In a new interview with Mashable, Activision CEO Eric Hirshberg has spoke a little more about how the company reacted to the initial Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare fan response.

For the official reveal trailer for Infinite Warfare, the trailer now has over 2.5 million dislikes on YouTube. During Activision’s previous financial conference call in May, Activision CEO spoke about this, stating that Call of Duty would not exist as a franchise today if the studios did not bring innovation.

Talking to Mashable at E3, Hirshberg stated that Activision has not changed anything in regards to Infinite Warfare after the fan response.

“We’re doing the same thing after the response as before, which is focusing on making a great game,” Activision Publishing CEO Eric Hirshberg told Mashable at E3 2016.

“At the end of the day, when we do that we tend to make fans happy and win people over and continue to have the franchise flourish.”

Activision CEO reiterated the fact that Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 initially had a similar negative response, where fans were unhappy with the futuristic setting for Call of Duty, but Black Ops 2 has become the best selling Call of Duty game.

“Our previous most-disliked trailer was the reveal trailer for Black Ops 2,” Hirshberg said. “[That was] the first time we brought the franchise into the future. And that turned out to be one of our most successful games ever.”

As noted by the company, Black Ops 3 continues to be a very successful title, even with the futuristic movement, features, and more. More players are playing Call of Duty than ever before, he said.

“The franchise has never been stronger than it is right now in terms of the number of people we have online playing,” Hirshberg said. “Black Ops 3 is doing great. We’ve managed to keep it relevant and fresh longer than many people thought we could.”

On another interesting point, Hirshberg revealed that the dislikes seemed to be concentrated on YouTube, mainly. The response on the video on other platforms did better than YouTube, nor did it effect preorder numbers.

“We didn’t see that reaction on other platforms and in other metrics,” he said. “We didn’t see it in our pre-order momentum, we didn’t see it even in the same exact [trailer posting] on other platforms, like Facebook.”

“It was unique.”

Details on Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare multiplayer are still minimal; a full reveal is expected on September 2nd at Call of Duty XP. Activision thus far has revealed in retailer listings that the game will have the “popular chain-based” movement system, which should feel natural to players that play Call of Duty: Black Ops 3.

SOURCE: Mashable

SHARE
  • JeronimoPW

    The vast majority of people like Black Ops 3, and the game is futuristic as hell. The truth is, there’s much more Treyarch fanboys than I’ve imagined. In my case, I’m very excited to play IW, especially to see how will be the Infinity Ward Zombies mode.

  • Hirshberg is a joke. You know a really good way to innovate. Stop with the Season Pass BS and Yearly releases and listen to fans. EA is doing it and looks how people are happy with the results. Battlefield, FIFA, Mass Effect, Titanfall the list goes on. All you did this year was release hot garbage like TMNT and THPS5. I bet my money right now Activision will be voted the worst company of 2016 mark my words.

    • Keshav Bhat

      They were actually voted as one of the best companies to work for in 2016.

    • fr4gbob

      Not sure what not having a yearly release will accomplish?

      They are already on a 3 year cycle, so they don’t need more time to complete the games, 3 years should be plenty, so what benefit would we get?

      If you don’t want the game every year, don’t buy it every year, you have a choice, buy it every 2 years, or even 3 years

      • I’m going to explain it to you with a simple answer. No boots on the ground equals outrage. And that outrage could have been avoided if instead of telling every dev team to have boost jumping in the game, take there time to see if AW and exos were a good step for the franchise. It sure as shit wasn’t but because they release the game each year they couldn’t change that. Not to mention at this point CoD is dead to millions of fans, and im talking to true fans those from the beginning not the 12 year old and their stupid ass parent who don’t know how to read. They are switching over to Battlefield and Titanfall including me. I’m done Activision has been milking and destroying everything they touch. TMNT, CoD, Original IW, Spider-Man (thank god Insomniac has that now) and more they see me as a wallet and in that case I will because an empty wallet for them because I already used my money for good game from EA.

        • fr4gbob

          And again, you do NOT have to buy it every year, if you don’t like advanced movement, skip it this year and buy it next year, I’m sure it won’t have it that year, and if you don’t like what they do next year, skip it till the year after,

          You could pick a developer and stick with them, take Treyarch and just buy their games once every 3 years, I’m pretty sure the next Treyarch game will not have advanced movement…

          You could buy as many or as little as you want, them releasing one every year gives us more choice, you can have it your way and not get one every year and others can have it their way and have one every year….. you have a choice lol, just because they release one every year, does not mean you have to get it every year!

          Also, I have been playing since MW, and completely went off the franchise 2 weeks after the release of Ghosts, cause I was bored of having the same crap over and over again, I came back a month after Black Ops 3 released cause it looked fresh and it is, I love Black Ops 3, my second favourite out of all of them, not including AW cause I never tried that one, so no opinion on it.

          • But a yearly release hurts the other games and it’s community. Just look at IW 2.5 million dislikes that all came from the people that hated what the other two games did. All came from AW and Black Ops 3 hate of boost jumping. IW ones again get the short end of the stick just like Ghosts and they have to live with it. Why? Because of the yearly release. Do I have to buy it every year, no. Are they the same in terms of story or gameplay NO. Are they all hurt because Activision is greedy and is trying to rip you of with Supply Drops. YES that is my fucking point, it doesn’t matter what dev team does the next CoD because every one game is going to try to outclass the last one and is going to have the same BS system to get you to pay more money. There is no difference in that department. Are AW and Black Ops 3 different from each other. Yes absolutely. But are they different when it comes to post-launch support and DLC absolutely NOT. You have to understand my point now.

      • Johtoboy

        The games somehow got worse after the switch to a three year development cycle. I think the devs got too cocky thinking they could become the next COD4 by pushing the setting forward in time and being “innovative”. But they ruined the basic core of what makes COD multiplayer fun (simple, predictable, and casual) and now the fans have turned against them. The ones that aren’t dick riders anyway.

    • Tied55

      Almost every game rn has at least some type of season pass and out of all of the season passes i especially dont like battlefields premium, its onlu my opinion but just saying try to avoid complaining about season passes in games

      • TITANFALL 2 won’t have a Season Pass and all the DLC will be Free. That is how you support your community. Also There is no Premium in the Battlefield 1 edition so far and no mention of it online so I think EA may actually not do Premium anymore. Fingers crossed.

        • CoDforever

          The only reason why TItanfall 2’s dlc is free is because nobody bought Titanfall 1 DLC and it ended up hurting the game more than profiting more from it ..

          If you want the same DLC model from CoD, than everyone will have to stop buying DLC

          • Which will never happen because kids like you buy it like hotcakes. All hail Vince and the Drew the motherfucking producer. Fuck Hirshberg And cOD!!

        • jordanxbrookes

          EA and their companies seem to be listening to what fans want. A complete 180 from what happened 3-4 years ago.

          • I know right. While Actiivision is using the updated marketing strategy since Black Ops 1. haha

    • Tied55

      Hopefully thats true but knowing any game company they might just add another way to get your money, like supply drops in cod, you never know. The companies always want to make a significant profit whether its short or long term. I cant really say to much now but tbh i watched the gameplay of bf1 and i was a little unimpressed. Im not saying its bad and i could be wrong, but i dont think that it will drastically change gaming. Personally ive only played bfh in the battlefield series and it was fun for a while but i dont think it was worth my $60. I think battlefield is more tailored to a specific type of gamer while cod is kind of like the fun party game you play with your friends. Again this is completly my opinion i could be totally wrong

    • RdJokr

      EA is doing it? Last time I checked, Battlefield 1 is still slated to come with a premium pass for all DLC map packs. Titanfall is the only one getting the special treatment here.

      • Premium? Where has it been confirmed. We have had no mention so far.

        • Keshav Bhat

          They’ll usually announce that at Gamescom.

          • welp if it is announced/confirmed then I will accept it and eat my words. How about this. EA so far (as of the time this comment has been written) have not fucked the community with anything. EA Play was great because they focused on Gamers and there was no DLC/Micro/Premium BS and that is what I loved about it. They need to keep it that way.

          • Keshav Bhat

            Have you not played Battlefield 4 or Battlefield Hardline??

            Both games have premium, both are filled with Gold Battlepack Micro items.

            And, EA’s executive already said they have plans for DLC Map Packs and micro items for BF1: http://www.pcgamer.com/microtransactions-and-map-packs-confirmed-for-battlefield-1/

          • Shit I knew there are going to be Battlepacks in the game you can see it in the Deluxe Edition. But come on EA. Fuck me I guess that article slipped through the cracks. Does it say that Premium is back or are they going to go Map Packs style only? Like CoD

        • RdJokr

          It’s also not yet confirmed whether we’re getting free maps either. But given that EA is putting France in as a faction DLC, I doubt they’re gonna sell it as just that. Probably a whole French-themed map pack.

          Besides, if we were getting free maps with BF1, they would’ve mentioned it already, because they know that will hype us the fuck up and get us to fork over cash even quicker.

  • I N N O V A T E

    I like to point out that each Call of Duty since Ghosts has been masked with the term I N N O V A T E

  • Element115Will

    Just wait til its official release, then we will talk. Lol

    Futuristic each year is bullshit.

    It should be

    IW: Modern
    3ARC: Past
    SHG: Future

    IMO.

    • Keshav Bhat

      Activision lets developers do what they want, but they approve it.

      SHG wanted futuristic games, and have to convince Activision executives about it.

      • Element115Will

        I bet they have tried to go back to Modern or Past Warfare and get denied then if thats the case.

        • Keshav Bhat

          No? Condrey said in an interview that as soon as MW3, launched, the team had idea sof designing an Eco duty for their next game and immediately started working it then. They always wanted a futuristic game.

          • jordanxbrookes

            Condrey also wants a WW2 game so fingers crossed we get that next year.

    • Making 3 futuristic CoDs in a row was a dumb move imo

      • This is true, i dunno how Activision or all these developers thought it was a smart move to do the same setting every year

      • Damien Solberg

        I’ll tell you why they continue to do future settings year after year, its because they are running out of ideas and in a future based game, anything goes.

    • fr4gbob

      I kind of agree with you, only I would prefer 3arc to carry on the way they are, one of the others can go backwards, I can skip that one then and just get the other 2

      • I’d like Treyarch to do a past setting their next time around, but Treyarch has definitely killed it with the future setting with BO2 and BO3

    • TYRO

      I’ll let iw making iw this year but I’ve always wanted it to be like that

  • DxG ToxjQ

    All they have to do is make a MP as noob-friendly and as AI assisted as BO3 and the game will do fine.. Take away the ability to head-glitch and make AI streaks weak enough where they don’t decide the game and the game will be hated.

  • Brad

    If IW is going to be just like BO3 in terms of movement then why are people complaining so much? BO3’s movement is just fine and BO3 is a very successful cod game. Did people just forget about BO3?

    • DeadZombieGaming 12

      People just love Treyarch so much, they are immune to negativity lol.
      They hate IW for having boost jumps, but love BO3, even though it has boost jumps.

    • Gamerazor247

      Treyarch is godsend, maaannnn!! The Savior of COD!!

  • Activision Employee

    Isn’t it always the same? People cry about how shit the next cod is but a week after release we hear “Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare breaks sales records once again”. No wonder they didn’t change anything, they know people will swallow anything they serve.

    • Sol Malus

      Yes because Infinite Warfare is the exact same game as CoD4.

  • Pahom

    So basically, “fuck what the fans have to say, because we ourselves think that this will be the best CoD ever made!”

    • Tied55

      It will be even worse if they get rid of nearly 3 years of work and change it now, its smarter for them to move on and accept they might have made a shitty game but hopefully IW and SHG learn from their mistakes

  • lunator100hd .

    I dont care about dislikes or how far into the future the game will go, i believe they have learned from their mistakes(ghosts) and this game is gonna be a very good cod like bo3. I know there is still the possibility to be garbage but i have hope!

  • J4MES

    Probably BS. They changed the box artwork pretty lively after the initial ridicule. I bet IW are busy tweaking after the initial reaction which is why the MP reveal trailer is being shown so late. All other companies at E3 were proud to show off their hard work in games and all we got from COD was a 6 minute snippet from the campaign.

    • jordanxbrookes

      And the snippet was all sci-fi stuff being shown off 😐

      • J4MES

        Exactly! Good PR that reels people in as usual – I remember how everyone was like ‘Riley is an amaaaaazing character and Ghosts is gonna be da best Cool of Duty ever maaade cos of a dog innit’.

      • Which got me hyped. I’d say it was effective

        • CoDforever

          Exactly, Infinite Warfare had extremely low expectations going into E3, the only thing it could have done is helped people like it, not dislike it anymore than they already do

    • Sentinel

      OR they have changed it because it looks a lot better than the initial ridicule. & again you write with all these assumptions like you are working hands-on with the Devs. Maybe they want to hold off the MP reveal for the COD XP. Hasn’t that occurred to you? No, ’cause you are just a hater.

      • J4MES

        Nope, I am simply cautious and being realistic; not a ‘hater’ as you kids keep throwing out at any form of skepticism – I’ve just proved myself right 3 years on the trot and aren’t optimistic about the team who made the infamously crap Ghosts. COD XP is just a PR push and it’s a shame that instead of Activison shutting up the ‘haters’ by showcasing their game; they keep it under wraps until 2 months before release whilst asking eSport cocksuckers to write scripted statements on twitter clearly written by the same person saying it’s ‘good’. I would have thought people like you would have learned long by now of this tiresome marketing charade…

        • Sentinel

          Just so you know, I didn’t read half way thru. I was being optimistic about the rest of the crap you was going to write, undeniable. Sit here and worry about their PR movement OR go to COD XP to experience the whole event, hands-on. There’s a life outside Charlie Intel buddy.

          • J4MES

            Funny how whenever people make a statement you know you cannot argue against; you always come out with the ‘I didn’t read it’. Grow up. I trust my opinion as it’s been right so many times and as a long standing supporter of COD; I reserve the right to be skeptical and if muggy fanboys can’t take it; cry elsewhere but don’t come back crying for the 4th year on the trot when once again; my initial concerns were correct.

          • Sentinel
          • Tied55

            I have to say that was probably the best response ive ever seen to an angry video gamer in the history of witty responses. 10/10 would watch again

          • BradyAlucard

            So you’re a troll?

          • Tied55

            What?

          • BradyAlucard

            Are. You. A. Troll?

          • Tied55

            I literally laughed out loud to sentinals response to j4mes, i wasnt being sarcastic or being a troll.

          • BradyAlucard

            Hmm alrighty, then, I believe you.

          • Tied55

            Even if i was though would it really matter?

          • BradyAlucard

            Sort of. There are quite a few trolls that pop in every once in a while and poison the site.

          • Sentinel

            I just don’t put mind on the opinion of these hypocrites on Charlie Intel. This is what Call of Duty has become and to be honest, I was quite bitter that they chose to continue with the futuristic setting. But as a loyal fan, from the minute I pick up the controller and play the game, they always deliver on the Call of Duty experience. Yet you see these kinds of people that despite all the confirmed info on the new COD, they still trying to find anything to bash the game. Like you don’t like the game now, get the fuck out of here then, simple as that. “Ohh I am allowed to voice my opinion” STFU. You think that putting your words in a “professional written” format and call yourself a “standing supporter of COD” along with your dick riders, makes your statements any valid. You are a dipshit. & they most likely suck so bad playing the multiplayer.

          • Wreckage

            I admire you. *applause*

          • TheDemonOfHate

            Would read again.

          • CyberWolf

            Well, you just straight-up rekt him.

    • CoDforever

      what the hell would they tweak? They are making IW along side Modern Warfare remastered, might as well go balls deep sci-fi

      Also, im pretty sure something like CoD xp would have to be planned months in advance

      • J4MES

        After the negative reaction of the reveal trailer and seeing that they’ve already drastically changed all the promotional material including the box art; who’s to say they aren’t making sweeping changes in-game based on the vast feedback gathered from that alone? Nobody is suggesting an entire concept change but they are certainly keeping much of it under wraps instead of promoting it. COD XP is just an event full of franchise cocksuckers and exclusive bought-for media instead of a transparent and open press event. That also raises eyebrows.

        • CoDforever

          what changes would they make? You think they would remove the spaceships or something?

          They arent going to do anything that they wouldnt have already done without seeing the trailer, the game is practically done at this point with a few minor tweaks, such as balancing. The fact that the E3 demo was balls deep sci-fi and full on Space warfare, wouldn’t you think that they would have showed normal boots on the ground on earth or something instead? I think this is proof enough that they don’t really care about what people think of it anymore and rather, they are choosing to stick with their original idea.

          Also, COD Xp has way too much shit going on for it to be a last minute decision. I mean they have PS VR missions, paintball, CoD championships, laser tag, musical performance, every playable option including CoD4, IW, IW zombies and BO3 dlc3, you can clearly tell this event was definitely planned way before IW’s reveal.

          also, the press will be at COD xp, its a paid public event, just like E3, all the info from there will be available, even you could have gone, so whats so ani-transparent about it?

          • J4MES

            It depends on the feedback but the MP portion could easily be getting tweaked and afterall; it’s confirmed not to be finished at this point and still in pre-alpha form. I’m not talking in regards to the campaign which is obviously done and dusted and wont be changed but there is no need to change something that will only last for 6 or so hours and have no long term affect. The XP event was likely pre-planned but that doesn’t stop a game being showcased in detail at E3 either especially when under such severe scrutiny – COD has had multi events in the past leading up to release of a game. A six minute segment ain’t exactly encouraging for the biggest stage in the videogame media and it didn’t do much to ooze further confidence.

          • CoDforever

            You realize pre-alpha is hardly anything different than the final product, right? Go watch the Bo3 E3 multiplayer gameplay, it was all “pre-alpha” but it looked exactly the same as the final build, except with a few balancing updates .. so you tell me how much they are going to “tweak” LOL ..

            ” The XP event was likely pre-planned ”

            So you admit the fact that COD Xp has nothing to do with the initial public impressions with the game ..

            ” A six minute segment ain’t exactly encouraging for the biggest stage in the videogame media and it didn’t do much to ooze further confidence.”

            What in gods earth are you talking about??? Every cod has been like that, with the only notable exception being BO3 .. You say that as if every cod has shown its MP at E3 except IW LOL which is clearly not the case ..

            Battlefield 4 was revealed in March while Battlefield 1 was revealed in May, using your logic the only reason DICE did that was because they knew the game was gonna be bad lmao ..

          • I need some of your kush man. That stuff must be good if your telling be Battlefield 1 sucks hahaha.

          • CoDforever

            I didnt like Battlefield 4, and BF1 looked exactly like it gameplay-wise, why would I suddenly like Battlefield 1?

          • Becasue your defending CoD and it’s the same engine and feeling every year. I thought you liked paying 60$ to play the same game every year. lol

          • CoDforever

            Oh yeah Im sure AW/Ghosts/Black ops3 were all the exact “same game” despite having significantly different game mechanics, movement systems, map design, themes and features ..

            While what was the difference, gameplay-wise between Battlefield 3/Battlefield 4 and Battlefield Hardline? Lmao, they were all just an exact reskin of each other. Whats even more hilarious is that Battlefield 4 reused over 30 weapons from BF3 – Exact same models, animations and sounds, atleast CoD changes the look of the gun when they reuse it from an older game LMAO

          • Oh sure I spotted at least 7 guns with the same animation between Black Ops 2 and 3. Hell I saw an animation in IW reveal trailer that was used in CoD4. And that was 10 years ago. Suck it kid and give me a phone number to your dealer I need some more of that stuff. lol

          • Icarus

            I’m not defending cod in anyway but don’t most games reuse assets because it’s much more easier than creating a new one? I think it would be difficult to make a new reloading mechanism because most guns, depending on the type, would have the same reloading mechanism. I don’t really know that much that much about animation but that’s just my thought.

          • Depending on the type of a gun from Pullpup to normal to rail. It also matters what caliber the gun is and what ammo it uses. You sure are right about the assets being used again because it is easier.

          • jordanxbrookes

            They do, but usually not the same for 10 years straight.

          • Icarus

            Engine limitation?

          • jordanxbrookes

            Not really. They can easily create new animations, but it’s cheaper to reuse animations every time.

          • Icarus

            Ah I see.But I do wish that they could invest sometime into creating a new engine from scratch without the use of modifying an outdated quake engine. There can be a lot of possibilities that the developers can implement in the game that would seem difficult with current engine limitations.

          • They won’t that will cost them more money. lol

          • Icarus

            They get a lot of money from the sales and micro transactions from this franchise. Though their marketing tactics is shady, they can at least put some money into creating a new engine but it seems that if it doesn’t break then don’t fix it.

          • No they seriously just don’t want to put money where they should. They are the most greedy company I have ever seen in my life.

          • jordanxbrookes

            They want to make as much money and spend as little as they can. Yes they have the money to: create a new engine, have full dedicated server support, create new animations etc. but they don’t want to spend money on that and instead keep revenue, spend it on marketing any new games, paying devs, paying licenses, paying shareholders etc. and whatever is left over put it in their wallet.

          • Icarus

            I never really thought of that. Thanks for the insight

          • jordanxbrookes

            I’ve been studying game development and the industry for over 3 years so I know these things. Glad I could help.

          • Trust him he does. The man has the brains of a dev.

          • Hhost

            Good morning. Everything that powerful people do is for profit.

            You should try to enjoy life. Dont act so depressed.

          • jordanxbrookes

            There’s a difference between making a profit and fucking over your customers. Have a good day Sir!

          • host

            I don’t know if you do any research but there are more casual cod players than cod fanboys. With starwars reembracing the sci-fi market, Activision is taking the momentum of the market to get more casual people to buy cod.

          • host

            By the way starwars is an example, but an important factor.

          • jordanxbrookes

            Again, that’s very costly in both money and time. Creating a new engine from scratch takes 3+ years to make, and if one hasn’t been worked on in the past couple of years, then it sure won’t happen in the next few.

          • J4MES

            Now you’re comparing a version of a product which you haven’t even seen!? Bizarre defensive behaviour. The ‘pre-alpha’ BO3 version was a worldwide release PROMOTIONAL TRAILER and they were never gonna do a partial asset and depleted texture build to showcase the game off to the planet LMFAO! That’s quite possibly the dumbest thing I’ve ever read on here and everyone knows the ‘pre-alpha’ tag is just a PR get out of jail for any future changes and tweaks and that it doesn’t represent the final product. When you go on ultra defensive protecting your beloved brand; you brain doesn’t quite function common sense. Take a step back and have a think before you type.

          • CoDforever

            “The ‘pre-alpha’ BO3 version was a worldwide release PROMOTIONAL TRAILER”

            What the hell are you talking about? Gameplay was also recorded from E3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YExYMH0KbgU

            and surprise surprise, it looks exactly the same as the final build .. please remind me what looks so different about, other than the weapon/perk balancing?

            Oh wait some of the logos and icons look different! SO DIFFERENT THAN THE FINAL BUILD OMG

          • J4MES

            Of course it is the same but Activision’s definition of a pre-alpha just like Ubisoft’s with Watch Dogs and The Division is very different to your typcial development one in terms of features and assets and as COD is a brand to be promoted rather than an early access game; they are never going to showcase early builds. I really don’t know why you’re waffling away in this direction as not only are you way off topic; you’re spamming any old nonsense and still getting it wrong LMAO!

          • CoDforever

            “Of course it is the same but Activision’s definition of a pre-alpha just like Ubisoft’s with Watch Dogs and The Division”

            WHAT! LMAO! How is activisions definition of “pre alpha” anything like Ubisofts?

            1) We actually know that Ubisofts game’s dont look anything like their pre-alpha builds

            2) You just admitted that BO3’s pre alpha however looked exactly the same as the final build, so how is the publishers use of “pre-alpha” between Ubisoft and Activision in any way similar?

            You seem to not understand my point or are trying to avoid it entirely – If black ops 3’s was in pre alpha around this exact time period last year and was hardly any different than the final build, than why wouldnt Infinite Warfare be any different?

          • Because it is made bu different developers who do shit differently. Suck on DEEZ NUTS boi. 360 cold scoped! lol

          • J4MES

            I don’t even think you know what your point is as your posts are so convoluted and completely all over the place whilst not on any topic. Let’s go back to the start and keep it simple for you – you said ”what will they tweak” and I said; the MP isn’t finished as they’ve confirmed so they may be using this extended time based on existing feedback in regards to the game’s reveal. For some reason you think the entire game is finished and are now behaving like the biggest moron and ‘playing’ dumb by deflecting even more.

          • I’m telling you he is not in his right mind right now. Hisenberg has been giving him that good kush. He is totally out of it. lol

          • J4MES

            Activision have really done a good job on those fanboys! They should start flogging blank discs with Call of Duty written in marker pen and they’d still sell for $60!

          • Really? I though they already were doing it. Just take a disc scratch of the last title and replace it with a new one and re-sell it for again for another 60$. lol

          • CoDforever

            No you understand my point perfectly well. You think that IW will drastically change from now until release based on fan feedback since the game is now in “pre alpha”. I said that Bo3 was also in “pre alpha” around the same time last year, and it was completely identical to the final build of the game.

            The only thing that will change is a few balancing issues, but nothing will change that will make angry people who hate space all of a sudden be more tolerating of it.

            And honestly, on a side note, your life must be pretty pathetic for you to come here every day spending hours typing and spreading your “anti-cod” circlejerk comments on a VIDEO GAME you have NO interest in on a COD-ONLY fansite .. thats pretty sad tbh

          • Activision and Hirshberg have ruined your mental state. Kids lesson to be learned. Don’t smoke all that kush from Master Hirshberg or it will ruin you. hahaha

          • J4MES

            Aww bless! I’m sorry I’ve insulted your beloved franchise despite being a COD consumer probably before you were born. I have the right to express my opinion and counter any drivel posted by some divine optimist who’s ignorance and general stupidity is that of a stereotypical blinded fanboy. You seem to want to ruin every article on this site just like Lovekiller and his alti account. Shameful behavior.

          • jordanxbrookes

            Dude you made him cry now. You should make it up to him by putting his toys in a Supply Drop LMFAO.

          • jordanxbrookes

            “Completely identical”. I didn’t realize the pre-alpha build had Supply Drops, Cryptokeys, Donald Duck Character Gear and Laser Rifles. Seriously what drugs are you on scrub?

          • CoDforever

            OH YEAH BECAUSE THOSE ITEMS DRASTICALLY CHANGED UP THE GAMEPLAY HAHAHAHA

          • You fucked up again. YES THOSE THINGS CHANGE THE HOLE GAMe. How high are you right now!!!

          • jordanxbrookes

            They did and they also drastically changed people’s opinions on the game you knobhead. Sorry if I don’t want my soldier to look like a fucking carrot carrying a Needler while dancing to the Jackson 5 you goon.

          • CoDforever

            Yeah, a few aesthetics completely killed the gameplay for me .. you are delusional if you think “cryptokeys” changed up the way the game plays LOL

          • jordanxbrookes

            I love how you completely ignored my word on the laser weapons/Supply Drop weapons. Spoken like a true fanboy!

          • CoDforever

            Supply drop weapons are normal weapons, it doesnt change the way the gameplay is changed at all. Looks like you’ve run out of ideas on what to reply back.

          • AW had the best guns looked behind Supply Drops. Your stupid argument is invalid.

          • jordanxbrookes

            Yes it does if Timmy no thumbs gets a one-shot plasma shotgun sniper after playing 10 games and I get a common sticker even though I am Master Prestige. Stop kidding yourself and do me a favour, tell me what drugs you be smoking?

          • jordanxbrookes

            Dude you gotta tell me what drugs you are using if you think BF1 will suck. Also DICE wanted to make a WW1 game because they knew FPS fans would love it since we’re crying for a classic shooter. EA didn’t think it would work, but they took the chance and it’s paying off. You are so DELUSIONAL!

          • I told you he had some good stuff. Would not surprise me if he imported it. Hisenberg must be doing fantastic right now.

          • jordanxbrookes

            Heisenberg agrees.

          • CoDforever

            I think BF1 will suck because it from what I can tell it plays extremely similar to BF4 and BF4 was no where near as successful as CoD, even the worst cod (ghosts) outsold it by 4x more sales ..

            And you can sugar coat it as much as you want, but the only thing a WW1 game is going to change is the aesthetics of the game, nobody will care about the setting after a week of playing because the novelty of playing a game based on its setting alone is retarded and then you will play the game for its game mechanics, which looks exactly like BF4 and thus if you didnt play much BF4 you wouldnt like this game (BF1)

            And on a side note, there is next to nothing classic or authentic about Battlefield 1. Most of the tanks/planes are reskins of BF4 vehicles, I mean seriously no vehicle in WW1 ever went as fast as those. Secondly, Most of the guns are reskins of BF4 weapons – Idk why anyone would expect any different. And thirdly – the maps are regular battlefield maps that now have a WW1 skin, nothing different about it other than aesthetics. The only thing cool about BF1 i saw was how the hindenburg falling was unscripted but that alone will not make the gameplay feel any better and after a few times it falls, im pretty sure it will just get annoying as the building falling from Siege of Shanghai (BF4) ruined the way the map plays ..

          • World War 1 guns were in BF4 WHAT!! dude did you get to play an exclusive DLC. Or did Hirshberg give a good amount of kush for you to smoke the hole time you were playing BF4. hahah lol

          • CoDforever

            Are you fucking stupid? You think the TTK or stats of any BF1 gun will be any different than regular BF4 guns?

          • jordanxbrookes

            No but you’re fucking stupid for still believing in this Activision bullshit. What drugs are you smoking again?

          • Hhos

            Hey buddy
            You sure love bf. Whu dont you take your cral comments somewhere else. This is a cod website not bf website.

          • jordanxbrookes

            Mate I have been here for over 4 years. I have supported CoD, hated on it and criticized it to make it better throughout my time here. You would know that if you have been around for that long. I like many others are just fed up of the bullshit that is happening with this franchise. I also love Rocket League, Grand Theft Auto and The Last of Us, doesn’t mean I can’t comment on here anymore because of it lmao. Guest Peasant.

          • TheDemonOfHate

            Ignorant punk

          • lets see there are no ARs. Most of the guns will be bold-action and SMG and LMG are totally different from BF4 and BF3. Dude seriously hive me some of that weed I want to see what you see. which is pure madness but some people want that for a little bit,

          • CoDforever

            Yeah dude, Im sure all the weapons feel DRASTICALLY different than BF4 guns .. Im sure the TTK, RPM, Headshot multiplier, reload time etc will all be much different than Battlefield 4 guns .. Oh wait, they re not. If BF1 was true to the setting than it would only have bolt action guns.

          • OMG SHOTS FIRED somebody bring me the vests!!! He is so high he doesn’t understand he is talking about CoD all the time. hahah lol

          • J4MES

            So what you’re saying is that BF4 sucked because it SOLD less than Ghosts? If you value sales over quality as a consumer; you really are the most blinded and ignorant fanboy I have ever seen on the internet. If you were an Activision shareholder than your opinion may have some weight but you’ve really dug a hole for such a stupid comment that just proves you are a fanboy who’s suckered in by Activision on a ridiculous level. The rest of your drivel is quite frankly embarrassing and some serious moronic and ironic nonsense.

            Battlefront sold 16m = must be the best current gen game ever LOL!

          • jordanxbrookes

            Saying BF1 will suck because BF4 didn’t sell as much as Ghosts did, therefore BF4 sucks and therefore BF1 will suck is the most stupid fucking reason I have ever heard. Also you say no one will care about the game after a week? Yet nearly 3 years on and there are still hundreds of thousands of players still playing BF4 today, myself included.

          • not to mention they were releasing free DLC for BF4 in it’s 3rd tear while CoDforever pain 180$ for the same product. Who is the sucker not. lol

          • CoDforever

            “Saying BF1 will suck because BF4 didn’t sell as much as Ghosts”

            No you missed the point entirely – If CoD players enjoyed the gameplay of Battlefield, than Battlefield wouldn’t have sold as lower as it did compared to ghosts – despite having a free 2-week open beta and paying popular CoD youtubers to upload battlefield 4.

            And yes, no cod players will care about BF1 a week after release – after they realize they dont enjoy the gameplay style of Battlefield, no matter where it takes place. And you think Battlefield 4’s player count is impressive? The fact that BLACK OPS 2 has more players than BF4, really does say a lot. Not even counting Black ops 3 or AW or even Ghosts, which have dominating the Xbox live charts ever since they came out

          • that is because kids like you buy it and can’t understand how amazing Battefield is because it’s to complicated for scrubs like you. It’s only for grown ups not kids lol

          • CoDforever

            Yep, thats why im sure you spend hours typing comments on a COD only site especially since you hate cod so much. pathetic ..

          • YOU ARE SO MENTAL!! holy fucking shit I’m laughing my ass of right now. You are defending the game like a fucking virgin who never touched a boob before. Someone bring help we lost for for sure!!! lol

          • CoDforever

            Oh no I am a COD fan on a COD-Only website! How pathetic right? 

          • Attacking everybody who doesn’t like your believes and opinions. And trying to Bullshit his way out of situations that you digged yourself in the first place. Somebody has a different and better opinion then you. ATTACK HE IS EVIL, HE IS RUINING MY GAME. Like a fucking 5 year old man. You lost it and everybody will know now that are soon as we see your comment we will have fun ripping you. lol

          • CoDforever

            I never attacked you and Im not sure you even know what attacking means, and fyi you replied to me first just saying

          • Oh I know you replied to everyone who didn’t like your opinion and said that they were wrong, even if they were right. You are a lunatic. And people now know it.

          • CoDforever

            really dude? I replied to one person in which everyone else replied to me back – its amazing how many insults you can throw at me just because of my opinion on a video game lmao, hope you go to the Battlefield community and take toxicity there as well.

          • You reply to everybody as if your life is at stake. You are pethatic kid who to this day uses his moms credit card. You “Opinion” is nothing but delusions that come from smoking to much of Hirshbergs kush. lol

          • jordanxbrookes

            You get extremely defensive when someone has a negative opinion or criticism on CoD and then attack when we don’t say otherwise.

          • CoDforever

            getting defensive is not the same as “attacking” someone but whatever floats your boat, you are the biggest bandwagoner I have ever seen

            You played MW3/ Ghosts religiously – Yet you somehow hate another game thats different even from the same developer. Thats like me getting mad at Naughty Dog for making the last of us and calling it “garbage” before its even out even though I really enjoyed Uncharted 2 and Uncharted 3. which is pretty much what you’re doing here.

          • Your doing the same fucking thing with Battlefield 1. you are stupid!!! You are officially braindead from here on out.

          • CoDforever

            And whats wrong with that? This is a COD site, not a battlefield site. I am free to speak whatever I want with the game.

            If I went to a Battlefield-only site and talked shit about BF1 all day, like you, than that would be pretty pathetic.

          • jordanxbrookes

            Just like we the true CoD fans are free to speak whatever we want with the game. BUT WAIT! You instantly quiver and get all defensive to CoD like a mother and her new born. Speaking of pathetic, you wanna know what’s pathetic, bundling COD4 Remastered with Infinite Warfare with only HALF OF THE BLOODY MAPS just to sell a failing game. THAT is pathetic.

          • Ghost

            What makes you a true cod fan

          • jordanxbrookes

            The fact that I know what the other true CoD fans want, the fact I can criticize the game in order to make it better and I can see through the BS PR wording and marketing that Activision throws at us. Having fanboys say nothing is wrong isn’t helping.

          • Ghost

            I am a cod veteran. I have played cod since cod 1 and I like the fact that they are trying new things. That is also how we got cod4. When cod4 was announced to be set in modern time, people hated it Look how it turned out. So my question now is how can you speak on behalf of me? And don’t tell me I am on the minority side.

          • There is a difference between trying and overdosing.

          • Just because it’s a CoD site we can’t say our opinions and fears that we have for the game. You are a faggot of the year. Congrats

          • CoDforever

            Ofcourse you are allowed to say anything, but spending this much time typing about a game you hate on a website all about that game you hate gives a pretty accurate idea of your IRL social status – mostly pathetic and probably a loser.

          • Give me the quote in which I say I hate Infinite Warfare. If there is non then you will forever be a cancer in my eyes.

          • jordanxbrookes

            You are the biggest COD Cock Gobbler I have ever seen. Infinite Warfare is not the same as MW3 or Ghosts you muppet. And I said you get “extremely defensive” which you’re doing right now lmao.

          • CoDforever

            Oh yeah and the Last of Us was not the same as Uncharted 2 or Uncharted 3, my logic still applies you bandwagoner. If I enjoyed the last 2 games from the same developer, than I would still excited for a new game from them despite being different and having a cliche’d setting.

          • Your comparing two different games from different developers and different play styles. You are beyond saving.

          • jordanxbrookes

            It’s because 2 former ND devs now work on CoD, he seems to think his argument is valid lmao.

          • CoDforever

            That specific detail has nothing to do with the point im making.

          • jordanxbrookes

            No but I bet you will use that as an argument in the future.

          • How can you even compare CoD to Uncharted. You are nuts.

          • CoDforever

            Im not comparing them, Im using Jordan’s logic here. He extremely enjoyed MW3 and Ghosts, yet hates Infinite Warfare despite being from the exact same developer. Its hilaruous.

          • Exact same devs don’t mean exact same game. You ginger bread fag.

          • jordanxbrookes

            “ginger bread fag” In tears right now lmao.

          • jordanxbrookes

            MW3 = modern setting, Ghosts = set in 2027 but has a modern theme, Infinite Warfare = HE SAID I’VE BEEN TO THE YEAR 3000! With Space Warfare, Laser weapons, Chappie, RCS Thrust Jumps and more futuristic crap. Yup, you’re right. Definitely the same game right there. Your Kush is strong.

          • jordanxbrookes

            You said “nobody” would care, not “no cod players”. And yes, for a game that’s been out for over 2.5 years and releases every 2-3, it is impressive. Black Ops 2 does well for a variety of reasons, including: it’s part of the Black Ops subfranchise, it’s got Call of Duty on the case, it’s fun to play, its gameplay is easy to pick-up and learn and for those that didn’t like Ghosts, they would consider Black Ops 2 as the last BOTG CoD game. Battlefield 4 is not an easy game to play. A LOT of learning, understanding and skill is required to do well. I’m not saying I’m the best player ever, but I damn sure am I good player for sticking around to learn how to become good. CoD players just want to play the game without the learning curve, hence why it sells more and has more players.

          • Gello

            I hope you and your will have a slow painful dead. I hate hypocrite people.

          • Thank god somebody who hate CoDforever. Where have been man. lol

          • jordanxbrookes

            I hate fools who can’t construct a simple sentence together, peasant.

          • Chello

            End your fucking life you cancer cunt i will kill your family

          • Going after the family. How original. You are a piece of shit just KYS. The world doesn’t need trash like you.

          • Chello

            Shut the hell up. I’ll deform your face with a crowbar.

          • TheDemonOfHate

            Child

          • TheDemonOfHate

            Kid

          • TheDemonOfHate

            I hope mommy pulls your router cords out. I hate children on this site.

        • Keshav Bhat

          I see that you do not understand game development. Let me try to help.

          You cannot change development of game that’s been in the works for over 2.5 years now. MP Maps take SO Long to develop. Why do you think we only get 13 maps each game? Once those maps are locked in for the new systems/movement, you cannot change it. It has to stay the same.

          And CODXP is not for media that is bought. Tons of fans who are just COD players are attending; you guys here do not care about eSports, but tons of people going are going for the Call of Duty Championship event too at COD XP. So stop making assumptions about “cocksuckers.”

          • J4MES

            Did I say anything about changing game development? You seem fixated on the fact that people expect the game to be cancelled and completely overhauled. There is a different between tweaking and virtually aborting a project and I’m not talking about the latter. The MP as quoted from Activision themselves is ‘no where near completion’ and after feedback seen; IW could easily make changes based on that alone. They obviously aren’t going to shout it from the rooftops to embarrass themselves are they. Also 13 or so maps per game whether it be a 2 year or 3 year cycle is quite low and it is kept low so they can push out the predictable DLC tirade of map packs. It’s not hard for them to hire more designers for this aspect so we get more maps than the bog standard ones but they DONT and that’s to maintain DLC sales.

          • Keshav Bhat

            It has nothing to do with DLC sales. They’ve said many times, in many different interviews why there are more DLC maps than regular game maps: during development, it takes a ton of prototyping to present a good map design, which limits how many maps they can make. Treyarch said they were developing a few maps for over a year just to be happy with it. DLC maps are easier to make because they have an idea and pattern of what they need to do with maps.

            And, can you tell me where they said MP is no where near done? That is false. It’s is well along in development. I’m guessing alpha stage or close to alpha stage by now. They have to be in beta by around August, and then go gold in mid September.

          • J4MES

            Sounds like you’re just buying all their usual PR and excuses. MW3 had plenty of maps and features despite it’s horrific development issues and now with a three year cycle and a studio with an immense amount of staff; we still only get the same piddly quantity of maps. It’s pure business and nothing to do with limitations. They rattle off the DLC quick enough too.

          • Keshav Bhat

            Actually no. Black Ops 3 has the most content out of any Call of Duty game ever, with campaign, MP, zombies, dead ops, nightmares, etc.

          • J4MES

            It’s the same amount of maps as any other COD game – I thought you would have known this seeing that they announced the maps and DLC packs before the game was even released..

          • CoDforever

            4 player co op campaign? Multiplayer? Zombies? Free Run? Nightmares? Survival mode? Dead ops 2? You are delusional if you think any cod has had this much content before.

    • Damien Solberg

      Why they would wait till September to show multiplayer is beyond me, why wait and show it to a select few people at cod xp rather then show it to the world at E3? My guess is that its terrible and they know it, so they are just waiting till the last possible chance to show it. They probably are trying to rake in as many pre orders before they show that shit.

      • CoDforever

        MW3 also had an MP reveal in september, and the game was pretty fun

        • BradyAlucard

          It was terrible in its prime but is more fun nowadays IMO.

    • Element115Will

      IW didnt impress me after rewatching the campaign again.

      Idk what the fuck E3 was smoking but I want some if they think IW was Best of the Show.

      • BradyAlucard

        That would either be God of War or Zelda.

        • CoDforever

          None of them are shooters ..

          • BradyAlucard

            I didn’t notice that it was a Shooter award… Titanfall 2 could have won that IMO.

      • CoDforever

        I think it deserved it, BF1 looked like a BF4 reskin with a ww1 skin and Titanfall 2 looked exactly like Titanfall 1

        • J4MES

          and IW looks like a BO3 reskin. At least BF1 is a completely different era whereas IW is just more of the same but this time you can float for advanced movement.

          • CoDforever

            Bo3 reskin? Please show me when Bo3 had 0gravity battles, grappling hooks and Spaceship dogfights .. If your talking about MP, than how could you even talk about it when they havent revealed anything about it?

          • So BF1 and Titanfall 2 are just reskins, so how exactly Call of Duty Infinite Warfare is different? Oh what? You pew pew in space with grapple hooks?

            D I F F E R E N T and I N N OV A T I V E

          • CoDforever

            How about the fact that everyone was surprised with IW not knowing what it was until the logo popped up? Lmao, thats proof enough that it didnt look like just another Call of duty

          • LOL, I knew it was COD the second I saw it

          • CoDforever

            because you watched the trailer already

          • And you should keep in mind that it was E3, not everyone in there plays Call of Duty and even if they had, they probably hadnt touch or paid attention to CoD in years. Anyone who has paid attention to CoD, would knew that was CoD gameplay the second it poped up

          • CoDforever

            The general gaming community is quick to find a cod reskin just saying also you wouldnt have known it was cod either if you never saw any of the trailers or followed any info from this site

          • And here is where you’re confusing yourself.

            A few people at E3 who didn’t know that was CoD until the logo poped up doesn’t equal Call of Duty Infinite Warfare is different from the rest of the CoDs.

            Sorry, but there are so much more factors and reasons to be played when you say “well, they didn’t know it was CoD!”

          • CoDforever

            You wouldnt have known it was cod either if you never watched the trailer and follow this site religiously dude ..

          • I knew it was CoD in less then 10 second. You know how? Because I saw Salter and she was talking with Reyes. Dead giveaway it was CoD.

          • Hur dur, if I didn’t pay attention or played CoD, but like I said, that statement doesn’t equal jack shit and doesn’t prove that IW is different

          • J4MES

            Yet you think BF1 is a BF4 reskin despite being a completely DIFFERENT era to any FPS game ever but IW is nothing like BO3 despite both being futuristic fantasy? EPIC LOGIC LOL!

          • Icarus

            Black ops 3 is based on bio-augmentation and cybernetics. Infinite warfare is based on a plausible future where humanity ventures onto the solar system to mine asteroids and establish colonies on planets. Though Infinite warfare and Black ops 3 is both a futuristic fantasy based game, The concept behind the technology is going to become a reality in some point in our lifetime.

          • CoDforever

            You nailed in bro ..

          • J4MES

            It doesn’t matter how much PR or terminologies they throw at the community; it’s just the same things with different names at the end of the day. It’s another fantasty era and althout it’s a different setting; it’ll be samey advanced movement, same weapons and a futuristic backdrop that people are tired of. A few perks may have different names and a semtex might be called something else but it is just the same thing with a different skin and this will be heavily echoed in the MP.

          • CoDforever

            Haha, you just described Battlefield 1!

          • Wreckage

            Smartest fucking reply I have seen on this site yet though.

          • Icarus

            If you pay attention on the news, The tech is coming by pretty fast. We have the technology that would let people move things with their thought with a chip implanted on the brain’s cortex. There are some people who even have cybernetic limbs or an antenna implanted on person’s head that would let them sense or hear colour and wavelength.
            There’s already news of various countries and private companies planning on launching a unmanned/manned flight to mars. SpaceX is planning on putting humans on mars by 2024-25. The technology is currently primitive but with new advancements, the tech you see in most futuristic games is going to become a reality. This is honestly going to be a great time for humanity in the coming decades.

          • Wait, ” hear ” color?

            How?

            What would that… ” feel ” like?

          • Icarus

            Here’s the video about a person who can hear ‘colour’ and sense certain wavelengths: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ss8UGJnKPYQ

          • CoDforever

            What does a different ERA have to do with anything? The only thing it will change is the aesthetics of the game, the game will play exactly like BF4 since it shares extremely similar gameplay mechanics to that game ..

            And IW is set in space, with 0g, grappling hooks, space dogfights, sidemissions, etc

            while Bo3 focused on augmentations, 4 player co-op, cyber core abilities etc Its more than a reskin dude ..

          • Sure if you don’t count the same engine. Gun sounds and design (which we don’t know how it will be but that SMG/Akimbo pistols weapons looks really similar to FMG9s) Oh and Zombies mode. What else Grappling hook was in AW sidemisson were in Black Ops 2 should we continue, lol

          • J4MES

            Era is everything as it defines a game especially in the likes of Battlefield and COD. Jesus; I cannot believe your ignorance. Also as I said earlier – grapple hooks = Advanced Warfare. Also why do you keep conflicting between the campaign and MP!?

          • CoDforever

            the time period is not going to do anything with game mechanics except for the aesthetics .. You’re still gonna have the same weapons with the same TTK, Rounds per minutes, all around the stats, the same destruction, the same vehicles with a WW1 skin – the game is not going to play differently than BF4

          • J4MES

            And? That is the same for Call of Duty. You’re getting desperate now kid LMAO!

          • CoDforever

            the movement signifcantly changes the map design, gunfights, player engagements and much more – thats why the past few cods play extremely different than the last few battlefields.

          • same can be said about vehicles, maps, game modes, gadgets. But because your are mental you will ignore all these thing. Loser

          • CoDforever

            Except all of those are reskins of each other. Go compare the vehicles from BF4 to BF1 – They all move identically and play the same except for a different skin.

          • Compare the Scorestreaks and the character animations. They looks identically and play the same except for a different skin. Fuck you kid you lost.

          • CoDforever

            How about you compare the movement and map design instead? Now please enlighten me.

          • So you are allowed to compere some parts of Battlefield. But as soon as I do the same with CoD you ignore it and trying to change the subject. How low kid low.

          • CoDforever

            because unlike the movement and map design in cod, there is nothing battlefield that makes it radically different than previous games.

          • Same with CoD deal with it.

          • CoDforever

            You mean the movement system and map design?

          • YES 3 lane MAP DESIGNS. AND DON’t get men started on the movement system which has been CONFIRMED BY THE DEVS to be similar if not exact like Black Ops 3. Suck it kid.

          • You completey missed his point.

          • IT’s OVER WE LOST HIM!!!!! HE IS MAD GET HIM TO THE HOSPITAL. Inform the parent they need to raise their next kid better then this one!!! hahaha

          • Michael Romo

            Like in AW, they can bring an era to another one and it doesn’t change the gameplay. Think about the Blunderbuss from AW: it’s a WW1 weapon in a time where boost jumping exists. Did it really change the gameplay? Not one bit. It was a little harder to use because of the reload, but that wasn’t a problem if you knew when to take cover. The game mechanics are the things that change everything, and BF 1 showed nothing new in that area. If they had put biplanes and Zeppelins in BF 4 as dlc, no one would have batted an eye. Even with the “destruction” that the Zeppelin can bring, does that really change the gameplay? Not severely

          • J4MES

            Why would Battlefield change the gameplay? It’s an MP grand FPS. It’s not going to become a arcade shooter or something different because of a dramatic era change. BF1 showcased new vehicles, completely different weapons, a new presentation and other features. They are doing what the COD community wanted their franchise to do years ago.

          • Qwerty

            Couldn’t of said it better myself. When I buy BF I expect a large scale battleground with boots on ground soldiers and plenty of vehicles and destruction. What I liked and expected from a COD game was a arcade shooter but had a realistic feel of war with it and like you were going out to go and above the call of duty in war. Now COD is about boost jumping ginger bread men with baseball bats and wrenches and wall running with weapons only through supply drops on water park maps with bright pink squids. COD has changed but for the worst. Just go have a look at the original cod games like 1-4 and world at war. They were about war and it was gritty. Now cod is something else, I wouldn’t even class it as cod anymore

          • Kobrah

            So BF can stay the same every year, but CoD must be different and ‘innovate’ with every new title? Double standards. Of course BF is not expected to become an arcade shooter, just as CoD is not expected to become a physics, “realistic” shooter.

          • J4MES

            Battlefield isn’t released every year….

            Also Battlefield 1943, Battlefield 2143, Battlefield 4 and Battlefield 1 are hundreds of years apart and all dramatically different aside from the concept of an FPS with high player counts and big maps which is exactly what the game is and what people expect and want.

          • CoDforever

            We have had 5 battlefield games in the past 6 years including BF1 .. Now think about that for a second

            Also you were arguing that BF1 was widely different than past battlefields, now you admit that they didnt change it .. lol

          • J4MES

            Stop playing dumb as usual you moron. I’m talking about ERA and not the concept. COD is 6v6 every year wah wah wah blah blah blah. Doesn’t that change? No it doesn’t because that’s the format. Battlelfield has explored an array of eras and settings whilst retaining its core whereas COD has relied on farming out its eras in chunks whilst using the same ID assets and just renaming a few things. If you can’t understand something so basic; you really are not only the worst fanboy I’ve seen online but also one of the most idiotic people I’ve ever encountered in life.

          • Kobrah

            Because it doesn’t come out every year it is okay to stay basically the same? WWII CoDs are set in 193x, AW is set is 2054. That is over one hundred years, they are very different games. What’s your point?

          • J4MES

            You keep fluctuating between concept/format and era which is strange and don’t seem to understand the difference. Having to use pre-COD 4 games for your argument just sums it up perfectly LOL!

          • Kobrah

            The era just changes what the game looks like. Not the format or how the game plays

          • J4MES

            Exactly. BF1 is a massive change whereas COD is pinned in the future for the 3rd year running.

          • Kobrah

            Massive change in looks. Not gameplay…

          • J4MES

            Why would there be a massive change in gameplay for a grand FPS team based game? They aren’t going to change it into an fantasy RPG are they..

          • Kobrah

            THAT IS MY POINT! You are the one saying CoD doesn’t change, but it is okay for BF to stay the same.
            “and IW looks like a BO3 reskin. At least BF1 is a completely different era whereas IW is just more of the same but this time you can float for advanced movement.”

          • J4MES

            Once again; you’re getting the games format and era mixed up which is a big difference. You say BF1 is just a BF4 reskin but IW is not a reskin of BO3 which is hypocritically ironic. BF1 is doing a dramatic era change whilst retaining its core formula but IW is just a BO3 extension with the same engine, similar movement mechanics and even copy and pasted assets. Also WW1 hasn’t been done before in an FPS whereas the space setting is almost modern day cliche nowadays.

          • Michael Romo

            If the game plays exactly the same, why would you buy it? It’s like paying full price for a reskin

          • J4MES

            That can be said the same of COD – 6v6, same modes, same perks with different sames, samey guns etc…At least BF1 has made a wholesale change in its direction and it isn’t going to become an RPG or sports title because it’s already a proven success that people want but in a completely different form and that’s what they get.

          • TheDemonOfHate

            Brain Cells

          • J4MES

            It looked exactly like Call of Duty – even a blind person could see that.

          • I personally knew it was COD because of the aesthetics, they looked the exact same as in the teasers of the two guys in their own ships talking to you through a fuzzy feed.

            If it wasn’t that, i would’ve noticed the shooting mechanics and silly treatment of weapon design, but I’m a cod player like most of us here, non cod fans most likely wouldn’t of caught on until the end.

          • jordanxbrookes

            This CoDforever guy is off his head. Not even Guywithbrains and LoveKiller were this delusional.

          • J4MES

            Haha!

          • Maria Johnson
          • BradyAlucard

            IDK, I don’t see many players defending SBMM. That was just… no.

          • jordanxbrookes

            Back when we would roast those 2 for thinking SBMM in Pubs was great lol.

          • Jenish Katuwal

            Reading his name, then the comment he posted is just….
            Lets say I facepalmed… a lot.

          • Ruski Drinks Brewski

            where are those fagggots

          • Michael Romo

            How exactly is BF 1 different from BF 4? Different era? Is that it? The Zeppelin doesn’t truly change the gameplay, the plane feels exactly the same as a fighter jet, just slower, and what else does it have? BF 1 is going to be very limited to its weaponry because there wasn’t much variety in WW1. How is that “better” than IW, which is actually promising a variety of weapons you can use, AND probably had more to come because the MP hasn’t been revealed yet

          • BradyAlucard

            Battlefield relies on physics. Physics are the main big things that are improved to Battlefield, but the Zeppelin definitely makes a difference, as well. Plus the bayonets and the melee weapons. They could easily change up the gameplay, at least a little bit.

          • I never said Battlefield 1 and 4 are different and to be honest, I really don’t care. I want BF to stay true to its series.

            However, it’s ironic that idiots like you are willing to say games like BF and Titanfall are the same, yet you play Call of Duty and so do I

            Considering Call of Duty is the masters at being the same. What I saw with Infinite Warfare is what I saw in 2014 and last year.

            Get a grip

          • Michael Romo

            Wow. You are truly blind. When’s the last time in COD that we had full control of a fighter jet? When is the last time we had 0g? Ghosts? That was just two missions that took 10 minutes to finish together. When is the last time we could go to different planets, have control of the story, have side missions that aren’t there to change the outcome of the campaign, HAVE A FREAKIN SPACESHIP CONVERSE WITH YOUR SQUADRON? None of these things have been implemented into COD before.

            Now let’s go to Battlefield. Planes? Done before. Behemoth vehicles? Is that really different from the AC-130s from BF 4? Not really. Both are seriously gamechanging.

          • You are literally the biggest retard in this comment section. Please jump off a bridge. You’re not even worthy of a conversation

          • CoDforever

            When you have nothing valid to reply back in a debate, you tell him to kill himself .. typical clowns these days

          • No, because I have already argued these points plenty of times and I just got done arguing with another delusional idiot like you, so im lazy at this point.

            Also, Romo man, is known for never saying anything intelligent, so he isnt worthy

          • hungryandrew

            Michael HOMO

          • Michael Romo

            How original. I’ve never heard that one before

          • Wreckage

            Seriously dude

          • Michael Romo

            So you have no good reply. Just say it. Don’t try to blow it off by telling me I’m retarded and should jump off a bridge. I guess i should expect this from someone who calls himself “sXeGreatness”. No intelligent person labels himself as “great”, it would just be known by his actions.

          • No, I’m blowing you off because your reply is literally idiotc and stupid. The fact you’re trying to pass any of the shit you listed as CHANGE or DIFFERENT is pathetic. You’re grasping at straws, kid.

            Also, my name isnt serious, there is actually a story behind it, now jump off bridge so this world could get better just by a little bit. Or just make it easier for me, so i dont have to deal with retarded ass fanboys named fucking Romo.

          • Dexx

            Lol the salt….

          • Two normie memes in one

          • Michael Romo

            First of all, my real first name is Romo. Second of all, the things I listed are changes and differences. Name another COD where we went to another planet. Name another COD that has zero G as an important factor in its gameplay. Name another COD where grappling is essential. If you can’t, actually, you really can’t, name one COD game that has an of these, then yeah it’s changed. Name some ways Battlefield has changed and then we can start a real, intelligent argument. But until then, shut your dumbass up and stop telling people to kill themselves. That’s not a joke, it just makes you seem even more retarded than you already are

          • Michael Romo

            *last name sorry. That was a typo, my mistake

          • You see, this is where you’re fucking retarded, oh boy Call of Duty is in space! That makes it different, huh?

            You do realize most of this space shit will be campaign, right?

            You do realize more than like space setting won’t be used to its full potential in Multiplayer, right?

            Call of Duty is going to be the same this year with just one fucking change and that’s space, Call of Duty is going to the bare minimum. And if Call of Duty changes one little thing, the 12 year old retards like you start cumming their pants with their little dicks and start saying ridiculous retard shit like “HURR HURR CALL OF DUTY CHANGED A LOT”

            No, it’s going to be the same and do the bare minimum like the past three years it has.

            Also, if you learned how to read retard, I never said Battlefield ever changed or made some major changes, as I don’t care about that, that was never my argument you stupid cunt. I’ll repeat myself for you, you stupid intelligent fuck, it’s really fucking ironic that retards like you will sit there and make statements like LOL HUE HUE HUE HUE BATTLEFIELD AND TITANFALL NEVER CHANGE” When Call of Duty does the same fucking thing you retard.

            You retards will literally fucking mention that BF4 and BF1 are cosmetic changes only, when THAT’S FUCKING CALL OF DUTY TOO.

            God damn, I love Call of Duty, but some of you stupid cunts need to fucking open your eyes.

            Also, jump off a bridge for the third time you cunt

          • Michael Romo

            See, you’re focused more on multiplayer. I’m talking about the game as a whole. The story will be totally different, we haven’t even seen what the multiplayer will be like, and they’re adding in a new zombies mode. It might play similar to Nazi Zombies and Exo Zombies, but then again it may not. We don’t know anything except what was shown in the campaign teaser. So how the actual fuck are you making a compelling argument when only 2% of the game has been shown? Have you played the full game? No? Then don’t say shit about it. Case closed, I’m done with you. Now maybe you can come back and tell me something in October when they actually show the multiplayer and the zombies mode. Until then, try to keep your ignorant comments off of sites like these.

          • Look, your replies getting more dumber and dumber by the second.

          • Michael Romo

            Funny how your replies are getting shorter. Tired of repeating yourself? Or do you really not have anything to counter my argument?

          • You’re*

            I have already counter them you retard. Learn how to read

          • Keshav Bhat

            “You do realize more than like space setting won’t be used to its full potential in Multiplayer, right?”

            >>Already stated that the flying mechanics, space settings, and more will be integrated into MP in ways they have not yet revealed. Full details at COD XP.

            >>Also maps across the solar system already confirmed.

          • Smayo

            Those aren’t plus points if you ask me…

          • CyberWolf

            No, he just pretty much broke apart and killed the other guy’s argument.

          • Smayo

            By pointing out the exact things that is hated on and feared to be in MP. It doesn’t help to make IW look better that way…

          • CyberWolf

            That’s not the point.

          • Smayo

            I know, but those points doesn’t ease the hate for this game…

          • CyberWolf

            Again, that’s not the point. The hate is mostly senseless at this point in time, so I don’t really give a shit about that.

          • CoDforever

            Thats not what he’s arguing. Whether or not you dont like those changes, doesnt change the fact that they are changes.

          • Kobrah

            …but they are new and different… Which is what everyone here is arguing about

          • And it’s probably going to aesthetic and barely change anything

          • I8LGod

            Everything you named is in campaign, it’s not like ur gonna be using it a ton and hell most people i know just ignore the campaign. Bf1 has changed over the past cause 1, they use a different engine almost every game now so the visuals change. 2, bf4 had some improvements with customization with a variety of camos and attachements etc. 3, destruction that being levolution or some of the older type destruction in bfbc2. 4, Vehicles that being different jets etc. We saw some differences from bfbc2 to bf3 and from bf3 to bf4. 5, Story element which i’ll admit isnt a huge facter but yet it still counts as a change. 6, multiplayer has also changed with the new modes, vehicles, customization, maps etc. Infinite warfare already said they want a three lane structure in MP and we also see a boost meter in campaign which will more than likely be in MP cuz they said it feels similar to bo3. I mean sure campaign changes but its not like the grapple or 0g is gonna be in MP which is what most fans care about.

          • CoDforever

            How do you know it wont carry over to multiplayer? Have you seen MP already?

            And didnt they already confirm 0gravity maps on other planets?

          • TheDemonOfHate

            That’s why there’s Destiny & Star Wars Battlefront

          • Read a book ww1 is interesting

            The problem with your argument is that even if BF1 to a small majority like yourself sees the game as pretty much bf4, that game still played better than the past 3 cods (and arguably even more cods imo) and that reason alone is capable of making BF1 the most played this year. You can quote me on that in a few months time
            And a side note, I’ve enjoyed every cod besides AW and I still think BO3 and even ghosts are good but BF4 to me managed to have at least a life span of 3 years and that’s got to mean something

          • BradyAlucard

            I’ll probably be spending my time on other games (that aren’t FPS’s, either).

          • CoDforever

            BF4 managed to have a long lifespan because 1) Hardline sucked and that was the only game battlefield players had and 2) They released DLC and support for over 2 years

          • CyberWolf

            Just forget about that moron. Don’t waste your time. Bastard will deny even the most obvious facts.

          • sXeGreatnessCOMEBACKSAREBAD

            Why are you even on charlieintel? this website is about cod news, and not about BF and Titanfall Fanboys who are trying to defend their games??

          • Yeah, this comment just proves even further that you didn’t read a damn thing and lack any understanding in my posts

          • why would you but battlefield 1 if you just admittedly said they’re not different

          • What?

          • *buy

            Sorry, pressed the letter right next to Y.

          • The same reason I’m going to be buying Call of Duty Infinite Warfare, considering it won’t be much different compared to the last two games.

          • Eddie Tupy

            thank you for being rational

          • CyberWolf

            Guess what I got for saying the exact same things earlier…

          • CyberWolf

            And that’s what I keep saying. And I think I know what I’m talking about since I own both BF3 and BF4 and they’re disgustingly identical. The zeppelin is interesting, however we have to wonder how many maps will have that kind of levolution. I don’t think they’re that many, but whatever… Apart from that, it really is the same thing. Same gameplay, pretty much the same graphics as BF3 (which is better-looking than BF4 in my opinion), but this time with probably less customization options. Oh, and fucking horses! Fuck yeah! I always wanted to customize a horse! I’d like to know what fucking attachments can you put on an SMG from that period, because aside from a bayonet and a slightly different Iron sight there aren’t any other options. Unless DICE pull some random fictional nonsense out of their assholes and take a shit on the game’s WW1 setting that already looks more like WW2 rather than actual historical WW1. I kinda understand why they made it more fast-paced, because realistic (I mean really realistic) WW1 wasn’t anywhere near that fast. It would be boring. That’s why WW1 games are risky in my opinion. WW1 had mostly trench warfare, there were very few auto / semi-auto weapons, and the tanks moved slower than the fucking human walking speed. But the game does look good. I’ll admit. Still, in my eyes it looks too much like a BF3 (not BF4) WW1 reskin, and I hope that the beta will prove me wrong.

          • Barbaraefesta2
          • TitanFall 2 really isn’t even a reskin, its literally the same game with new stuff in it.

            It’s to the point that I could genuinely believe they reused a lot of assets.

            It’s not bad though, TitanFall is fun as fuck, it just has so little content in it.

            TitanFall 2 seems to be TitanFall 1 but with that content that TitanFall 1 lacked.

            Battlefield 1 really does look like it’s going to shape up to end up like Hardline in my opinion though.

          • BradyAlucard

            Titanfall 2’s gameplay seemed different to me. It looks as if they made it even smoother than the first game, and they seem to be taking a different approach to the map design.

          • It doesn’t look any different to me at all, it only has certain things I wanted like sliding and grappling hooks.

            Map design? We have only seen little tidbits from a single trailer, so you cant really judge anything from there.

          • BradyAlucard

            It was a trailer showcasing the game mechanics which was the main reason why I spoke about the map design, and the same can be said for what you’re stating as well. We’ll just have to see.

          • sXeGreatnessCOMEBACKSAREBAD

            The last time I played a battlefield game, the gameplay and visuals were the exact same. The campaign is ‘waaaay’ to short and makes no sense. BF4 and BF Hardline were exactly the same. When the setting was past wars people were complaining that we’ve already done that, now they are complaining about it being futuristic. Any video game is going to get hate regardless.. Every post you make mentions jumping off of a bridge… is that the only comeback you’ve got other than defending your series?

          • Wait, wait, wait, besides all that pointless crap you just typed, am I reading your usename correct?

          • sXeGreatnessCOMEBACKSAREBAD

            Your argument is more invalid than the reason you were born. You are the reason that this society is crap. You always want to be right like CyberWolf stated. I can just imagine a 10 year old at his keyboard typing the most IGNORANT comments I’ve ever seen. *Gives sXeGreatness a gun* you know what to do.

          • Lol my comments are ignorant, yet you make ignorant ass backwards replies that clearly shows you miss the point and lack any understanding. Please for the love of god, end yourself. I don’t have the patients to help retarded children

          • sXeGreatnessCOMEBACKSAREBAD

            Patience* and you can’t even end with punctuation, I doubt you are any older than 8 years old. all you can do is use the same comments over and over to defend yourself. You’ve used backwards replies 2 times already, and on top of that you’ve used retarded children 2 times as well. I can tell you are a bf fanboy by just reading your comments.

          • Oh my bad, you right I spelled that wrong, sorry, shows how much a rush I am to hurry up with retarded kids like you.

            Honestly, I feel the need to repeat myself in comments because you’re completely retarded. You have no intelligence at all. You have proved it countless times with your idiotic replies. You constantly call me a BF fanboy, yet, I’m not here from BF. I’m here for Call of Duty, as I am fan of Call of Duty, just like I am a fan of Battlefield.

            You see, if you had a pink jelly in your small wittle head buddy pal, you would see I wasnt trying to show which game was better and nor was I even trying hate on Infinite Warfare.

            Anyone who is smart enough would see that I was pointing out the irony that idiots like you say Battlefield is the same again but yet Call of Duty is the same game. And it is, go ahead and try to mask with all the PR bullshit you want, it’s still the same game. Now that’s not bad thing, that’s not what I’m saying. All I’m saying is you retared childern are hypocrites. But then again, I don’t expect much out of you idiots.

            Anyway, thanks for making a username based off of me, I greatly appreciate it. I feel it more flattering than insulting.

            But hopefully your pathetic parents will show you more love tomorrow, hang in there kid, it gets better

          • sXeGreatnessCOMEBACKSAREBAD
          • >memegeneratornet

          • sXeGreatnessCOMEBACKSAREBAD

            Shut the heck up sxegreatness. You are a disgrace to your family and also adopted. TBH you act like an eight year old and can’t say that i’m a kid. This is basically a giant summary of things you have said before, so waste your time writing it, nobody is on your side and you should kys and stop telling others to.

          • What cancer did I even just read

          • CyberWolf

            Oh, fuck…shit just got real… Also, funny how he calls your comment “pointless crap”. So, my guess is he’s either dumb or cannot take criticism. Because you do have a point.

          • All his comment did was show that he didn’t read a damn thing, kinda like you. Then again, can’t really expect much brain power from idiots

          • CyberWolf

            Which comment are you talking about, jackass? In every single comment you say the exact same thing: “You’re wrong. I’m right no matter what you fuckin’ say, ’cause I’m a fuckin’ smart-ass.”.

          • Listen Cyberwolf, I know this hard for someone like you, I know you dont have a full functionally brain, but maybe, just maybe, read the entire conversation before you make retarded ass backwards statements.

            I swear, I feel like I’m dealing with retarded children

          • CyberWolf

            You know what? I’ve been wasting my time. Again. You keep doing your thing and be an asshole, but don’t be surprised if you get hit by lightning.

          • CyberWolf

            Wow. You just hit a new low. Congrats. You want a fuckin’ cookie now or what?

          • Yeah, I’m pretty hungry actually, you got some cookies?

          • Michael Romo

            Dude. That’s not funny. There are actually children out there who suffer from things like autism. That’s not meant to be a joke

          • Yeah and you’re one of them.

          • J4MES

            I already acknowledged the zero gravity combat by saying ‘float’ for advanced movement. This is not exactly a revolution is it? It’s like boost jumping but this time floating in mid air. I’m obviously not talking about MP but if ZG battles aren’t in that; that pretty much suggests that it’ll be more in line with BO3 which infact; they have partially confirmed this anyway. A grapple hook was in AW if I remember rightly too LOL!

          • CoDforever

            0gravity and advanced movement are very different LOL, for one you can stay in the air and the other you can only jump before instantly falling down .. Its a much bigger revolution than just normal Boots on the ground hate it or not ..

            You said its a reskin of Bo3, not AW and secondly, no one knew it was a call of duty game until the logo popped up at the E3 demo, thats proof enough that it looked very different.

          • J4MES

            Zero gravity is a type of advanced movement as was described in the presentation. If it isn’t present in the MP; that will make the movement the SAME as BO3 LOL! If you couldn’t recognize the game before the logo; you must have been watching with some sheer blind optimism but luckily; some of use can see right through the brand, business and the very people behind it…

          • CoDforever

            dude you wouldnt have known it was CoD either if you never watched the trailer and if you never spread your circlejerk comments on every article on this website since the reveal, including extremely small tidbits of IW information ..

            Secondly, you can bet your ass that Zero-gravity movement will be a much different movement system than another Boots on the ground movement system will ever be .. And I love how you’re talking about MP calling it a Bo3 reskin when that wasnt even shown at E3 nor was it the thing we were talking about haha ..

          • J4MES

            I never said IW MP was a BO3 reskin LMAO!. Here’s my original post ”and IW looks like a BO3 reskin” and I then stated IF the ZG movement is not in the MP; that will make it more in line with a BO3 reskin plus it uses the same engine and futuristic weapons.

            Please stop twisting people’s words to try and justify your misconceptions and general ignorance.

          • eh

            Here’s a mw3 side by side. Engine is outdated, was outdated 3 years ago.

          • Markdg23

            You realize cod has been running on the same engine since cod4 lol and your trying to talk about other games looking like reskins hahahahahaha you sir are the reason why cod is dying because you have no real expectations for the game ever improving bc their using a decade old engine and “tweaking” it each year aka adding crack baby jumping movements trying to mimic Halo, Titanfall and Destiny. Nice try CoDDied4everAGO. Don’t give me the “why do u come to this site if you hate cod” bc I don’t hate cod I just wish they would stop catering to competitive nerds and children.

          • Name

            Forcing niggers and women into absurd roles is fucking stupid. Infinite Warfare is more believable than BF1

          • Frag Wall

            Come again?

          • CoDforever

            remember when you said that the MP reveal was delayed after the reception of Infinite Warfare? Yeah, about that ..

            http://charlieintel.com/2016/03/01/activision-will-holding-major-community-event-call-duty-later-year/

        • J4MES

          Oh and both BF1 and Titanfall 2 weren’t even at E3 – they were at EA Play so they weren’t shortlisted.

          • CoDforever

            How retarded can you get? Titanfall 2 and BF1 were still mentioned on that article dumbass, BF1 won “Best multiplayer” on there

        • BradyAlucard

          Ohhh they got “best Shooter” not best game. My bad.

        • BradyAlucard

          To be fair, Titanfall 2 barely has any information. We know little about the mechanics. But it seems to have a significant update to it. Why change the Titanfall formula? I think them adding new content and features will improve the game in a significant way.

          “BF1 looked like a BF4 reskin” I’m not sure if we can come to this conclusion yet… They added quite a few new things to their physics. All we’ve seen is pre-alpha footage. But I do see your point that the elitists are eating crow.

          • You are talking to one. Look the comments he is eating 10 cows. He is the biggest fucking elitist on this fucking site.

          • BradyAlucard

            Only because Battlefield fans have spent so many years shitting on CoD being “the same game every year”, so they deserve it. I don’t necessarily agree with the approach here but I can see his perspective.

          • CoDforever

            What? Nearly everybody thats played titanfall 2 has said its played extremely similar to Titanfall 1 with more content. Theres nothing wrong with it playing the same as its only the second game in the serious, but if all titanfall games in the future played exactly like Titanfall 1 then there would be a problem.

            And Bf1 definitely looks a reskin to me, looks like just another bf game with aesthetic changes. Look at the tanks, jets, weapons – all of them handle extremely similar to BF4 except they look different since its WW1.

          • BF3, BF4, BFH 3 games. CoD4, WaW, MW2 Black Ops, MW3, Black Ops 2 and Ghosts 7 games. Your logic is so broken you must be braindead.

          • CoDforever

            Nobody is denying the fact that COD4 – Ghosts were mostly the same. But to say that the last 3 cods are similar is extremely idiotic. They have been changing much more than the recent battlefield games have,

          • your comparing 3 games to 7 and that is ok. You are metal for the 10th time I think.

          • CyberWolf

            His point and mine is that Battlefield has been doing the same shit. It did the same thing CoD did. I do acknowledge that Call of Duty hardly changed for a long time, but it is trying now. I repeat: TRYING. But since the other game is Battlefield somehow it has a free pass. Please tell me I’m wrong. I dare you. You’re defending a series that has made the exact same mistake as Call of Duty. That is the fucking point. I didn’t know I can’t criticize Battlefield…Well guess what! We CAN criticize that fucking game! If you or anyone else think that Battlefield can get away with this shit just because “Fuck you. It’s Battlefield, bitch!” then you are dead wrong. Is Call of Duty more innocent? No. But Battlefield is just as guilty.

          • Battlefield over the years has changed more then ones. They keep using new engines and try different things. Battlefield 1 is different because doesn’t just go for the setting but also for the gameplay and it is different. And No, no game gets a free pass. But CoD is using the same engine since 2003!! Setting or time setting is a change and a good one to start. But you can tell it feels the same with just added animations. My opinion is that I am excited for the CAMPAIGN of Infinite Warfare because they are doing massive changes to that. Side Missions, Better Characters. A Story that is actually interesting unlike Black Ops 3 where it was forgotten during the marketing of the game. And no on rails space dogfight sing me up. That is innovating for the franchise and I love that. But you know what would be better. If they could make an engine that could give us even more, but the IW engine is old as shit and there will come a breaking point where updating it is just not going to cut it. Battlefield has changed a lot from the beginning to now with many engines being used. Right now they are using the Frostbite vesrion that was used for Battlefront and it looks amazing for a Pre-Alpha. In Black Ops 3 sometimes the textures during a start of a match may not have loaded and it looks like garbage. The true innovation comes from the heart of a development team and DICE have been doing an amazing job with the CTE and post launch DLC after free years. That is why many people don’t like CoD because after the games year one cicle the support is dropped and Activision is moving to the next game which the exception of AW support for that game still lives and I have to give massive props to SHG for doing this. Sorry it’s so long but ones I get into it I go all the way.

          • CyberWolf

            (Long-ass read ahead. Just read it, anyway)
            See? That’s what I like. Now, I don’t entirely agree with you, but it’s ok, because you don’t have to agree with me. Battlefield has changed, yes, but the last 3 games were completely identical. I own both BF3 and BF4 and I’ve played Hardline’s beta, and there’s no other word to describe those games other than “identical”. Also, BF3 is nearly identical to the Bad Company games as well. That is the reality. Still, I can’t help but think that the gameplay in BF1 looks and feels too much like BF3. Adding 2 new vehicle-based classes isn’t really what I call innovation. The levolution looks great, but I’m a bit worried that things like the zeppelin crash might be too few (like 2 or 3 maps) and might end up annoying like the Shanghai skyscraper (I personally didn’t have an issue with that, but whatever). The engine might be a new version of the Frostbite, but in my eyes it looks just a tad bit better than BF3 (which I think looks better than BF4). I doubt the campaign will be too “out there” if you know what I mean. But because we’ve already seen MP footage it’s kinda easy to compare it with the previous games. At least that’s where I stand. Now, the Modern Warfare games were identical because they were in the same series and had the same setting. If the devs went to far and changed it too much, it wouldn’t have been “modern” anymore. With Black Ops, things were a little different. Those games weren’t focused on a specific time period, but rather on the concepts of government conspiracies and secret operations. That’s why BO3 sort of fits in the series. I mean, even I thought it was a dumb idea to make BO3, and I still think that it should’ve been its own game. As for Infinite Warfare, it’s a little tricky. You said it yourself. The game’s campaign seems very innovative. However we can only speculate on the multiplayer part of the game. We know that the movement system “should feel familiar to BO3” but that implies that it will be different in some way. We also know that the MP WILL have zero gravity combat, but based on the campaign gameplay, it shouldn’t be too different. Still, that’s all we know. Heck, the game might have dogfights in MP as well. Thing is, I don’t really blame BF1 for being too similar to BF3 in terms of gameplay. My issue is that the game should feel like WW1, and, aside from the weapons, the vehicles, and the equipment, BF1 seems to be doing a poor job emulating WW1 combat. You may say that they changed it to be more fun and it would make sense. Long story short, the setting doesn’t make the game. The gameplay is key here. If the gameplay is too different then people won’t recognize their game. That’s why if Battlefield can do that without upsetting people, then so should Call of Duty. The gameplay doesn’t have to change. The looks can change from game to game but the gameplay has to stay the same while adding new things such as new features and new mechanics to keep the game fresh. That’s the exact same thing Battlefield does. Both of these games evolve in the exact same way and that’s why they’re good games. But if we keep arguing over which game has the better graphics or which game has the better story then we are doing nothing else but wasting our time rather than spending it enjoying these games.

          • I never argued with anybody that Battlefield had a better story or graphics then CoD and vice versa. That shit is dumb and it’s a waste of time. All that I’m saying is through 12 years of gaming I have seen those two behemoths being the best shooters out there with their own problems. But this year I saw EA trying to get people to play the game by doing something the fans have been asking for ages. That being free maps and DLC for BF4. Launching a indie dev program meant to help indies get more promotion, and DICE continues to innovate with the Frostbite tech. While Activision launches a new game this year and drops the support for the last one. That is what I hate about it. And I agree with you about the BF3, 4 and Hardline having the same gameplay however CoD has been doing this for so much longer and that is what bugs me. And I don’t know why but why does everybody say that BF1 feels like BF3 or BF4. Unless you were at the event then you have no way to know how it feels like. Just throwing that out there and the game reminds people of BF3 and I’m like there are animations and cross hares that are taken directly from Battlefront, how does it look like BF3 I have no idea. I like your opinion because you are not fanboying like hell without any real point. Good stuff.

          • CyberWolf

            Well I ain’t just throwing random shit out because, after all, I watched gameplay vids. It is the same Battlefield gameplay, but I think that if a game has a certain setting, then the gameplay and the various features should work well with the setting. I don’t know, the gameplay in BF1 so far seems too fast to even resemble WW1. We just have to play the demo and see. My overall point was that Call of Duty isn’t as devilish as people make it look like.

          • Call of Duty and the Development Teams aren’t devilish. Activision are. And hey BF1 is definitely not a best representation of WW1. They even said they are aiming for fun not accuracy.

          • CyberWolf

            Alright then. I really hope you and the others have finished your stupid argument. I swear, this must be the longest fuckin’ hate fuelled argument I’ve seen in a while. It just went from 0 to Crazy in a matter of seconds. And it’s not just one guy’s fault here…

          • I was done after yesterday I had a laugh for a bit but later it turned into an absolute shit show. I bet 300 of those comment were going left and right with no clear answer.

          • BradyAlucard

            They’re approaching Titanfall similarly to Call of Duty; say no to changing the fundamental mechanics, just add things here and there to add more to the game, like the holograms and incorporating the grappling hook more.

            The tank in Battlefield 1 look like they play differently in comparison to past games because it all depends on the equipment that the game gives you. But IDK for sure. I’m more excited for Titanfall 2.

          • CyberWolf

            Maybe you’re right. But since we’re talking about Call of Duty here, of course it gets hate for everything.

        • Duke of hazard

          “BF1 looked like a BF4 reskin with a ww1 skin” That is the biggest lie I gave read today. Look at them side by side, they look NOTHING alike.

          • CoDforever

            tell me whats so different about them?

          • Duke of hazard

            I’m talking about in looks. If we’re talking gameplay than the most notable change is the gameplay is more chaotic than BF4, largely due to the era, plus the dynamic weather that will affect gameplay heavily. The game is relying more on skill now. In the graphics department, BF1 blows BF4 out of the water. It’s not even a comparison.

        • Aidan

          BF1 reminds me of Battlefront, but not in a good way. I’m seriously going to be bummed if it’s another BattleFront, I’m really looking forward to this game.

      • djml9

        Thats the powet of bias. Everyone thought the crazy new space game looked amazing, then they saw it was cod and suddenly it was shit.

      • Tara Tilton
        • Lover and Hater

          My Roommate Tara Tilton has no life, she loves trolling the internet and spreading useless ads that nobody looks at. Her only redeeming quality is…… well I’ll think of one later, anyway I believe poor Tara is a closet serial killer and enjoys putting her victims faces on her walls. Please donate your prays to the death gods in hopes they may spirit her away. Go to http://www.SpiritAwayTara.org today and help her meet her maker. Thank you.

          This message is from the “Make a wish foundation”.

    • XboxISdead

      You people are so stupid THEY HELD OFF ON SHOWING THE MP SO THEY CAN HAVE SOMEHING TO SHOW OFF AT COD XP SO KIDS GOOOOO AND BUY TICKETS

      • TheDemonOfHate

        Successful Marketing

    • Keshav Bhat

      Can I get a link here for where everyone is assuming MP for IW was gonna be at E3?

      Black Ops 3 was the first CoD title to show MP at E3 like that. NEVER been done before for CoD.

    • Smayo

      It’s just damage control. The negatively concentrated on youtube ?? Not effecting pre-orders ?? BS man… the pre orders for IW are laughable compared to BO3 same time last year. Read the comments on the official CoD facebook page on IW ? Yeah real positive comments there man…

      that dude is full of shit and he knows the franchise is going to take a serious hit this year…

    • mac.z.faike

      Infinity Ward never not shown multiplayer at E3
      Do you understand?

      • J4MES

        So? It’s up to Activision how they market the game and it’s just bizarre that with all the flak Infinite Warfare has got since the reveal; they persist to keep it under wraps which doesn’t ooze confidence…

        Simples.

        • Aldo

          I’d say it’s the opposite actually. They’re not reacting to all the hate because they’re confident in their product and that opinions will change in September when they show off the game. Changing their strategy because of knee-jerk reactions and an online hate campaign would not help. Personally, I didn’t want a futuristic CoD either but I’m willing to wait and see it before passing judgment or hating. Who knows, maybe it’ll be awesome!

          • J4MES

            They’ve already commissioned the change of ALL the promotional material including retail box artwork and it just makes you wonder from a consumer standpoint how much they’ve inputted on any potential changes in-game. They wont exactly admit it if they did this to save face so we’ll never know but it’s a distinct possibility. They also have to reassure the shareholders at any given opportunity that the ship is steady so you’d expect everything to be positive in their PR even if there are dire scenes in development.

        • mac.z.faike

          They want us to anger, so it is better to sell a good product

      • BradyAlucard

        Treyarch never showed MP either, but the reveal trailer had M elements, and their E3 showing was half a SP player reveal and a MP reveal.

  • jordanxbrookes

    Happy I cancelled my pre-order. Just more crap coming from a crook.

    • Hirshberg is definitely a masochist. They receive so much hate and yet this dude talks like everything is under control.

      • J4MES

        He’s only trying to convince the shareholders that everything is rosy. They always have supply drops to mug people off with if the game fails and idiots will pay up for those even if they hate the game.

      • [PCMR] Grimlock

        If he says anything negative then Activision’s stock will drop like a rock. He needs to spin things and create the illusion that everything is under control.

      • RdJokr

        It’s business talk. No executive in the right mind would admit that a situation looks bad, unless it’s blatantly obvious to everyone. In the case of COD, it hasn’t gotten there at all.

        • I think it would be better to ignore the hate…his comments just make it worse.

          • RdJokr

            But he’s gotta say something to calm the crowd. Especially the shareholders.

          • calm the crowd? looks like he is doing the opposite

          • RdJokr

            Theoretically speaking. Besides, as long as investors and shareholders are calm, he doesn’t care what we think.

      • Keshav Bhat

        he’s the CEO and has PR basically guiding him how to talk

    • Why would you cancel the pre order? You’re still gonna buy it.

      • DeadZombieGaming 12

        That is true…. people say so much shit about it and they buy it anyways…

      • jordanxbrookes

        Because Battlefield 1 and Titanfall 2, that’s why.

        • Icarus

          Battlefield 1 looks decent, I don’t understand the hype with this game. However, TitanFall 2 looks nice and the campaign and a good addition to game to explain the lore much better than having campaign in multiplayer in TitanFall 1.

          • jordanxbrookes

            The hype is because us old school FPS players want a new past FPS game and EA & DICE are giving us that with Battlefield 1. Plus the game looks so bloody amazing.

          • Icarus

            I agree but I wouldn’t be too tied with the hype until I’ve played the game.

          • jordanxbrookes

            Well we’ll be getting a Multiplayer Beta at some point soon so I guess we’ll see for ourselves.

          • Icarus

            See you on the battlefield!

          • jordanxbrookes

            Copy that, over.

        • Why not get all 3? You’ve already put money down through the pre order.

          • jordanxbrookes

            Because I don’t want Infinite Warfare? And nope, I have that money back in my account. BF1 is already pre-ordered and I’m still deciding on which TF2 edition I want.

          • Why don’t you want IW? What’s wrong with it, it hasn’t even been released yet.

          • jordanxbrookes

            What’s wrong with it? You just have to look at it to laugh yourself to sleep. I want a normal Call of Duty game, not Call of Destiny.

          • Call of Destiny: Star Wars Battlefront

          • Sentinel

            Your stupid for this.

          • You’re*

            Fucking idiot. I seriously hope that reply was satire

          • Sentinel

            Baited! It purposely done to fuck with your head. hahaha

          • OH SHIT YOU GOT ME! EPIC PRANK DUDE! XD ???????????????????????

          • Sentinel

            Umm calm down, Sir. The intention was not a joke. Just to test your mediocrity.

          • LOOK THERE ARE CAMERAS RIGHT OVER THERE. IT’S JUST A PRANK. CHILL OUT DUDE. JUST JOKE ?????????????????????????????? LE EPIC TROLL FACE XD

          • Sentinel
          • Stop jumping on the hate wagon you fgt, IW is gonna be a GREAT game just like Ghosts was!

        • Keshav Bhat

          LOL. I love how people are willing to buy TF2, but not CoD. I hate the argument that “TF is always future so its fine” “COD isn’t.”

          There’s no manual or book that says what Call of Duty has to be. It can be whatever the developers want it to be, as long as its a FPS with the 60fps controls.

          • Sentinel

            You are right in so many levels…can we be friends or is that out of the question?

    • Sentinel

      Great! See you next year 😀

      • lunator100hd .

        Hahahaha, nop that jackass will be here forever, bet your ass on it.

        • Sentinel

          This statement holds nothing but the truth! Unless he proves us wrong.

        • jordanxbrookes

          Jackass? Really? I rather be a jackass than a blind fool who thinks Infinite Warfare will be a good game you utter twat lmao.

          • Noneed

            I am going to laugh so hard when you buy the game. You fat hypocrite.

          • jordanxbrookes

            I am gonna laugh so hard when you realize what a tool you are you goon.

          • hope he likes getting his wallet ripped for the 3rd time. Oh wait he is using his dads credit card. lol

          • MrToastJr

            A “tool” oh really?

          • MrToastJr

            I will too! XD

          • MrToastJr

            You’re something on this site (cancer), I saw all of your comments and they’re mostly fucking negative. Chill the fuck out man dam you’re like a fucking dolphin raping a fish, because you need to have a rant comment about a fucking game, do you know that this game was plan when Ghost was out? I think no.

      • CoDforever

        Lol he will definitely pre order this game at some point

    • fr4gbob

      I’m sure there are thousands of kids turned 12 this year, who’s parents will be happy to buy them them their first COD game…. COD will live on in your absence.

      • jordanxbrookes

        I never said it wasn’t.

        • fr4gbob

          I never said you did.

        • MrToastJr

          It’s not all about you buddy….

    • Mick

      You cancelled your pre-order? I’m actually quite surprised. Not judging, because I know you’re into cod.

    • [PCMR] Grimlock

      I’m with you on this one. I won’t pre-order the game as it might turn out to be worse that Advanced Warfare. This is Infinity Ward and we all know how weak they are. They fucked up so much, they decided not to make Ghosts 2. I would not want to be their victim, once again.

      If the TTK is as bad as Ghosts then I’ll be skipping this game and not even rent it.

    • Yusuk

      Says the person that has no life and refreshes charlieintel 100 times a day.

      Well played fat dude

      • jordanxbrookes

        Thanks for your pointless comment you peasant.

  • J4MES

    ”The biggest and best Call of Duty yet” he said
    https://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/cod-ghosts-eric-hirshberg.jpg

    You can always trust Hirshberg on everything he says LOL!

    • Sentinel

      Lmao then again, this happened 3 years ago! So mediocre.

  • Gamerazor247

    Why did they find it necessary to comment? No shit, nothing is being altered, you don’t have time to do jack. The game would come out worse than what people are expecting…

  • Bonn Bo

    Yeah last minute changes never turn out well, leave this game alone and just follow the initial plans. If they want to start changing things up, leave that for the next two cods from sledgehammer and treyarch where they can try changes from the ground up rather from an already established game and concept.

  • 2 criticisms of his statements. Yes, people enjoy BO3 but we might be bored of a future setting and not want to buy another; and what’s he on about with pre-orders – it’s possible that the estimate charts are wrong but they usually give a good idea as to how pre-order sales are doing and IW is doing awful compared to BO3.

  • Jay Evan

    Just to clarify, Black ops 3 has more dislikes than Black ops 2, so that argument is bullshit.

    • Tied55

      A lot of people still play or are continuing to play bo3, the only problem i have with it is that the supply drops used to be cosmetic things and it was cool to get some sick camos, now that they added weapons the melee weapons are downright hated because they are reskins and everyone would much rather have the weapons. In reality, none of the weapons are OP so im not going to complain about that, but they are way cooler than reskins and weapon skins so suoply drops feel pretty shitty when you open one and you get trash camos and rarely any weapons

  • Jay Evan

    “Yeah, people have stopped caring after we went into the future and because of supply drops, but everyone still likes Call of Duty.”
    That’s what I heard

  • Bobbykins

    LIES!!! Why cancel the MP reveal at E3 if they aren’t panicking and changing the shitty boost jump bullshit!

    Activision have a BIG shock coming this year as people are switching to Battlefield! I’m buying BF1 and NOT buying IW!

    • CoDforever

      They never planned an MP reveal at E3 ever, the only exception was Black ops 3.

      • Bobbykins

        They did they said the MP would be playable at E3!

    • Bobbykins

      They did they said the MP would be playable at E3

    • Tied55

      Im sorry but despite the fact there is a possibility you might be right, you really have no grounds to assume just like everyone else at this point. Boost jumping is a MAJOR part of a game and it can change the maps entirely, with only a few months i doubt they will change the base of the game.

      BTW they’ve only described it as “chain based movement” that can mean a lot of things, like vaulting over walls and shooting, and wallrunning, sliding and probably other things too, that doesnt neccasarily mean they have boosting. Either way at this point no one can tell so just sit tight and see where it goes

    • PvBrent

      There was never any plans to show MP at E3? Why does everyone think that JUST because Black Ops 3 MP was shown at E3 means the rest of COD titles will? BO3 was the first and ONLY time MP was shown at E3 and every other E3 event was ALWAYS Campaign. Also, I’m dead certain you didnt see MP at E3 was cause IW is showing MP at the Call of Duty XP in september, which as for the last Call of Duty XP was also in September, and the year before that was Black Ops “Call of Duty XP” MP event (Under a different name) was also revealed in September. So no REALLY dont think they are panicking or canceled an MP reveal at E3. I’m dead certain the plan all along was Call of Duty XP.

      • Bobbykins

        Activision themselves said MP would be playable at E3 and then again Activision themselves said they were going to hold off until cod xp so before commenting do your research!

        • Keshav Bhat

          Do you have any proof or links where Activision said MP would be playable at E3 for Infinite Warfare? They never said anything that I saw.

          The only MP thing they announced was playable and reveal at Call of Duty XP.

    • DeadZombieGaming 12

      3 words: Different marketing plans

  • Mick

    Dude at this point I just want to see multiplayer gameplay and judge for myself based on what I’m seeing. I don’t see a beta happening for this game at all :/

  • Alex

    BULLSHIT!!!!!! IW has been spit roasted by the community. The amount of hate for this game is incredible. They need more time to change the way the game plays before the MP is shown to the world. Otherwise, if they were confident in their product they would have shown the MP by now.

    Apparently there’s talk of MW being sold separately ? I won’t be getting IW for MW

    • Tied55

      You cant really accuratly depict how many people hate the game compared to the latter, this is mostly because as humans we see all of the rage filled comments of a cod fan, but you rarely see/ pay attention to the people who actually kinda want to get the game. Im not saying that the majority of people actually want to get the game because it may be untrue. Also the fact that the game is being spitroasted os because little to no people are paying attention to the good and actually pretty cool aspects of the game. In reality though, we have no clue about how good or bad the game is, i think everyone should keep an open mind at this point and stop getting angry because tbh its making the fanbase look like a bunch of spoiled brats. I personally dont have any clue if the game is going to be good, but i can definitly see this game being a possible revolutionary thing if it pans out. I dont think ill be preordering but ill wait and see other people play it to see if its good. I am however excited to see MW so i dont think anyone can complain about that one

    • Keshav Bhat

      1) Activision has said only way to get MWR is by buying Infinite Warfare.

      2) All Call of Duty MPs are revealed in August/Sept. Black Ops 3 was just an exception since it had a beta + different marketing plans.

  • these motherfuckers really think IW is gonna be like the next BO2?

    That’s a bit… presumptuos.

    Oh well, i’m sure the game won’t be bad.

    • J4MES

      Probably the same people that said Call of Duty Ghosts would be better than MW2 because of a dog. The optimists and apologists usually end up red faced but hopefully they’ll be right for the first time in many years this year. Doubt it though!

  • ben wills

    Well, they changed the box art

  • PvBrent

    God i hate the CEO of Activision. His whole statement can be summed up into him saying “We know what’s best for the consumers, not the consumers.” It’s another way of saying “We will continue to do what we want regardless of what you think.”

    • CoDforever

      He’s basing his statements on actual facts – If people hated advanced movement than no one would have bought Bo3 right? Despite that game having a free open beta, people still chose to buy that game shows the interest of BO3 movement to Activision – Also add the fact that Bo3 is doing exceptionally well in terms of sales, player retention, DLC sales, Supply drops sales and is the most popular game on xbox one right now – is a no-brainer to make another game like Bo3.

      • You are a fucking idiot for the 100th time.

      • PvBrent

        Thats wrong. I hate the advanced movement but I still bought the game. I still want to play the campaign at least and zombies. You can hate an aspect of the game and still play it. Call of Duty as a whole isnt a peice of shit. just the advanced movement system IMO I dont care for. But thats not enough for me to NOT buy the game but it is enough for me to voice my opinion and say hey! I am a loyal consumer, but this is what I want changed in the future.

        • CoDforever

          For every person like you that doesn’t like the movement system, there are 10 casuals that do .. You have got to look at it from their perspective. The people that vote for advanced movement are the people that actively play the game and support it.

          • PvBrent

            How on earth do you know that? Casuals don’t speak up. They are casual, if they dont like it, they dont play it and they dont voice their opinion. Or they play it regardless and still dont voice their opinion. There are lots of other games I’m “Casual” at and many aspects of those games I dont like and becouse I’m casual, I dont care to voice my opinion.

          • CoDforever

            ” Casuals don’t speak up.”

            They dont need to !! They speak up by playing the game!! Otherwise Black ops 3 wouldnt be the most popular game on xbox right now, nor would the DLC/COD Points sales be as high as they are right now.

            https://store.xbox.com/en-US/Xbox-One?SortBy=MostPopular

          • PvBrent

            So your saying… that just because a casual plays the game its impossible for him to dislike the movement system, JUST because he’s playing the game?

          • THE KUSH IS REAL!!!

          • CoDforever

            Yeah, if they didnt like the game, then they wouldnt be playing it? As evident with ghosts, which had the worst player figures in CoD history and is the very reason why we dont have player population counters anymore, the casuals will only play the games that they enjoy. AKA the people you wont find voicing their opinion on charlieintel.

          • Charlieintel isn’t the only place where CoD players voice their opinions

          • CoDforever

            the casuals voice their opinions by playing the game, not what a vocal minority says online.

          • PvBrent

            So if you play through an enite campaign of some game (Doesnt have to be call of duty) and at the end you decided that you didnt like it. But you never voiced your opinion, that by your logic, the developers will assume you liked the game based on the fact that you played it?

          • CoDforever

            We’re not talking about that. We’re talking about people that still actively currently play the game, months after launch. look at how many people cried about “contracts” just a few weeks ago. Why would they cry about it so much if they didnt like the game in the first place?

          • PvBrent

            once again. we are NOT talking about the entire game here. just the movement system. You can keep playing a game but not like every aspect of the game. Your trying to tell me that just becouse people are still playing the game that they must love 100% of the game? is that correct? Cause if you think that is correct then you truly are an idiot. I still play Black Ops 3 for many hours a week. I do like the game, but i DO NOT like the movement system. This is just 1 thing I dont like among many thing that I do like. My voiced opinion is that I’d like COD to move away from advanced movement systems and go back to boots on the ground. Please try to keep up and think logically about your debate.

          • J4MES

            Just ignore CoDforever. He thinks sales equates to quality when it comes to videogames. By this logic; Justin Bieber and Madonna are the two best musicians known to humanity! The Activision corporation has really done a job on him.

          • Totally. Whatever floats your boat my dude

          • PvBrent

            We arnt talking about the entire game. Just the movement system which IS NOT the entire game. I dont DISLIKE Black Ops 3 just because I dont like the movement system. I still play the game. I just dont want to keep seeing it.

    • J4MES

      It’s all about $upply Drop$ now! That’s what is driving the revenue and not the games or their quality. That’s why COD is bad for the consumer but great for the shareholder these days.

    • [PCMR] Grimlock

      His statements are meant to calm and re-assure investors. It’s not about caring for their loyal gamers, It’s about keeping investors happy.

      • PvBrent

        ok? The message is still the same regardless. Even if it’s to investors or to consumers directly.

    • DEMOLITION12

      wow you anti-semite

    • Sentinel

      Actually, if you look at the fine print. He’s saying fuck off to those who don’t like Infinite Warfare now, in a very professional manner.

  • Michael Romo

    I’m glad Activision chose not to change anything. They’re basically telling everyone who doesn’t like the reveal trailer, “Fuck off. We have real fans who are excited for this game and we are not going to let your negativity and stupidity change it for them. We listen to the community, and we don’t need your shit.” I am personally super hyped for IW and I was hyped for BF 1 until they showed the actual gameplay. Nothing in Battlefield has really changed since Battlefield 3. I feel like I’m playing the same game over and over again at a price of $60 a year. I think it’s good that COD continues to change, and I believe that if they remaster the older CODs, it’ll be even better. That way, we get something new and we get the nostalgia from the remasters. All the people who want a COD game set in WW2 again are stupid. They’re just trying to recapture the feel of when COD started, and that’s not healthy for the franchise itself. If that happened, COD would stop selling because it would be the same thing every year.

    • I can tell that you dont even believe what you’re saying.

    • Sentinel

      I agree with you on the first half of your statement.

  • They shouldnt. The same thing happens every year. they change shit, people bitch about it. they spend $60 on the game to bitch some more. Im sure this game is going to break records, like every COD before it. so either buy it or dont. simple as that.

  • Guys thanks for an amazing comedy night. If CoDForever kid will ever recover and tell you where did he get that kush contact me. Although I don’t think he even knows, he lost his mind from riding the CoD cock. lol

  • ScOott

    Jesus fecking Christ man, this comment section is aids.. Conspiracy theories, blind hate, battlefield loving.. All from people I 100 percent respect and get on with..

    I’m not best pleased that we are going to space, I’m dreading what the new movment could be like, but I do agree with CoDforever many CoD fans will not stick with battlefield 1 just becuse of how it plays, the setting is going to be kewl but it’s still going to play like B.F game and there are many out there who will always prefer the causal arcade shooter..

    Let’s just chill our fecking pants till we see multiplayer for our selfs..

    Many of u are going to look like total fecking dicks if u end up liking it lol.. I’m not saying be a blind fan boy.. Im saying just chill Winston

    • I never said I hated IW. But the kid was attacking anyone who had an opinion addressing issues that they feel will ruin the game. Wish you were here sooner ScOott. lol

      • ScOott

        There are a whole load of comments in this article and I haven’t read them all, but for most part he seems to be on point..

        This is going to be a completely brand new experience or similar to bo3

        B1 will pretty much be a reskin (not saying CoD won’t be)

        There will be a hell of a load of gamers that will buy B1 becuse of the setting but end up going back to CoD becuse they prefer the arcade gameplay..

        He probably didn’t word some stuff particularly well, but props to him for trying to get his opinion across while he’s been bombarded with messages from everyone left, right and center ready to jump on him..

        But hey I didn’t comment to get involved in all of this, just to ask people to chill out, that is all..

        • He made some mistakes that only the delete button can fix. The only reason he is bombarded is because he is bombarding the comments with a logic of a 3 year old. No to mention he is a hypocrite.

    • jordanxbrookes

      You’re welcome ScOott 😀

      • ScOott

        A big smiley face. My calming words must be working a treat..

        • jordanxbrookes

          Nah, you’re just a cool dude. I have no problem with you bro, just the people who can’t take criticism and a “negative” view.

          • ScOott

            Right back at ya, so in that case let’s man hug this out, and get off C.I.. In twenty minutes It will be 2 o clock in the morning dude, Screwww this comment section I’m off to the land of nod..

  • I’m officially done for today. Can’t wait to see the messages tomorrow. lol

    • Sentinel

      Great! Who gives a fuck. 😀

    • TheDemonOfHate

      Goodnight

  • Sentinel

    All these haters & hypocrites joining this comment section like…

    http://i.memeful.com/media/post/PM02BEd_700wa_0.gif

    • Yuo right we need to get CoDforever out of here. Nah just kidding, we need to get him to rehab. To much kush man.

      • jordanxbrookes

        We need start making a Will for him, I think he’s overdosing himself to an early grave haha.

        • #RIPCoDforever You will always be remembered as the one who smoked to much of Hirsgberg’s kush. lol

          • Sentinel

            Officially done for today I see. Loser.

          • I know right I’m trying but you faggot keep coming back to get burned even more. Like seriously are you not barbecue yet. lol

          • Sentinel

            Are you for real? Sike! You are hyping nothing but irrelevant bullshit here. Get over yourself you dipshit. lol

          • jordanxbrookes

            We’re done arguing with blind sheep.

          • Sentinel

            Exactly! Welcome to the real perspective, young blood. But only the raeilst Wolf kwons who’s raelly fukcen blind. There is levels to this shit, sheeple.

  • To the parents. We did all we could but we could not stop the kid from his drug addiction.

    • sdasd

      Today, i will go buy a sniper rifle, kill you and your family, and sell your body to a convicted rapist.

      • Today I will drink one for you . Knowing that somewhere out there a loser like you exists. You would not even have the cojones to do it so bitch STFU.

        • sdasd

          Hahah I had to write that after seeing your BS comments all over the place.

          Have a good one. Don’t choke on the drink 😉

      • TheDemonOfHate

        Enjoy your cellmate.BTW I hope he’s the alpha male of the relationship.

  • Commander Wolfe

    Again, they can’t compare this game to Black Ops II. Why? Because even though it had a futuristic setting, it didn’t too far into the future and used weapons that currently exist. Not to mention having missions dating back to 1986 and 1989. Honestly, Call of Duty would’ve been more exciting if they made a World War I game, a Korean War game, or better yet, a much better sequel to Ghosts since the campaign ended with a cliffhanger,and the game’s multiplayer was junk.

    • CyberWolf

      I’m just curious. Wouldn’t you say that Black Ops 2 was more modern based on the setting and technology?

      • Commander Wolfe

        I’d like to think so. I mean just look at some of the weapons featured in multiplayer. The MTAR,M27,AN-94,FAL OSW,SCAR-H, all exist in the present time. There are probably more but I’m listing a few examples.

  • Commander Wolfe

    Also, stating that it didn’t effect it’s pre-order sales is also incorrect. Since the reason most people pre-ordered the game did so just to play COD4 Remastered.

  • Kyle Emery

    Only if we had ghosts 2 then no one would Complain because that’s not Futuristic. Even though I didn’t like it. But it’s boots on the ground what people want. Every Developer who makes Cod won’t make boots on the ground Cod. Why do you all think there making Cod 4 remaster? Just in case no one plays their up to date Cod IW… To make more money out of us! That’s why they took the Futuristic Risk! I don’t mind what setting its in salons it’s good. Anyone see my point of view here??

    • If it was Ghosts 2 people would be largely positive because IW was bound to learn from their mistakes with Ghosts.

      • fr4gbob

        If it was Ghosts 2, I wouldn’t have even watched the trailer!

  • Batman

    Same here, I haven’t changed my opinion since announcement, the game is trash and I ain’t buying it, this was a big f* you and what you want to their fans.

    Btw BO2 had a positive like/dislike ratio
    Btw the infinite warfare pre orders are 10x less than bo3 last year, its not even top 10 most pre ordered title

    Btw if BO3 player base is so crazy high, why do you hide its numbers?

    • djml9

      Actually, this is them saying “Here, exactly what you told us you wanted back when we could use your input for this game.” Its not theyre fault that everyone hopped back on the hate bamdwagon after they started making the game.

  • Tara Tilton
    • I’ve blocked, like, five different versions of you already. Enough is enough!

      • Sentinel

        Is it making different accounts every times it gets banned?

        • J4MES

          It’s called a bot. It can generate new accounts automatically across a string on daily generated IP’s.

          • Sentinel

            Finally, useful info out of you!

          • lunator100hd .

            But still cant wait to see his next hate comment for IW……….Oh i mean his slight criticism with a small dose of doubt.

          • J4MES

            You kids really need to learn the difference between ‘hate’ and constructive criticism.

          • Sentinel

            Fuck your standards. They are nothing more than just irrelevant on these grounds.

          • J4MES

            My standards is what stopped me getting burned on Ghosts and AW and then spending two years crying on this website and then getting hyped only to be disappointed once again. I’d rather have standards than be an Activision puppet who gets pooed on annually!

          • lunator100hd .

            Constructive criticism based on what? We have only seen 6 min of gameplay and was pretty good if you ask me. Im positive because i like what i have seen so far, maybe i will change my mind later on but for now im not judging a new game according to what went wrong to previous games, every game is different and with no axception IW will be too. Im pretty sure is gonna have its issues like every AAA title but as a cod player for years im positive. Stop spreding your ”constructive ctiticism” just because its set on the future and, wait until cod xp for the mp reveal and then we will judge it together, fingers crossed to be a great game.

  • Sentinel

    So what have I missed here…nothing important! haha! Anyways, I’m calling out the following COD players to a Face off match. To a 1 v 1 custom match on BO3. Let’s see if you a real Call of Duty player. & The call out goes to;

    – jordanxbrookes
    – EpicLikeMike
    – sXeGreatness
    – J4MES

    Reply only with your gamertags in the section below v If you don’t, take this supply drop with a bribe that contains an early “L” If you don’t have a PS4 console, Get TF out.

    All other FPShooter fans are welcome to play along with; Let’s kick back, pop some beer(only if you are 21 or over), mic up, squad up and play a couple of matches on any of the following games;

    – All CODs from Ghosts to the latest (on PS4)
    – Battlefield 4 & Hardline
    – Rainbow 6ix
    – The Division
    – Sniper Elite 3
    – GTA 5

    Let’s crack jokes & talk shit to all the squeakers online!

    • Lover and Hater

      On behalf of all those poor young squeakers out there, you should be more respectful, they are poor misguided little souls who have parents who are worth less than fecal matter. They may be the most annoying little creatures out there, but we should be nice and comfort them with insults that go beyond “your mom” jokes. Thank you.

      This message was brought to you by “Make a wish Foundation”.

    • Fortnum

      i’ll play psn is fortnamtom

      • Sentinel

        Gotcha!

    • lunator100hd .

      It would be a really cool idea to do a supporters vs haters match with players from CI.

      • Sentinel

        Interesting

      • Mr_ysi42t96

        LETS DO THIS

    • This is the most cancerous comment I have ever seen

    • J4MES

      Fanboy has flipped his lid LMAO!

    • I got all CODs on PS4. Add me bro. Slim_Skull-boy_

      • Sentinel

        Gotcha!

    • Mr_ysi42t96

      Mr_ysi42t96 but I removed ghosts and Aw. I have gta 5

  • Wreckage

    Even though I nothing against IW but how the fuck did it get “Best Shooter” at E3. It was just a trailer.

    • RdJokr

      Only Game Informer called it that. And let’s be honest here, out of all the shooters we’ve seen at E3, which do you brings more innovation to itself than the others?

      Sure, BF1 is getting huge hype and all, but WW1 is ultimately just a setting. There is very little meaningful change to the overall gameplay. IW has yet to really reveal their MP, so I won’t be judging any of that. But the campaign alone already looks to be much, much better than expected.

      But nooooo, apparently COD is an “MP game”, so we gotta have that MP footage, and nothing else matters…

      • CyberWolf

        Careful. I said pretty much the same thing earlier about BF1 and CoD and some of the geniuses in the comments section somehow tried to deny facts and statistics. But you’re right. These idiots are comparing the campaign of one game with the Multiplayer of the other. Solid logic…

  • Eddie Tupy

    good. I dont understand why people have such high expectations for cod yet hate on them for trying something new.

  • I8LGod

    For everyone arguing in the comment i have one phrase about infinite warfare. 2.5 million dislikes ?

  • Epicsand

    Good.

  • Dickmissle’s Son

    LOL this guy already knew what was up!

  • Alienade

    All I need is the same Black Ops 2 sniping style.

    • lunator100hd .

      Because you are 12 years old.

    • fr4gbob

      All I need is for that to never return.

  • FraMarte
    • lunator100hd .

      This is a troll.

    • DeadZombieGaming 12

      I believed it for a bit, until i realized the dancing and the fact that this was zombies only.

  • hungryandrew

    Oh, they changed it alright…………

  • Astraxis

    Just remember, kids. Even if this game looks pretty and “innovative,” it’s still gonna have supply drops! 🙂

    • fr4gbob

      Good, more free weapons 🙂

      • ChincyNigs

        troll attempt 1/10

        • fr4gbob

          Simple truths are troll attempts now? think you need to learn what a troll is!

        • CyberWolf

          They are sort of free, actually. I got the AK47, M16, Stg 44, the Blunderbuss, the Dragunov and the M1911 without spending a dime.

      • Astraxis

        I liked my weapons as part of the Season Pass, but you must be one of those new kids on the block who mooches off your parents credit cards.

        • fr4gbob

          I’m 34 and used free Cryptokeys and weapon bribes lol, hence why I said “free”, clue is in my first reply dude, keep up.

          If my parents were willing to let me use their credit cards, I still couldn’t purchase Cryptokeys, they are free…. you can’t buy something thats free!

          • Astraxis

            At the same time, I don’t have literally hundreds of hours to dump into farming Cryptokeys. See, while you’re defending this system, you could have just gotten the weapons instantly in the Season Pass, but that’s too good for you.

          • fr4gbob

            Its not too good for me, I simply don’t expect hand outs, I appreciate them when they come along, like the 6 free weapons I have got from supply drops so far, that is extremely generous from a business who’s primary function is to make money, you can see how simply giving stuff they have created away does the opposite of that right?

            But they have given us a chance to get them for free whilst still making money from muppets who are willing to pay for COD Points, its a win win situation for them and for us.

            Yet little cry babies who expect everything for free and are always looking for hand outs can’t accept that, they have to constantly piss and moan about it all over the internet and if anyone with a different outlook and opinion than them comes along, all hell breaks loose.

          • Astraxis

            Yeah, maybe if we WORKED toward getting said items, I’d be completely alright, but I’m vouching for those weapons to be “handed out” rather than locked behind an RNG wall. I have well over 600 hours in the game with nothing but bullshit to show for it. Activision doesn’t need more money, they have a rather large wallet already, but your stubbornness to realize that they’ve rigged the entire game is the reason we have this decline into RNG fuckery. Way to go, jackass, I applaud you.

          • fr4gbob

            lmao, there is no downside to it at all, call it stubborn, call it whatever you like, its still true, we have a chance to get them for free, thats the upside, if you don’t get them, you lose absolutely nothing, so no downside.

            There are plenty of guns in the game already that you can WORK towards getting, the supply drop weapons are extras, I would be happy if I never got any of them to be honest, it wouldn’t make a difference at all, I would still have the game I paid for, nothing less…. but you go open another box of tissues to wipe away all you tears…. I hope they are here to stay, just to wind people like you up lol

  • Disappointed Jusus

    It’s really sad seeing all these grown men arguing about video games. Every single day you see the same people arguing about which game will be better or if supply drops are good or bad. The sad thing is that they spend hours a day doing this. Do they not realize how much time they’re wasting of their lives? Do they not realize spending hours on a computer hating on a franchise will doing nothing? The truth is, you arguing over a keyboard with a stranger for hours will not change anything. You will not change how they feel about a subject matter. In the end you’ll both still feel the same way and the arguing will continue the next day and so on. It’s even got so bad that groups of people are atacking another for being a “sheep” for loving cod, but they’re doing the same thing by blindly loving battlefield.

    The people arguing should really reevaluate what they’re doing and notice that majority of the comments on Charlie Intel now is them arguing. It’s really disappoint to see the state that Charlie Intel is in now.

    • CyberWolf

      I rest my case. You are indeed 100% right. No joke. I was actually wondering if there was anyone else thinking the same way.

    • J4MES

      The saddest thing is when people state a personal opinion that may slightly criticise the brand or its direction and then they get persistently attacked by fanboys. I’ve owned every Call of Duty since it was created but I am suddenly a ‘Battlefield fanboy’ and ‘COD hater’ because I have doubts around Infinite Warfare and Activision’s business practices. I have also heavily slated Battlefield in the past too on their official sites but at least the Origin community can accept such criticism whereas some users on here flip their lids if their beloved Activision is tarnished in any verbal way.

      I remember raising the same concerns with Ghosts and Advanced Warfare and being obliterated for my opinions back then only to have the people that originally slated my thoughts, go on and make the same observations as I did pre-release. It’s all part of the usual COD cycle though!

    • Sentinel
  • DeadZombieGaming 12

    People on this site are bunch of meth heads that you can anger up faster than you can a 5 year old in Ghosts Gun Game.

  • isuckhordanscockFOREVER

    comment section is horrible now you have whoredan thinking hes a expert on everything yet the degenerate was most likely in the autistic class in school then you got isuckcockforever thinking bf1 is a reskin yet cod is the same every year and before cancer patient says nice map design you u have sledge hammers cluster fuck , infinity wards battlefield sized maps when its like 6v6 and treyarchs 3 lane bullshit like im playing league or dota every year , nice reused assets , nice engine , nice grapple that was in advanced shitfare nice 0 gravity thats been in just about every cod thanks to the modders that try to make any cod half enjoyable i forgot taking advanced warfares grapple hook and extending the first ghosts level and adding star citizen to the game was innovative and i truly enjoyed cod 4 but since he doesnt like cod 4 he likes robot cock i guess u could call that a full on reskin , he says the theme is different but boy with ur ugly ass that looks like u were made in spore cant tell the difference to begin with but wait there isnt a difference the story is always about a bomb or some shit or a squad of faggots that u end up killing at the end i dont care for battlefield but let me say its more different then cod will ever be they added new movement mechanics that havent been in a prior game before bf1 they used a fresh engine used in battlefront which looked very nice they have a enjoyable setting and single player no one cares because only brain dead faggots are the people who buy battlefield to expect a good single player on a multiplayer based game

    • lunator100hd .

      Well english is not my first language but damn you suck balls, next time remember to use a dot.

      • taketheLfaggot

        damn another cod iw queer.

    • J4MES

      The COD community are obsessed with Battlefield 1 even though it’s a completely different type of game. Probably just feeling a bit sore as DICE listens to their community whereas Activison just follows the money and what’s ‘cool’ for the kids at that time. Surprised we haven’t had Call of Duty: Justin Bieber Warfare yet!

      • Moronic

        You’re very moronic. It’s actually the polar opposite. You rarely see cod fans hating on battlefield trailers, yet when you go on a cod trailer you always see “cod is dead. Battle field is better” “bf killed cod” “bf is better”. They say the same thing every single time BF and COD comes out the same year. Yet, every single time cod always ended up being the morely finished product. This can be seen when bf4 released and it had so many bugs, yet Ghosts had a little bit of bugs.

        And I hate to have to reiterate this, but infinity ward does listen to the fans. When they started developing the game cod fans were saying that cod needed innovation and that it’s the same every year. They had no idea fans wanted call of duty to go back to the past. They could not change the entire game in the middle of development.

        So please, don’t hate on something if you’re going to make idiotic points.

      • Moronic

        One more thing, is bf1 going back to the past not what the “cool kids” want? WW1 setting is what everybody and their mom wants right now, but a couple of years ago people were hating on WW1 games and wanting games to have a modern setting. The same thing will happen again in a few years again when people get tired of the World war setting. Thus, the cycle will repeat.

      • CoD Died After BO2

        Yup, basically, Bf1 is the game the cod fans wanted infinite warfare to be

        • ROGUE

          Umm J4MES, why are you reply to yourself with a guest account… Stop being a basic bitch! #REKT

          • J4MES

            LMAO! Check the webcache…

      • Sentinel

        One of the members of the COD community here! So, I am really obsessed with Battlefield 1? Well off course not! sXeGreatness probably is, he’s in love with it. But why is it that you always believe that everyone foresee only your perspective here. So foolish. & Yes you are sore, but for bashing your thin head against the controller with frustration because you sucks so bad at BO3, can’t get the hang of the 3D movement. It is to fast for you & Jordan. That is why ya’ll both need a boots on the ground game! Don’t get Titanfall 2. Save yourself the money! My little nephew can probably beat both of ya’ll! LOL So okey, as your initial concerns, you already know how Activision is for the 3rd “year on the trot” Why the fuck ya’ll still here then? Go with DICE, it listen to the community! You have finally found your place! Yet you still here, bitching. It is ironic how you state that I “come back to cry” on this forums when really, it’s the other way around. Jordan cancelled his pre-order, yet he still here. Doesn’t bitch as much but we all know he’s going to buy it anyways. Just like you are along with all your dick riders. Ya’ll bunch of hypocrites.

        • This is the same retard that says “i dont care about these hypocrites opinions ” yet you always find away to either mention me, J4MES or Jordan in your fucking comments.

          Are you daft?

          • Sentinel

            ERROR: Your comment is invalid. Please input your Playstation 4 username below v
            http://i.memeful.com/media/post/edvrgdb_700wa_0.gif

          • XD ??????????????????? LAWL EPIC

          • J4MES

            The kid has only been on this site for 5 minutes too and he’s slating people’s opinions of community members that have been on here for years and who have been apart of COD since day one (2003 and not Modern Warfare 2 lel)

            He apparently doesn’t care but that doesn’t stop him getting butthurt when Activision loses a pre-order or if someone is planning to get another videogame to play instead. These one game a year peasants who get it bought for them by their parents are just so bitter!

          • Mr_ysi42t96

            For the views maybe?….Fazal, Jordan, Scooot, sxe, keeeeeeemstaaaaaaaar

        • iGotNothinOnBatman

          So just because people don’t like the bullshit movement system on BO3 means they are terrible at the game? So fuck you for that. And it’s fucking stupid to even mention Titanfall due to the fact the game started out with the boost jumping and what not. CoD started out as a gritty WWII series and now they’ve progressed to the bullshit that people play now. Don’t get me wrong, best CoD hands down is CoD4, but it was set in today’s world.

  • Wait didn’t mw3 sell the most copy for any cod game? 26 million if i recall correctly

    • fr4gbob

      Doesn’t mean it was good, I purchased it after really enjoying MW and MW2, fucking hated MW3 though, same with Ghosts, that was the point I stopped pre ordering, stung twice by Infinity Ward, won’t be stung again

      • I loved mw3 had so much fun playing it, ghost was okay not bad as people made it to be and since i’m an iw guy i already pre ordered infinite warfare lol

    • Somethimg along those lines. I think MW3 and BO2 are probably the best selling CoDs in the series. I dont think the sales have matched up to them since

      • J4MES

        Supply drops have bailed them out pretty much. They only release the revenue rates now and not the unit sales of the games.

  • CoD Died After BO2

    Everyone over 21 is buying Infinite Warfare for Modern Warfare Remastered.

    Everyone under 20 is buying it for just Infinite Warfare and supply drops.

    Everyone under 18 is getting their parents to buy it for them.

    Everyone who wants a mans FPS will buy Bf1.

    • fr4gbob

      lmao, I’m 34 and will probably get IW, depends on whether it plays like Ghosts did, if it does, I won’t be getting it, definitely won’t be getting MW-R or BF1, I have no intention of going backwards, so your post is a lie.

    • Mr_ysi42t96

      I’m 20….

    • GinsuVictim

      I’m 38 and buying the $100 set, with IW, MWR, and season pass. That’s a great value. I look forward to both games.

    • Fortnum

      what about people who are 20?

    • iGotNothinOnBatman

      BF1 is gonna be so goddamn epic. And when compared to the looks of Infinite Warfare, BF1 is gonna beat the living shit out of Activision and their bitchass fanboys.

  • Eze Enwereuzor

    Since when the BO2 trailer video was disliked?

    • Mr_ysi42t96

      They just give excuses

  • Maria Johnson
  • Sentinel

    I might be online tonight, I will hit you up on your gametags to squad up to play BO3 or RS6 Siege.

    • Mr_ysi42t96

      I can t I have exam this week

  • imBATMAN

    So…the box art doesn’t count? ok

  • Ak74u

    When I wake up again in a few hours I better see some news regarding DLC 3 or a leaked ray gun mark 2 or 3 or a promotion poster for the next DLC. We need a tease for zombies to build up some excitement cause everything feels so boring right now

  • Barbaraefesta2
  • dust&cheese

    you can hardly compare B02’s youtube reveal dislikes to IW. i hope this game truly flops and those greedy bastards over at activision can buckle up and make a fucking better game. AW was a shit show of a game. although IW is the one making the game activision has creative direction in where they take the series. we’ll see closer to release what they really have to offer but this will definitely be the first year of COD that i dont buy the game the week after release.

  • Richard Method

    If they want to save this game, they had better release a BETA and it better be good or it’s dead on arrival.