s happening.. Imagine paying to go watch a film, and at the end of it instead of being satisfied with the film u have to re watch the film pausing at bits to read tiny text that was impossible to follow during the film.. Makes no sense..

            A mind fuck to me is a clever plot, bo3 doesn’t have that, I feel people are confusing a mind fuck with leaving out information and story for it to purposely not make much sense.. That is not a “mind fuck” as u guys keep saying.. It’s just bad story telling..

            I honestly can’t belive they have got away with this as a story and people not just accepting it but applauding it. It’s beyond me..

          • Kurama The Nine-Tailed Fox

            Just because they have purposely left things out doesn’t mean it’s bad story telling. It’s done on purpose so that what we don’t know now can be revealed fully later on. (BO4 perhaps) It’s part of the mystery and allows the community to band to gather to discover the mystery.

            This is isn’t a movie, this is a game. Two very different things.

            Treyarch have been successfully mind fucking people since BO1 i find it hilarious.

          • ScOott

            W.e man we ain’t going to agree, u see mystery I see un explained plot holes that don’t make sense.. no point continuing this, I would like to see u reply to Moo Cow below me tho, as no one has been able to question what he has said..

          • Kurama The Nine-Tailed Fox

            It’s a mystery anyone can discover it’s not that hard but you may need to play Campaign multiple times to understand, as well as look at the details in the CIA computer. The BO3 comic helps you understand the campaign also.

            Deep mystery and mind fuckery is clearly what Treyarch wanted to achieve to add to that re-playability. If you get the story in the first play-through there is no point whatsoever playing it again. Not only that but there is no mystery or various theories to talk about.

            But w.e I agree to disagree. What Moo Cow said about what?

          • ScOott

            Doesn’t matter, seems like u already know u need the comics to help tell the story n everything else.. All I want to do is chill out on my ps4 or xbox and play a story game.. I don’t want to have yo turn into a private detective after.. I’m glad it added re-playability for u, but this is just not my kind of thing..

          • Well then obviously this story isn’t for you then. You seem like the guy that just wants to chill and have a cool, basic story I suppose. One of the reasons why I love the Black Ops 3 storyline because Treyarch changed it up on how they told the story and another reason is because they took a page from their zombies mode. The zombies storyline is complicated, a mindfuck, and you have to look for it yourself. I can see Treyarch wanted to do something similar with their campaign which I applaud them for.

          • OpinionsAreFrownedUpon

            The Zombie adage is them trying to see if people would buy a stand alone zombie game.

          • That makes no sense

          • Kurama The Nine-Tailed Fox

            I understand where your coming from and I’m sure IW or SHG may be able to deliver those chill out film like action story experiences that we’ve always had for years now.

            Me personally I’m done with single player story time games, if theres no co-op and deep story its just not worth it or fun imo.

          • OpinionsAreFrownedUpon

            Is that why everyone wants the old ones remade? nice try though.

          • Kurama The Nine-Tailed Fox

            What kind of a retard gamer wants something remade when it’s already been made and experienced before… what a waste of time. We need new original stories not remade bull crap.

        • Eddie Tupy

          nah man

      • MichiganerE

        Agreed 100%. It’s my favorite since BO1’s campaign, and I’d say I like just as much as BO1.

      • ben wills

        “Simple”

        Well, we have another hopeless person. The game was designed for stupid people, moron.

        You were dreaming the entire time? Where’s the lessons, excitement, impact? IT DOESN’T EXIST. IT’S LAZY STORYTELLING FOR A LAZY TWIST SO STUPID PEOPLE GET MINDBLOWN AND THINK THEY’RE SMART WHEN IT’S THE DUMBEST THING THAT’S EVER BEEN WRITTEN.

        The irony… Just… the irony. You IDIOT.

        • Kurama The Nine-Tailed Fox

          If it’s a lazy twist explain it then? Boy I can’t wait to see you mess this up.

          • ben wills

            I already did? Reading isn’t your strong suit is it? It’s REALLY apparent this twist was designed for you. Sorry, but having a dying dream for most of the game isn’t good at all. It’s lazy. It’s their excuse for nothing in the game making sense. It makes the game meaningless. Nothing happens, literally. You die at the start, that’s it. A character you have no attachment to dies, just the same as the millions of other soliders in other CoD games. There is no story, no lessons, no meaning. Literally nothing. All for a lazy twist. A lazy twist that gets a bunch of morons to get their mind blown without thinking about the game in a larger way with comprehension and meaning. A twist doesn’t make something good. It needs to make sense, and it needs to be done well. These are two things Black Ops III failed at, if it even attempted it at all. Funny how I just typed all this for a guy that can’t read.

          • Kurama The Nine-Tailed Fox

            Lol judging from what you’ve said you didn’t get the twist at all whatsoever just as I assumed, I suggest you go do your research bruh because in actuality your the one that’s being lazy.

          • ben wills

            Then you really can’t read. How ’bout you explain it, dumb boy? I’m well versed in the twist, actually. I really can’t wait for this.

            Not to mention I just explained the entire thing and every problem with it and you can’t be bothered to even reply. I doubt you understood, which is why you reverted to not responding intelligently to anything I said. I’m rather surprised you can even type, even with your simplistic language choices.

            So, go on big boy. Actually make an argument, which you’ve failed to do this entire time. I’ve explained the twist and why it’s bad. You have not explained the twist, why it’s good, why you enjoyed it, what could possibly be redeemable about it, etc. I get it, you’re not smart, but you need to at least try.

          • Kurama The Nine-Tailed Fox

            You explained the entire twist? LOL all you’ve said is that;

            “You die at the start, that’s it.”

            That’s literally all you’ve said in regard to the story. If that’s all you got from the story then I feel sorry for you. I don’t even know the protagonist of the story or the enemy? lol

            I’m not about to sit here and write you a bedtime story by writing the whole understanding of the story for you. It wouldn’t even make sense for me to ‘explain it’ to you as the story can have several theories evolve out of it. It’s that deep.

            It’s not my problem the story hasn’t registered with you like it has done to others, that’s your own fault. The fact that there are people who think it’s lazy story telling just goes to show who got mind fucked and who figured the mind fuck out. Treyarch did good haha.

          • ben wills

            You mean that thing how “you” are reliving Taylor’s journey?

            Nice try. Moron. You’re just too dumb to think through what a dumb and meaningless twist it is. Which, really, is a good thing. Your lack of IQ lets you enjoy things, so really good on ya, just don’t go saying they did anything close to “good”.

          • Kurama The Nine-Tailed Fox

            Don’t get salty at me because you haven’t got enough IQ to understand the campaign of a Call Of Duty game lol there is definitely a meaningful twist and it went right over your head like wind.

            “You mean that thing how “you” are reliving Taylor’s journey?” By saying that I know your still confused. Either keep digging or keep acting salty because you don’t get it… lol

            PS. I will call it a good campaign just like many others have, I’m entitled to my own opinion thanks.

          • ben wills

            God, you really can’t read. I said you’re entitled to your opinion, as dumb as it is. Moron.

            That’s not what that means at all. I was insulting you because it’s the most obvious thing about the game. Moron.

            On the contrary, my IQ is at the level where I see all the flaws and stupidity in the game. You can’t think on a rational level, so you like it. It’s like the sense of wonder you experience as a child, or as an animal going for a walk. You’re just so excited by all the new things while other people laugh at you for having already been at that point decades ago. Moron.

          • Kurama The Nine-Tailed Fox

            Since your IQ is so high show me the “flaws” in the BO3 campaign? instead of just stating you know the flaws why don’t you actually prove it by showing us your critical analysis after-all your the one who supposes there is “stupidity” in the games twist.

          • ben wills

            Re-read the comments a few times please and you should eventually stumble upon it. Remember the bit about how there’s no reason to care?

          • Kurama The Nine-Tailed Fox

            LOL you basically have no evidence to prove why the campaign is “stupid”… by saying “there’s no reason to care” is just a cop out answer and just goes to show that you don’t know the campaign or the twists and the possible outcomes because it never registered with your brain. Treyarch fucked the shit out of your mind lol

            You don’t know or care about the campaign you have no right to give your opinion and call it “flawed”.

          • ben wills

            You’re the biggest goof there has ever been.

            I explained the story

            I explained the flaws

            I backed it up with evidence

            You haven’t talked about the story once. You’ve only said “it’s good”. That’s it. You never talked about it, why it’s good, or backed it up with evidence. You don’t have any. You’re stupid. You’re a goof.

          • Kurama The Nine-Tailed Fox

            “You’re stupid. You’re a goof.” – Biggest insult of 2016?

            Guys I don’t think I can handle this abuse anymore… wow I’m so offended. Biggest insult I’ve received in all my life… definitely never heard that type of an insult in primary school. LOLOLOL.

            Like I said I’m not explaining shit to someone who hasn’t got the capacity to get the basic understanding of the campaign let alone the deeper understanding,,, until you explain the story, explain the so called “flaws” you think you’ve found in it and back it up with proof I will not be carrying on this conversation. If you can’t do that I highly suggest you to keep quiet and go back to school.

          • ben wills

            “I’m not explain shit”. Yeah, that’s the point, You don’t understand it. You’re trying to argue without arguing anything. You’re the single dumbest person on a CoD thread you Goofasaurus Rex.

            – You won’t argue the story

            – You won’t argue why it’s good

            – You won’t argue the blatant flaws I’ve pointed out

            You’re embarrassingly stupid. Like, I feel bad for humanity for ever having you in it. I feel bad for your parents for having such a stupid child. I feel bad for your teachers for having to read your essays or see the answers on your exams. You’re just stupid and incapable of making an argument or understanding anything.

            Make an argument. I dare you. You can’t. You’re just stupid goof.

          • OpinionsAreFrownedUpon

            So are terrorist.

    • ScOott

      Willey fredo.. No surprise ur on treyarch dick.. U got Activision dick up ur ass from being ok with supply drops, then treyarch dick in ur mouth.. #WillyLikesTheWilly

      • Will WilFredo Mendoza

        Id rather have Treyarchs dick in my mouth any time than be gagged up by IW and SHG dicks that you enjoy the entire time. #Scootthinksheisasmartfuckyethereallyisafuckingidiot

        • ScOott

          Lol I hate SH and ghosts… I ain’t got no willy time…

      • This comment made my day.

        ” #WillyLikesTheWilly ” I nearly suffocated

      • Eddie Tupy

        i dont see the problem with supply drops at all

        • ScOott

          This is coming from some one who doesn’t see the problem of not putting the full story on a disk and leaving bits out.. Doesnt surprise me… Im a hardcore cod fan and will probably never get to experience all the weapons.. Something is defiantly wrong with that statement, I don’t care how much u defend it..

          • Eddie Tupy

            You didnt ever explain why it is bad. I think its necessary since the base game is valued less than NES games back in the day.

            Also about the campaign, i never played campaign yet but from what i gather it just seems to be a take on the movies ‘the matrix’ and ‘source code’.

            ive played till mission 2 and so far i think the story telling is well done for a fps game, its no halflife or something but its getting there.

          • ScOott

            U have no clue what ur talking about because u haven’t completed it.. the films u have listed do not leave stuff out so u have to go on YouTube and slow text down and get the comic books.. they are just clever films..

            Their is no physical way of knowing what happens in bo3 with out going on YouTube..

            The point is its not a clever game, they just missed stuff out.. U know that writing that zooms past the screen that’u can’t read because it moves to fast.. U need to read that to understand the story, and they made it go quick on purpose just so people would be “mind fucked” and the only way of reading that text is to come off the game find a YouTube video and pause it at the right places..

            Also they rely on the comic books for back story, which should of also been fitted into the game, I shouldn’t have to buy the comics to find out such things..

            Come back to me when u have finished the story.. I’d love to see what u think then..

          • Eddie Tupy

            i beat the game, while it is confusing at first i kinda got a feel for it. Only thing that has me puzzled is why he said his name was taylor at the end.

          • ScOott

            Yh thats the whole point if u don’t get the ending u don’t understand what’s been happening in the game.. And the reason u don’t understand the game is because they left bits out.. That u have to.come off the game to find ur self.. Which just is stupid in a 50 pound game.. I want the every bit of information included for that price..

            Like I said this is just my opinion why I think its shit, and not for the reason u stated assuming I didn’t get it..

          • Eddie Tupy

            Ya i think they made the campaign like they make zombies easter eggs. You have to WANT to know about it.

    • Ghost

      Even when I figured the story. I didn’t feel attached to any of the characters as much as I did with MW series.

    • lotterry

      The campaign was poorly made. Displaying opposing views as being idiotic just makes you look like an idiot.

      • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

        What? How? It’s the best Campaign in years.

        • lotterry

          I did not like it because of the gameplay mechanics, this was the same with advanced warfare but the aesthetics and storyline made up for it. Also the campaign did not feel very gritty or dark to me and felt a bit cartoony. The writing was poor and cheesy. The storyline might have been a mind fuck like all of you have been saying but I wish not to google a game to figure that out. Just my opinion.

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            Ah, well, nothing to argue against that. I personally think that the gameplay makes up for anything else.

    • Wraith

      Idea was good. Execution has been done better many times elsewhere. Characters were bland, levels were same-old, same-old. It’s not that no one gets the story, but mindfucks and the like don’t automatically make the campaign any better. It’s just a story-telling device.

    • jordanxbrookes

      I’ll give Treyarch props for bringing back gore and adding lots of mindfuckery, but the mindfuckery was heavily pushed on me and didn’t feel natural. I understand what happened, but lets be honest, it was very confusing to pretty much everyone who got to the end. Plus the lack of the storyline connecting with the previous games really sucked tbh. I mean you call it “Black Ops 3” and all there is is a brief mention of Menendez? No flashbacks or anything? And a pointless WW2 mission that some woman wrote a paper on when she was young? At least have the mission make sense and not just chuck it in because. It was a solid 5/10 for me, especially when comparing to the great Campaigns in the older Call of Duty games. Definitely not the worst, but I’ve played much better.

      • Frag Wall

        Let’s just hope that Bo4 has more connection and no more bullshits.

    • ruthlezz

      it was a boring

    • TheHorror

      I don’t want to play a game just to be “mindfucked”. I’d rather have good story telling and memorable missions. If mindfuckery can be added in to that then that’s even better, but I don’t want to play through an entire campaign just to get “mindfucked” with a half assed ending.

      • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

        Yet the term “mindfuck” that pertains to a story means that it’s good. It’s not being used loosely. When you’re “mindfucked”, the sequence is so shocking and crazy enough that it shocks YOU, so when you’re saying that it’s a “mindfucking” experience, that means that Treyarch incorporated story elements that gave you a high shock value, in which they did. If you’re looking for more story in general, or lore pertaining to the other two Black Ops games, then go for the FromSoft approach and find items that are scattered around. I personally love that in their games and I really don’t mind BO3’s Singleplayer at all.

        • TheHorror

          The problem was that I wasn’t even that shocked. After the end of the game I was 80% annoyed and like 20% shocked/mind fucked. It was just incredibly unsatisfying to me, it felt like “the easy way” to end the campaign to me. But to each their own

          • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

            At least they had good ideas about the technology. Advanced Warfare didn’t really have much of a “story”, it was just annoyingly linear. Terrible.

          • TheHorror

            They had some cool ideas, I can give them that. It was something different. I didn’t hate the AW campaign but it is in my bottom 3 COD campaigns for sure

    • Maybe you realise that it’s still not good? I played the campaign and beat it within 2 days of release and waited and waited for explanations until people found out the ” big twist ” a couple weeks later. It’s still stupid and shitty.

      Oh wow, you play the prequel comic but for some reason you change out Taylor’s older squad for Taylor’s newer squad?

      Oh, you mean the by the second mission you die? And all the corvus shit is just inside your mind and only exists because you’re ” dying “, besides Deimos in Nightmares literally talking about how it was all real, but just another universe timeline?

      WOW SO COOL OMG!!!

      Yeah, screw off kid. The twist is shitty and contradicts itself multiple times over.

      • Exactly. And the shitty twist still doesn’t excuse the shitty, cringe worthy writing and undeveloped half assed characters and voice acting. God damn did the Black Ops 3 campaign suck. And that’s not even moving onto the gameplay which is one of the worst of the series. The level design was awful, it wasn’t designed with solo play at all nor were the abilities meaningful or had much impact. Such a disappointment considering Black Ops 1 and 2 had fantastic campaigns, especially since the later had branching non-linear storylines which I would have wanted to see return.

        How people can call BOIII’s campaign better than mediocre is beyond me. God damn I feel burnt.

        Multiplayer is effin fantastic though, and is the best since BOII.

        • Frag Wall

          I just don’t understand how the fuck did Treyarch just dropped their fucking balls over this. The sound design is very shitty and the voice acting is a piece of shit. Spec Ops The Line, most underrated millitary shooter in 2012 had the best visuals, sound design and voice acting and yet, they used UE3, not IW.

      • ben wills

        Yep, you got it

        It’s just bad. The entire game was a dream. Where were any lessons to be learned, excitement, impact. It’s non existent. None of it mattered. The twist was basically “congrats, you wasted your time”.

    • Frag Wall

      Still the devs is pretty lazy in terms of sound designing, voice acting, weapons (DLC weapons is pretty much a recycle from old CODs with re-sking and re-designed, but same reloading animation) etc. I expect that Bo3 will be good with new things but no, it has the same reload animation, shitty running animation, shitty characters animation, even cringy voice acting (even Bo1 and Bo2 is better), terrible sound design and terrible maps-fucking-design. What the f- even AW and Titanfall has more open space then small shitty narrow maps!! If you want your fucking game to success, do it properly and don’t rush! Oh well, the game is attacked by an idiots anyways.

    • spartanelite

      What no I didn’t really like the campaign because it basically made 0 sense and it had nothing to do with bo1 and 2

    • John Mark

      Black Ops 3 sucked. Get over it.

    • thunder 2.0

      so just looked at the story explanation. i basically new it apart from a few details still doent take away from the fact the story was jank, the levels where boring and it paid little to no attention to the events of bo2

    • Vystrel

      Truly a next gen title.. Google the rest of the story.

    • OpinionsAreFrownedUpon

      I know what happened & it’s trash. It’s the worst CoD campaign to date.

    • Jacombo

      Made an account to reply.. So bud, you’re an idiot. I completely understood the campaign. Just cause it was hard to understand doesn’t mean it was a good campaign you fool. It being complicated doesn’t change the fact the it was utterly boring with dull characters with 0 pointless development. Figuring out what really happened in the campaign made me hate it even more. Sorry I just don’t feel any joy playing through a “deep” story and then realizing later that nonevening of it happened and it was absolutely pointless to play through it. Terrible story. Sorry dude.

  • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

    If it’s not a past-era game, it’ll suck balls.

    • Agreed. I’m honestly tired of future games. If this year is a future game this will be the 5th futuristic game in a row. It’s sad to think we haven’t had a past-era CoD in six years..

  • Sexy Mcgee

    Yeah, but The Big Red One wasn’t about erect dog penises.

    • Smayo

      Dude… haha

    • GinsuVictim

      Only because we couldn’t make emblems.

  • Smayo

    My next CoD wish list;

    Boots on the ground

    All I ask at this point …

    • enjoy your campers!

      • Smayo

        Right, I remember Bo2 was full of campers indeed. But wait.. Ghosts you say ? Or Mw3 ? Or Bo1 even ? Take a look at the stealth perks in those games and you see that it’s not BotG that is the cause of camping, but rather bad perk design

  • evang_18

    Remember Call of Duty: Finest Hour? The title didn’t mean anything there either, so this wouldn’t be entirely surprising to me. I’ve been betting that the game won’t have Ghosts in the title but will have some kind of tie-in with the Ghosts storyline, since IW was undoubtedly planning to follow it up in the first place and probably didn’t expect such a negative reaction.

    I did recently have a nightmare that it got announced as Ghosts 2 though.

    • joey

      google “finest hour”; click on the first thing that says “winston churchill”.

  • Bloodlines seems like an obvious reference to Ghosts. Either way, I’m not excited for this years CoD. Especially when it’s anything Ghosts related.

    I’m honestly looking forward towards SHGames next CoD in 2017 and then Treyarch’s epic CoD in 2018

    • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

      IDK, I’m just getting CoD for Zombies, these days. If Sledgehammer goes to past-era and stops focusing on competitive, then I’ll give them a second chance. Treyarch needs to get the time to kill in the Multiplayer straightened out and they’re golden. They already have the hit detection right imo.

      • Yeah that’s what I mean with SHGames in 2017. If theyre next game is in the past, I’ll definitely give them a second chance. I honestly enjoy Black Ops 3 to the max and I’m looking forward to their next game. I hope they do a game in the past too.

  • thebulky1cometh

    So much hyperbole to sort through, so little time…

  • jjmoney

    Guys it’s not modern warfare 4, ghosts 2 or space warfare because all of the domains are open or taken by a company

  • hungryandrew

    Call of Duty: BOOTS ON GROUND

  • Wraith

    CoD4’s campaign isn’t any better than the newer ones. It only achieved a new level of hype because it started this whole cinematic formula where they put you right into the action and pack huge amounts of epicness into short levels and short campaigns overall. If you replay CoD4, or better yet, if people that haven’t played CoD4 play it, you’ll see it’s not a step up over any of these post-CoD4 campaigns. People shat on MW2’s campaign, saying it had barely any story and that it was rushed compared to CoD4, then the same for MW3. You’ll probably hate on CoD 2016’s story too.

    • MichiganerE

      I think the reason that we love CoD 4’s campaign to this day is because of the impact it had years ago.

    • jordanxbrookes

      That’s because the Modern Warfare series is fucking amazing.

      • BradyAlucard[sillibk]

        Thanks to actually feeling like you’re in a call of duty – being in the frontlines, and being a new recruit. What Call of Duty’s supposed to be. Black Ops 1-3, Ghosts, and Advanced Warfare feel like spin-off series. CoD4 was just simply a fun game all-around.

      • LovekillerX

        And that my friend is difficult to topple. I loved MW2 Army Ranger missions and MW3 Delta Force missions.

    • GinsuVictim

      I didn’t play CoD 4 until 2012 and found the campaign to be my favorite.

  • Jacob Adams

    this is so fake its not even funny…

  • John Canady

    posted this before ( reddit) , so I will copy and paste: here is how they ” fix ” Ghosts 2 .. Hesh, Logan and Rorke all end up in a secret base with a time machine, to escape capture, Rorke goes back in time to 1936, Hesh and Logan follow….blah blah blah….WW2 Multiplayer

  • Thug Turf

    In regards to story characters, I’m getting sick of these stereotypical super solider badasses who are afraid of nothing. I would like to see characters that are scared, that aren’t mindless killing machines, who actually seem relatable.

    • FazalGaming

      “relatable” lol

      • Thug Turf

        What’s funny about having relatable characters?

    • Kurama The Nine-Tailed Fox

      Corvus is an AI that turns into a virus that gains self conscience, fears and questions it’s own existence AND transcends across multiple DNI soldiers in the CIA and all technology.

      I don’t know about you but that isn’t a stereotypical super soldier.

      • Thug Turf

        The soldiers themselves are too much. Running along walls to cause havoc as a one man wrecking team. C’mon, that’s no longer realistic, it’s reckless at best.

  • Bengal Tigger

    Bloodlines is just the codename for ghosts 2 like how eclipse was codename for bo2

  • Bo3 Opinionated

    The Bo3 Campaign really fucked with my mind and thats the problem many people don’t like that they like simple yet exciting not complicated and and mildly exciting if you have to look up a video of the campaign then it’s simply not a good one you shouldn’t have to go through looking it up you should actually understand whats going on while playing.

    But then again it’s just my opinion…

  • I’m honestly excited for IWs new Cod.

    I don’t expect it to be good, but I want to know what they will do.

    Will they create a new movement system? Will they go back to B.O.G or will they reuse a movement system already done in a COD?

    Only time will tell.

  • Kyle Soule

    Ghost 2 confirmed.

  • Does Young Metro trust this leaker?

  • Alex

    No need for arguments gents.. I think most can agree we are tried of call of duty in general. not to mention the cartoon feel.

    Bring on Battlefield 5 rumor has it WW1 and even if it’s not at least they won’t have wall running,jetpack/exoshit in the game based in 3055

    IW will fvck this game they will NOT deliver. MW was made by a DIFFERENT CREW THEY NO LONGER WORK THERE !!! it’s important that you ALL understand this that way you can LOWER your expectations..

    Guys we had fun time to move on…..

  • s0rr0w

    Whoever wrote this article about the other article is stupid, smh.

  • Wiener

    Plz bloodlines

  • Keyser p. Soze

    *accurate

  • Heisenberg

    spider man the FIRST avenger??
    lol this news are fake

  • Eddie Tupy

    People need to just calm down and enjoy something for once

  • John Mark

    I don’t see why it’s out of the realm of possibility to have an NX Destiny before a PC Destiny.

    If Nintendo is really trying to make the NX succeed, they will need a lot of 3rd party support, and Destiny would be HUGE. Bungie has made it apparent that they aren’t interested in PC, but have no problem with consoles. NX being a console, I could see Destiny being on it.

  • Eddie Tupy

    bo3 story was good but the gameplay was a little repetitive, but hey its cod.

  • AC

    “In fact, Wii U versions of Call of Duty never got post launch support.” Untrue. Black Ops 2 eventually received the Nuketown 2025 map, as well as Freefall was added to Ghosts.

  • James Stoubas

    I think that Bloodlines is the title the game has during production.Call of duty Advanced Warfare also had a name during production:Blacksmith.