During Activision Blizzard’s Q4 Earnings Call, Activision confirmed that Sledgehammer Games will be developing Call of Duty 2017. Activision also said that the Call of Duty 2017 title will ‘take Call of Duty back to its roots.”

During the call, Activision Blizzard COO emphasized that this year’s game will have “traditional combat will once again take center stage,” confirming that the traditional boots on the ground gameplay will be back.

This year’s title will be Sledgehammer Games’ third Call of Duty title. They previously worked on Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 and Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare.

Activision Blizzard’s COO said, ““In 2017, Activision will take Call of Duty back to its roots, and traditional combat will once again take center stage. This is what our dedicated community of Call of Duty players and Sledgehammer Games, developing this year’s title, are the most excited about.”

Sledgehammer Games Studio Heads posted statements on Twitter:

Activision has not announced any specific details regarding Call of Duty 2017. A rumor from November suggested the code name for this year’s title is “Stronghold.” There have also been additional rumors swirling around the internet, many of which are fake.

Activision usually reveals the new Call of Duty titles sometime between April-May, with the game’s launch in November.

As always, stay tuned for the latest news on Call of Duty 2017.

  • Jesus

    Boots on the motherfucking ground boissss

    • GOD

      Watch your language son

  • Ok but what are my chances of getting nigerian knee pads in supply drops in this new game?

    • César Alcalde Delgado

      about 99%

      • Brendasollis

        Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours & have longer with friends and family! !sr70c:
        On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
        ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs360WebPageGetPaid$97/Hour ★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫::::::!sr70c:….,……..

    • joey

      or getting j-lo to design the weapon master outfit again.

      • Mario Rivera

        haha so funny.

        • Do you always upvote yourself?

          • PuddleOfStix

            Careful with that question.

          • Wesley Avrett

            They upvote themselves like Trump supporters register to vote twice, because “They’re cheating!”

          • Tummus The Goat

            Why bring politics into a Video Game discussion? Your comment is completely Irrelevant.

          • mark


      • So true, it was still great to actually have a weapon master outfit though, even if it did look like a giant make-up bag

        • Mario Rivera

          They never fixed the mastery pants glitch. Not weapon master; the mastery outfit that you got doing challenges. #grrrrrrrrrr

          • Well I’m a designer for a living so maybe, haha.

          • Maybe they could, maybe they couldn’t. Doesn’t matter.

            You don’t need to “do any better” to be a judge of quality. If you can’t cook, but eat a terrible meal, do you just have to suck it up, or can you tell it doesn’t taste good? Same thing here, really.

          • Tummus The Goat

            Video Game Designing is 20x harder than cooking. God you Immature Twelve year olds always have to go off topic and make completely Irrelevant comments. Let’s see you do better then come talk shit about the game okay child? Have a Nice day.

    • Mario Rivera

      How about don’t be negative and sarcastic and be grateful for the good stuff you got.

      • Snoop Lying

        Eat my fart.

        • Mario Rivera

          very mature.


      • Tummus The Goat

        Twelve year olds never know how to grow up. It’s sad and Pathetic these days.

    • Tummus The Goat

      Yet you’ll still play and bitch about it like every cod player.
      Everyone wanted change they get it, now they bitch about it yet still play. I for one enjoy This years title “Infinite Warfare”.

      • Dre

        You are a fucking nerd

        • RebornAngel666

          it’s cool he likes to jump 20 feet up so other players can’t aim well enough to get him, that’s the only way he can win a battle. And ya that’s a sweaty mf who can play well doing that shit, therefore he is a fkn no life geeky nerdy outcast lmao

          • Tummus The Goat

            Can you children grow up? Also I don’t need to boost Jump to get kills. Lmfao Why are all Call of Duty Nerds 12 years old? I’m 18 and have College to worry about not Call of Duty. I play it for fun and I barely try at it. Learn some Respect and learn how to grow up You Immature Twelve Year olds. 🙂 Have A nice day.

      • Jeromie Hartsough

        No. I didn’t even purchase Infinite Warfare. Battlefield 1 is basically the game I always wanted COD to be. The next title will have to be pretty impressive to bring me back.

        • Tummus The Goat

          No one cares about fake fans bro

          • rats

            He’s not fake he just knows what a good cod should be and infinite warfare was shit. I also didn’t buy it and I’ve bought every cod since mw2

          • Tummus The Goat

            Lol FAKE FANS BITCH ABOUT EVERYTHING. I love the FAST PACE. Sorry you want to camp around every corner but I don’t like playing a pussy game. 🙂 Fast Pace and Running & Gunning is the mans way of playing. Man up or play with your sisters Dolls 🙂 PEACE

      • Robert Bamford

        I agree, at least in part. My complaint has always been no joystick control for flight sequences. However, I also enjoyed COD Infinite Warfare and look forward to the next title.

    • Dre

      You are gonna need them cuz Activision cock will be in your mouth.

    • DracoLaUzi


  • Amalox

    Back to the roots? So no supply drops too? Yeahh boiiii

    • Person

      Just face it, supply drops are not going away. There needs to be absolutely no one buying them for Activision to consider it. If you argue that with me, Activision will also make a ton more money by bringing Call of Duty back to where it should be.

    • lol hold your horses, supply drops are going to be in full force in this game

    • jordanxbrookes

      Haha no, Supply Drops are here to stay. I hate it too, but idiots continue to buy into the RNG system so Activision keeps going along with it.

    • Andrey Martim

      You are asking them to simply not earn one f***** billion dollars this year?

      SD’s are coming back… I hope they come to be similar to the MWR’s ones, tough.

      • RebornAngel666

        he was being sarcastic. Ffs

    • Brian

      Back to the roots as in so fucking flying about. The next Call of duty is guaranteed to have supply drops and cod points

    • RebornAngel666

      i love how most of them don’t realize u were bein sarcastic???

    • Amalox

      I was being sarcastic peeps, of course I know Activi$ion won’t give up on SDs


  • ghosts sucks

    They would be insane not to.

  • Slothigans

    Won’t believe it till we see some gameplay.

    • Brian

      You saying they are lying? Lying to their investors?

      • Jayric2

        would’nt be the first time

      • Tayler Hammond

        Yup. They lied about supply drops. Why not lie about other shit.

        • Brian

          When did they lie about supply drops?

          • Tayler Hammond

            The day they told us they’d be cosmetic only. Now CoD4 has dlc weapons.

          • Brian

            Are you talking about that Vonderhaar quote? because that was took out of context and never to the investors.

        • PuddleOfStix

          They would NOT lie to their investors/shareholders. Why would they? They’re still turning up huge profits for them, so they’ve no reason to lie to them.

        • BradyAlucard

          If they truly lied about Supply Drops, that’s false advertising, which would put them in serious trouble. I can’t stand Activision either, but they aren’t allowed to lie to their investors.

        • Batman

          BECAUSE THEIR INVESTITORS CONTROL THEM AND THEIR MONEY FFS, stop going full retard, they cannot lie to them or else they would go bankrupt

      • jordanxbrookes

        They don’t lie to their investors and shareholders, they just don’t tell them the full story. It’s shady, but most Publishers do that.

        • Brian

          What’s the full story then? if it’s relating to “cosmetic only” stuff then refer to my other tweet, that quote was taken out of context

          • jordanxbrookes

            The full story as in they don’t tell their shareholders and investors when something is negative, or if something hasn’t gone well, or if something didn’t sell enough, because they want to keep them happy. An example is Infinite Warfare selling poorly compared to previous CoD games, but because it remained at #1 in 2016, that’s the thing that Activision will tell their shareholders and investors.

        • Joshwoocool

          well I consider lying by omission still lying

  • Zypher

    if they mine no jetpack im in

  • Chocobooo!

    Hmm.. What could it be?

  • Roscoe

    $5 says they’ll still find a way to incorporate outer space and advance movement.

    • Jayric2

      Naw man , if space comes in its gonna be like in Ghost… campaing , and only 1-2 mission

  • jordanxbrookes

    Normally I’d be pessimistic, but here’s a bit of optimism from me: It’s WW2.

    • Idk. Another Cold War game would be nice. There’s a lot to do in that era.

      • jordanxbrookes

        Idk, I’d rather Treyarch handle the Cold War era than Sledgehammer. I’m totally not saying this because I’m a Black Ops fanboy 😛

        • Mario Rivera

          Yea Treyarch is better in a past setting, Infinity ward shines in a modern setting and they could just let Sledgehammer handle the future.

          • Batman

            Sledgehammer never did a past setting before, how can you know that (overrated)treyarch is better?

            Infinity ward sucks at everything nowdays

          • How do you know Treyarch is better at developing for the past setting when neither Studio has attempted it? With the exception of the old Infinity Ward Studio making Call of Duty and Call of Duty 2

          • Mario Rivera

            Well all I know that with WAW and BO1 treyarch have proven themselves to be highly competent in making past era games. While the other studios haven’t attempted it thus far, I would still say Treyarch is the obvious safe choice there since they actually have a well received track record in that regard. With the MW series and certain aspects of the underrated Ghosts (Which can be built upon in a new game) IW has shown us that their strength is still in the modern era. That leaves SHG to handle futuristic gameplay which is something they truly ushered in the 1st place.

          • Sledgehammer helped make MW3 showing they can also work great in the Modern setting. A Developer should not be hinged to a single setting because of their previous installments.

          • Mario Rivera

            We all know that SHG had a minor role in MW3 (spec ops if im not mistaken). In any case, we know a team like Treyarch could excel in futuristic like setting too but neither IW or SHG have really proven themselves in a past like setting just yet (Yes, I know about IW making cod 1 and 2). Its better for Activision to play it safe as a whole and let 3arch run the past as they are by far the most decorated in that regard. Let SHG handle the future setting they showed promise in while letting IW handle their bread and butter specialty in making modern setting COD games. My logic is about playing it safe and trying to strike a good 3 year game rotation as a whole. I wouldn’t be interested in taking unnecessary chances by putting any one of the 3 dev teams too far outside their proven comfort zones.

          • It wasn’t a minor role. They helped in all aspects of the game.

        • The Cold War era is quite a large part of time and there’s a lot to do there. One Developer should be held responsible for one setting.

    • I wan’t something realistic and either current times or old times, but nothing regarding a freakin World war for god sake.

    • SANDY

      I say, it’s vietnam because nazis and swastikas are Banned or blocked, in many countries, for example in Germany and there would be no point in making the game without the nazis or swastikas.

      bo3 zombie game mode, swastikas were replaced by iron cruise and “nazi” was removed from the zombies game mode name

      • jordanxbrookes

        Still doesn’t stop Sledgehammer from making a WW2 game and altering the appearance of the flag, while having the characters say “Jerry’s” or just “Germans”. Lots of WW2 games have done this, while keeping true to the history.

        • SANDY

          Yep, I hope too that sledgehammer games make wwii game, but still unlikely.

          • jordanxbrookes

            Just wait and see 😛

          • It seems like you know something..lol

          • jordanxbrookes

            Me? Nah, what do I know pfft. I’m just a “CoD hater” 😀

          • If ya know something we don’t know, you should totally let me in on it because im dying for a WW2 or Vietnam game mate. I have to know lol

          • Fury

            Well, I can tell you it isn’t WW2, but the “Fog Of War” is actually in plain sight. 😉

          • RebornAngel666

            Oh ya? Wait til April-May when they announce it then

          • I mean, I have no problem doing that. My comment wasn’t completely literal.

      • BradyAlucard

        You think that Treyarch would succumb to censorship? No, they wouldn’t. There aren’t swastikas in BO3 because the Nazi’s didn’t exist and Nazi was removed from the name because the zombies were no longer Nazi’s. Is that too difficult for people to grasp?

        • Batman

          Lol, you don’t know shit about the zombies storyline then, yes treyarch follows censorship, that’s why bo1 didn’t have any swatikas in germany.
          BO3 is purely nazi zombies, they just replaced swastikas with the Iron cross and the term nazi with german.

          Its still fully set in WW2 minus SoE and revelations(a map that has parts of kino der toten(classic nazi zombies map) on it, yet its swastikas have been fully replaced as well

          • BradyAlucard

            I know a lot about the story; the change itself is part of the storyline, actually, since it’s set in an alternate reality. Hitler probably doesn’t even exist in the Origins universe for all we know. Germans didn’t use swastikas in WW1 and Hitler didn’t rise to power in the Origins universe. It’s confusing, I know. But in real history the iron cross was the Prussian/German symbol and the swastika replaced it (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Cross). Here’s how it goes:

            World at War/Old Universe: Nazi’s use element 115 to win WW2; swastikas.
            Black Ops 2-3/Origins Universe: Germans use element 115 to win WW1; iron cross.

      • DEMOLITION12

        it hasn’t been called ‘nazi zombies’ since bo1 you mong. since there were commie zombies?…

      • In WW2 games nowadays the Swastika will stay in the countries it can and will be replaced by the Iron Cross in the countries it can’t. Just look at Wolfenstein The New Order and The Old Blood. It’s a simple fix.

    • Taylorisasnake

      Modern times like the early 21st century would be fine. Vietnam is fine but no WW I or WW II.

  • who gives a fuark with supply drop weapons, four map packs full of maps infinitely better than maps shipped with the base game but vastly underplayed, garbage netcode running on 10-20hz servers, missing player count, and so on?


    • Supply Drops just aren’t going anywhere. But yeah weapons in them in are a problem, but MWR did it decently with being able to craft new guns (even though adding guns and supply drops to MWR was wrong and still is).

      I also have to argue that BO3 had better base maps than DLC. Same with AW.

      I think people are obviously excited for Call of Duty going back to what is Call of Duty. With hopefully a good historic setting too. So im pretty excited.

      • Joshwoocool

        Cant speak for multiplayer on BO3 that well but BO3’s zombies was great.I have nitpicky issues with it but that comes down to personal preference of what I like in my zombies maps

  • JeronimoPW

    Vietnam, there we go

  • zack

    Return to roots reimagined with supply drops. Oh well this pretty much confirms ww2, which is good.

  • Alright then, there’s no way we are fucking up this years CoD too, aye?

  • Stefan Lang

    I would rather something modern than a ww2 shooter tbh.

  • LaShaquanishia

    so… no mw2/waw remastered?
    skipped get fucked activation ya bunch of greedy cunts

    • jordanxbrookes

      Good. Have you seen what they did to MWR? I wouldn’t want to see any CoD get remastered after the stunt Activision pulled.

      • LaShaquanishia

        still it’s the most fun I’ve had with cod in years. and the sd weren’t really that bad

        • jordanxbrookes

          I can agree on the fun part, except for the Black Ops 3 Beta since I really loved that.

      • Is this because of the recent supply drop drama in MWR? It’s a bad idea, I agree, but that doesn’t change the fact that Raven did a fine job on the remaster.

      • BradyAlucard

        If I bought the game I’d be happy at the fact that I’d get more content. Wouldn’t be worth the extra money I pay to get so very little. This coming from someone who doesn’t like RNG, but I’d rather have it than overpriced camo and weapon microtransactions that aren’t included in the Season Pass either.

        • jordanxbrookes

          If it wasn’t a Remastered version of Modern Warfare, I wouldn’t be as annoyed as I am now.

          • BradyAlucard

            Never saw it in that perspective so to be fair it’d upset me too.

    • TheHorror

      MWR has made me not want to see another remaster ever again #LeaveTheMemoriesAlone

      • LaShaquanishia

        it was the best cod since bo2 imo

        • TheHorror

          I’d much rather play BO3. Hell, i’d probably rather play AW. I love MW2, its my favorite COD game hands down, but i now have zero desire to see it remastered.

          • BradyAlucard

            What if it were remade without all the things that made it crap?

          • TheHorror

            If it was 100% solely a remaster with absolutely no bullshit added, then maybe. But even then something tells me MW2 would be infuriating to play in the year 2017

          • BradyAlucard

            I’m talking a full-on remake, without any of the broken things. The industry would clammer for it.

          • TheHorror

            Nah, that’s way too subjective. Plus it wouldn’t even be MW2 anymore, the ridiculously OP things is what makes it MW2. May as well just make MW4 at that point

          • BradyAlucard

            Yeah not trying to be factual, it’s just something I’d want, and I think the community would rather have a MW2 the way it should always have been at launch. It’d be the best CoD ever.

  • Tested

    Now stop with the pay to win supply drop thing and i make get it.

  • TheHorror

    Thank god. If this year’s COD was going to be futuristic, it would have been the first COD game i wouldn’t have bought. IW is so bad i don’t even care enough to bitch about it

    • Same dude lol

      • Pete R

        What’s even better is blocking Mario and u don’t have to read his childish bs

    • Mario Rivera

      what’s so bad about IW? lol. People are so entitled these days. SMH.

      • BradyAlucard

        Troll account?

      • What’s good about it? I mean seriously, if you ignore all the features it copied from BO3, what’s actually original and good about IW?

        I played it for an hour and already didn’t like it

      • Entitled = Expecting quality from a $60 thing you bought.

        People sure are entitled these days; wanting the things they buy to be as good as they can be.

  • ccrows

    Lemme guess. It will be a WWII shooter that looks great with an Erad Cyclopean laser SMG coming out of SDs down the road… 😉

  • Pirates

    I practically jizzed in my pants reading this fine piece of an article! https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d53327dccba09dcded163046062e5e328bf9b9eaf10c7b2da040db047dcb5cb5.jpg

    • Mario Rivera

      TMI!!!! LOL!!!!!!!!

      • Pirates

        Thanks baby I love you long time!

  • In the words of my boys in Sepultura,

  • Michael Romo

    Hopefully there won’t be any more weapon variants

  • Johnny

    Good to hear this. That is what we wanted. Looking forward for more info from Sledgehammer Games.

  • Tao

    Well the early CoD games never have been popular enough to make “center stage” so I think traditional means BOTG

  • Shane Lee O’shea

    Sledgehammer games.. Great, the company that ruined the Modern Warfare series and also brought us the first futuristic (and worst) call of duty; Advanced Warfare.

    • How did they run MW3, exactly? Infinity Ward was still the core developer, SHGames was only hired to help.

  • AlexK489

    Aaaam i the only one who’s a bit concerned by this?
    I mean, i’m not saying bring back exo suits, but BOTG seems to just promote suuuuch a camper friendly play style….

    • jordanxbrookes

      I love the tactical playstyle. Makes the game’s pace more balanced instead of chaotic.

      • ccrows


    • TheHorror

      BO2 did it damn near perfectly. It was BOTG, but it was still fairly fast paced. And aside from the odd polesmoker with the LMG/Target Finder, i didn’t find campers to be too much of a problem.

      • BradyAlucard

        It didn’t get extremely bad until Ghosts. Worst CoD ever.

        • TheHorror

          IW is worse than Ghosts IMO but that really isn’t saying a whole lot

          • BradyAlucard

            IMO I prefer IW. To me it’s night and day. Far better execution.

          • TheHorror

            Fair enough, I’ve never completely stopped playing a COD game in the first two months of its release ever until IW, at least Ghosts I lasted about 7 months before stopping

  • The9tailedgamer

    There you go, now stop whining about the futuristic stuff, maybe the community wont be *as* toxic as it is now

  • Step Daddy

    RNG systems for video games should be illegal. If gambling is illegal, then RNG based loot system for games that children play should definitely be illegal.

    • jordanxbrookes

      Except with RNG in video games, it’s technically not gambling. With gambling, you spend or “bet” money and there are two outcomes, either you win or you lose. With RNG, especially these loot boxes, you spend money on it, but you always win because you still receive something, even if it’s something you didn’t want, and this is why companies can carry on with this. I dislike RNG too, but it’s here to stay until the next money-making business model comes along.

    • Glockyyy

      Or you could learn to shoot straight and outshoot with the default weapons of the game. This is coming from someone who picked up CoD4 a week after it first came out. Do you know how many times friends and I said “I wish they would add more guns to the game.” Now they give it to you and people whine about it because they don’t get it. If you play the game and put time into it you will eventually get the weapon you want. Or as I said earlier learn how to shoot better. I never have problems with people who have different weapons than I. That’s dillusional- it’s the player not the game.

  • Matt (SylveonSweeps)

    not interested as of right now.its IW season thank you.

  • ccrows

    Honestly I could care less if it’s boots on ground or space jumping, just keep that SBMM garbage that they used in AW out of the game.

    (for me) I’m done with playing with UNNECESSARY LAG just so people all over the world have the same skill in the lobby…

    • Mario Rivera

      Yea SBMM is pointless if the connection is being compromised in order to put these specific people in our lobbies. If they wanna take care of newbies then they just need to go back to the easy to pick up and play but hard to master formula that the old COD games had. This jetpacking crap made noobs wanna quit before trying and it annoyed alot of vets cuz of the random chaotic pace and the constant MLG like environment due to the noob shortage. Any noob could jump on BO1, MW3, etc and almost instantly get in on the fun while vets focused on being able to consistently do well (A.K.A the real reason behind the KD, SPM and leaderboard obsession). That was always the magic COD formula that made everyone happy. Noobs had plenty of other noobs to play while vets had lots of noobs and great connections due to increased player counts.

  • OuTeRhEaVeN

    Yes, with the supply drops alongside.

  • hungryandrew

    I want Vietnam.

  • Vittorio D’Antuono

    Either a Cold War or a WWI / WWII game would be much appreciated. Maybe with a new Remaster alongside. I would just like the new title to use a heavily improved graphics / audio engine to take a big step forward since, Cod hasn’t changed much in this regard. Especially if considering the PS4 Pro and the upcoming Xbox Scorpio. And please, let it run on a overhauled networking enivorment. Activision hasn’t been investing much in more and better servers. We would deserve to get the best possible multiplayer experience with 60Hz/60Hz sending/receiving rates and using 100% dedicated servers. (right now Cod runs on a hybrid system of P2P and dedicated servers).

    • Pete R

      Ditto what you said about new and improved dedicated servers. No more host advantage and kids lagging around the map with 400ms pings.

  • RdJokr

    Well, can’t say I didn’t see this coming. Gonna miss all the boost jumping, that’s for sure. Definitely would like to see if any of the gameplay changes since AW made it in this one though (like infinite sprinting).

  • Mikey9835

    I’m now 80% sure we are going back to ‘nam, SHG added a ton of weapons from that era in AW, and now BO3 have added the PPSH and the M16; and we all know the different studios like teasing the next game. The reason I think it wont be WW2, is because I think Treyarch are more likely to tackle that era, and I don’t think the Black ops storyline can go any further. (BO3’s campaign ruined it) Either way i’m at least glad they’ve gone back to their roots.

    • PDX Guitar Freak

      What concerns me about Vietnam is whether it will provide the variety of maps to keep the game interesting. Lot of jungle/village maps obviously, but hopefully they do some city maps like Saigon too

      • Batman

        EXACTLY, they need to deliver 12-14 launch maps + 16dlc maps, and vietnam doesn’t offer too much diversity, we wouldn’t even have snow maps at all.

        They need to bring diverse enviroments while staying true to history and setting.

        My solution would be to go full battlefield and make themed map packs, like a WW2 pack with WW2 guns and maps, WW1 pack, Korean War pack, as their dlcs, to offer variety and value to the season pass.

  • CoDisAids2k17

    still gonna be shit

    • ccrows

      Still clicking on COD articles…

  • Anthony C. Nwankwo

    Now we wait and see, but nothing will ever top Call of Duty 2, MW, or MW2 for me. I had fun with AW, but I purposely skipped COD the last two years.

    • Mario Rivera

      right on, bro.


  • CheEsEToUcH666

    They better pull a Resident Evil 7

  • Beast Mode

    Can i bring the Brecci with me? 🙂

    • ccrows

      *sigh* 🙁

  • Eldensword

    Real-world weapons, period – And who is going to take on the different ammo types? Ball, wad-cutter, OO Buck, 0000 Buck, armor-piercing etc? In 1998, Rainbow Six on PC had different ammo types! Where did that go???

  • Batman


  • djml9

    Definitey ‘Nam

  • Brendasollis

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours & have longer with friends and family! !sr71c:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs361ShopPageGetPaid$97/Hour ★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫::::::!sr71c:….,….

  • Tan Bir

    Yes, I hope too that sledgehammer games make WWII game, i but still unlikely.

  • Gamerazor247

    Oh shiii- Supplyhammer Games is making a shooter likely set during WW/Modern-era, Two face mode, ACTIVATE!!

  • Sick of ww and futuristic stuff. I’d prefer something like BO2 where it’s modern but in the future enough to allow new stuff within the modern setting.

  • BobKat

    Thank goodness, if I wanted to play this space game garbage, I’d buy a Halo title

  • Sentinel

    Still, we will have to wait and see what kind of back to it’s roots really mean to Sledgehammer, let alone Activision.

  • Aidan


  • So World at War 2 with WaW Remastered set for next year? Ok thanks!

    • J Lopez

      I will take it with Natzi Zombies revamped!

  • Diego Diniz

    NO!!! World War 2 again???
    Oh Wait…

  • hungryandrew

    Yeah back to roots, probably a alternate time line, of World War 2 in alternate reality, where soldiers have EXO SUITS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Anthony Muller

    I am sure it will be just as lame as the last 10 CODs… Guys wake up and show these kids what a REAL COD is. Remake United Offensive and you just might have people take notice again.

  • Donnie Sullivan

    No more boosting up in the air. The most dedicated COD players like the traditional boots on the ground with the choppers, more life like killstreaks. If we wanted jet packs and space junk we would play superman or some kiddie type game. Black ops 3 and infinite ruined a great platform. I cancelled my pre order of Infinite Warfare because of the boosting/ wall running. Also you should make it where you can detect people using modded controllers, Black Ops 3 is rampant with them now, no different than hackers. Auto aim, rapid fire, jitter way too many people using them and the chip sets in them are un detectable by Sony or Treyarch.

  • Frag Wall

    This game better not be stereotypical and I hope to see gore returning. Without the gore, it should be rated T instead of M

  • aGuyWhoIsLazy

    Fix this garbage. This franchise is trash.


  • Code Elite

    Slegehammer’s turn again, man time is just flying by.

  • Skyrilla

    I want this to fail so much harder than any other CoD title. It will be the final nail in the coffin.

  • Ed

    Just hope its modern or ww2/1 but mostly hope maps are great

  • Shotzz

    Am i able to get Anne Frank in the supply drops