Terminal Map – Team Deathmatch

Frontier Map – Defender

Breakout Map – Team Deathmatch

SHARE
  • Thomas the Tankswag

    Furst. This looks like the best cod since Ghosts now that it’s basically confirmed theres no RNG weapons.

    • Former

      It’s Ghosts with updated movement, essentially.

      • BradyAlucard

        It’s a far more polished Ghosts. It plays better and it doesn’t promote camping.

        • Former

          We’ll see how it plays when we play it.

          • BradyAlucard

            Yeah. At least the movement seems to be more optional than BO3, where some the maps were set up to where you had to use the advanced movement, but IW seems more like a boots on the ground experience than not.

    • ccrows

      I thought there was weapon variants, like that Elite gun variant with the nuke attachment.

      I’ve been busy on and off today, maybe I missed something… *shrugs*

      • Thomas the Tankswag

        The weapon variants you save up currency for to buy so it’s not RNG. If you want a weapon, you just need to save up for it. I’m 100% fine with this model as it’s much less pay to win than games like battlefield so no one can complain about it.

  • CyberWolf

    Sekund.

  • ben wills

    looks largely like bo3 which i dont care for. specialists for ultimate circumstantial advantage, handing out free kills and deaths for no reason. wall running is a nice addition, but has been handled poorly in both games, firstly because its clunky, second because they treat it like a gimmick to wall run across a gap instead of making it an impactful change. unfortunate.

    • BradyAlucard

      AKA “I’m a CoD hater and I won’t like this game no matter what they do”. Your opinion is noted and I disagree completely. How did that gameplay look “clunky” even in the least bit?

      • Rich Piana

        Aka you suck that ACTIVISION cock

        • BradyAlucard

          I’m one of the most critical people of Activision on here LOL.

      • ben wills

        if i was a cod hater, i wouldnt be on here. i quite love cod, i dont care for the direction its gone.

        my criticisms are based on logic and reason. unlike you, i actually think about gameplay, its design, and its impact to the skill gap. theres no point to playing when they just hand out kills and deaths for free through awful netcodes or specialists.

        what part is clunky? do you have eyes? have you read any reports saying it doesnt always respond the way it should (like one here on CI). seriously, look at the game and try reading some reports.

        try using your brain for once and dont just buy something due to a name. if morons like you stopped doing that maybe we could get rid of supply drops and get back to some decent gameplay.

        i have exact criticisms with exact ways to fix the game. there are many ways to satisfy me and fix the game. i dont even know how you said what you said when i specifically noted the flaws. you just cant handle any sort of criticism, or comprehend anything to do with gameplay design and how it impacts the skill gap. you are really, really sad.

        • jordanxbrookes

          Thank God we have someone like you too. These blind sheep think critiquing the game to try and make it better means that we’re “haters” lol. Well said btw.

          • BradyAlucard

            This child isn’t “critiquing” the game, he can’t even elaborate on his claims, he’s just a hater who has no idea what he’s talking about. You know me and how not-of-a-sheep I am, I’m just being fair; that guy is just ignorant and completely lacks critical thinking skills.

          • ben wills

            did you actually just try and use the insult i used on you back on me? well, at least i was right about it.

          • BradyAlucard

            The fact that you call it an “insult” is sad. You’re never right about anything, especially when you hide mindless complaining as “criticism” and “logic and reason” but keep being butthurt.

          • ben wills

            inΒ·sult
            verb
            verb: insult; 3rd person present: insults; past tense: insulted; past participle: insulted; gerund or present participle: insulting
            inˈsΙ™lt/
            1.
            speak to or treat with disrespect or scornful abuse.

            you have an AWFUL understanding of english. thats literally the definition of english you pathetic moron.

            did you read my reply where i outlined game logic? you’re fucking hopeless. are you even a real person, or just some ATVI shill here to try and influence comment readers? stupid, stupid person. you are one of the dumbest people humanity has ever had. you drag the average iq down.

          • BradyAlucard

            You’re crazy. Touting all this nonsense about “not understanding” a claim when you’re acting hypocritical and don’t understand what *I* was trying to say. The fact that you sit on your computer with your petty little keyboard warrior nonsense *with intent of insulting me instead of providing said logical arguments*. Tell me, genius; if I don’t know anything, then please, enlighten me. All I’ve asked this entire time is elaboration.

            “did you read my reply where i outlined game logic?” Where did you outline game logic anywhere other than spewing nonsense like “dur hur the netcoding sux* when it’s impossible to tell.

            “you’re fucking hopeless. are you even a real person, or just some ATVI shill here to try and influence comment readers?” You don’t pay attention on this site at all, do you? The fact that you call me an “ATVI shill” is pathetic and a complete utter lie with no reasoning at all whatsoever. You don’t know me and you don’t even know if I’m getting the game, so you really don’t need to jump to conclusions. Oh wait! I have to completely rag on the game in order to NOT be considered an Activision shill. I get it now.

            “stupid, stupid person. you are one of the dumbest people humanity has ever had. you drag the average iq down” Apparently, by your ignorant logic (in which you so desperately seek yet can’t find for yourself), I’m dumber than every mentally ill human being on the planet all over a bunch of code and pixels? Is your mindless narrative really that narcissistic? Get over yourself. Yeah, I’m totally “dumb” “stupid” and/or “moronic” over a simple disagreement over a video game that will sell tens of millions of copies no matter how much you complain.

          • ben wills

            im going to do like you do to me and not even read your comment. LAWL LAWL LAWL HAR HAR HAR SEE HOW SMART NOT REED DA COMMENT IZZZ IM BRADYYYYY

          • BradyAlucard

            Stop trolling. Seriously, if you’re not going to iterate any intellectual response, then stop replying to me with your lies. How would you know that I don’t read your comments? Because I read every last ignorant word, as torturous as it is, so you can’t pull that card.

          • ben wills

            i was simulating what its like to deal with you haha

          • ben wills

            lol @ butthurt. you replied to me whining numbnuts, without having any understanding of my comment or game logic might I add. you really are stupid.

          • BradyAlucard

            “Game logic”? That’s cute, because “it sux lul” with no reasoning isn’t really “logical” in my book, but that’s none of my business. Grow up.

          • ben wills

            i wrote 4 paragraphs explaining game decisions and how they affect the skill gap. i also never used the words “it sux lul”. you are pathetic. for convenience, here is a small part of my comment:

            specialists: these give players a super power boost at random times
            for no reason. you dont earn them, they just come. in this time, boosted
            players are way more powerful than anyone else. hence they can get
            kills with absolutely nothing the other player could do. its
            circumstantial advantage because people get it at different times with
            no rhyme or reason. its casual catering because it gives bad players an
            easy way to get a kill without earning it, giving good players a death
            out of nowhere. it compresses the kd toward 1. its casual catering. no
            reason to play.

            movement: considering the small scale of cod,
            these enchanced movement mechanics do nothing except add to the
            clusterfuck nature of the game. with everything tight, people end up
            just spraying uncontrollably until someone gets something. purely
            circumstantial what happens. just a giant, uncontrollable mess. then the
            movement is awful and feels terrible (compared to something like
            titanfall). then it doesnt actually do anything for the game. its just
            there, and they add a gap to wall run over. it doesnt change the game
            aside from enhancing the clusterfuck. if something like that is to be
            added, the game needs to adapt so it doesnt become a mess. it didnt.

            ttk: low ttk means things are more reactionary and thus more connection based. less focus on gun aim.

            netcode:
            unsure if this is an issue yet, but considering it has been in 4 of the
            last 5 cods, its something to be conscious of. bad netcode means you
            can die without every seeing your enemy, generally circumstantially on
            who rounded the corner. again whats the point in playing

            where is “it sux lul”. that is all logic and reason, you buffoon.

          • BradyAlucard

            “where is “it sux lul”. that is all logic and reason, you buffoon” IF ONLY YOU PUT ALL THIS IN YOUR INITIAL COMMENT where said initial comment was so poorly elaborated you might as well have just said “it sux lul” you idiot. Now that you get the point, stop replying to me. You lost. Move on.

          • ben wills

            i did, it was expanded upon

        • BradyAlucard

          “unlike you, i actually think about gameplay, its design, and its impact to the skill gap” Really? Because last time I checked, you were making absolute statements without any “logic” to back up your “criticisms” at all, and CoD doesn’t need a “skill gap”, it’s a casual game. That mentality is why the developers put things like SBMM in the game. “theres no point to playing when they just hand out kills and deaths for free through awful netcodes or specialists” How do you know that the “netcoding” is awful when you can’t even tell through LAN? I’m pretty sure Infinity Ward games rarely have had issues with hit detection since MW3. If the Specialists are balanced, in which they are in BO3 and therefore that may carry over here, then they’re perfectly fine in my book.

          “what part is clunky? do you have eyes? have you read any reports saying it doesnt always respond the way it should (like one here on CI). seriously, look at the game and try reading some reports” I know full well what Charlie Intel said and from the footage that I’ve seen and compiled for myself, I’ve seen very fluid fundamental mechanics and it’s mainly the advanced movement that needs changes, in which they may by launch. But “clunky” isn’t the proper word, because even with its… “offness” it’s still more fluid than most if not all FPS’s out there from what I’ve watched.

          “try using your brain for once and dont just buy something due to a name” You can’t tell me what to do. You merely have a different opinion than me, one that completely downplays Infinity Ward’s hard work, but still an opinion nonetheless. I’ll buy whatever I want to buy and I always remain optimistic. ” if morons like you stopped doing that maybe we could get rid of supply drops and get back to some decent gameplay” Did you seriously call me a moron? Lol that’s rich, you only think such because I disagree with you nothing else, what’s moronic is judging a game that’s not even in beta stage and nitpicking it by the follicles, and people with YOUR mentality are the reason why things often go overlooked. Such ignorant behavior.

          “i dont even know how you said what you said when i specifically noted the flaws” Oh? You *specifically* noted Infinite Warfare’s flaws? All I saw were blatant nickpicks without any elaboration whatsoever, and you want to claim “logic and reason”? Practice what you preach. “you just cant handle any sort of criticism, or comprehend anything to do with gameplay design and how it impacts the skill gap. you are really, really sad” It’s funny that you said that because the fodder that you spewed is not “critical”, not even in the least bit, and how can you see anything about the design of the game *when it’s a tacked down demo that’s not quite in beta stages and you’re not even playing it yet*?

          • ben wills

            lol what did i just read?

            “CoD doesn’t need a “skill gap””

            please tell me i didnt just read that. what is the point of playing the game if you dont earn your kills and deserve your deaths? might as well just watch paint dry if stuff is just happening with no reason. this line alone pretty much confirms that you’re a massive moron.

            and no, that mentality has nothing to do with sbmm. quite the opposite in fact. see in games with an actual skill gap, players desire to get better and hone their skills. this requires playing against people better than them, and seeing reward at the end. the k/ds are greatly spread out. sbmm closes everything on 1. sbmm is for the casual catered game you idiot.

            “I’ve seen very fluid fundamental mechanics and it’s mainly the advanced movement that needs changes”

            and now you cant read. ive been talking about advanced movement this entire time nimrod. if you played bo3 and titanfall, youd know bo3 feels like absolute trash compared to tf. its not fluid at all, sometimes it doesnt like responding all together, its laggy (you need to aim approx 20 ms ahead of target wall running [source: ovenbakedmuffin], and on and on and on. seriously try understanding the game.

            “All I saw were blatant nickpicks without any elaboration whatsoever”

            yep, definitely cant read. im wondering if i should even bother again, but i guess ill try.

            specialists: these give players a super power boost at random times for no reason. you dont earn them, they just come. in this time, boosted players are way more powerful than anyone else. hence they can get kills with absolutely nothing the other player could do. its circumstantial advantage because people get it at different times with no rhyme or reason. its casual catering because it gives bad players an easy way to get a kill without earning it, giving good players a death out of nowhere. it compresses the kd toward 1. its casual catering. no reason to play.

            movement: considering the small scale of cod, these enchanced movement mechanics do nothing except add to the clusterfuck nature of the game. with everything tight, people end up just spraying uncontrollably until someone gets something. purely circumstantial what happens. just a giant, uncontrollable mess. then the movement is awful and feels terrible (compared to something like titanfall). then it doesnt actually do anything for the game. its just there, and they add a gap to wall run over. it doesnt change the game aside from enhancing the clusterfuck. if something like that is to be added, the game needs to adapt so it doesnt become a mess. it didnt.

            ttk: low ttk means things are more reactionary and thus more connection based. less focus on gun aim.

            netcode: unsure if this is an issue yet, but considering it has been in 4 of the last 5 cods, its something to be conscious of. bad netcode means you can die without every seeing your enemy, generally circumstantially on who rounded the corner. again whats the point in playing

            i could go on but im afraid you wont understand this as it is. seems its your first exposure to actual reasoning and thought.

          • BradyAlucard

            “lol what did i just read?” Something that you merely disagreed with and had a man-period over said disagreement.

            “please tell me i didnt just read that. what is the point of playing the game if you dont earn your kills and deserve your deaths?” Again… *it’s a casual game that’s meant for fun and the mentality that petty things like how good or bad a gamer is needing to be a priority just makes no sense*. Sure players will get better at the game naturally but pandering to said mentality wouldn’t seem very enjoyable. The enjoyment is tarnished once toxic players start worrying about their K/D and/or want a more competitive element when that’s not what most games are about at all. TL;DR I value fun and designing the game around that over skill and therefore making a rage-inducing experience.

            “might as well just watch paint dry if stuff is just happening with no reason” I could flip that [lack of] logic to my side by saying that you might as well watch paint dry taking a game so seriously. How are lobbies full of sweats even remotely “fun” and/or “entertaining” in the slightest? That’s why CoD sucks now, the developers care more about a competitive environment (which is stupid) rather than creating a more enjoyable experience for everyone. Where’s the fun in experienced players getting utterly destroyed by players who exploit the game? By your logic, every CoD game should have SBMM. Yeah… no thanks.

            “this line alone pretty much confirms that you’re a massive moron” It’s a fact. I find your blatant hypocrisy to be “massively moronic”. Just because someone disagrees with your mere opinion, doesn’t make them a moron. Until you practice what you preach you have no room to talk. As I stated, all I’m looking for is more elaboration and detail. Then I could give my thoughts and the insults can end.

            “sbmm is for the casual catered game you idiot” Wow. What an oxymoron. Not only do you deny the fact that SBMM mostly occurs only when a forced competitive element is implied, and then you thought that I was the idiot. Come up with something better other than lies and sub-truths about me and CoD.

            “and now you cant read. ive been talking about advanced movement this entire time nimrod” No you weren’t. “if you played bo3 and titanfall, youd know bo3 feels like absolute trash compared to tf. its not fluid at all, sometimes it doesnt like responding all together, its laggy (you need to aim approx 20 ms ahead of target wall running [source: ovenbakedmuffin], and on and on and on” WHY DIDN’T YOU JUST SAY THAT in your original comment?! “seriously try understanding the game” I’m the one who doesn’t understand the game? That’s rich. Says the one who says that Black Ops 3’s movement wasn’t fluid when we all know that that wasn’t the problem, not in the slightest, and Titanfall is a completely different beast. I think that purely out of a mechanics standpoint, Black Ops 3 is more fluid than at least the second one and the franchise in general is catered to crazy movement around the maps. In Black Ops 3, it’s merely used as ways of maneuverability, so no one can really compare Black Ops 3 to Titanfall.

            “yep, definitely cant read. im wondering if i should even bother again, but i guess ill try” Are you being serious? You WEREN’T elaborating, you just made absolute claims without any detail whatsoever. You know what I made you do just now? Fully elaborate your opinions in more detail, and that’s all I needed. It’s just an opinionated matter from this point.

            Specialists: I disagree. Even though they’re treated similarly to Support killstreaks, that doesn’t mean that you don’t earn them. You only earn Specialists through kills and a small amount of time. It requires some sort of effort whether everyone likes it or not. “its casual catering. no reason to play” Well, CoD’s a casual game, so who SHOULD they “cater” to? To answer that question I guess no one really, but that’s the way that they should design their game around, nothing else, nor should anyone care about skill level.

            Movement: “then the movement is awful and feels terrible (compared to something like titanfall). then it doesnt actually do anything for the game. its just there, and they add a gap to wall run over” I completely disagree here. I find Black Ops 3’s movement to be very fluid. Infinite Warfare’s I don’t know. As I stated, it’s implemented through a means of traversal around the maps as well as flanking routes and a different approach to map design. I found it to be almost as seamless as Titanfall (hence why I said almost because Treyarch can’t beat the real IW) but the maps aren’t as crazy and the entire game isn’t built specifically for it, it’s meant as an option, nothing else. Like it or not, Black Ops 3’s movement works and Treyarch implemented it far better than you think they did.

            Netcode: “unsure if this is an issue yet, but considering it has been in 4 of the last 5 cods, its something to be conscious of. bad netcode means you can die without every seeing your enemy, generally circumstantially on who rounded the corner. again whats the point in playing” Ghosts’s and Black Ops 3’s seem fine in terms of pure latency (in terms of just tick rate at 20hz/50ms) and it really depends on whether you’re on a dedicated server or not. I honestly think that it’s the best netcode that we’ve had in a long time (even if it’s still not very good and can’t really compare to Battlefield) and it’s not the main issue that I have with the game. You want to know what I take issue with on Black Ops 3 the most? Sweats, via S[crub]BMM, it needs to go. For good. I don’t even see anyone complaining about the netcoding anymore.

            “i could go on but im afraid you wont understand this as it is. seems its your first exposure to actual reasoning and thought” I actually thought the last half of your comment was going quite well until you added this gem in. That was rather narcissistic and completely false. You act like you just gave me a thorough, in-depth lesson on game design here but I was left disappointed.

    • ccrows

      We already have COD4R this year for your boots fix, and more than likely SH will be taking the series back to WWII next year…

      • ben wills

        not the concern. i dont mind wall running, or future stuff, but it needs to be implemented in a less gimmicky way with less clusterfuck.

  • BradyAlucard

    Those graphics are phenomenal.

    • BradyAlucard

      And what about the melee? Is it one-hit, two-hit, etc.?

      • Jay Evan

        Two-hit, gameplay from driftor proved it.

        • BradyAlucard

          Thank the lord!

        • Thanks for clarifying this, I was wondering too.

          • BradyAlucard

            You’re welcome! (jk)

  • Rich Piana

    Is this BO3 DLC 5?

    • ccrows

      Would you rather have them copy AW?

      Anywhoo, if the game tanks, that’s just more time for me to play COD4R and BO3 for another year… πŸ™‚

      • DEMOLITION12

        are you implying they didn’t copy aw?

        • Filthy Prank’d

          They did?

  • I’m serious disappointed in how this is exactly like Black Ops 3. But eh, the game looks alright. Guns look like they do damage and so do explosives. Hopefully everything is overpowered as FUCK like MW2. Then that’ll be fun. Unbalanced games are super fun.

    • BradyAlucard

      It’s not exactly like BO3 though?

      • It is. It really is

        • BradyAlucard

          No it’s not. It doesn’t look like it plays “exactly like BO3”.

          • Yeah it does. You sure you’re watching the same videos I’m watching?

          • BradyAlucard

            100%. The maps are completely different and the movement isn’t nearly as spammed as it is in BO3. “exact” is severely exaggerated here.

          • Really are you sure? Lol, same movement system, same specialist crap, same maps. Small to medium-sized maps. Sounds like something i got in 2015 honestly. Looks like it too.

            I’m just saying, if it’s wants to be Black Ops 3 clone, that’s fine. But maybe maybe just these fanboys would stop throwing out the word innovating. Because it’s far from it.

          • BradyAlucard

            They confirmed that all of the levels will feel unique and/or different, so those things really aren’t “the same”. The way the player interacts with walls is different and the thrusters aren’t as high this time around I’m pretty sure, and I see no issue with Specialists, especially since they’re not nearly as crazy and they have a new take on them.

            It’s not one though and that’s all I’m trying to say here. Nothing wrong with having an opinion, I’m just respectfully disagreeing, that’s all. No Activision puppeteering here. Is it innovating? LOL not really, but I do like some of the new gameplay features that they added, which were quite a few things, but innovative? Yeah, that’s too much, and that was a blatant lie.

          • Only thing the really bothers me honestly is when they first announced it, they literally passed it off as innovating lol

      • jordanxbrookes

        It is just with a Space theme and good hit detection.

        • BradyAlucard

          I don’t notice the advanced movement being used nearly as much as BO3 does, and I think IW have done their own unique take on it and other things as well. They’re far more worthy than they were during Ghosts that’s for sure (I’m not sure if this is the exact same team though) and they’re absolutely not lazy with their approach to this game.

    • Mick

      Until I get my hands on the beta then I’ll finally come to my decision on whether or not to buy this game. I’m a bit skeptical. The gameplay I see looks fun, and the guns look fun as fuck to use.

      • I know I’m gonna get it, but CoD4 is my main reason to get it as of right now

        • Mick

          I’m gonna play both if IW is good. I don’t think Charlie Intel posted this up yet, but there’s a cod 4 remastered multiplayer trailer out there somewhere. My bro showed it to me earlier today.

          • I saw it on youtube. It looks great. I just wish they didn’t change the friendly colors from green to blue. It’s pretty weird. That’s me nitpicking but still

          • BradyAlucard

            You can nitpick all you want as long as you don’t hide it as “criticism” unlike someone else *ahem*. I agree. They should give an option to change that IMO.

          • I never hide anything as criticism. I’ll be the first to admit I complain and bitch. If people don’t like it, they can jerk me off or sue me. Don’t bother me, I’m still gonna bitch lol

          • BradyAlucard

            I’m talking about ben lol.

          • I knew you were talking about someone else. I was just more or less stating generally lol

          • BradyAlucard

            Oh okay just making sure lol.

          • Nonversation

            Youre such a fat girl and if you consider yourself a critic theres a difference between a irrelevant fuck and a person who knows how to waste their time wisely and isnt trying so hard to be someone he isnt

          • Your comment made no sense at all.

        • BradyAlucard

          For me it’s both CoD 4 and IW’s graphics, fluid gameplay, new features/gameplay, and guns based off of looks alone (they just *look* cool).

      • you need to pre order to get the beta, or am i missing something

        • Mick

          Yeah I’m well aware. Still haven’t pre ordered yet. I will eventually.

    • jordanxbrookes

      I agree, where the fuck is my OP Chopper Gunner though?

      • BradyAlucard

        That’s what I need, OP streaks. The main thing recent CoD games have been missing.

        • Capten ermirica

          Agreed. High reward for playing well. It was so depressing in advanced warfare to get a fully beefed up 1700 point paladin only to get 3 kills with it hahaπŸ˜‚

          • BradyAlucard

            Just another reason why that game was an utter joke!

          • ben wills

            specialists: these give players a super power boost at random times

            for no reason. you dont earn them, they just come. in this time, boosted
            players are way more powerful than anyone else. hence they can get
            kills with absolutely nothing the other player could do. its
            circumstantial advantage because people get it at different times with
            no rhyme or reason. its casual catering because it gives bad players an
            easy way to get a kill without earning it, giving good players a death
            out of nowhere. it compresses the kd toward 1. its casual catering. no
            reason to play.

            movement: considering the small scale of cod,
            these enchanced movement mechanics do nothing except add to the
            clusterfuck nature of the game. with everything tight, people end up
            just spraying uncontrollably until someone gets something. purely
            circumstantial what happens. just a giant, uncontrollable mess. then the
            movement is awful and feels terrible (compared to something like
            titanfall). then it doesnt actually do anything for the game. its just
            there, and they add a gap to wall run over. it doesnt change the game
            aside from enhancing the clusterfuck. if something like that is to be
            added, the game needs to adapt so it doesnt become a mess. it didnt.

            ttk: low ttk means things are more reactionary and thus more connection based. less focus on gun aim.

            netcode:
            unsure if this is an issue yet, but considering it has been in 4 of the
            last 5 cods, its something to be conscious of. bad netcode means you
            can die without every seeing your enemy, generally circumstantially on
            who rounded the corner. again whats the point in playing

            SEARCHING
            FOR: “it sux lul”…. NO MATCHES FOUND. only things found: logic and
            reason on how game decisions affect the game. for the part on skill gap:
            what is the point of playing the game if you dont earn your kills and
            deserve your deaths? might as well just watch paint dry if stuff is just
            happening with no reason.

            you are truly “special”. no wonder you need the game dumbed down for you. sad sad sad.

          • BradyAlucard

            “movement is awful and feels terrible” Uh… no. Not true at all.

            “logic and
            reason on how game decisions affect the game” That’s funny because you lack both. “reason on how game decisions affect the game. for the part on skill gap” Skill gap factually doesn’t exist in CoD nor does it need to because it is a casual game. “what is the point of playing the game if you dont earn your kills and
            deserve your deaths?” Nobody implied anything of the sort, but that mentality is just silly. “What’s the point in playing”? To have fun, maybe? Nothing you’ve stated implies that there’s no point in playing, maybe elaborate on that a lot.

            “you are truly “special”. no wonder you need the game dumbed down for you. sad sad sad” Now you’re just being pathetic and extremely ignorant. Learn to use some different language for a change.

      • Right, i’d love to have that back

      • Tuby

        Dont forget the ac 130 πŸ˜‚

        • Felix Lamirande

          Blackbird, **that cannot be shutdown**

    • W8TilYaSeeThis

      That does not make any sense. Look at the OP M16A3 from BF3. If two pros compete with one using the M16A3, and the other using the AK74M, the M16-user will most likely win. If you made the AK74M OP by giving it the stats of the M16A3, then both have the same chance of winning, meaning that the guns are balanced, not OP. If everything is OP, then nothing is.

      “Unbalanced games are super fun” To many people they are not. In BO1 the FAMAS, AUG, and Rapid-Fire AK74u are the best guns in the game. Every time I faced a clan or otherwise serious players in BO1, they were using one of these three weapons. If I used anything other than these three weapons, I’d get owned, because they were underpowered. The OP weapons excelled in all situations.

      How is it “fun” to be forced to use 1-3 guns to have any hope of winning? I didn’t pay 60$ for 20-something weapons to be almost forced to use 3 of them.

      • Okay despite all the crap you just said, which honestly, I didn’t even read it because, it’s honestly not interesting.

        And yeah to many people it’s not fun, but hey smartass, read my comment,.I WAS TALKING ABOUT MY OWN PERSONAL PREFERENCE, so let me clear it up and say i dont really give a shit what other people like and dont like.

        Basically what I said is I want a game like MW2 because it was the most fun in the series in my opinion. It’s the most unbalanced but i think it’s the most fun.

      • Markdg23

        Hey common now the Galil, G11 and Mac 11 rapid fire were dope too!

    • Lelouch

      Unbalanced games are fun?
      I hope you mean advanced warfare excluded

    • Jay Evan

      The explosives are overpowered, Tac rigs looks over-the-top, we have several Hybrid guns and everything looks to have low recoil. I’m excited.

      • Hey as long as explosives are actually powerful and actually do work im good. I remember in the olds of CoD4 when surviving a grenade meant something lol

        • Jay Evan

          Oh my god yes lol.

  • MichaelSwift

    Infected is coming back. That may be the only thing I’d play.

    • ccrows

      You can play infected RN on BO3 with half the TDM lobbies using boxing gloves ATM… πŸ˜‰

      • BradyAlucard

        Welp Hero armor will be a piece of cake then lol.

      • djml9

        Oh sh*t, i forgot about that. I gotta collect my gloves

  • Triggered

    Why was specialists streaks removed?

  • ALex

    WOW this is really underwhelming..

    What they need to do …
    * Stop with this futuristic shit WE’VE HAD ENOUGH
    * BOOTS ON THE FVKING GROUND
    * Color plate need to be more gritty less cartoon like
    * Some sort of realism
    * Real guns ( pay the license you tight arses

    • ccrows

      They’re gonna have real guns, there’s a “classic” category of guns. Who know’s how many in the SD, but they will be in the game…

    • Jay Evan

      Okay, what the shitting fuck did you expect multiplayer to be after the reveal trailer? Of course it will be just like campaign you stupid piece of shit.

    • W8TilYaSeeThis

      You are the biggest idiot I’ve seen on the internet this entire week.

      “Stop with this futuristic shit WE’VE HAD ENOUGH ” This game has been in dev for over 2 years, they won’t suddenly scrap everything the second you start crying.

      “BOOTS ON THE FVKING GROUND ” Read my above reply.

      ” Color plate need to be more gritty less cartoon like” What is “gritty”? Do you want realistic, or do you want everything to be grey, grey-green, grey-blue, and grey-brown? Ghosts did this and most people hated it. Every CoD map that is depicted has colors that are natural in THAT environment. Hijacked is colorful because it’s a cruise ship, duh. Do you expect a vacation spot to look like a chilling white office-space? There’s nothing “cartoony” about BO2’s maps.

      “Some sort of realism” If you want realism, go play Verdun where rifles kill you in 1-shot across the map, and pistols kill you in 2-shots. Better yet, go into the armed forces in real-life, you’ll get all the realism you want there when you hear the sound of bullets whizzing by your head.

      “Real guns” So you want the entire arsenal of IW to be replaced with everything from CoD MW1? The MW series did that, and it’s part of how the “CoD is the same every year” train was created.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usWOzuPC8_I

      Anyway, how do you expect people living in 2016 to go into 2120 (or whatever year IW takes place) and put them into this game?

      I’m so sick of seeing the crap that these bandwagon-riders spew.

    • jordanxbrookes

      “pay the license you tight arses” that is definitely something I would say haha.

    • BradyAlucard

      The game is boots on the ground most of the time. I don’t see nearly as much advanced movement as I do in BO3.

    • Roscoe

      1. Speak for yourself.
      2. The majority of the time, you’ll be spending it with your boots on the ground. That’s even how it is in Black Ops 3.
      3. The game doesn’t seem cartoony to me.
      4. I doubt they didn’t think of adding a sense of realism.
      5. Real or fake, they’ll all do they same thing.

    • BradyAlucard

      * This may be the last futuristic game for a while. Even then, this is pretty cool, and mainly just an aesthetic thing.
      * The vast majority of the gameplay is boots on the ground, even more so than BO3.
      * Color palate doesn’t and/or shouldn’t matter. I think it looks “gritty” enough though. What do the players want? One guy I see wanting Barbie’s Dreamhouse levels of saturation and then I see you wanting grittiness. We need to make up our minds.
      * Lol.
      * The guns look like they’re fun to use. Probably more fun than BO3’s and I love the way they look too.

    • Filthy Prank’d

      Some sort of realism? When the fuck did COD have realism? You’re asking for too much lol

  • Like the way they have the health bar under the name now i won’t stop shooting thinking they’re dead. Plus we need positive vibes only so go bitch somewhere else like you don’t have to keep telling us you’re not getting the game

    • jordanxbrookes

      It’s not bitching if people are critiquing the game so it can be better. I too like that they added a health bar, although with the TTK of Ghosts, it might be a bit pointless lol.

      • Filthy Prank’d

        But he’s not talking about the people that are criticising the game, he’s talking about those that countlessly moan about why CoD is the way it is.

        • Bettyslozada3

          Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !ie158t:
          On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
          !ie158t:
          ➽➽
          ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash398MediaSureGetPay$97Hour β˜…β˜…βœ«β˜…β˜…βœ«β˜…β˜…βœ«β˜…β˜…βœ«β˜…β˜…βœ«β˜…β˜…βœ«β˜…β˜…βœ«β˜…β˜…βœ«β˜…β˜…βœ«β˜…β˜…βœ«β˜…β˜…βœ«β˜…β˜…βœ«β˜…β˜…βœ«β˜…β˜…βœ«β˜…β˜…βœ«β˜…β˜…βœ«β˜…β˜…βœ«β˜…β˜…::::::!ie158t:….,……

        • CallofDutyWillOwn

          Couldn’t said it better myself. You sir know the difference about those morons.

      • BradyAlucard

        Some people don’t understand the definition of “critique”, though, gamers think that “this sux” is “sophisticated criticism” nowadays.

      • I agree that the health bar is great, but how effective will it be? Time will tell…

      • True, i just hope they don’t do a bo2/3 type ttk because i hated it on both games

      • Capten ermirica

        That’s what I initially thought,that it was a nice touch but I think the ttk in any call of duty game does make them a little useless. Gunfights are generally over in a second or less!

  • Chummier

    Can you see your body if you look down in this game?

    • Filthy Prank’d

      I don’t know myself, but seeing that you can see your legs while sliding, I’m sure you can see your body when you look down as well. If not, then that wouldn’t make sense seeing how BO3 has this feature and IW not.

  • Former

    So will there be an open beta like Bo3 had? Or are we forced to pre-order?

    • Filthy Prank’d

      Weren’t people also forced to also pre order BO3 for the beta? I think the open beta is released after the closed beta, maybe a week after or 4 days maybe. The beta is only available for 3 days to those who pre-order, so the Open Beta could be a week long, probably.

      • Former

        Yeah, but if an Open beta was confirmed, you could just wait for that instead of pre-ordering. That’s what I want to know. I’m pretty sure the open beta for Bo3 was a surprise though.

      • Wraith

        Idk about consoles, but on PC (if you’re that small percentage), we had access to the BO3 beta if we owned either Ghosts or AW.

    • jordanxbrookes

      You have to pre-order to play the Beta like with Black Ops 3.

      • BradyAlucard

        How do we know that it won’t be open yet?

        • I mean we don’t. But right now, the only way to get it is pre order.

          • BradyAlucard

            It better be open because locking something so important behind a pointless pre-order is just stupid. I refuse to pre-order anything.

          • It only lasts three days too, it’s not going to be like six days or whatever BO3 was. So i doubt itll be open.

          • BradyAlucard

            If it’s not I’ll laugh hard. They couldn’t screw over fans any worse than that. I don’t pre-order games for a reason and I’m sticking with that principle.

          • Former

            Isn’t it only 5 dollars? Then you can cancel the order? I’m not sure how it works but I guess spending 5 bucks to play a beta isn’t terrible. Better spent than on CoD points.

          • DEMOLITION12

            its literally free

          • Former

            Oh. And you can cancel at any time afterward?

          • DEMOLITION12

            yep

          • BradyAlucard

            Yeah I just personally wouldn’t do it, and hopefully we can get a CoD 4 Remastered closed/open beta too.

          • Former

            Not sure if a Cod4 beta would make much sense, seeing as how it’s a remaster with little to test out. It’d be nice to have one though.

          • BradyAlucard

            Yeah… just simply having it would be nice.

      • YoungMurf

        Didn’t BO3 become an open beta after a couple of days though?

  • Eddie Tupy

    looks good, will get…not that it should matter if i get it.

    • BradyAlucard

      It shouldn’t. What other people think shouldn’t matter all that much.

  • Roscoe

    It all looks good to me.

    However, my biggest concern is map design. With Treyarch games, there’s not that many pathways and walkways to keep an eye on with their take on three-laned maps, depending on your position on the map, which pretty much makes it easier to notice “a change in environment”, or in other words, notice when an enemy steps into your FoV.

    Though, I’ll be playing this on PC, I won’t be able to see for myself.

    • BradyAlucard

      The map design is the main thing that I’m impressed with. It’s so much better than Ghosts’s it’s like night and day.

  • dust&cheese

    Playing off our nostalgia. Smart. However, your older fanbase can see through the bullshit. This is nothing but a recycled, reskinned[hardly], pile of ****.

  • djml9

    I think you need a little more practice with the black hole gun, whoever was playong,

  • YoungMurf

    The graphics of IW make BO3 look like Family Guy graphics, and I thought BO3’s graphics were pretty slick to begin with.

  • Drank Bleach

    1st impression i got from the running and reloading animation was it looked similar to halo reach multiplayer.

  • Wraith

    People are saying it’s akin to BO3 gameplay, but I think it’s more like MW3. The sounds, the ADS, idk, those are just the vibes I’m getting personally.