Activision and Treyarch have officially announced the third downloadable content pack for Call of Duty: Black Ops 3, Descent. Descent DLC Pack 3 will be available on July 12th on PlayStation 4.

“One of things I love most about Treyarch is that team just keeps going for it,” said Mark Lamia, Studio Head, Treyarch. “Descent doesn’t take its foot off the gas, serving up a flat-out scorching Zombies experience, as well as multiplayer map designs and gameplay opportunities that we think our fans are going to love.”

This pack includes four new multiplayer maps, including a remake of Call of Duty: Black Ops 2’s Raid, and a new Zombies experience, Gorod Krovi.

Multiplayer Maps:聽

  • Empire: Treyarch adapts its Black Ops III movement system to the Call of Duty庐: Black Ops II fan favorite map Raid. The re-imagining of this classic, medium-sized map features an authentic Roman villa that has been “recreated by a modern-day eccentric billionaire,” where a classic map structure mixes with the new gameplay mechanics of Black Ops III.
  • Cryogen: Located far off the coast in the Dead Sea, an isolated compound holds some of the world’s most dangerous criminals in frozen isolation. Sentry towers keep watch over the small map’s circular design as frenetic combat is funneled around the prison’s cryogenic tubes, where opportunities for wall running attacks abound.
  • Berserk: Ancient sentinels from a lost civilization guard the entrance to Berserk, a Viking village frozen in time. Players will fight through blizzards, and control the center bridge as they navigate this medium-sized map’s wooden buildings, deadly rocky outcroppings, and tight chokepoints.
  • Rumble: Gamers battle amongst larger-than-life mechanized warriors in Rumble, a stadium where giant robots battle to the roar of the crowd. This medium-sized map funnels high-speed combat to the central arena, where players battle their way through fallen mechs and pyrotechnics.

Zombies:聽

  • Gorod Krovi: Descent also thrusts players to an alternate universe of Nikolai’s motherland, the 1940s Soviet Union, in the next highly-anticipated chapter of the Origins Zombies saga, Gorod Krovi. Players face-off against a swarm of mechanized zombie infantry and dodge hell-fire from aerial dragon assaults, all in the middle of a raging battle within the remnants of Stalingrad. Gorod Krovi delivers the most exciting Zombies experience yet, filled with horrifying new enemies, exciting new gameplay mechanics and an epic set of Zombie annihilating weapons.

TRAILER:


Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Descent is available July 12th on PlayStation 4聽and is coming soon to Xbox One and PC. Descent is available with the Black Ops 3 Season Pass or available separately for $14.99. DLC Pack 3 is not available on PS3 or Xbox 360.

SHARE
  • Random guy

    Furst

  • Ivan

    Why till the 12th? Really wanted to play next week!

  • Aidan

    No MP footage? I see how it is.

    • Chomsky

      Gotta say though, even from the pictures these multiplayer maps look pretty damn cool. Cryogen looks like it has some pretty crazy wall running opportunities and I’m glad to see a remake of raid.

    • TheDemonOfHate

      The Zombies community were dying for a least a teaser.

      • Dr. Edward Richtofen

        Thank god we got it

  • The Gaming Revolution

    There is so much new stuff in this map! As if they took new content that should have been included in the other maps and packed it into one dlc

    • Dr. Edward Richtofen

      Shut up and make me a dlc 5 samich

  • jordanxbrookes

    Zombies looked good until I saw them flying robots. I’m sure it will be a fun map to many Zombies fans though. Can’t wait to see how bad these other 3 MP maps will be though 馃槓 At least we have Raid 馃檪

    • waylay3r

      “until i saw them flying robots” why is everybody so itchy with the first sign of something robotic? Personally i bought BO3 mainly for the zombies (yes call me crazy) and i am more than happy with what i am seeing

    • zack

      they had the flying bugs on shadows of evil its probably the same shit but reskinned. and they will only come on certain rounds. gamers are sensitive af

    • Element115Will

      Oh you played it already? Ffs #CoDCommunitycomplainsofthedumbestshitiswear

      • Mizhe5

        Lol that’s why people think this Community is a joke.

      • jordanxbrookes

        Nope, but judging from the trailer that’s my view so far. Sorry if you don’t like it.

        • Michael Romo

          The trailer showed no mp gameplay. How can you judge it by the trailer?

          • jordanxbrookes

            The trailer showed preview screens of the multiplayer maps, but I was mainly judging from the last 2 map packs.

    • Ak74u

      Just stop Jordan please I remember people complaining about the bugs in the shadows of evil trailer and saying that zombies is ruined because they are mixing extinction aliens into zombies and they were wrong please stop judging it and if you followed the zombies storyline you would know that robots actually have a significant role in zombies just like the giant/ Der riese

      • Doesn’t matter, IMO SoE was the best zombies map so far. I don’t have high expectations for the rest of the DLC zombie maps, my hope for the multiplayer maps is long gone.

        • Ak74u

          Yes I also love shadows of evil I’m saying people complained about it because they thought they were mixing some extinction elements in zombies like the bugs rounds but it actually turned out to be great!!! I’m saying Jordan shouldn’t bitch about flying robot bugs because it’s not a major changer and robots are actually a part of zombies according to the storyline

        • Michael Romo

          SoE was far from perfect, but it was a good map. IMO DE was better tho. Just because of the setting and simplicity of the map

      • jordanxbrookes

        I don’t follow a storyline because I play Zombies just to kill zombies lol.

        • Ak74u

          So then stop complaining about robots in zombies your just a causal who doesn’t know anything about it just like the other noobs who complain because they don’t know how to do shit

          • jordanxbrookes

            No I can express my opinion if I want to. The flying robots turned me off. Don’t like my thoughts then ignore my comment instead of getting all defensive because I made a criticizing statement to your precious storyline.

          • MrToastJr

            Oh look, another guy complaining about COD, it’s an a amazing site and also hear the battle cry as well.

        • Michael Romo

          Then you are a casual who really doesn’t know the significance of everything in this map

        • Dr. Edward Richtofen

          Don’t talk about it if you don’t know what you’re talking about

          • jordanxbrookes

            I can talk about it because I’m going to be playing on it you tool.

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            You’re calling me a tool lol

          • jordanxbrookes

            Yes I am calling you a tool for saying I can’t have an opinion just because you don’t like it.

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            I’m just suggesting if you do not know what you’re talking about the don’t talk about it

          • Former

            “I play zombies to kill zombies” So then why the hell should a robotic enemy matter to you? Your logic is fucked.

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            When did I say that

    • Und3rY0urB3d

      *Dragons in a zombies map*
      *Bitches about robots*

      I’m starting to think that the entire zombies community are just technophobes. I mean the robots are just re-skinned parasites what difference does some blue glow make?

      • jordanxbrookes

        Parasites? Have no clue what they are. Shows how much I’m into BO3 Zombies. And anyway the Dragons don’t seem that bad, although they probably will be annoying lol.

        • Filthy Prank’d

          Parasites from SoE?

        • Michael Romo

          Uh, where exactly did you see the dragons possibly being annoying?

          • jordanxbrookes

            They look like they will swoop down and pick you up when you’re outside, that’s the annoying bit I meant.

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            Where did you see that

        • Former

          Got ourselves a Negative Nancy once again.

          • jordanxbrookes

            K.

          • Former

            For real though, you bitch a lot about petty things

        • Dr. Edward Richtofen

          Just watch one soe guide it will help

    • MrToastJr

      Oh you again, what a surprise.

      why.

    • MrToastJr

      kys

  • CoDLoL

    Great news for the 10,000 people that still play this game! Only 7,500,000 playing Overwatch right now…

    • Stefan Lang

      Idiot

    • Keshav Bhat

      Well, Activision Blizzard’s Blizzard side made Overwatch, so they are happy about that.

      • Reckton

        rekt

    • Element115Will

      Youre a jackass.

  • Laddie

    CAN’T WAKE UP

    • CoDLoL

      Is that advanced warfare, black ops 3 or infinite warfare? i cant tell as all the Cod games these days are the same

      • Thomas the Tankswag

        Haha nice trolling.

      • Ak74u

        Why are you hating man

      • Element115Will

        Its your pos game called Overwatch. Maggot.

        • Filthy Prank’d

          Chill, man, the game’s not a pos, it’s actually a good game. And where’d that game come from, all of a sudden?

          • BradyAlucard

            Online only game for $60 lol.

          • Former

            Yeah because people buy CoD for that campaign man…Riiiight.

          • Michael Romo

            What? I buy COD for the campaign

          • Filthy Prank’d

            I buy CoD because it’s CoD, honestly.

          • Michael Romo

            I buy IW games for the campaign (because they’re good at story telling) and 3arc games for the zombies and mp. Sledgehammer is new so I don’t really know what their strong points are

          • Siftblade

            Nothing

          • Former

            I’m sure you do. I’m speaking in general terms here. If anyone had to choose between Multiplayer or Campaign to be removed from the game, I think anyone with a brain would choose the latter.

          • BradyAlucard

            I’d just rather have more RPG elements in the Campaign than have it removed. Multiplayer really doesn’t cost a lot.

          • Former

            Fair enough, but you’d still choose to keep Multiplayer.

          • BradyAlucard

            I wouldn’t choose one nor the other. CoD is about the entire package.

          • Former

            I was referring to the hypothetical ultimatum I created.

          • BradyAlucard

            I know.

          • Former

            I guess you don’t understand the concept of an ultimatum then. Lmao.

          • Guest

            He doesn’t know how to take an L or be wrong. So he’ll pretend he wouldn’t play COD at all if campaign didn’t exist.

          • Former

            Lmao.

          • Dammit

            Right.

            I bought my house because of the package too.

            Not like location or if my bank loan was approved was ever the bigger issue.

            Priority was, I wanted free window blinds to come with my house.

          • BradyAlucard

            What is this, a CoD news site or Fixer Upper?

          • Ghost

            In your case it’s neither. It’s actually the reason your penis is dryer than Tempe, AZ in July

          • BradyAlucard

            Can’t be that bad, I’ve had worse.

          • Michael Romo

            Honestly I find the MP to be addicting, but I’d take the campaign just because the MP had gotten really bad over the years. It’s still fun, but it’s really unbalanced gameplay

          • Former

            If you want balanced gameplay, take a look at Arena. I know some people on this site despise people that actually have thumbs, but it’s still the best option is want a non-bullshit match.

          • Filthy Prank’d

            Tough situation. I play almost all of the CoDs campaign and really enjoy it, but Multiplayer is revolved around that aspect (Factions, Weapons, Characters, etc.). If I would have to choose which to sacrifice, then most likely Campaign because I don’t want to spend $60 on a game that has a 4-16 hr single player, that’s too much.

          • Former

            Exactly my point. CoD would be nowhere without multiplayer. Just stating facts.

          • BradyAlucard

            Some do, actually. It’s called value.

          • Former

            Value in a few hours of play time? Multiplayer and Zombies hold the main bulk of the value in CoD games.

          • Michael Romo

            Really dude? There’s a reason they make one game a year: to prolong the story

          • Former

            When you’re talking about in-game play time, multiplayer and zombies take it. You keep missing that concept. Yes, the campaign brings uniqueness to the game, but that’s not the main reason MOST people buy CoD.

          • BradyAlucard

            Lmao, multiplayer costs a fraction of the Campaign budget. The fact that it’s even there in the first place is a good thing.

          • Former

            Ok…Like I said, multiplayer and zombies provide the replay value of the game. Not sure how what you’re saying regards to what I’m saying.

          • BradyAlucard

            You’re right – those are the only purpose that they serve. All games should have an offline Singleplayer option. Otherwise, it’s not worth $60, unless they have content to warrant it. Games like R6 Siege, Battlefront, and Overwatch can have their $60 warranted if they actually had some content. No thanks, I’d rather play an open world game.

          • Former

            What isn’t content for you is quite enough content for others. Just because you prefer single-player gaming over multiplayer doesn’t mean everyone else does. If Bo3 was promoted with no campaign, I’m pretty sure at least 60-70% of players would still have purchased it.

          • BradyAlucard

            Uh… not in the slightest. Sure, the “online only” demographic exists, but why ruin the entire industry? It’s a hindrance, not a feature. That’s how stupid shit like always-online DRM occurs (AKA no offline option whatsoever).

          • Former

            Not in the slightest? Referring to my 60-70% statistic? Pretty sure that’s a good guess, considering most people I play with haven’t even touched the BO3 campaign. Sorry to break it to you, but most people don’t care as much as you about single-player.

          • Andrew

            You really have nothing else to do with your life then have a long ass debate just to prove urself right????ur doing great??

          • Former

            I think you’re overestimating just how long it takes to type a few sentences. I realize it may be a struggle for simpletons like you, though.

          • Guest

            That bitch likes to argue. He knows damn well COD’s bread and butter is Multiplayer and Zombies. There is honestly no debating that. Regardless of if some only touch it for singleplayer the fast majority spend more time on zombies and multiplayer as it relates to COD. Even when people complain or discuss COD they bitch about COD points or balancing in MP. The vast majority of comments are centered around MP. Even the complaints about Infinite Warfare are based off people not wanting futuristic COD again when it comes to multiplayer. That piece of shit knows when it comes to COD the biggest selling point is the MP. I’m sure no more than 1/5 of his bitching ass to do with singleplayer. People play multiplayer more and talk about it more. Bloodborne, GTA, Uncharted games are a different story.

          • BradyAlucard

            And where are these said ‘statistics’? 20+ million people have been playing CoD every year since MW2. Over half of them play the Campaign and only the Campaign and barely touch the Multiplayer. There are demographics for both, so Activision doesn’t need to add to the problem in modern gaming. They should at least think about a free update with at least a way better, more replayable offline option.

          • Former

            I’m just going off of common sense. There’s a reason there’s such a large community for CoD multiplayer on Youtube: it’s the thing most people care about. I don’t even know why I’m arguing something so blatantly obvious. The majority of people DO NOT buy CoD for campaign.

          • BradyAlucard

            I’ll have to stop you there, because YouTube is NOT a good statistic for playerbases in the slightest.

          • Former

            http://www.gamezone.com/news/only-18-6-of-players-have-completed-cod-black-ops-single-player-campaign

            There’s your statistics you crave so badly. I’ll be happy to find more proof regarding other CoDs, because I’m sure they exist.

          • BradyAlucard

            Still practically nothing. Those are statistics showing who beat the Campaign, it doesn’t factor in everything else.

          • Former

            If you buy a game strictly for single player, you’re most likely going to finish the single player, would you not agree? With that in mind, the majority have obviously barely touched the campaign.

            Here’s more evidence, but I’m sure you’ll conveniently brush it off because you hate being wrong. https://ourcadegames.com/2014/02/20/fun-with-numbers-fps-single-player-vs-multiplayer/

          • BradyAlucard

            I’m not wrong, though, that’s the point. Nothing you’ve posted has given any insight into the playerbases of the three modes. Multiplayer is a bonus. An essential bonus, but still a bonus, that isn’t hugely costly. Always has been and always will be.

          • Former

            You keep mentioning the cost of production as if that has ANY indication as to why people buy the game. Also, you don’t take into account the multiplayer team who handles updates and in-game changes to multiplayer gameplay for YEARS after the game is released. I’d say that would add to the “cost” you’re so hung up on.

            Still claiming I’m wrong, then providing nothing to prove otherwise. You argue like a child. If your next reply isn’t something worth my time, I’m quite done here.

          • BradyAlucard

            You’re the one arguing like a child by lazily posting articles that don’t even pertain to this conversation. Not once did you provide even a slight bit of insight into why $60 Multiplayer only games should still be a thing, *because there’s no objective justification for it*, you ignoramus. Just admit that it’s your preference and move on, and just because it’s your preference and YOU are okay with it, doesn’t mean that others should be, because it’s *factually* a huge a problem that this industry faces. You think Activision are the only ones screwing gamers with extreme amounts of DLC and Multiplayer a only games? You don’t know the half of it. It’s only going to get worse, and your demographic is to blame.

            Updates are really not very costly, and production value is very relevant, because it holds more objectification than the overall package’s value with content and the like. It sure beats making nonsensical absolutes out of thin air with no elaboration nor objectification, let alone a logical argument. I do think that we’re done, here, because you’re not very convincing.

          • Guest

            Of course you’re not wrong if you CHANGED THE ARGUMENT. No one is arguing if Campaign is essential or not to a $60 game. The point the Former guy was making was an obvious one. MP is the main thing people get COD for. MP drives streaming, micro dlc revenue and even the shitty Esports side of things. It’s also the thing most people talk about on COD sites and forums.

            So if you change the argument like you’re clearly doing then of course you won’t be wong. The original point was Multiplayer(and even Zombies) drives COD more than campaign does in 2016 at least. So stop changing what the debate is just to avoid admitting the truth.

            Then Youtube isn’t an accurate depiction of playerbases? It’s full of toxic coversations and arguments which sounds like COD fanbase to me. I mean look at yourself. If YT and it’s long history of impacting COD in so many ways(BlameTruth, TMartn, Seananners, glitch videos) isn’t a place for an accurate assessment of the playerbase then why should anyone take some guy with way too much time on his hand’s opinion on the matter? YOUR sole opinion is more valid than statistics and millions of people? Stop changing the argument. MP is the most important part of COD. Doesn’t mean campaign isn’t vital but stop it. It’s 2016, no one is playing BO3 for the campaign only.

          • BradyAlucard

            And all of that is not enough evidence to support Former’s argument, *and that was MY point*. It’s not a fact that MP is the main thing that a majority of gamers buy CoD for, because there’s not a shred of evidence for it. Factually and more logically speaking, more gamers *probably* buy CoD for the Singleplayer because of the fact that most if not all of the marketing and overall budget for the game is prioritized in the Singleplayer, and, according to Cliff Bleszinski, it’s 75%+.

            “So stop changing what the debate is just to avoid admitting the truth” Don’t tell me what to do. I’m not avoiding the truth, because it IS the truth. Neither you nor Formal have a shred of evidence for your claims. It’s not changing my argument, if you can’t even elaborate on your claim, then I didn’t “change my argument”.

            “It’s full of toxic coversations and arguments which sounds like COD fanbase to me. I mean look at yourself” Oh the irony.

            “(BlameTruth, TMartn, Seananners, glitch videos) isn’t a place for an accurate assessment of the playerbase then why should anyone take some guy with way too much time on his hand’s opinion on the matter?” Because those guys (besides Tmartn) don’t even have a million combined Call of Duty subscribers. You know why else? *Because you don’t know if their subscribers subscribe for the commentator or for the game*, so it is NOT an accurate statistic, at least not a very good one. This notion that “YouTubers sell games” is silly and should be done away with entirely.

            “YOUR sole opinion is more valid than statistics and millions of people?” My mere opinion? It’s a FACT.

            “Stop changing the argument” Stop telling me what to do. You have no authority.

            “MP is the most important part of COD. Doesn’t mean campaign isn’t vital but stop it” I won’t stop doing anything. You have no point at all whatsoever, let alone a logical and rational argument. You can’t even elaborate with evidence for your guys’ silly “MP is the most important part of CoD” claim.

            “It’s 2016, no one is playing BO3 for the campaign only” Proof?

          • Guest

            He changed the argument. You’re arguing that MP drives COD and is what most people buy the game for at this point. HE is arguing about always on policies how detrimental $60 online on models would be. He comes up with some stat about half of COD players not touching MP with no actual stats to prove it then when you provide stats it’s, “just Googling numbers that don’t matter, Youtube doens’t matter”.

            I’m sure back in the COD4, MW2 and even BO1 days a lot of people didn’t touch MP(half seems like a reach) but in 2016 no way in hell “half” of the player base doesn’t touch MP.

          • Former

            Exactly. This dude can’t even remember what I’m arguing, so I just went ahead and blocked the retard.

          • BradyAlucard

            Plus, unlike Ghosts, CoD Campaigns are 7/8-10 hours these days. That’s not bad at all.

          • Former

            Still pales in comparison to the many days played in multiplayer and zombies, on average.

          • BradyAlucard

            I understand that, but it’s really the same repetitive gameplay over and over again. You can say that anything can give you as many hours played. I’m up to 100 hours on an open world game like Bloodborne, especially to get the Platinum. Hell, I spent 40 hours completing the game the first time, and I had to beat the game another 2 times. I’ve totalled at least 200+ hours on the game alone, and spent more time playing it than I do Black Ops 3, because even though Bloodborne is challenging, I still have more fun on it. I still play it to this day. It’s that good.

            I mentioned the length because it’s double the length of the old CoD games, and Infinite Warfare might be even more, especially with the other things that they added to it, plus you can factor in progression and replaying missions. It’s really a subjective thing.

          • Former

            I’m strictly talking about Bo3 here. Why bring up other games when they obviously have a ton more to offer for single player? CoD multiplayer will always have more in-game value than the campaign. I’m sure some weirdos exist that play campaign and never touch MP, but that’s probably less than 1% of CoD players.

          • BradyAlucard

            Then prove that it’s less than 1%, because you’re objectively wrong. And I don’t know why you stated that you’re strictly talking about BO3 and saying that other Campaigns in the franchise have more to offer, because BO3 is technically one of the most replayable Campaigns in a long time, thanks to it having more RPG elements, a longer story, a safehouse, and being able to access a mission at any time. What’s the issue? Especially since BO3 has far more to bring to the table than games like Overwatch and R6 Siege in terms of the overall package. Way more, no question.

          • Former

            When did I mention another Cod’s campaign? That was you, buddy. Look, if you can’t even keep track of what I’ve said, even when it’s all written out in front of you with time stamps, I see no reason to continue this. I feel as if staying on topic is inherently difficult for you.

          • BradyAlucard

            Is that because you have no logical reply? I was just adding unto my point. BO3 is one game out of a dozen.

          • Former

            You’re off-topic and you don’t even realize it. I’m arguing the fact that more people buy the game for multiplayer, then you start talking about how Bo3 campaign compares to other games. That has literally nothing to do with my point.

          • BradyAlucard

            Uh, no, I’m completely on-topic. It adds to my point, because for some reason, you only find BO3 relevant.

          • Former

            Take any CoD…it doesn’t matter. More people pay their $60 for the multiplayer experience. It’s common sense. I’m sorry you can’t wrap your head around it.

          • BradyAlucard

            *It’s because you have no factual evidence for your claims*, so it’s automatically nonsensical by default. Logically and factually speaking, the most time and money are spent on the Campaign. It’s even a majority of the marketing.

          • Former

            “Logically and factually speaking” LMFAO. You have provided not ONE piece of evidence to support your claim. Of course neither of us could poll every CoD player who ever lived to find the true numbers, but I gave you considerable evidence to show that most people don’t finish campaign, therefore that wasn’t their reason of purchase.

            Honestly, who doesn’t finish campaign if that’s what they were *dying* to play when they bought it? The evidence may not be perfect, but if you use an ounce of brain power, you can deduce what I have.

          • BradyAlucard

            You haven’t given a shred of evidence. It’s not that you haven’t tried, it’s just that the articles you posted aren’t even on-topic nor up-to-date, let alone showing raw player numbers. Your statements don’t provide even a little bit of logical reasoning behind the justification of letting Multiplayer only $60 games to continue being a thing. Comparing the budgets and/or production values of the two, Singleplayer only games have far more value in their price tags than Multiplayer only games, and that’s a fact. Plus factoring in open worlds, side missions, and other features that offer replayability. There’s no real argument here.

            There is definitely a demographic of CoD players out there that play the Campaign for a few hours and never touch the *game* again, not just the Campaign.

          • Former

            Lmao! You STILL have no clue what I’m arguing! I’ve NEVER been claiming that $60 multiplayer-only games should be a thing you ignorant fuck. I’ve stated several times what I’m asserting, but I guess those words can’t make it through your thick head.

            Once again, you’ve proven ho much of a waste of time you really are. Congrats! Your level of retardation has now gotten you blocked 馃檪

          • Guest

            You stated something fairly obvious which is MP is what drives COD. This article is about the damn DLC pack for mutliplayer and zombies. It’s 8-9 months into the games cycle and no one is checking for campaign anymore.

            This pos you’re arguing with literally just wants to hot take about the videogame industry. You could’ve said Mario is the flagship game for Nintendo and he would’ve found a way to argue about the poor development of Zelda or why there is a lack of Pokemon games on console. We all know how vital MP is. Which is why instead of agreeing there he is talking about how much more it costs to produce a campaign which is has nothing to do with how much more popular and how much more longevity MP and Zombies have. If anything it would show how vital MP is considering the millions of cash they’re bringing in pushing P2W weapons. Making millions off of the least expensive aspect(well according to Mr Know it All).

            Then accuses you of supporting $60 online only of nowhere. Dude might legit be looney or just strangely uses a CharlieIntel comment section to discuss videogame politics.

            I saw another article where he argued skill doesn’t exist in COD because it’s a casual game so if someone is statistically better than him it doesn’t matter because the game somehow wasn’t designed to have skill be a factor. Which is about as retarded as it gets. Also another where he argued EA’s E3 conference was a waste despite millions of people watching live and again numbers to back it up.

          • Former

            Glad you took the time to notice his bullshit. Thought I was the only one.
            Yeah that casual vs competitive conversation was with me, I believe. Lmao. Some people just argue to argue, I guess. Even when they are blatantly wrong.

          • Guest

            Lol. In real life of course COD skills don’t matter as much(unless it’s your job) but to act like someone isn’t better than you is asinine. It’s funny how he dismisses COD as some casual game that doesn’t take skill or anything yet he spends all this time talking about the game and arguing about it. I’d think your ability to play COD should be a little more important than your ability to argue about it and talk about it all day.

            What you said was fairly obvious and had zero to do with how much a game costs to develop, where develop dollars go or the value of having a complete videogame package instead of $60 online only. COD’s bread and butter is MP same way his bread and butter appears to be just finding an argument.

          • Ghost

            How is the 200 hours (what a loser btw) you spent on Bloodborne adding to your point about BO3? More people play BO3 for the multiplayer than campaign. Even if campaign is great more overall time is spent playing MP and even Zombies. You just like arguing or something? I’m pretty sure most COD players agree much more time is spent BO3 online than in campaign especially with Dark Matter, Hero and P2W elements involved . So why are you bringing up other gsmes and trying so hard to disagree with the obvious truth of MP driving BO3 whether campaign is good or not?

          • BradyAlucard

            A loser for playing games and fully completing the games they like?! Yeah, I’m such a loser! You got me! Even though we have over a week played on CoD MP when the cycle is over! But yeah, I’m the only exception. /s

            Yeah, I like to argue, *in a comments section*.

            Because a SP exists and I guess we don’t understand how much we overlook that fact. We spent much more time in MP, but it’s subjective because most of the time we play with the same mechanics over and over versus the Campaign, in which can be varied.

          • Michael Romo

            That’s because any multiplayer mode will last longer than any campaign mode. Even GTA has a longer lasting MP

          • Former

            Exactly. That was my point. The more you play the game, the more value you’re getting from the money you spent. Thus, multiplayer holds most of the value. It’s not a hard concept.

          • Guest

            That bitch just likes to start arguments. If you couldn’t tell

          • Former

            Who, Romo? Yeah, I kinda get that vibe from him. At least he isn’t an asshole like other people on CharlieIntel, though.

          • Guest

            No, Brady Alucard. Look at all the arguments he engages in.

          • Former

            Oh, yeah. Been down that road. Lol.

          • Filthy Prank’d

            That’s for the Origins edition, which gives you exclusive skins and characters to the other Blizzard games. If you’re speaking about online only games, RSS, and TD is also that too, and RSS is pretty good for an online only game. I’d rather buy to play than free to play honestly, and everything in the game is ALL cosmetics, unlike AW and BO3. The game also rewards you with a loot box every time you level up (Doesn’t take too long, and of course, just cosmetics pike skins, icons, sprays, voice lines, etc.). Just because it’s online only game for $60 doesn’t make it a POS, and the original version of the game for PC is $40.

          • BradyAlucard

            Yes, that makes it a POS in some format lol. It’s unacceptable. Just shows laziness. Why not have a $40 console version?

          • Filthy Prank’d

            Ah yes, in a parallel universe, because an online only game is $60, it makes it shit. /s. At least it’s not like FFXIV, where it’s online only subscription based. Already told you that the Origins edition is $60 only. This game was made for PC but then got ported to consoles.

          • BradyAlucard

            Yes, and porting a $60 version with little content to consoles is totally acceptable. The overall package is shit, and, therefore, the game itself is not worth it. FFXIV is completely different, because it actually has a fucking story.

          • Filthy Prank’d

            I don’t think you understood what I meant when I said ‘ported to consoles’. Overwatch was specifically made for PC only, being F2P with items you have to pay to get, which nobody wants. OW PC and XBO/PS4 are the same game, with the option of having to pay for either the game itself, or its Origins Edition. Of course, the only difference are the controls, and the PC plays better in that perspective. Overwatch was supposed to be on PC only, but the devs decided to add it for PS4/XBO. OW may not have an actual story, but they release animated short movies from time to time to tell you about the characters you play as inside the game, which is pretty cool. I’m not hating on FFXIV, just letting you know, but the online only subscription based shit needs to go, and I love that game to death. I’m surprised SE still didn’t remove it since FFXI. Just to let you know, I’m not looking for a fight, but rather wanting to know why a game like Overwatch gets hate by other FPS players, especially from the TF2 fandom when it barely plays like it. Oh, and that comment you replied from me was sarcasm. Did you not see the “/s”?

          • BradyAlucard

            I know the situation around Overwatch. Those “animated snippets” don’t do anything for those that purchased the game. What about those that WANT a Singleplayer option? I’m sure it’s not entirely out of the equation, but as of right now, it is, and that’s a problem. A *gaming industry ruining problem*. This is how crap like always-online DRM (being online even during sequences that could be played offline) occurs, because of the general acceptance of Multiplayer gaming this generation. It’s not okay.

            And no, I didn’t notice the sarcasm symbol.

          • Filthy Prank’d

            I get what you’re saying, but a team-based pvp game with selected characters can make quite a confusing way to play. How are you going to play single player with these types of characters? In case you never know, there are other games like Overwatch as well with this type of problem, but it can’t be solved because it’s never been done by anyone because of classes. Only Battlefield has a campaign, but we all know that their story took little to no effort. If you look at TF2, RS Siege or CS, those games were made for multiplayer only, and no one had a problem for that. The thing with OW is that it is a new IP, with a team-based competitive shooter, and it also releases free content whenever they can, unlike having people pay for content/DLC, this is a great thing to have applause to. I’m not sure whether you can play OW offline since I haven’t tried it yet, but the only way to play by yourself is with bots, or training, it’ll still feel the same as online because you’ll still get your ass kicked by them. I do agree with you about the Always online DRM thing and about having no single player though, but class-based (or in this case hero-based) PVP only games are hard to make a single player game out of. I don’t know why Blizzard didn’t give the consoles a standard edition, but seeing how MS and Sony has the 30% license fee, that might be the reason why.

          • BradyAlucard

            I think I blame Activision as a corporate enitity more than anything, even if they’re called “Activision Blizzard”, because Blizzard are definitely great developers. As far as a Campaign goes, you get offline bots and that’s it. That could definitelt be improved by doing a Co-Op mode with a progression system, for example. I’ve always wanted full Combat Training progression in CoD by significantly improving BO1’s format to help ragers like me cool off and play longer. Would it work? I’m not 100% sure, it’s just a thought.

          • Batman

            But have you played it though? Via a friend or borrow / rent a physical copy?

            It is very good. I paid more for the Uncharted 4 steelbook edition yet I got more play time out of Overwatch.

            To make a parallel comparison, we take the fashion industry. Something from Louis Vuitton or SUPREME or VETEMENTS is not going to cost the same as other brands. The item is the same (clothing), material (cotton polyester etc), packaged the same (in a bag with a cardboard brand tag wtv)

            Value, just like beauty, is probably always in the eye of the beholder.

          • BradyAlucard

            I think that value can be objective in some capacity… A game with a MP should have the content to warrant $60 and I think that gamers are being a bit too generous when it comes to this. It’s sort of like SFV, except for the fact that it’s not like the franchise existed for, like, 20 years and had a classic feature like Arcade removed (well, Singleplayer stories are even more classic, actually). My apologies if

          • Eddie Tupy

            we’ll see how good overwatch is when they stop getting money cuz people already have it

          • Filthy Prank’d

            What? OW is from Blizzard, and with it coming out with free content, you already know that their game will last long. Hell, Blizzard doesn’t bring out too much games, because they have enough people playing them.

          • Filthy Prank’d

            Oh, and I forgot to mention that every DLC they put it is absolutely free, which are maps, characters, modes, and cosmetics. It’s a pretty good buy for $60, especially considering that games that just came out this year are kind of shit (Far Cry Pri-meh, Assassin’s Weed, The Duplication (of boredom), Umbrella Corps (It’s such a sin to even call that a paid game, and it actually is) and even more).

          • BradyAlucard

            I think that a $60 game with no Singleplayer is a much bigger scam than the games that you mentioned and, speaking about them furthermore, Ubisoft and EA are especially to blame for this epidemic. It should have a Standard Edition on consoles, and saying it was originally a PC game doesn’t excuse that. But, again, I don’t think that they’re getting rid of Singleplayer entirely, I just hope that they don’t add DRM to it like Need For Speed. I mean, really, the AAA multiplatform publishers are a joke. All of them.

          • Siftblade

            $40*

          • BradyAlucard

            Last time I checked, it was $60 on consoles. Can’t find the $40 version anywhere. That changes it a bit.

          • Siftblade

            Well if you’re playing Overwatch on consoles, you’re doing it wrong

          • KBM

            That looks like the beginning of a deep hole you’re digging there.. Could probably say the same with CoD or any other FPS if that’s the stand you’re making

          • Eddie Tupy

            i second that fps are better on pc

          • BradyAlucard

            I’ll always play both. It’s really a taste thing.

          • Siftblade

            No it’s not. CoD is a console game, that’s where it shines. Overwatch was made for PC and it shows. When the most OP character on consoles is Torbjorn, there’s a problem. Especially seeing as how he’s one of the easiest people to counter on PC. I’ve played on both, and the level of communication and teamwork on consoles is almost nothing, whereas on PC lots of people use mics and chat to communicate what heroes are needed to counter the enemies

          • BradyAlucard

            Console versions exist. It’s pretty stupid to not have a standardized console version. We all get the same game. It wouldn’t be as much of a problem if it were $40, I think that that’s a pretty alright price for the developer’s hard work. Blizzard are pretty great at what they do, so it’s nothing personal.

          • Siftblade

            Just because it exists on consoles doesn’t mean you should buy it on consoles

          • BradyAlucard

            LOLWUT?! The option exists. Why is this even a discussion?

          • BradyAlucard

            $40 version is PC only**, and it’s bullshit.

        • Big all

          Dirty bitch

          • Element115Will

            Thanks! 馃榾 since you seem interested, would you like to eat my asshole? Considering of all the shit that comes outta your mouth? Sit the fuck down bitch.

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            That’s really gay

          • Element115Will

            Whats wrong with gayness?

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            Because everyone says gay fucking shit

          • Element115Will

            And that everyone obviously includes you.

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            Original stuff are you in 2nd grade

          • big all

            Only like to fuck your mommy pathetic slave.b

        • Eddie Tupy

          why is everyone such a fanboy

          • Element115Will

            Ask yourself that question if youre here.

          • BradyAlucard

            This is a fan site, not a fanBOY site.

          • Element115Will

            You use that word as if you know the definition of it but yet you probably dont, but of course youre gonna google it either way. Pos.

          • BradyAlucard

            Lmao I’m a “pos” over a simple disagreement? That’s your own fault for being sensitive over something so petty. Many trolls that I’ve seen on here are overly biased and defensive and attack us (the genuine members and fans). I’m not the only one who sees it.

          • Guest

            “Us”? You have like 2K more comments than upvotes. Who is your ally here at all? Every article on front page is you just arguing with someone and talking about DRM and always on and all this extra shit. It’s a COD site. You need a blog or something. I mean you should probably take a break man. It’s really not THAT serious. You’re like the definition of a keyboard warrior. Just logging in to comment sections of videogame articles to debate, talk shit and then change the argument when you’re losing. You’re not even here to discuss COD. You’re legit here to find an argument and talk about always videogame policies and practices that you have bottled up inside. I bet people in real life wanna talk sports, music or even tabloid gossip while you just wanna talk about the videogame industry and if Nintendo will make a splash with the NX(hope so actually). What a loser lmao.

          • BradyAlucard

            “You have like 2K more comments than upvotes” Who cares? LOL. And that’s where you lost all of your credibility… troll.

            “Every article on front page is you just arguing with someone and talking about DRM and always on and all this extra shit” Arguing on a comments section meant for opinions and arguments is full of opinions and arguments?! GASP! How dare I complain about DRM and always online restrictions in $60 AAA games with $100 million budgets!

            “It’s a COD site” In which an Overwatch discussion was provoked.

            “You need a blog or something” That’d be nice, because I love to write, hence my comments. Who are you, though, my mother? Mind your own business.

            “I mean you should probably take a break man. It’s really not THAT serious” Again, mom, I’m a big boy, now. Being logical and intellectual and learning from the lack thereof is important to me and I don’t care how many of you trolls don’t like it. Like it or not, these conversations are actually good for people because they’re thought-provoking and helps educate people, so I’m not just going to listen to someone on the internet that I’ve never met.

            “You’re like the definition of a keyboard warrior. Just logging in to comment sections of videogame articles to debate, talk shit and then change the argument when you’re losing” I don’t lose arguments, buddy. But keep lying to yourself that I do. Unless you can elaborate. You call me a “keyboard warrior” yet you think you can tell me what to do? Get over yourself. Everyone on this website argues and debates. If you don’t like it, then you don’t have to be on the internet if you don’t want to.

            “You’re not even here to discuss COD. You’re legit here to find an argument and talk about always videogame policies and practices that you have bottled up inside” It’s cute how you act like you know me. Yes, you totally know what my intentions are on this site! You got me! /s

            “I bet people in real life wanna talk sports, music or even tabloid gossip while you just wanna talk about the videogame industry and if Nintendo will make a splash with the NX(hope so actually)” And that’s why you’re ignorant for making up lies about me. Shoo, fly.

            “What a loser lmao” I thought I was the keyboard warrior? Don’t change your “argument”, now! I’m not going to judge you for living in your mom’s basement.

          • big all

            It’s a fan site yet this pos is just here talking shit about COD and arguing all day.

          • Element115Will

            Yet look at what youre doing you utter sack of crap. Like I said, go kill yourself and join your dead granparents in hell. 馃檪

      • Michael Romo

        Are you a retard? Yes, yes you are. Was that b8? Probably, but it was horrible

      • MrToastJr

        Plz, think about your life…….

    • Ak74u

      I screamed like a girl when I saw the Raygun mark 3 and thanked the zombie gods

      • Mr_ysi42t96

        I screamed like a little bitch

        • Mariernorris1

          <.
          鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽::::::!bg61mm:….,….

        • Jessicacarndt4

          <.
          鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄:鉁光槄::::::!bk92r:….,..

      • Vinbat

        what about TWO Ray Gun mark 3s?

      • Kyle Soule

        We give thanks and praise to our Lord and Savior David Vonderhaar

        • Tayler Hammond

          He doesn’t do zombies. Only MP.

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            Really it was a joke

          • Kyle Soule

            I know, but whatever I guess, I don’t know.

      • Tramaine Tevis

        I screamed when I shall the ppsh

      • KLEEBAN KLIBAN

        Hmm.. it’s similar in shape to the Mark 2. Wonder if it is a Mark 3. I loved Mark 2 and want to see that come back as well. Whatever this is, a new gun for all maps is fitting. It was DLC 3 that brought the Mark 2 before.

        • Dr. Edward Richtofen

          Seems to be a wave / ray gun

        • Ak74u

          I want to see the Raygun mark 2 return also I loved it so much

    • kermit the frog

      don’t worry mate I’ve got you covered

  • Commander Wolfe

    Do season Pass holders get the maps early?

    • Element115Will

      Uhh no.

      • Commander Wolfe

        Oh, I always thought they did. Then again, BOIII is the first game I ever bought a Season Pass for.

        • Element115Will

          Would be cool though!

    • Drasadex

      No.

    • Chomsky

      Probably not…

    • No one gets map packs early apart from Playstation 4 users who get it a month earlier than everyone else.

  • PPSH!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Mr_ysi42t96

      *meow*

    • Dr. Edward Richtofen

      Yes

    • TheDemonOfHate

      Pharo is still better

      • Dr. Edward Richtofen

        Ppspharro41 best gun ever

  • Saw this in a YT comment, thought you guys want to see it.

    0:22 Panzer holding sickle. So sickle is back.
    0:42 Electric skeleton-zombie. Possibly turns off power temporarily???
    0:44 Green gobble gum with hourglass on the front. No pattern so it’s a classic gobble gum.
    0:48 BIG-ASS DRAGON – new trap?
    0:57 Panzer shoot electric fire???
    0:59 Flying robots that attack you. Like parasite rounds from SOE?
    1:02 Dragonbone shield – shoots green goo.
    1:04 New melee weapon/specialist – overdrive?
    1:08 NX Shadowclaws dual wield
    1:10 new trap?
    1:12 FFAR, New wonder weapon? AND THE GODDAMN PPSH-41 BABY!
    1:21 Red dragon – part of EE?

    • Zac

      0:44 – Not new, it’s ‘coagulant’
      1:10 – Like the flip press trap thing from Die-Rise
      1:21 – You fackin bet your a$$ that’s part of the EE, though not as big a part of it as you might think 馃槈

      • Michael Romo

        1:10 – More like the flinger from COTD

    • Ak74u

      1:04 it’s actually the ripper specialist baby

      • TheDemonOfHate

        Now all we need is the Firebreaker. Been waiting for the purifier.

        • kermit the frog

          I’m waiting

    • Thomas Murphy

      When you posted my reddit post you did not say Saw this in a reddit post,thought you guys want to see it. (http://prntscr.com/bm854k)

      • Because I didn’t see it in your reddit post?

        • Dr. Edward Richtofen

          lol

        • Thomas Murphy

          Where did you see it? I’am not aware of any reposts, oh and plus I dont really care that you reposted it and i just wanted to see what you would said XD

          • Kobrah

            He saw it on a YT comment

  • Bonn Bo

    PPS mother Fucking H. I would want this in MP, but I’d probably never even get it so it doesn’t even matter.

    • If it does.

      SUPPLY DROP OPENLY!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Michael Romo

      The PPSH wouldn’t be good in mp anyways. It’s high firing rate would make the recoil terrible. And if it acted like it did in WAW, then it’d be really op as it would have a seriously high fire rate and little recoil. I think they’re going to add in the MG from waw

      • Bonn Bo

        Having high recoil wouldn’t be a major problem if it melts up close. SMG’s aren’t supposed to be long range weapons anyway, there mid to close range. Besides, I’m not looking for the next best weapon, it was a fan favorite and a lot of people would have fun using it again.

        • Michael Romo

          I’m just saying that compared to the other guns, it would be OP. Remember the Scorpion from BO2? Imagine that gun with good sights and little recoil. That would be the PPSH in BO3

          • Bonn Bo

            They can just balance it. Having high recoil can resolve that issue of being OP, doesn’t need to be an exact rip from WaW. But if we’re talking bringing back personal favorites, like your Thompson, then I’d seriously want the FG42 from WaW, or the stoner from blops 1. We haven’t had any new LMGs so those two would fill the role.

  • if dlc 4 drops on november 12 on xbox im gonna punch someone at activision in the balls..

    • Aidan

      More than likely, it’s gonna be October…chill

      • i dont know man, they are pretty late to the dlc game this year

        • Aidan

          I know that, but treyarch would only be shooting themselves in the foot if they released it in November.

          • thats true, but unfortunately treyarch isnt pulling the strings in the end

          • Filthy Prank’d

            Don’t worry man, it’s totally Oct. for XBO. Each map pack comes into two months, and for 3ARC on BO3, there is new content each month and then the next month, there’s a DLC.

        • MrToastJr

          You do realize it’s Van last year in treyarch, so that’s why they’re slacking in revealing things.

    • PS4 user’s are gonna be playing COD 4 Remastered and xbox one wouldn’t have received dlc 4 yet.

      • yeah.. ):

      • KLEEBAN KLIBAN

        Hahahah! Don’t worry. Won’t happen. After Ghosts Activision doesn’t want anything competing with it’s sales of IW. DLC 4 will come out with enough time that you can get tired of it before IW. This just means there will be less of a wait between DLC 3 and 4. Hell Activision would cancel DLC 4 altogether before letting it clash with IW. They have done it before actually. If you are familiar with BO1’s Kino Der Totten Zombies level, that was originally going to be DLC 4 for WaW but it was too close to MW2’s release so DLC 4 got cut from WaW. That’s why Kino Der Totten still has Nazi Zombies and that same chick singer in the Easter egg song, and why there are still teleporters involved with pack a punch just like Der Reise. All that probably changed is the Cold War guns getting added in. Originally BO1 would have had Five as the first level that you unlock when beating campaign, just like Nacht Der Untotten in WaW.

  • DeadZombieGaming 12

    More and more i see the criticism from this community… i think everyone hates technology pretty much…

  • KaOz

    RAY GUN MK III DUAL WIELD AND PPSH IN ONE GAME?! I’M GONNA SHIT ALL OVER THE ZOMBIES!!

  • ToonToons22

    PPSh-41! I’ve missed you for so long! And the Ray Gun MKIII! I knew the season pass would be a worthwhile investment.

  • lunator100hd .

    No dlc weapons and another big ass map for zombies, no thanks.

  • hungryandrew

    A zombie dragon?

  • MrRogati1

    this map pack might be awsome just saying i like the viking village and ofcourse raid map looks amazing

  • Michael Romo

    Does someone have any toilet paper cause I just shut my pants…. 掳_掳

    • Real men don’t wipe. Real men use their hands and then eat it.

      • PandaMan

        Disgusting, yet slightly satisfying…

      • Aidan

        I just get in the shower afterwards

      • lunator100hd .

        Aids!

  • djml9

    Im guessing the last map will be in the US. We had Eisendrach in Germany for Richtofen, Zetsubou in Japan for Takeo, and now this in Russia for Nikolai. Now we just need a map for Tank.

    • Laddie

      After this map, all four souls of the main characters will be collected, presumably that is, if Nikolai 1.0 doesn’t kill our current version. I just don’t see the next one being in the US considering Tank’s soul is already in the Summoning Key. I have a feeling we’ll know more about Richtofen’s “insurance” in DLC 4. Maybe with new characters?

    • Dr. Edward Richtofen

      Really?

  • If there’s no basketball of some sort. I don’t want it.

    • DeadZombieGaming 12

      Apparently Vonderhaar said on Twitter that there is no basketball court… BLASPHEMY OF THE HIGHEST ORDER!

      • Dr. Edward Richtofen

        Death threats incoming lol

  • Gamerazor247

    Damn, looks like the Speakeasy just wasn’t done with me yet… Nice seeing more dual wield weapons in Zombies, be nice to get more Weapon Kits too… All the MP maps LOOK to be great.

    • djml9

      I dont think that was the thompson

      • Gamerazor247

        Oh yeah, I know, but i don’t trust any fucking gun with a Reciever or Drum magazine like that!!

        • BradyAlucard

          It’s the PPSH.

  • Jonny Wan Kenobi

    Wow, I have not kept up with zombies. It looks so complicated. I miss how simple the first world at war zombies was. Guess I can still play that.

    • Former

      Go play Giant then, pleb.

      • Jonny Wan Kenobi

        Pleb?

        • Former

          It’s a word.

          • Jonny Wan Kenobi

            So because I prefer multiplayer over zombies, that makes me ordinary and low class? Good way to measure a person guy. Sorry I haven’t played every zombie map from each four games to keep up all the transporting, pack a punch, gobblegum, power sources, dogs, and storylines. If I had played zombies all the time, then it wouldn’t seem so crazy to me know. That was my point. It has evolved a lot is all.

          • Former

            Lol. You actually looked up its definition. Respect. Honestly, it was a joke, dude. Play whatever you want. It’s just that I see that “I want old zombies wahh!” comment all the time.

          • I want old zombies wahh!

          • Former

            Plebeian.

          • Jonny Wan Kenobi

            Haha, I did. I had never heard or seen that word before 馃槢 I know, I just prefer multiplayer. Zombies does look cool, it has just evolved a lot it seems like.

          • Former

            Zombies is slowly peeling away from the casual player’s ideals, which I think is a great move.

    • Michael Romo

      You’re obviously a casual. You don’t understand how awesome this really is

      • Jonny Wan Kenobi

        Not casual overall. I just prefer multiplayer over zombies. I don’t think Level 391, nuked out, dark matter and a 2.44 k/d is casual 馃槢

        • Dr. Edward Richtofen

          What does that mean for zombies that’s mp lol

          • Jonny Wan Kenobi

            I just meant that my attention is at multiplayer instead of zombies and that’s why I haven’t kept up with zombies.

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            Oh ok

    • MrToastJr

      You want it to be boring??

  • Filthy Prank’d

    I hope BO3 has a lot of longevity. Seeing at the 2 previous CoDs (Ghosts, AW), there are barely 30k players in any of the consoles combined (We already know about PC…). BO3 is honestly the best game we had for CoD in a long time (or at least IMO) and it also has the most content as of now.

    • Definitely agreed. Black Ops 3 is the best Call of Duty since Black Ops 2. If infinite Warfare blows, I have CoD4 and BO3 to fall back on

      • Michael Romo

        IW hype is real ?

    • TheDemonOfHate

      They need a 5th map pack for the Zombie fans

      • Dr. Edward Richtofen

        Resurrection but I don’t think they can

      • I wish that would happen, the least they could do is include two zombie maps in DLC4. I would love a Resurrection 2.0 DLC, i see why not, mp has enough maps already

        • TheDemonOfHate

          I feel like this game needs more zombie maps. Main reason for me so I can play many maps to rank up & not get bored.

      • Filthy Prank’d

        They should definitely remaster all of the zombies maps from WaW to BO2. True it is a lot of work, but we have yet to know about zombies in DLC 3 and 4. I’m not sure though, honestly.

        • TheDemonOfHate

          For only a payment of $60

  • Now this zombie map, City of Blood, looks like it can stand toe to toe with Mob of the Dead. Hopefully it’s just as good, if not better than Mob of the Dead

  • Mick

    Zombies looks lit.

    • LLORT

      Speak English please.

      • I’m pretty sure that was English. It was LIT AF ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

      • TheDemonOfHate

        Welcome to the new generation gramps

      • Mick

        That’s not English to you? Lol

    • TheDemonOfHate

      lol literally

  • Michael Romo

    As long as there are no buckets in sight, I’m good

  • Siftblade

    ZOMBIES LOOKS AMAZING. Definitely hyped. Only reason I play COD nowadays

    • Former

      True. The daily and weekly contracts are the only things drawing me back to multiplayer.

    • lunator100hd .

      That yter is you?

  • Michael Romo

    Now we just need the Thompson back

    • kermit the frog

      this is me right now

  • Sentinel

    Ohh Scheisse! The PPSH is back! How I loved to slay zombies with The Reaper…good ‘ol times!

  • Commander Wolfe

    So when do you guys think Gorod Krovi takes place? During World War II, or Post-World War II and why?

    • Aidan

      “Descent also thrusts players to an alternate universe of Nikolai鈥檚 motherland, the 1940s Soviet Union”

      • Commander Wolfe

        Year, not decade. The 40s could take place anytime from 1940-1949.

        • Aidan

          Ok, It’s clearly set in WWII

          • Commander Wolfe

            I should’ve mentioned that All the maps in the zombies timelines so far (except for Origins,Mob of the Dead, and Shadows of Evil) Take Place after WWII. Since the War ended on Sept.2,1945 and Verruckt takes place on Sept.10,1945. And Since The Giant takes place on Oct.1,1945 only to have Der Eisendrache,and Zetsubou No Shima take place sometime after Oct.1,1945. So are they going back to WWII’s Battle of Stalingrad (1942-1943) or is it Post-WWII Stalingrad?

          • Stefan Rang

            You have to understand the storyline. Read the zombie storyline. In BO3 they are in another dimension http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/Zombies_(mode)/Story

          • Commander Wolfe

            Ugh, for the last time. I KNOW THE STORY!!! I’m asking on people’s thoughts and opinions. You know, for conversation. Even if people’s thoughts were later proven incorrect, it’s just someone’s personal thoughts.

          • Dr. Edward Richtofen

            1941 – 1943
            it has German planes suggesting the siege of Stalingrad

          • Commander Wolfe

            No it’s ’42-’43. Don’t mistake Operation Barbarossa for the Battle of Stalingrad. Also, are the planes in the air or is there wreckage around the map? Could you provide a picture please?

          • Aidan

            Good lord, why does it even matter? It’s obviously set during WWII because it only makes sense that it is.

          • Commander Wolfe

            It does matter. Do you know how many Germans and Japanese kept fighting after the war was over? When the Nazis lost, Hitler ordered the SS to carry out guerrilla attacks against the allies. Not to mention the dates. Seriously, this wasn’t even meant to be an argument. This was supposed to be ideas for when the map takes place and having some supportive evidence to prove it. If you aren’t even going to give your own thoughts as to when this takes place, then DON’T RESPOND!

          • Aidan

            Sorry if I triggered you

          • ben wills

            Der Riese would take place after that. The Giant is in between WW1 and WW2. Seriously, read the damn storyline.

    • It doesn’t matter. This storyline going on since Origins doesnt matter. None of the zombies maps in BO3 (and Origins) have no meaning

  • Name

    i don’t know how people can play zombies so much, but good for those peeps i suppose

    • Former

      There’s a lot to learn for each map; plus, finding efficient strategies and going for high rounds is quite enjoyable.

      • Name

        i get that, especially for new maps, but what about when you already know what to do, i mostly don’t get when people say they will only play zombies, im surprised people aren’t tired with all the zombie stuff nowadays, i actually groaned when i heard iw is doing zombies too, felt like the could have done something more fresh/original like some terminator robots that move slow but have guns or something or spec ops again i dunno

        • Former

          Zombies is just very laid-back, yet challenging at some points. It’s the perfect thing to play when you’re sick of raging in multiplayer. I don’t know about those zombie-only folks though. That would get a bit boring.

        • Michael Romo

          Zombies is meant to be a laid back, easygoing gamemode to enjoy with friends. It’s not meant to accomplish much

          • Name

            yeah with all these replies im starting to understand it a little better, when i had read all these people saying they only get the next COD for zombies i guess i just imagined every time they turned on their system they’d only ever play zombies which i guess was pretty ignorant of me lol

        • KLEEBAN KLIBAN

          Agreed about the IW Zombies, although Zombies is what got me into CoD in the first place. MP is great in CoD, BO3 is best MP I’ve played, but I wouldn’t have found CoD with all the MP games out there if it weren’t for BO2 Zombies. For me it was about discovering secrets in a game I thought was just about survival, and getting better and better and beating my high scores, and then when I got reaaallly good it was about doing something I’m awesome at and showing off to people online (until I was inevitably the only person who hadn’t rage quit which sadly is about always before round 40 haha). Maybe because I’m 25 and was around when arcade games were a thing, I can appreciate the arcade style high scoring game hybrid with a FPS zombies game. If you didn’t enjoy Pacman, Pinball, Galaga, Super Stardust HD or other high score arcade games, you will be less likely to enjoy zombies. Arcade games are just fun for fun’s sake, not for permanent progression. Anyway, my hope is that IW will re-do Extinction (from Ghosts) just with a zombie theme. I am hoping Activision just wants the name Zombies being used in each game. Extinction was actually the best 3rd mode so far as far as player progression and character customization goes. You had permanent upgrades that were much more effective than getting gun attachments, and it also had a good amount of loadout options. Plus you had an end goal and the levels were all meant to be completed. It was a nice change of pace and I would be down for the same ideas just with zombies. Would be a shame to lose that diversity. AW zombies was kind of disappointing because it was too similar to Treyarch Zombies, but hopefully Sledge finds a way to make their Zombies mode more different next time around.

          • Name

            hey that’s not a bad comparison, im 20 but i had older brothers that would take me to arcades so i understand that feeling you’re talking about

    • djml9

      I absolutely loathe doing things over and over starting from nothing. Thats why i only play 1-2 games of zombies every one in a while, but its still fun.

      • Name

        that’s exactly why i’m not really into it, repetition, not being able to beat it, and loss of progress, but yeah i can see 1-2 with friends being bearable

    • J4MES

      Yeah, I play it a few times once in a blue moon but I’m usually bored after a couple of runs. I also don’t get absorbed in the lore like others who get mesmerized by things like boxes and other silly things. No end goal and having to start from scratch whilst taking ages to get to where you were previous is another thing. Glad people enjoy it though and for some; it’s the only reason why the buy the games. Just hope IW’s iteration is done with care unlike Sledgehammer’s mediocre save-face effort.

      • Joshwoocool

        If you wanna try zombies with a end goal Try Origins from BO2.If you complete the Easter egg with any amount of players it ends the game.Besides that Custom zombies on PC most maps have end games like Buy Ending for X amount of Points.

  • Mariernorris1

    <.
    鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽::::::!bg61mm:….,…

    • Wreckage

      Wrong. Lori is getting money from sucking my dick.

      • Dr. Edward Richtofen

        Very original

  • Mr_ysi42t96

    congratulations to me for getting the first legit sub 馃榾

    • lunator100hd .

      Nice, now take my cookie.

      • Mr_ysi42t96

        Where is it?

  • Ak74u

    I didn’t recieve any crypto keys from my weekly contract anybody else???

  • imBATMAN

    DRAGONS! 馃榾

  • Tramaine Tevis

    I Have a theory that the dragons might attack us is because they possibly were the dragons in der eisendrache and the 115 turned them evil? Or they either came from zetsubou no shima or they already were evil. Just a guess.

    • Dr. Edward Richtofen

      It doesn’t look evil because we ride on it

      • Tramaine Tevis

        Yeah I watched Ali a’a video after I posted the comment and he pointed that out

        • Tramaine Tevis

          But again I’d be screaming once the dragon starts setting me on fire

        • Dr. Edward Richtofen

          Eww Ali A

          • Tramaine Tevis

            You do u.

        • the big dirtty

          Ali a is a chump who knows zero about zombies – kids watch him…he’s as douchey as they come

  • MurkN101

    Zombies looks alright. Can’t wait to see Tmartn post some early gameplay of the shitty new maps for multiplayer, but he might be too busy trying to find a lawyer for running an illegal gambling website.

    • J4MES

      He’s a corrupt scumbag. He may have fooled his subscribers with this baloney story but everyone now knows that not only does he entice gambling on supply drops but also on his very own scam site which isn’t affiliated or approved by Valve. It also breaks all the gambling laws so the lawyer is either non-existent or a crook. Just looking at his face; you can tell he’s feeling the pressure as most of these 3rd party site owners do their utmost best to remain anonymous and are usually based in the likes of Russia, Poland and Albania so they can’t be easily tracked.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lLSuRGfE_o

      • Dr. Edward Richtofen

        What a fuckbag

    • hungryandrew

      He’ll post some videos from Federal Prison.

  • Eddie Tupy

    nice raid remake and ppsh in zombies again, what else do i need, Oh dragons and new raygun.

  • IW should just make it a spinoff like: Infinite Warfare: Call of Duty

    • J4MES

      I think they should just call it Infinity Ward: Infinite Warfare

  • Diego Diniz

    Gameplay Trailer…When?

  • Jay Evan

    The map Rumble reminds me of Spy Kids 3D. I should shoot myself for saying that…

  • ben wills

    LOL since when is Raid medium? That’s as small as maps come. I guess every map is small now so they changed the scale? Even then…

    • Aidan

      Raid is actually a decent sized map. Lots of flank routes. If you want a small map, go play Shipment or Rust.

      • ben wills

        I was clearly complaining about how all the maps are small now. I clearly do not want small maps.

        Raid is puny, though. Shipment and Rust are joke maps, they always have been. They hardly appear in rotation.

        • Aidan

          I was just saying compared to Rust and Shipment, Raid is a medium sized map.

    • DEMOLITION12

      raid is medium. something like freight would be “small”

      • ben wills

        Freight is bigger than Raid wtf?

  • Junekvillanueva1

    <.
    鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽:鈽呪湽::::::!bg612mm:….,.

  • Nick TheNoob

    ray gun mark 3 look sick! i jus hope they bring it in all the zombie maps like they did with the mark 2.

    • Dr. Edward Richtofen

      Screw the mark 3 we need the ppsh in every map

  • Nick

    Will the ppsh be added into multiplayer???

  • El Mo

    When will it be out on Xbox one?