Spectre

Treyarch has announced that Double Weapon XP is coming to Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 this weekend, starting Friday, June 17 at 10AM PT and ending on Monday, June 20 at 10AM PT.


SHARE
  • Brian

    ok

  • ghosts sucks

    Fart noise

  • Qwayze

    Don’t know if its just me but is anyone else sick of having 2X weekends all the time, it was much better when they were less frequent as it actually meant something when you saw someone max level rather than just anyone?

    EDIT: I know this isn’t Double XP, just saying…

    • Dr. Edward Richtofen

      Well it has been a while

    • Drank Bleach

      Rather 2x cryptokey which to me is more beneficial

    • Kyle Soule

      I know it’s actually kind of annoying tbh. They just have it way too often. I like Double XP but it just occurs way too often like I said.

    • Frank Rizzo

      No. I’m sick of nerds bitching about it.

    • Meesum Zaidi

      Why question it? Would you rather people waste more time playing a single game that has is losing its replay value? I’m not against COD, but really let people enjoy their double xp. It’s a pain to level up as it is.

      • jordanxbrookes

        That’s the challenge of ranking up online. You think it’s a pain to level up in Black Ops 3? You must have not played MW2 multiplayer, now that was a painful grind.

        • J4MES

          Yep haha! Reaching level 30 was pretty routine but after that; it was one hell of a grind and probably took on average 65-70 hours a prestige. I got to prestige 5 before I stopped and then a modded lobby made gave me 10th annoyingly but I very much doubt I could have stuck out the grind all the way and credit to the people who legitimately made it all the way. In the latest COD games on DXP weekends; it’s common for people to prestige twice too now!

        • Kurama The Nine-Tailed Fox

          Did MW2 add tons of DLC weapons that you also have to level up? I don’t think so.

          Let’s not forget about that. This game has a lot of progression. As someone who is trying to 100% the game, I’m not complaining at all.

          • jordanxbrookes

            *DLC weapons that you’ll most likely never get, so don’t play that card.

          • Kurama The Nine-Tailed Fox

            So you haven’t got even 1 new DLC weapon since Black Ops 3 came out?

    • RdJokr

      With all these new weapons being added in, a little bit of 2WXP would help.

    • fr4gbob

      I have a couple of guns I can’t stand using, like the MX Garand and the HG-40, seriously underpowered and really hard to use, so double weapon XP is great for then, but I agree about the rest, far too frequent, especially proper double XP, like you said, makes it far too quick for everyone to reach max level.

    • jordanxbrookes

      I think it’s because they want to keep the retention rate at a constant as much as they can. It sometimes annoys me how often they happen, but then again it’s usually the only thing that brings me back to BO3.

    • J4MES

      It’s a good way to keep people coming back on the game, whilst enticing them to spend money in-game too. It does look a bit silly having a DXP event literally 3 times a month but COD doesn’t have the luxury of being guaranteed over 1.5m users on at any given time over a weekend across the systems like they used to back in the Modern Warfare/Black Ops days. Keeping people clinging on with incentives like this keeps the cash flowing for Activision no matter how daft it looks for gamers.

    • Kurama The Nine-Tailed Fox

      Even with all the Double XP mas prestige still means something. I know players who have had the game since day 1 and are to not max prestige. Not to mention the extra 1000 levels after Max Prestige…

    • Former

      This is the first CoD in which there are this many levels….1000 levels AFTER hitting 10th? C’mon dude. Double XP is needed.

  • Gamerazor247

    Fuck this game, us Season Pass owners DLC weapons are locked in SDs and I can’t climb the fucking bed anymore on NUK3TOWN, get these hands here, Vondeez Nuts /shot

    • Dr. Edward Richtofen

      They never said they were for season pass owners

      • The Gaming Revolution

        He was referencing the good old days of cod where in the rare case that they put in a new weapon in the game, us loyal season pass owners would get it for free, vs now multiple new weapons are put out every 2-3 weeks and those of us who paid $50 for the season pass don’t get anything. And yes, we did get 1 guaranteed weapon, but only after fighting on literally every social media outlet for weeks.

        • Dr. Edward Richtofen

          You mean bo2 really the good old days only four years ago black market black out didn’t work lol

          • BradyAlucard

            Nah BO2 started the stupid microtransaction trend in CoD.

          • jordanxbrookes

            But lets be honest here, Personalization Packs were as best as microDLC will get. I liked them, didn’t cost that much, were only cosmetic, and Activision made money off them. Win-win all round, but it just wasn’t enough for greedy Activision.

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            I bought almost half of them

          • jordanxbrookes

            I bought almost all of them lol

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            The game I have spent the most on nba 2k15 and it was to much for a game

        • RdJokr

          If you think that so-called “Black Market blackout” movement did anything, you’re delusional.

          • So then how did the weapon bribes get added then? Why did Activision give season pass holders free supply drops and a weapon bribes?

          • TehGreatostDeticteve

            Maybe……MAYBE….it was because Infinite Warfare was getting more hate than any game trailer ever, and Battlefield 1 had started the rip cod trend so they had this ready for implementation, in case of an emergency. The blackmarket blackout was the most useless thing ever

          • So either way its a damage control move

          • RdJokr

            That is an entirely different matter. People have pointed out various times why the movement doesn’t work: it’s too toxic by nature (especially the two idiot Youtubers that support it, aka Whiteboy7thst and Mikey Gaming), and it only reaches out to a minority of the community. Those who don’t keep up to date with the news on the Internet won’t care, and will just continue to buy CODPoints regardless. And frankly, that number is way larger than many think they are.

            Whatever the reasons are for Activision giving us bribes and free SD bundles, it certainly has nothing to do with the charade that is the “Black Market Blackout”. There are ways to make Activision hear you, but crying and whining like spoiled entitled kids is never going to work.

          • BradyAlucard

            If Whiteboy and Mikey are two stupid YouTubers, then what are Tmartn, Ali-A, etc.? No one can prove anything because Activision is never going to flat out say that a movement changed the game.

          • RdJokr

            TmarTn is alright. I think he’s genuine to a certain extent. Ali-A is friggin’ ridiculous though, I can’t stand that guy. But that’s more or less about his personality on-screen, rather than what he doesn’t do about the supply drop problem.

            And let me remind you, Whiteboy is an absolute disgrace. He fell off and didn’t have the fame he used to during his BO1 days, so now he’s just riding off the hatred of the fans by adding fuel to the fire. He doesn’t care about the community, he just wants his 15 minutes of fame as the “voice of the people”. He goes on and on about how gambling in COD is bad, while making gambling videos and promoting it himself. Hypocrisy at its finest.

          • BradyAlucard

            Tmartn is one of the biggest shills on YouTube. He tried to damage control getting CoD Points by saying that “it’s like a sponsorship deal”, which is factually not the case in the slightest (and CI condoned it and called it 100% accurate in which I completely disagree). And Whiteboy clickbaited before it became a thing. I actually don’t watch him often. I mainly watch Thunder and JDfromNY. The less “mainstream” ones, because the “mainstream” ones suck ass.

          • RdJokr

            So he’s getting free CPs, big deal. The amount of money he makes from uploading videos and streaming makes the freebie CPs look like a kid’s weekly allowance. You’d have to be crazy to think such a small amount of money is even worth making a fuzz about. Seriously, don’t go there, man. You’re only making yourself look like Eight Thoughts, and that guy is like the embodiment of hatred.

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            Eight thoughts that faggot is a salty bitch almost as bad as Ayesha curry

          • BradyAlucard

            You can’t seriously think that free CoD Points (in which it is not even just a Tmartn matter, some French YouTuber [I think] had a shitload) aren’t a big deal. It is a form of compensation, whether these YouTubers’ fanboys want to admit it or not. Is it really a “small amount of money”? There is no exact amount, nor will Tmartn ever admit that it was a high amount. If FaZe Rain can get however many CoD Points he had (not as much as the French YouTuber, but still a shitload), then what the others had was not “small”. It is definitely a big deal and I’m glad they’re finally getting called out for it, because these YouTubers are sleazy.

            I’m talking about Eight Thoughts, he’s the one in question, and is he wrong? No, he’s not. He has a good point in his videos. I’ve been watching him since the Modern Warfare 2 era, and if you’re going to take him completely serious, then you’re in his trap, and it’s what he wants, because he’s always made that kind of content. I wouldn’t call him a “troll”, per se, but he has had moments where he dedicated his channel to more “mature” content (to say the least) and even called himself the Cock of Gold. Is he really “hateful”? No, it’s for entertainment, and these dickriders have it coming. Not that they deserve it (one could argue that they do), but they should expect it.

          • RdJokr

            If Eight Thoughts’ videos can be called “entertainment”, then I fear for this generation’s future. Seriously, this guy grabs onto anything slightly negative and turn it into a fucking shitstorm. He’s literally calling CI an Activision shill just because they got sent an early unlisted link to the latest Black Market trailer. And he’s saying that the big YouTubers don’t care about the COD Endowment and helping veterans, just because they didn’t make a video about the new CODE Valor calling card. All the while, he didn’t even mention the fact that these very same YouTubers have done activities to help veterans outside of COD-related movements.

            That’s just a few examples, I could go and name some more. Point is, Eight Thoughts is the Keemstar of COD, and that’s just bad news these days. The likes of him and Whiteboy are doing nothing but stirring up the negativity within the community. So I don’t care if they had made “mature content” before, I care about what they’re making now. And I don’t approve of that. End of story.

          • BradyAlucard

            And if the future of YouTube are shitty commentators taking bribes and damage controlling them by calling them “sponsorships”, then the platflorm is fucked. You act like the YouTubers are innocent. They’re not. I admit that Eight Thoughts doesn’t always do things that I agree with. His CoD endowment video is questionable, because he had some inaccuracies ike calling it “Veteran’s Day”, but he still made good points. They talked about it for 5 seconds and that’s all that he was trying to say in that regard. Tmartn is a part of The Race and he deserves credit I’ll admit, too; but there is far more “dirt” on him already. As I stated, EightThoughts has always been a “zero fucks” type of guy, and you took his bait. I prefer honest YouTubers than YouTubers with annoying voices screaming into my ear. Plus their annoying news anchor commentating style. Why not just speak normally like JD and EightThoughts do? And was his video on chaosxsilencer’s Patreon bullshit just a small ordeal? No, not at all, it’s a very big deal. Just like the free CoD Points fiasco was a very big deal.

            Keemstar started with CoD. But even then, that’s a pretty terrible comparison. And by “mature content”, I meant adult content. Sexual comedy. He had series dedicated to it. What makes you think he got his catch phrase from? And what EightThoughts does isn’t negative. Is he wrong? There’d only be a point there if his Cringe series wasn’t completely factual and accurate. It’s only negative to some because he’s telling the truth in a way that others don’t. I do admire that, he’s got balls. He has taken these shills head-on.

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            tbh the only part of the community that is worth watching is zombies because there aren’t many feuds

          • BradyAlucard

            Multiplayer content can be enjoyable. It depends on your taste, and the people you watch.

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            I mean a lot of people get along

          • So you didn’t answer my question

          • zack

            you are correct, the boycott is irrelevant. even if a small minority of users buy supply drops, its still a profit because their cost is zero. lol. a handful of rich kids is all they need to milk……

  • TYRO

    Not first

  • Dr. Edward Richtofen

    Just going to play R6 anyway

    • Axel Noir

      What?

      • Dr. Edward Richtofen

        Rainbow six siege

        • hungryandrew

          Me too, me and my squad plays for hours and hours over the weekend.

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            I just Got into it

          • hungryandrew

            t’s a good and intense game if you play with players dedicated to team work.

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            And not team killers

          • hungryandrew

            We had a match, where the match started, the other team, team killed, where there was 1 person left. The last person, nitro celled himself, and we automatically won.

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            Here i am putting up barricades with castle and then someone with Valkyrie kills me why damn Valkyries

          • hungryandrew

            Find some good people from matches, add them, so you can play with them on a regular basis.

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            Impossible

          • hungryandrew

            I did., be patient

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            Never

          • BradyAlucard

            It’s a trash $60 game, must be lower than 30 now though.

          • hungryandrew

            You must be terrible at it.

          • BradyAlucard

            Nah, 3rd party publishers’ business practices are just screwed up. I don’t know what skill level has to do with the value of the game, to be honest, concerning the fact that the content that it does have is pathetic, and its offline portion is laughable at best. I’m speaking generally, FYI, it’s not a personal attack towards anyone particular. I speak with my wallet.

          • hungryandrew

            Game is good rainbow six.

          • BradyAlucard

            I’m sure it’s alright.

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            I’m terrible but I could see how he doesn’t like it

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            Y u do dis

          • BradyAlucard

            Cause I can’t stand the mentality that 3rd party publishers have with Multiplayer-only/DRM games nowadays lol, it’s nothing personal against you, I’m just speaking generally. This generation has me and a huge portion of the gaming community salty as far as the business practices go.

  • TheDemonOfHate

    I’m pretty sure my dad would appreciate more of a Double Cryptokey weekend.

  • Sentinel

    I think they should reward players who grind to reach max level at least. Like weapons bribe, a special weapon camo to show off, ect. They really took away what it meant to reach master’s prestige…you just level up yay exciting stuff…

    • fr4gbob

      What did you get before? I only ever prestiged on Black Ops 2, didn’t see the point of it, ever, only went to master on that one cause someone said I couldn’t and I was too stubborn to let that slide, but there was never any reward bigger than getting everything open as far as I am aware? I guess I missed something?

      • Sentinel

        Well Advanced Warfare released 15 addition prestige after the masters prestige. They where all the same as the previous but golden emblems and it rewards players with Elite weapon variants after reaching a certain prestige level. At least it gave the players a nice reason to keep on grinding. BO3 had the permanent unlock but it doesn’t serve as a great reward.

        • Shawn Gee

          AW did it right. The Purple master prestige gear, then the grand master prestige levels (even though I had all the weapons), then the GMP Appreciation supply drops.

          • HAHA

            ”AW did it right, BO3 sucks” the cod cycle is real with you!

        • fr4gbob

          Did the weapon variants actually do anything though? or were they just useless cosmetic only?

          • Sentinel

            Yes, my favorite was the AK-12 RIP and the Hair Trigger variants. All of the variants were tweaked by adding or taking away points on the damage, accuracy, fire rate, ect. Making them a better or useless version of the stock weapons.

          • BradyAlucard

            Which made the game unbalanced and Supply Drops p2w.

          • Sentinel

            Yeah, I don’t think it did. There was OP guns in the game but it was nerfed. It took me a while to get most of the elite variants but by the time I reached prestige 13, I already had all the elite variants on most weapon class. Didn’t paid a single penny! The only thing I disliked the most the about the game was the button layout for the exo movement…My R3 thumbstick broke on two of my controllers because of that stupid exo!

          • BradyAlucard

            I don’t remember them nerfing the broken variants. And only your R3 button? I’m surprised your L3 didn’t get fucked up lol.

          • Sentinel

            Idk about the variants but the stock weapons did. & yeah, only the R3 ’cause of the constant pressing to use the exo side thrust. I felt like I was on a grasshopper warfare! lol.

          • BradyAlucard

            The variants were definitely a problem, and I thought the Exo Dash was mapped to L3?

          • Sentinel

            Well that won’t matter now, AW is collecting dust on the shelf. and yeah, it is mapped to L3…

          • BradyAlucard

            Must be a SCUF, then? And I play AW from time to time. Like all CoD games, it’s much better out of its prime, and when you play on an account with a negative KD (oh boohoo bitches, the game’s been out for a year and a half, STFU).

          • Sentinel

            You caught my typo! lol I meant to say L3 before, I just changed it after I replied haha But Nah, just a regular PS4 controller & truee, I haven’t played it in 3 months!

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            You know my favorite none

    • RdJokr

      Well, the game’s internal code still has some lines referring to a Prestige Master reward, that seems to be another Weapon Bribe + Supply Drop bundle. Don’t know when that’s getting added though.

      • Sentinel

        Oh really, hopefully they add it to the level 1,000 Prestige Master reward!

    • Former

      They should create an equation for dealing Black Market items so that the higher level player has higher chances towards Epics and Legendaries. Not sure how hard that would be, but it would make a lot of people happy.

  • Stefan Lang

    Im just happy for Nuketown

  • Bob Loblaw

    Why should you go to jail for a crime someone else noticed?
    You don’t need double talk, you need Bob Loblaw.

    (Bob Loblaw no habla espanol)

  • Jayden Stephen

    I don’t understand what goes through treyarch’s head they need to understand that the people who play their game doesn’t care about 2x WEAPON Xp because I don’t think that anyone prestiges their guns in bo3 players would more have Double Xp or Double Cryptokeys so they can obtain one of the new weapons. I say that for fathers day treyarch should gift players over the age of 18+ and has season pass a free weapon bribe

    • fr4gbob

      Funny, cause I am a person and I play their game, yet I do want double weapon XP and have been hoping for it for a while, I have a few guns I absolutely hate using that I can blast through levelling them up with double weapon XP, also, I do prestige my weapons, so speak for yourself, not everyone is the same!

    • J4MES

      It’s a business decision by Activision to keep people playing and spending money with incentives that don’t cost them a penny to offer. It would look ludicrous and desperate if they had a double XP event every week so having a XP one for weapons is sometimes enough to keep people clinging on and buying supply drops on the side along with keeping the player counts up. They wont give away anything for free where there is money to be made and Treyarch are probably under strict orders to offer DXP events based on live statistics from a business standpoint authorised by Activision. Don’t be fooled that these are gestures made towards the community.

  • It’s useless for me now. I got all my weapons to Prestige 2 Max including the DLC weapons that I got. At this point the only way I can level up guns is if I get a new one.

  • Gayson

    i am gay please help also who actually uses double weapon xp lol

    • fr4gbob

      What do you need help with? and I use double weapon XP!

    • Dr. Edward Richtofen

      Gross

    • Michael Romo

      Don’t go to Orlando

  • Ak74u

    As prestige master level 300 with dark matter, I don’t need weapon XP I rather have double cryptokey

  • Sentinel
    • BradyAlucard

      Looks pretty decent. Best thing from that shitty EA conference. I’m not bothering with EA and Ubishit during E3 anymore. It’ll just lead to disappointment thinking their formula would change.

      • I thought the EA conference was pretty good, Xbox and EA conference were probably the best imo

        • BradyAlucard

          There’s no way lol. PlayStation stole the show again definitely. And Bethesda had a decent showing, too. Ubisoft showed off a new IP too, which is nice.

          • I beg to differ that PlayStation stole the show. I thought it was boring to say the least, there isn’t much I cared about. All I remember was God of War, which I have no interest in, some zombie game (which looked interesting, probably the most interesting on that show) and Call of Duty, which was lackluster, but I couldn’t expect much from Call of Duty considering Battlefield destroyed them two days prior

          • BradyAlucard

            Did you watch the whole thing? God of War, Days Gone, Horizon Zero Dawn, Spider-Man, Detroit Become Human (believe me, I don’t like Quantic Dream, either, but this game interested me), Resident Evil VII, Batman Arkham VR, Star Wars Battlefront VR, Death Stranding, Crash Bandicoot 1-3 remastered (from the ground up, and a leaked new game is in development as an exclusive), etc.

            Whilst Microsoft showed games that have already been shown alongside the Slim and Project Scorpio announcements, I found their conference to be just okay. Definitely their best E3 in a while, though. But they have nothing on the PlayStation conference’s pacing. Unlike everyone else, they just let the games do the talking (and all of them looked good), and I hope Sony and everyone else keeps this formula going forward. Oh, and I also liked Nintendo’s Zelda showing.

          • I watched the whole thing and I lost interest in after Call of Duty’s lackluster showing. The rest was uninteresting to say the least.

            I also dont have any interest in anything VR honestly either.

          • BradyAlucard

            I already don’t remember the post-Infinite Warfare content lol. And that’s weird about the VR stuff, because the Xbox conference mentioned VR, as well. Ah well. Point is, is that the PlayStation conference was impressive, and it just had to have had the best pacing and “megatons” over everyone else (besides Nintendo, I’d say). If I were honest, though, I mainly only wasted my time in watching the EA and Ubisoft conferences, as they shouldn’t even have a conference to begin with.

          • Mike_Scarnn

            I’m sitting here just wondering how glitchy and awful the whole VR thing is going to be. I think it’s going to be horrible at first.

          • BradyAlucard

            I think it’ll be fine. But we won’t know for sure until it launches. And then Neo shortly after in November, potentially.

          • Even with Xbox doing VR I have zero interest. It’s just one of the things, I don’t see myself caring about lol.

            I didn’t bother with Ubisoft, i literally expect nothing good to come from them lol.

            Actually, the only good thing they have done imo is the South Park games. I can’t wait for the new one this year

          • BradyAlucard

            And Steep is interesting IMO. Anyway, if there were any time to get a PS4, now is the best time. Their lineup is definitely the strongest and most diverse.

          • I would get a PS4, but I honestly don’t think I could handle two consoles at once or let alone have time for two consoles. I feel like most of my time would still be on Xbox and PS4 would collect dust. I feel like I can only have one lol

          • BradyAlucard

            Nah, you can own more than one. PS4 has a far more diverse library and it has games for everyone. You could use it as your multiplat console.

          • ScOott

            Sony conference wasn’t amazing, but the games u listed got me more excited for playing ps4, the only thing I remember from xbox that I’m interested in are dead rising 4, a flipping timed exclusive.. And gears of war 4.. Sony definitely had the better show this year.. I enjoyed ubisoft and EA conference as well, just dissapointing having to wait so long for Wildlands..

          • BradyAlucard

            PlayStation had the best pacing I’ve ever seen. All AAA retail releases. No bullshit. They just let the games speak for themselves. EA shouldn’t even have a conference.

          • ScOott

            Just becuse u didn’t enjoy it doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be there..

            Fifa was a fecking huge announcement, the best places to make huge announcements is E3.. And I’m sure the other sports games were just happily received by their fans of the game and all that before they announce battlefield and what ever else..

          • BradyAlucard

            They shouldn’t be there if they don’t have much content to show. How many games did they show? 5? What a complete utter waste of my time. At least Ubishit showed off a new IP. And Xbox wasn’t very disappointing, I actually thought it was their best showing in years.

            Another FIFA game is huge? Welcome to modern gaming, where Singleplayer modes are added in as a bonus, and taken as a “huge announcement”. Sports games are not huge announcements, they’re mainly roster changes. Gamers know what to expect from them. Who wanted them to waste 20 minutes on Sports games? I’d rather watch Battlefield 1 or Titanfall 2 gameplay footage. Hell, it’d be much better! Complete utter trash conference. Not going to tune in to EA anymore, personally, that’s for sure. PlayStation and Nintendo will always be who I wait for.

          • ScOott

            U don’t get how great their conferences was becuse u have no intrest in sports games, no one is forcing u to watch it, I love finding out whats new, the mechanics they added in fifa sound incredibly impressive, and fifa has always had a career mode, but what they are doing with this story mode getting to see stuff off the pitch is completely new to the fifa franchise and is well worth sharing at E3, i haven’t been this hyped for fifa for a few years..

            Of corse ubisoft is going to appeal to u more than EA becuse their games are more varied compared to EA..

            Just becuse u have no intrest in it doesnt make it trash..

          • BradyAlucard

            Not everyone will enjoy it because you enjoy it, either. That could be taken both ways. FIFA did not make their conference great IMO… and many gamers agree with me. Not saying that popular opinion is fact, I’m just saying that I’m not the only one. I’m interested in seeing what these “mechanics” are. Maybe you were more interested in FIFA because you’ve been playing every release and you are more accustomed to soccer/futbol in the U.K. (oh… I typed that after just browsing through, thought you were an annual FIFA fan). Was it “trash”? No, I don’t remember saying that (although I probably did because what I got for what I waited for was disappointing for me), I think that it looked like the best FIFA game in a long time, but they showed nothing new, which showed me what their intentions are. As for the new Singleplayer mode, I mean a full-on Singleplayer mode. This is EA we’re talking about – a publisher that made a beloved Racing franchise like Need For Speed a DRM (always-online) game.

            I was genuinely anticipating EA’s conference, expecting it to change, and it didn’t. You explained it perfectly; EA has next to no variety.

          • ScOott

            It really can’t be taken both ways. If ur a gamer and u can’t figure out if ur going to enjoy or be bord shirtless through out an EA press conference, then their is seriously something wrong with u, and maybe should seek some form of life help.. their is still plenty of people out their who enjoy and tune in other wise they wouldnt be their..

            I really don’t understand what u and these many other gamers was expecting from a heavily sports based press conferences lol I mean seriously, its like me sitting down to watch a Esports expecting something good :s I wouldn’t do it becuse I have no intrest in it yet many people out there love it..

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            Just fix nba live

          • BradyAlucard

            It depends if the live-stream is from EA’s YouTube/Twitch stream themselves, or it’s being streamed by another party, because most of the streams’s viewers are only watching the streams because it’s E3 and they’re expecting new announcements like everyone else. A vast amount of people think the same as I do, so I’m not the only one who thinks that EA shouldn’t be holding a conference. Why waste gamers’ time when they could be watching a, say, Nintendo conference (if they even did one, just an example)? FIFA may be a huge conference, but gamers didn’t get excited over it like in other conferences. Notice the reactions to Xbox’s hardware announcements and PlayStation’s megaton announcements; they were genuinely interested and ecstatic.

            Then you must be completely confused as to what I’m saying… I didn’t tune into EA’s conference to watch sports, because I didn’t know that they would dedicate half their conference to them. I expect huge budget AAA games. That doesn’t mean that I didn’t learn my lesson; thanks to that awfully boring conference, I now know to not tune into another EA conference again because it’d be another waste of time. I wanted to see things that I would have seen from other conferences; new IP’s, and actual demos instead of trailers. Battlefield 1’s hour-long Multiplayer stream doesn’t count because it wasn’t in the press conference. It’s funny that you talk about e-Sports, since FIFA had dumb e-Sports “features” shown at EA’s conference.

            Bethesda had a decent showing. Nintendo didn’t show one game, they also showed Pokemon, just FYI. Doesn’t mean that I support the idea of focusing on one game, though. It was more interesting to me than FIFA because they actually showed gameplay footage and it breaks the Zelda tradition. Unlike FIFA, Breath of the Wild actually feels like a new iteration.

            LOL what?! They say that they’ll add new mechanics that make the game feel like a worthy iteration every year, but it’s always the same game. I don’t know what I’m talking about? If they’re going to show FIFA for over 15 minutes, then they better have something worthy to show, but they spent half of the FIFA 17 announcement on e-Sports, so I want to know about these “new mechanics”, because they weren’t talked about in the stream that I saw. Why should they hold a conference at E3 if the amount of content that they’re going to show is very little? Perhaps YOUR outlook on EA’s conference relies too much on personal preference?

          • ScOott

            U make little sense, u tuned in expecting half their show not to be based on sports, I know ur not stupid and I know ur not a 12 year old kid so I’m not sure how u came to that logic before tuning in..

            Same with the people Watching on twitch I’m pretty sure they know what they are getting when they stay tuned in for the conference..

            Your last point really does sum all this up, of corse MY out look on EA press conference is based too much on personal preference that’s the whole freaking point!!! Their are many like me who purposely tune into EA conference to see whats happening with our favorite sports games..

            Just becuse u and others u know don’t fit into the target audience doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be their, it just means u shouldnt tune in, as it’s pointless for u to do so.. Doesn’t mean shouldnt be their

            I have no intrest in Nintendo after selling my Wii U, so I didn’t watch it, I am not their target audience doesn’t mean Nintendo shouldn’t be their tho..

          • BradyAlucard

            I don’t see the issue with my logic, here… I actually expected a decent EA conference because, well, I don’t wish for failure, and as I stated, instead of bitching about it from now on, I just won’t tune in, because *now* I know what to expect, and *now* I see why so many gamers dislike their conference every year. To me, they have little to offer, and seem to be there to just be there because they can. EA doesn’t even have the respect enough to show demos (actual gameplay) of their games, all they do is show trailers and in-engine footage, whereas the other conferences show 5+ minute demos showcasing the games in all of their glory, so I don’t see the issue with my subjective view here at all.

            Last time I checked, Twitch and YouTube have very similar chats as far as the reactions to the conferences go. “Your last point really does sum all this up, of corse MY out look on EA press conference is based too much on personal preference that’s the whole freaking point!!!” Then why complain about MY personal preference? Is that hypocrisy talking or am I confused as to what your intent is? It’s nothing personal. I think that the best option would be to show enough content of EA Sports (since it makes up a huge chunk of EA revenue, I never doubted such) that would make both sides happy. Did you care about all of their e-Sports crap? They could have easily crammed that down much, much more. I’m open to every genre, I don’t just limit myself to a few, so who knows? I’ll probably give FIFA 17 a go. I loved the PS2 games.

            “Just becuse u and others u know don’t fit into the target audience doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be their, it just means u shouldnt tune in, as it’s pointless for u to do so.. Doesn’t mean shouldnt be their” It’s not just from people I know. I’m talking hundreds of thousands to millions of people that would agree that they dedicated too much time to content that could have been shortened significantly for the conference to be smoother and to have better pacing… I’m still not convinced that it should stay. This conference was apparently worse than last year’s, so if their conferences are getting progressively worse, then why should it still be a thing?

            I’m pretty sure that hundreds of thousands were actually *impressed* with Breath of the Wild and the other things that they displayed. That’s the difference; Nintendo doesn’t always have boring, piss poor conferences like EA does *every* year.

          • ScOott

            Seriously dude, the top 4 places to watch the EA press conference reached 4 million views alone on YouTube, that’s not taking into consideration other channles to watch and other places to view, all with significantly more likes to dislikes.. Like I said just becuse u and the group of people u know don’t like it doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be their if plus 4 million people are watching..

            EA should never show gameplay of their games, these guys know what they are doing, they tell us about the game show a quick trailer and move on as quick as possible, watching NBA and Madden would be so God dam painfull if I had to sit and watch gameplay as well.. As it stands it was painless and made the whole experience enjoyable to watch knowing the games I wasn’t interested in would be over In minutes..

            But this is not about how the conference should be run, ur original point is that they shouldnt be their.. I find it a pretty Ignorant thing to say when the numbers are right infront of u, the fact that u and a group of a thousands dont like it is irrelevant, it has a big enough audience to warrant a place at E3.. I would not sit down In a theater and say this show shouldn’t be on becuse I don’t like theater lol.. Ur crazy man..

          • Guest

            That fruitcake doesn’t care about numbers, just his opinion. He refuses to accept various skill levels on an online game aka he isn’t actually bad because the game is a “casual” game so if people do better than them it doesn’t actually mean they are better just means they are “playing like bitches”. The fact that he is dismissing actual evidence shows how big of an asshole he is. He continued to watch just so he could bitch about it. Lots of people cared about it and numbers would show that…Then again numbers probably show he sucks ass at COD but he’ll dismiss that as not mattering.

          • ScOott

            Lol yh agree his opinions make little sense sometimes, the whole CoD is casual game thing, his hate for anything Microsoft and now this are opinions il never understand. Will be intresting to see what his reply is, if he can come up with one that is. If he admits he’s wrong il be amazed..

          • Guest

            The guy who “didn’t care for it” sat their and watched the entire thing. Just like he bitches about COD all day yet pays for collectors editions. He just comes online to bitch and sound fake smart.

          • ScOott

            Lol I didn’t think anyone would actualy see this Convo as it’s an old article now, but I’m glad to know other people don’t think he’s making any sense..

          • BradyAlucard

            They don’t get that many views **LIVE**, that was my point. “EA should never show gameplay of their games, these guys know what they are doing, they tell us about the game show a quick trailer and move on as quick as possible” Then there’s no need for a conference. They need to learn from first party. Gamers are interested in *gameplay*. What if there was a live gameplay demo of Titanfall 2 during the conference? A huge portion of gamers would have preferred that than seeing irrelevant sports game features. As I stated, and I can’t stand repeating myself; it’s an issue of pacing, and *Myself and the people I talk to are not the only people who think this*. It’s the popular opinion that EA hosts boring conferences and there’s no need for them to be there.

            https://cheapbossattack.wordpress.com/2016/06/12/e3-2016-ea-play-was-pretty-awful/
            https://www.destructoid.com/everything-that-happened-at-ea-s-meh-e3-2016-press-conference-367801.phtml
            http://www.thepolinetwork.com/poli-games-vids/2016/6/12/ea-conference-highlights-the-good-the-bad-and-the-boring

            I’m crazy? Your point about “theater” was crazy and ignorant. I don’t find it all that crazy to think that EA doesn’t need to have an E3 conference, because it makes sense, and that doesn’t mean that they won’t have an E3 presence at all, I’m just saying to replace EA with a publisher that actually has content to show AND actually add something to the conferences. Why should they be there? Because their games are popular? Might as well have Konami conferences again and an Activision conference, by your logic. And you me ignorant lol.

          • ScOott

            How do u know? I didn’t watch the ps4 conference **LIVE** even tho it’s the main console I game on, does that mean ps4 shouldn’t be their? I mean seriously it doesn’t matter when u watch it, views are views and they are right infront of u..

            I’m assuming the the three links u provided are of a group of people Bitching about the cofrence on certain articles, again a pointless link as the numbers speak for them self’s..

            If ur actually that ignorant to ignore them then theirs nothing else to say, u keep talking about pacing as if I’m disagreeing with u, pacing is anothwr subject entirely one I’m not going into as it’s pointless knowing how different our views are on it..

            I also hate to repeat my self, but this isn’t about pacing it’s about if EA should be at E3.. Like I said if u dismiss numbers like that then no point in this what so ever.

            I know if EA was my company and I had millions upon millions of people tuning in to see what I was selling, id be going to E3 fo sho, by the sounds of it, u wouldnt be their lol.. Becuse EA shouldn’t actually be their lmao? Do u even realise what u r saying sometimes! I mean come on seriously dude, admit u was wrong to make such a dumb comment and move on..

          • BradyAlucard

            “How do u know? I didn’t watch the ps4 conference **LIVE** even tho it’s the main console I game on, does that mean ps4 shouldn’t be their?” Again, your logic makes no sense. “I mean seriously it doesn’t matter when u watch it, views are views and they are right infront of u..” It does matter, because how you receive the conference live is more important than seeing it later, especially when you’re reading the comments. It’s the best way of seeing a reaction to something, so yes, it definitely does matter. “I’m assuming the the three links u provided are of a group of people Bitching about the cofrence on certain articles, again a pointless link as the numbers speak for them self’s..” It’s typical to ignore the articles I posted, most do, but one of them was posted on N4G, which is a social news site, so there’s some sort of level of actual journalism, there, despite its cricisms, so (sites like Dualshockers are on there)…

            “u keep talking about pacing as if I’m disagreeing with u” Pacing is a very important part of an E3 conference. It’s my *entire* argument. If they had a better showing by outlining their content better, then that would mean that they have a worthy E3 showing, IMO. It’s not like Ubisoft’s was any better, but Bethesda was definitely the best out of the 3. I would have preferred Square Enix to be there, because their games are far more diverse, and there are more of them, but I understand why they didn’t have a conference this year… And I’m ignorant for ignoring what, now?

            “I also hate to repeat my self, but this isn’t about pacing” It has almost everything to do with pacing, because that’s the way that the entire conference is held together. “Like I said if u dismiss numbers like that then no point in this what so ever” What numbers? YouTube views? Those aren’t “numbers”, nor the majority of who watched the entire conference. This isn’t a new thing, gamers have been saying it for years… Gamers tune into E3 for a reason. They expect gaming news. EA is the most disappointing out of everyone else of this. “Let’s show as little information on our games as possible” doesn’t work. A pre-rendered trailer of Star Wars Battlefront wasn’t enough in 2014 and it wasn’t enough now. The fact that there is more information in later trailers for certain EA games than E3 is sad and pathetic.

            “I know if EA was my company and I had millions upon millions of people tuning in to see what I was selling, id be going to E3 fo sho” In which millions don’t even watch them live, when it’s more important? Okay, then… “I mean come on seriously dude, admit u was wrong to make such a dumb comment and move on..” Uh, no, just because you disagree, doesn’t make my comment “dumb”, especially when yours have no logic at all whatsoever here, just blind defending. Now THAT is more “dumb” than thinking that a publisher that doesn’t share a whole lot of news at the most significant press conference in gaming doesn’t need to hold a conference anymore.

            “Millions and millions of people tuned into find out about EA games coming soon, live or not, that’s millions of millions of reasons they should be at E3..” They should be at the biggest press conference in gaming because millions of the same people tune into theirs once a year? That makes no sense, especially when their trailers get more views outside of their conferences. They’re wasting everyone’s time by just showing trailers for games that were already announced (Titanfall 2, which was leaked) and snippets of Star Wars games that aren’t releasing for years. Even Mass Effect Andromeda, which is releasing in 2017, barely got any information. It will get millions more views for the rest of this year off of more showings of the game than the E3 conference.

            You’re ignorant for ignoring the fact that I stated that my opinion would change if they offered more to their conferences, such as better pacing and more content to show. If EA improves in the coming year(s), then I’ll take back the fact that I think that they should no longer hold a press conference.

          • Guest

            So….basically you watched something that you weren’t interested in so you can bitch about it? Long ass novel btw. The same way you and a lot of other salty, bored losers click articles on subjects you aren’t fans of on CharlieIntel solely just to bitch. EA’s bread and butter are sports games. Madden and FIFA in particular generates ton of revenue. Of course they will talk about sports. Once you saw it was gonna be overly focused on sports you could’ve easily stopped watching and just looked for the information about FPS games that you wanted to know after the fact. But no, you can’t wait, you must watch so that you can be negative and bitch all day, same way you losers can’t go hours without commenting on articles you care nothing about. There is my novel. Drinking game idea. Everytime you say “troll”, “corporate slave”, “Playstation”, “moron”, “idiot” or even the N word take we should take a shot. I guaranteed we’d be as drunk as your dad was the night you were conceived you fruitcake

          • BradyAlucard

            You seem butthurt. No, that’s not why I watched it, you fucking idiot. I watched it *being* interested and being *disappointed* when I found out that the conference was awful. Am I not allowed to express myself? You trolls act like I’m not allowed to complain about my $60 purchase, which is weird, because I’m entitled to do so. I mean… This isn’t a fanboy site. Stop making excuses about EA’s conference. It was the worst conference I’ve ever seen, get over it.

            Do you have nothing better to do than being a trolling asshole? I bet you were fuming when you typed that novel for me. I’m flattered, but I don’t speak stupid. You’re here trying to act like all of the other dickriders on this site and also trying to say that I’m “negative” or a “bored loser” when you’re making pathetic personal insults over video games. Suck a dick.

          • Guest

            I got you Cartman!

          • Guest

            Wouldn’t you expect a mangina like that guy to NOT enjoy sports games? I doubt he even knows what an air hockey table looks like.

          • ScOott

            Lmao

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            Detroit become human what’s that

          • BradyAlucard

            I’m only interested because they might have made an actually fun game this time (Quantic Dream).

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            I live in Michigan

          • Wraith

            Sony was basically basking in their own greatness the entire show (which cmon, was still enjoyable), while Microsoft was focused with trying to secure bigger audiences for the future. I mean, that’s exactly what you’d expect as Sony is currently in the lead in sales with Microsoft lagging behind. I feel they both did what they had to do, and they did it quite well.

          • I disagree, like I said, Sony’s show just lacked any interest to me compared to Microsoft were as I was very impressed. I didn’t enjoy Sony’s show, it just felt boring and none of the games appealed to me besides that one zombie game, which im not even gonna get to play as I don’t own a PS4, but it’s whateves

          • BradyAlucard

            I’m very interested in knowing why Xbox wowed you more lol, I was disappointed in their lack of showing anything new, and PlayStation definitely had much better pacing. IDK bruh, I’d definitely recommend a PS4 to you. Xbox basically told me that I don’t have to own an Xbox and I can own a PC if I wanted those games, and that’s okay.

          • Funny enough, I was originally going to get a PS4 when the consoles first came out, but it wasn’t for the right reasons lol

          • BradyAlucard

            I would have gone for my instinct. $399 vs. $499. PS4 was definitely more bang for your buck IMO.

          • BradyAlucard

            What do you mean ‘basking in their own greatness’? There were barely any speeches! It was probably the best E3 showing I’ve seen, especially in terms of pacing. They really outdid themselves. But that doesn’t mean I thought Xbox’s was bad just FYI lol.

          • Wraith

            I could feel it. How proud they were showcasing all the games and such. To me it was like they were saying, “hell yeah, we’re at the top of the console market and let us remind you why we’re currently unrivaled.” It’s not a bad thing, it was a great conference and that was the energy in air I felt.

          • BradyAlucard

            Oh okay, I slightly took it the wrong way lol. Glad you enjoyed it as much as I did! Probably the best I’ve ever seen (I haven’t seen many E3 conferences live, though).

      • Sentinel

        Yeah, it was. It was the only game that got my attention out of the whole conference. Ubisoft ehh, I wasn’t excited as I expected to be for the reveal of Ghost Recon. Ubi are notorious for downgrading their graphics after retail games are released.

        • BradyAlucard

          Yet Ubisoft had the balls to say that they’re not going to mislead anyone with gameplay footage lol. Titanfall 2 seems to be EA’s best game this generation, but we’ll see. Battlefield 1 may or may not just be the same formula different era (I don’t personally believe that, it’s just what I’m afraid of). Plus, I have other games I care about, anyway. Hope Titanfall 2 will be one of them.

          • Sentinel

            Well at least Watch Dogs 2 looks like is running on console graphics but I don’t trust Ubisoft! They always make drastic downgrades to their games before release date. It’s a shame they keep up with this marketing process. & Battlefield 1 looks promising to be honest. It has an amazing dynamic weather netcode, affects everything that goes on in the map! The weapon’s cosmetic will generate rains drops on the gun currently being used by the player when it rains on the map…on real time gameplay! (Attention to details) The environment looks spectacular for the WW1 setting. Titanfall 2 got my attention, I think it will feel familiar to COD in terms on gameplay! Still, I can’t wait to experience it for my self. Anyways, my PS4 pre-order list looks big this year. Specially when 4K video games era on consoles is already here!

  • Shaun O’Neill

    For fuck sake why do they keep giving us double weapon xp all the time give us something else for a change like double level xp

  • Gimpanese

    I still can’t believe I spent 1030 ckeys and didn’t get one weapon out of it!!

    • lunator100hd .

      Better dont tell your mother.

      • Gimpanese

        Wat?

        • lunator100hd .

          That you waste her money on cod points.

          • ScOott

            U earn cryptokeys for free dude just by playing the game.. . Where u been all this time..

          • TheDemonOfHate

            Remember man last-gen doesn’t have crypotkeys lol

          • lunator100hd .

            I have a feeling that he is going to buy cod points eventually so im trying to save his soul before its too late.

      • Ike Broyles

        You don’t have to tell your mother about this site. You can just tell about it to your father! If you know what I mean 🙂

    • Activision Shareholder

      Thanks for all your money as usual! I honestly cannot believe people keep plying us with money and always getting nothing in return only to give us more. Looks like I’ll be eating duck a l’orange this weekend at the Hilton with some champagne once again. Keep you cash coming and once you spend £1000; you may get some pixelated weapon of sorts but I can’t guarantee it.

      • reamerb .

        Haha.

      • fr4gbob

        You do know cryptokeys are free right?

        So really, I should be thanking you for, so far, giving me 6 weapons for completely free, awfully nice of you 🙂

      • Gimpanese

        Cryptokeys not cod points you idiot

      • Activision Employee

        We do anything to please you!

        • Kyle Soule

          Thanks Eric Hirshberg.

    • jordanxbrookes

      Because you have to buy COD Points to even stand a slight chance at getting one.

    • Jonny Wan Kenobi

      I spent about 1000 once and didn’t get any. Then I spent about 1300 another time and got Shadowclaw, Marshall, and malice 🙂 I spent about 650 in this most recent weapon drop and got nightbreaker, rsa, and slash n burn.

    • Michael Romo

      I call bullshit. I’m barely prestige 2 and I’ve gotten 4 weapons

      • LOL No. It’s not bullshit, very common actually. I’m level 217 and I have still yet to get a single gun. Not only that, I spent over 2000 cryptokeys I earned playing the game and havent seen a gun

        • Dr. Edward Richtofen

          I have a hg40 a sword a skullsplitter and a malice

          • I only have melee weapons which arent any use to me after one game

      • Weed the People

        I’m prestige 9 and all I have Is the bat via 75 wins contracts

      • HyruleKing88

        You, sir, seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of luck and random chance

  • Dr. Edward Richtofen

    On YouTube the battlefield fuckboys are real

    • Mike_Scarnn

      Says the dude whose username is Edward Richtofen. I’m sure that all the BF fans feel deeply insulted by your statement.

      Edit: Sorry. Forgot the “Dr.” part.

      • Dr. Edward Richtofen

        On YouTube not all but there are a lot of battlefield elitest the talk so much shit over pixels

        • BradyAlucard

          Battlefield fanboys can’t pull the graphics card anymore. CoD always goes for 60FPS 1080p on consoles (PS4). They have no argument there.

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            I’m talking about how they say oh you’re just going to quickscope cod faze fanboy they are a bunch of cunts

          • BradyAlucard

            LMAO I know right? It’s a multiplatform game. It should be expected that not everyone is going to play the way that *they* want to. Entitled pricks.

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            I watched a YouTuber talk so much shit about cod and how battlefield is so much better because I guess there is a fucking bullet drop so is that pretty much it oh and they use vehicles it’s like are they that fucking stupid

    • GinsuVictim

      I don’t know what any of that means, but plenty of us here are fans of both series. No reason for people to act like fanboy cunts when both series are excellent.

  • Michael Romo

    Wow. Can’t wait to spend time with my dad and feel guilty for wishing I was at home playing video games. Assholes.

    • lunator100hd .

      Everyone feels guilty for something dude, except fazal, who is proud and fagt.

      • Dr. Edward Richtofen

        Fazal lost his friend in Orlando the kid who got drowned by the alligator

  • Patsyrmoore3
    • Dr. Edward Richtofen

      Nice ass I guess

  • Mike_Scarnn

    If you still think that Infinite Warfare is going to be better than Battlefield 1, I pity you.

    • BradyAlucard

      That’s a mighty strong subjective opinion.

      • Mike_Scarnn

        Elaborate.

        • lunator100hd .

          Let me do it for him: Zeppelin vs spacecraft
          -enough said.

          • Mike_Scarnn

            Fighting with/against a zeppelin is waaaaaaaaay cooler than spaceships. And then there’s the dogfights. Biplanes that actually existed or spacecraft that doesn’t and won’t exist in our lifetimes. My point is Infinite Warfare makes Black Ops 3 seem like it took place in 2010. Going this far into the future just doesn’t work for me and a lot of others.

        • BradyAlucard

          You implied that Battlefield 1 is going to be better than Infinite Warfare as if it were objective, which is strange, as neither games are out yet.

          • Mike_Scarnn

            So I’m not allowed to have an opinion that’s been formulated after seeing both gameplay trailers? Interesting…..

          • Sentinel

            You can have an opinion but it’s flat out unrealistic given the fact that you have never played both games yet. I think it is stupid that people compare Battlefield with Call of Duty when both games are in two different categories.

          • Mike_Scarnn

            So my opinion is unrealistic because it is based off the gameplay that I have seen and I think that Infinite Warfare’s gameplay looks dumb while BF1’s looks great. Last time I checked, my opinion is not based off actual gameplay, it’s literally based off of what it looks like, and as said before, BF1’s looks a whole lot better than IW

          • Sentinel

            Yeah, that is pretty much what I said. Why jump onto conclusion when the games aren’t even out yet. It is dumb haha and things are subject to change. & I can state things like, Battlefield looks a whole lot better than BF4. Just like IW looks a whole lot better than BO3! I don’t see why I need BF to compare it with COD when they are two different categories!

          • Mike_Scarnn

            But they’re not different as far as categories go. They’re both first-person shooters. And speaking of BO3, I think that game looked, well looks, terrible because it truly is terrible. Why is it so hard for you to accept that I do not like Call of Duty set way in the future?

          • Sentinel

            They are two different games, BF1 being a large scale war FPshooter and IW being an arcade fast pace FPshooter. They are both in the same first person shooter genre. And so hard understand? TF lol. Yeah, it’s okey you don’t like the game and the future. Just stop jumping onto conclusions and being a colossal fanboy. I’m done.

          • ScOott

            U havent seen IW multiplayer gameplay, u haven’t played any of them, yet ur giving pitty to people who prefer the arcade shooter genre over battlefield type gameplay.. U sound like a Fagit dude and u can shove ur pitty up yo ass..

          • Mike_Scarnn

            My opinion was poorly worded I guess for you Scoott. We have seen gameplay from both games’ campaigns. Fighting in space in a Call of Duty game just sounds and looks ridiculous. Whereas BF showed us being in the mud, fighting with tanks and bayonets and so forth, which in my opinion, LOOKS better. I keep forgetting that I’m arguing with CoD fanboys who just can’t accept that I have an opinion that degrades CoD. My bad

          • ScOott

            Wtf u talking about dude.. It’s kewl for u to prefer battlefield… I know I prefer CoD gameplay over battlefield gameplay based on previous games tho,i sure as hell don’t need ur pitty becuse of that..

          • Mike_Scarnn

            Well too bad, cause you have it

          • ScOott

            And that’s why ur a Fagit lol..

          • BradyAlucard

            Nope, not if you state it as a fact.

          • Mike_Scarnn

            How did I state that as a fact? The only fact is that I feel sorry for people who think IW is going to better than BF1.

          • BradyAlucard

            Then you should have said that it’s your opinion.

    • Battlefield 1 is going to steal the show this year. It’s the game I wanted, and BF1 is giving me that where as CoD is like “you wanna another futuristic shooter?”

      • Mike_Scarnn

        Exactly. Have you seen the multiplayer gameplay for it? It was breathtaking. Infinite Warfare, in all honestly and this is me being blunt, just looked flat out stupid.

        • Multiplayer blew my mind, it made me even more hyped about the game and it definitely shows a first person shooter game in 2016 that is set in the past can and still work. It also shows that World War 1 is an amazing setting. I have been begging for CoD or BF to either do a World War 1 or a Vietnam setting for years

          • Mike_Scarnn

            Thankfully, DICE and EA listened. We got Black Ops 1 a while back, but it was alright. In my opinion, I think the only CoD that was set in the future that was decent was Black Ops 2. It had a decent campaign, the multiplayer was fun (got really old, really fast tho) and the zombies were great. Origins (set in WW1 btw) is my favorite zombies map to date, so I’ll give Treyarch props for that. Anyways, BF1, even tho it will probably be loaded with glitches and bugs like every BF at first, has won the holiday season

          • Black Ops 1 wasnt a full Vietnam game or experience. It was a cold war game.

            I would kill for Call of Duty or Battlefield to do a full Vietnam setting for a game.

            Black Ops 2 and Black Ops 3 were great futuristic games imo. I loved all the Black Ops games and all Treyarch games honestly.

            That being said, I’m 100% looking forward to Battlefield 1. I think it’s definitely going to be a fantastic game. I wonder when the open beta happens

          • Mike_Scarnn

            I agree with you on Black Ops 1 now that I think about it. I would not consider Black Ops 2 to be great, and I wouldn’t even consider Black Ops 3 to be half way decent. I can’t stress how much I dislike that game.

            Two games come to mind when I think of great futuristic games: Halo and Titanfall. Even though Titanfall lacked content and didn’t have replay value on the level of BF4 or CoD4, it was so much fun for the first several months I played it.

          • I think if Titanfall just had a campaign then it would be fine and maybe a few more guns but i think Respawn just lacked the funding or resources back then or whatever. I’m honestly looking forward to Titanfall 2, i feel like that game is going to be really good

          • Mike_Scarnn

            Couldn’t have said it better

      • jordanxbrookes

        Yup lol. Battlefield 1 is gonna be dope 😀

    • fr4gbob

      I will take that pity and more than likely get Infinite Warfare whilst not bothering with Battlefield at all 🙂

    • Dr. Edward Richtofen

      Does battlefield 1 have zombies because that’s pretty much why I’m still playing cod

  • Wraith

    Last time I checked, father would not be pleased if I spent the weekend grinding levels for my BO3 guns instead of acknowledging his existence.

    Also unaware that most fathers apparently ignore their family on the one day they give him their full attention so daddy can prestige his non-existence supply drop guns.

    Treyarch’s got strange ethics.

  • Sentinel

    I see many people that compare Infinite Warfare with Battlefield 1 but not with Titanfall 2…Titanfall was praised to be the real “Call of Duty killer” but came up short after a couple of months from it’s released. I see many people that be commenting things like, “BF1 it’s better than COD” or vice versa. It is too fanboish and it’s pointless to discuss real facts with them. They are clouded with all the competition between games.

    • lunator100hd .

      Cod FOR THE WIN!

    • People are allowed to say shit like “BF1 is better than CoD” it’s their opinion, also, what facts are you talking about, exactly? I’m not seeing any.

      • lunator100hd .

        You wanna hear a fact? Cod FOR THE WIN!

      • Shawn Gee

        Shut your dumbass mouth, fuckboy. Nobody gives a shit about your opinion.

      • Sentinel

        Indeed they are but I is pretty stupid when they write shit like that and most of the time they are just writing it. Hate and opinions are two different things. It is the same old BS that almost nobody cares to read about, only fanboys would fall in onto this sorts of “opinions” & discus about facts like, Battlefield 1 now has a dynamic map layout when players are in the loadout screen. They can literally see everything that’s going on in the battlefield. How BF1 has a dynamic weather system running on real time gameplay. NOT things like, “sorry COD but BF1 won my heart this year” “Battlefield 1 is way better than IW” blah, blah, ect.

        • Nothing wrong with voicing your opinion however you please, if they hate on Call of Duty then let them. It’s their opinion and there isn’t nothing wrong with being a fanboy either. However there is a difference in being a fanboy and being a blind fanboy

          And I like how you even mention my own comment “sorry CoD, but BF1 won my heart this year”

          How is that exactly wrong? Is it wrong for me to be disappointed in Call of Duty and saying Battlefield 1 won my heart?

          You know, it’s a two way street honestly, the main point is voice your opinion however you please and say what you want. If you can’t handle different opinions, perspectives or thoughts, then maybe you shouldn’t be on the internet. It clearly shows different opinions bother you unless it’s being done the way you want it to be done.

          • Sentinel

            Let’s get one thing straight. I honestly do not care about opinions that go against COD or BF. I like to stay neutral and open minded with every FPS game. If I ever disliked a game, I will put in my 2 cent about it and be done with it. I used your comment ’cause it shows that you chose a side. Anyways, I just think such comments are plain stupid because they don’t entice a real discussion. Such as qualities and details about both games. The pros and cons about the game. I am stating what I think and just being a realist here so you don’t need to lecture me about the internet. If you like Battlefield 1 now, there’s a site for that. I’m just letting you know I do not care how BF1 this or that on a Call of Duty site.

          • And since when does choosing a side became a bad thing or even wrong? I’m honestly interested in hearing the absurd shit you’re going to say on that. Like I said, actually get my quote correct and I’m sure you seen my replies regarding Infinite Warfare to you. So get a better understanding.

            And honestly if you didn’t care about other people’s opinions, you wouldn’t feel the need to constantly call people hypocrites for not liking IW or calling people stupid for choosing a side or just having a different opinion.

          • Sentinel

            Where did I ever stated that it was a bad thing or wrong though? You just chose BF1 because COD didn’t delivered a WW1 or 2 experience to you. Bohoo, That’s all it comes down to. I see all these game as various options to chose from whenever I get bored of playing one game. & If you really think I sit here and go thru all your comments boii you got me fuck’d up. My logic is based on hands on experiences with the FPS genre ’cause it ain’t just about BF1 & COD…

            I called hypocrites on those who previously bashed COD for it’s 3D movement and how they wanted boots on the ground experience ’cause right after Titanfall 2 reveal was released. All of ya’ll were suddenly loving the game, which in terms of 3D movements, are basically the same deal. & this is the internet, I can do, say whatever the fuck I want haha. Anyways, I’m done here. My babe just finished cooking some banging dinner! 😀

          • And you fail to understand that Titanfall 2 and CoD are two different series, so hypocrites? As far as I’m concerned no.

            And like I said in my last comment, if you honestly, truly didnt care, you wouldn’t feel to need to constantly call people hypocrites or fanboys. Typically when I dont care about something, I pay no mind. Maybe I’m just crazy, I dunno, it’s pretty mind blowing, huh?

            And yes, this is the internet, you can do what you want, but at least make sure you get some things correct down the line before you make yourself look like a fool. Just some advice, fam.

            Anyways, I got some deep fuckin Treyarch dick to suck and it’s gonna be bangin lit fam ;P

          • GateKeeprRed

            It might be good to mention at this point that Battlefield and CoD are two different games also. It’s ok to make comparisons between the two, after all, they are part of the FPS genre, but in reality (and ‘im not saying you’re comparing them to each other either, im merely stating this) comparing CoD to Battlefield is comparing an Arcade Shooter, which is supposed to be less realistic and more entertaining, with the fact that you are limited to a confined area, to a Realistic First Person Shooter, which is made to be as realistic to reality as possible within the confines of a game, and is generally very open and large.

            That’s why, when a fanboy chooses their favourite game and begins to hate on the other game without a decent understanding of what the other game actually is, it defeats the purpose of their statement to a degree. Its like me enjoying Call Of Duty, but hating on CS:GO because it’s not Call Of Duty.

          • I totally agree that BF, COD and Titanfall are all different series. Basically my original comments have always been me more excited for Battlefield 1 than Call of Duty this year, because it’s actually giving me what I want.

          • GateKeeprRed

            Exactly man! Playing the games that get you excited for is what gaming is all about. I for one look forward to both BF1 for its archaic warfare, and IW for its space missions!

    • When you think about it this way it makes it seem so retarded lol, they’re basically fighting over entertainment preference.

  • Sentinel

    Onto things that actually matter. Can’t wait to relive this moment!

    https://thechive.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/call-of-duty-infinity-warfare-night-vision.gif?w=600

  • Sentinel
  • Michael Romo

    I say we need a return of the XP bar at the bottom of your multiplayer HUD. The same one from MW2. I seriously miss that lil bitch ?

    • Dr. Edward Richtofen

      Why not just pause

      • Too much work Dickmissile

        • Dr. Edward Richtofen

          Who is that

          • You

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            I can’t start this right now I’m about watch a movie

          • That’s too much work as well

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            The controller is to far to start the movie

          • See

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            Are going to watch game 7

    • I actually agree

    • lunator100hd .

      No iys better without it, cod is not an mmorpg lol.

  • lunator100hd .

    Im done

    • GinsuVictim

      Fuck that guy.

  • Former

    I miss the weapon prestige reward in BO2 that let you put your emblem on the gun.
    If they brought that back, I’d actually have a reason to use double weapon xp….

  • Today is fathers day. I love my daddy ScOott!!!

  • My boy manni gets more luck in 1 supply drop than all of you fgt’s luck with girls your whole life.

    • Element115Will

      The same applies to you. Fagit! Lol

    • lunator100hd .

      Who the fuck is manni?

  • So supposedly Infinite Warfare is going to have over 100 weapons in the game. I hope that’s not weapon variants and actually 100 base weapons.

    Now only if there could be more than 14 maps at launch, doubt it, butttttttt they should do it

    • Element115Will

      100 wepons…in supply drops. Dont believe rumors, this was also said for BO3 and look at it now. Supply drops.

      • I dont ever recall that rumor occurring before Black Ops 3, besides saying Treyarch saying there wouldn’t be supply drops, which look at it now, but I get your point. I necessarily don’t believe it as I have low expectations for Infinite Warfare.

        • Bo3 said no supply drops. Then supply drops with ONLY cosmetic items. Now… I don’t even know what the fuck you call these supply drops anymore.

          • J4MES

            The BO3 drops are called ‘easy money’ in the Activision offices I believe!

          • Sentinel

            You don’t remember…? It is an inside job!!

  • lunator100hd .

    There are rumors about ps4 neo coming out in 2016. Maybe infinity warfare in 4k resolution is not just a dream.

    • PCMR

      Been playing CoD in 4K for years. It’s nothing special. I will however be playing Battlefield 1 in 8K = 200% scaling. Now that’s a proper gaming dream soon to be reality. 4K is soooo old now.

      • lunator100hd .

        Ok calm down dude, probably guys like you are prob less than 5-6% of the player base. Its not only that pc players are way less than console players (only for cod) but i bet half of you dont have a pc capable of running cod in 4k/60fps so yeah, maybe for you its not that big of a deal but most of us are very excited over 4k gaming, also im not jealous at all because cod on pc sucks balls anyway so try to make me envious again cause your 4k dosent mean anything when we speak about a bad optimized port.

        • J4MES

          COD on PC is absolutely fine especially played in 150fps. It’s just there are so many better games available on Steam that there isn’t much interest in the franchise on there although the ones that do play are dedicated and largely mature and it’s quite a closely knit and respected player base. I prefer playing on console but don’t dismiss the PC versions as they are an absolute force technically and in fluency terms.

          • lunator100hd .

            Well if you have a pc capable of running games in 4k res at decent fps then you are most likely a hardcore gamer rather than a 14 year olds boy who gets hyped over dark matter camos and skins so i gree in that matter but cod has always consoles as leads platforms thats why looks better on them, BF is exact the opposite, and from my little experience with cod on pc, has more latency duo to limited player count special in EU.

      • Sentinel

        Yet again, who tf is talking about PC?? This CONSOLE 4K gaming. Get it? Got it? Good. Nobody cares about your 4K + 4K scaling.

  • Ak74u

    DLC 3 trailer inbound tomorrow guys

  • LEL

    when does this duble xp weekemd start pls tell me thnks

    • J4MES

      It starts last Wednesday. Good luck with it!

  • Ak74u

    Anyone else not have a discuss option on the next article after this one?