UPDATE – March 28th: Both IGN and EuroGamer have posted articles stating that their sources have confirmed to them that this year’s Call of Duty game is called ‘Call of Duty: WWII.’

Original Story: 

A YouTuber — “TheFamilyVideoGamers” — has posted a video of what appears to be images of Call of Duty 2017 marketing artwork, some of which appear to be concepts for final art.

The leaked images show that Call of Duty 2017, developed by Sledgehammer Games, will take place during the World War II era.

The images above show artwork that Activision appears to be creating for promotional images for the title. It also appears that Activision has decided to be straightforward with the naming scheme for the game and call it ‘Call of Duty: WWII’. This would be, probably, the simplest name for a Call of Duty game since before Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare.

Back in 2014, Michael Condrey (Studio Head of Sledgehammer Games), stated that he wanted to see another Call of Duty game set in World War II: “I think a next generation game with the latest production values and robustness in a World War II setting like Band of Brothers would be amazing.

Furthermore in 2015, Activision Publishing CEO, Eric Hirshberg, said in an interview that it’s “certainly possible” that there would be another World War II Call of Duty game: “Those kinds of things happen,” Hirshberg said, “so there’s definitely a chasing of innovation and new ideas within a well-worn genre that lead people to similar conclusions like changing time periods. And of course I think that opens up the opportunity for what is old is new again.”

We do caution that, as of now, Activision has not confirmed any of this art work.

Thus far, Activision has only confirmed that this year’s title is developed by Sledgehammer Games. They also said that Call of Duty 2017 title will take ‘Call of Duty back to its roots.’

Stay tuned for the latest news on Call of Duty 2017.

SOURCE: TheFamilyVideoGamers and Reddit

SHARE
  • Duke of hazard

    Please, please let this be true. I beg you.

    • grimm joww

      it is true.

    • BradyAlucard

      This is the most real leak we’ll ever get right now.

    • The images above show artwork that Activision appears to be creating for promotional images for the title. It also appears that Activision has decided to be straightforward with the naming scheme for the game and call it ‘Call of Duty: WWII‘. This would be, probably, the simplest name for a Call of Duty game since before Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare.

    • We do caution that, as of now, Activision has not confirmed any of this art work.

  • hungryandrew

    Fuirs

  • JeronimoPW

    I think it’s fake. Why people leak this with so much low res? lol

    • I think if this were fake, CharlieIntel probably wouldn’t make an article about it. I mean there has been two other rumors about CoD 2017 that they didn’t make a rumor.

      I’m leaning to this being real most likely but I’m gonna try not to get my hopes up lol

      • grimm joww

        this is true you guys have to believe me

    • Vape Nation

      Call of Duty said they’re going back to their roots, and the first Call of Duty was based in WW2, so this is most likely real

      • Vape Nation

        Same with CoD 2 and 3, they were also based in WW2

  • hungryandrew

    It’s an alternate WW2, that also has EXO SUITS

    • Faebled

      And dogs

      • Batman

        Fish AI

        • K m8

          Is no longer due to hardware limitations

          • smh preorder cancelled

          • The9tailedgamer

            YES, A M3RKMUS1C FAN!!!

        • Faebled

          Exo fish with exo slam!

        • Better batman

          Exo fish AI

      • Aidan Rick

        And Exo dogs

        • Darin Cunningham

          lol

        • Caleb Geysbeek

          And last stand

          • What you looking at?

            and Juggernaut

    • Zon-Robrine

      dear god nooooooo

      • Dustin Wilson

        What r u talking about “nooo”?? Ww2 era is waaaaaay better then all this furturistic shit! this is how call of duty started! This is by far the better kind of cod that everyone in the community has ACTUALLY been wanting and SHG is the only one that listened

        • we

          he was replying to the guy saying ww2 with exo suits…….

        • Noahjac360….the youtuber

          3 year dev cycle for a call of duty game….we decided we didn’t want futuristic call of duty till right before black ops 3…aka over halfway through a dev cycle, infinity wars didn’t have a choice but to continue with their call of duty, and I’m a big fan of the modern warfare and black ops serieses story in campaign but infinite warfares, was the first cod to make me cry at the ending since MW2….so appreciate that they cared that much, to at least not milk an advanced warfare. And decided to go more of a halo and black ops 3 mixture with their good old infinity ward storytelling………..bitch

          • Look, it’s trying to say something!

          • BradyAlucard

            A Call of Duty “story” made you cry? And yet you called that other guy a “bitch”?

        • Zach

          He was saying no to the guy who talked about ww2 with exo suits…learn to read

          • Paul Romantini

            Idiots get with the times advanced warfare was the best they should make advanced warfare 2 if you don’t like it and you like old school go back to Mario kart

        • Cameron Fitzgerald

          SHG isnt the only that listened. AW came out and by then bo3 and iw were already in development. It was too late to make a change… This is the first possible time that they could change it. SHG were the people that introduced the exo stuff in the first place…

        • CallofAdvancement

          So why go back?!
          Just take out your old game then!!!

          • GhostT

            cause no one wants exo shit in space while u play toy story 3

        • WW2 is definitely the best. There are an almost infinite number of stories and battles, and in varying conditions, operations and events. More than any other war in history. You could make 100 WW2 games and barely touch the surface of everything that happened in that war.

      • TheWahGamer

        What the hell are you talking about? World War 2 is the best Era there is. It’s much better than all this futuristic shit.

        • Vanilla_Gorilla

          Better than the Vietnam era?….?‍♂️

          • What you looking at?

            yes,better then vietnam era.

          • BradyAlucard

            Yes. Vietnam is a bit too close to modern for me, even though it’s mostly upgraded WWII technology. But I definitely love that era too and would love to see a true AAA game with current-gen graphics. OMG

        • TreyarchPLZWW2

          yeah your right WW2 is much better!

        • Jay

          Damn right it is!

    • Jack Sharaf

      I know ur kidding, but I get this feeling that they would pull some shit like this lol

      • The Classic Gamer

        Pray they dont

        • Rebeccamconnors

          Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours & have longer with friends and family! !dt50c:
          On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
          !dt50c:
          ➽➽
          ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs340WebNextGetPaid$97/Hour ★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫::::::!dt50c:….,….

          • Caleb Geysbeek

            nien

          • David Smith

            fuck off with your spam shit

          • imBATMAN

            dont talk to my girlfriend like that!

          • imBATMAN

            i love you bbg

        • Speak Whenever

          They confirmed its boots on the ground on their twitter.

          • No they didn’t

          • Ptrain727
          • i’ll believe it when i see it. boobs on the ground means nothing at all, remember the following:

            MWR, MW3, GHOSTS, IW (tactical ruleset), AW (no exo ruleset)

          • Batman

            Ghosts was okay, MW3 was awesome, even though not as good as MW2, IW tactical is the only way that game is remotely decent, and MWR is the exact same as CoD 4 with a lot of cool new shit added

            Im no CoD c*cksucker but your examples are not that great

          • BradyAlucard

            MW3 was awful at launch. It’s decent nowadays. And I prefer IW’s normal playlists to Tactical TDM, the headglitching and camping is just cancer, which is what I fear with boots on the ground Call of Duty games going forward.

          • BradyAlucard

            IW Tactical TDM playlist has wallrunning in it. And “taking Call of Duty back to its roots” means both WWII AND boots on the ground. It’s definitely boots on the ground until proven otherwise.

          • Wallrunning has absolutely nothing to do with why tacttdm is garbage.

          • BradyAlucard

            Kind of, but what really killed it is the headglitching and camping, which are only huge problems in boots on the ground CoD’s, might I add. I’m not going to miss it in the next game, I can just see the cancer already.

          • christbatman03 Gaming

            Lol you said “Boobs”

          • I actually like COD IW Tactical TDM

            Makes the game far more bearable.

          • Con is in his name

          • GhostT

            they did

      • The Rabid One

        Activision: We will make Call of Duty World War II.

        Fans: Yes on the ground, classic COD.

        Activision: Alt WW2, with Iron exo suits.

        Fans: No! That was not part of the deal.

        Activision: I’ve altered the deal, pray I do not alter it further.

        • Angelarfranks

          Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours & have longer with friends and family! !dg36c:
          On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
          !dg36c:
          ➽➽
          ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs326DigitalOfficeGetPaid$97/Hour ★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫::::::!dg36c:….,…..

        • GhostT

          Not True

          • Maria Luther

            <-Super and Easiest 0nl!nee Home opportunity for all. make 87 Dollars per hour and Make 2512 Dollars per month.All you just Need an Internet Connection and aComputer To Make Some Extra cash.Visit this link…………..…………………….. ║ http://gee.su/ZcePC

      • Azir,ShurimasOvernerfedEmperor

        they could make the story like this : a nuclear blast strikes and decreases the earth’s gravity so u have less than moon gravity with ww2 guns and theme…

    • The Classic Gamer

      Aka wolfenstein but better in their case

    • Dorki

      Fuxk you who do you know that they said its going to be boots on the ground bitch

      • What are you trying to say here?

      • hungryandrew

        It’s a joke you little should of been aborted, mistake in the world today.

    • Qaotik

      That’s what I was hoping BO3 would be

    • Jay

      No way! Please no!

    • NOOOOO

    • MrLadyfingers

      I remember when Robert Bowling said “fuck you land stand!” and we got Final Stand (and Dead Man’s Hand!). #MW3 #StealthClown

      • GhostT

        that was different he was mocking the community he never said he would get rid of it

    • GhostT

      no its confirmed boots on ground so stop trying to create a negative scene for this game as IT IS CONFIRMED BOOTS ON GROUND!!!!!!!!

  • PuddleOfStix

    I thought CharlieIntel didn’t report on rumors?

    • BradyAlucard

      This has the highest potential of happening, far more than “Chemical Warfare”. ha

      • PuddleOfStix

        I hope so. Was saying to my friend the other night they need to drop the “Warfare” prefix for CoD, it’s more stale than the futuristic thing. But where did “Chemical Warfare” even come from?

        • BradyAlucard

          It came from a NeoGAF post.

    • Batman

      Rumors with 51%+ chance of being legit are reported

      • BradyAlucard

        BAM, hit the nail right on the head!

      • PuddleOfStix

        Really? Where does it say that? I’m curious, because I wanna see where I’m proven wrong.

    • That’s what Charlie Intel started on. Long ago, before they were called Charlie Intel

  • D. Kitt

    Thank god, cause all that unrealistic 5.0 K/D ratio having, sprinting on walls and soaring thru the air like Peter Pan while on a 45 kill streak with a handgun and exploding throwing knife shit got old REAL quick!

    • Get own!

      You got killed by someone with a pistol and now you are mad??? HAHAHA

      • BradyAlucard

        He’s speaking hypothetically, I believe.

  • Corey

    Right, so what do you, Keshav, say to the accusations that some of these images come straight from Saving Private Ryan? I know CharlieIntel would know if something is fake, so…

    • BradyAlucard

      Got proof that they came from Saving Private Ryan?

      • Corey

        No, that’s why I’m asking, if a site notorious for saying something is fake because of X reason, if they thought these were from SPR.

        • BradyAlucard

          There’s your answer, right there. Thankfully until it’s proven that it’s taken from SPR, it’s got at least some validity. The most we’ll see until the official reveal, in my mind.

    • They aren’t from Saving Private Ryan

      • BradyAlucard

        No evidence that it is thankfully, according to Reddit! 😀

    • The images are not from Saving Private Ryan. While scenes did take place on Omaha – none of these images on the steelbook are shots from the film

    • Proof?

  • Why does it have to be centred around a world war?
    And these rumours are probably false

  • Diego Diniz

    Fuck WW2!
    Modern >>> WWW2 >>> Futuristic

    • Aurr

      shut up please

    • WW2 is better

      • BradyAlucard

        It really is. I’m done with modern!

      • KX virus

        But not better than WWW2

      • Mario Rivera

        variety is better. it’s def time to leave the future in the past, like marty mcfly in back to the future two.

    • BradyAlucard

      Modern is the worst. I play games to ESCAPE reality, not live it.

      • Realmmop

        But WW II was reality

        • It’s still an escape for people that didn’t live it and only heard about it in history classes

        • BradyAlucard

          Key word is “was”, it’s not anymore. Modern is the reality we live in now and we’ve had far too many modern games in-general.

      • Bigi345

        Wait are you actually a military personnel in an active warzone?

        • BradyAlucard

          Nope.

    • Batman

      Modern is still oversaturated
      Futuristic is way too saturated

    • jordanxbrookes

      Please drink bleach. Thankyou.

      • what

        wasn’t expecting this type of toxic response from you..

        • jordanxbrookes

          At least I was being polite about it 😉

          • Element115Will

            You did say please. LOLOL!

    • This

      There’s only so much you can do with the same fucking war after like 4 games at least do something modern that way you can make something up and not have the same boring guns.

      • KX virus

        “There’s only so much you can do with the same fucking war”
        That’s where you’re wrong.

    • Dude we’ve had 8 modern/futuristic game (9 if you could MWR) since COD did world wars, its way overdue. Until BF1 there’s been so many modern or futuristic FPSs and look at the positive response BF1 got. If they did anything modern or further in the future it’d probably be a flop because people get bored of the same shit all the time.

      • Fraser // Turmoil

        “Look at the positive response BF1 got” even though their games playercounts have dropped increasingly more every month since launch. BF1 was like the original Titanfall, overhyped as hell, everyone getting their money ready for a midnight launch, got home, played it for a solid 8+ hours then realised it’s shit and barely ever touched it again.

        • Better to have a huge hype and positive response followed by drop in playercount than a resounding “boo” from the get go (Infinite Warfare). BF1 is a solid FPS, gets dull after a while like any but it’s not shit

      • Source Reserve

        No, we’ve had 3. CoD4, MW2, and MW3. BO2 and Ghosts was near-future (which is still futuristic) AW, BO3, and IW is far future.

        As a matter of fact, we’ve had 5 history games, CoD 1, 2, 3, WaW, and BO1.

    • Element115Will

      You and the idiots that like your comments should mix rat poison and bleach and have a huge toast towards one another.

  • DUDE FUCK YES IF THIS IS TRUE

    • BradyAlucard

      IT’S HAPPENING!!!!!!!!!!! queue Ron Paul

    • If only they tweetd this out on april first then say april fools. That would be the funniest thing ever, but knowing sgh they’ll probably do some stupid shit to the game lol

  • Aaron-James Needles

    I wont be buying it then. I can understand why people got frustrated with the game changing so much. but after 3 years, i prefer the advanced movement…. to some extent.

    • grimm joww

      then go play halo or titanfall you little bitch

      • Jhonatan Orlando Ferro

        this… CALL OF DUTY is boots on the ground… want space or double jumps? go to Halo or Titanfall.

        • Jed Miller

          You realize Halo came before CoD, and had 3 installments with no “double jumping,” and the maps were simple. Everyone that says, “Go play halo then,” is clearly a dumbass or never even touched CE, 2, or 3.

          • Peewee78368

            Halo never came before COD you fucking tard. It was on PC then made a move to console learn ur facts bitch

          • GinsuVictim

            Halo: Combat Evolved – Nov 2001

            Call of Duty PC – Oct 2003

          • jordanxbrookes

            Halo CE released in 2001, Call of Duty released in 2003.

          • FaZe D4WN

            You are retarded, halo came out before cod. Peewee halo was released in 2001, and call of duty was released in 2003. So please shut up and learn your facts you ignorant fuck.

      • Gabriel Adrian Nava Guzman

        sodium chloride here

      • FaZe D4WN

        Bleach weaboo damn. Lol green jow the arancar. you failed otaku weirdo and i bet you cannot afford to have either of those games.

    • jordanxbrookes

      You can stay on Infinite Dogshit then.

      • ToonToons22

        You got the name wrong! It’s supposed to be “Call of Duty: Shitfinite Warfare”.

  • Vanilla_Gorilla

    Please not another ww2 game…..do Vietnam….that’d be badass…..

    • grimm joww

      Sledgehammer and will take ‘Call of Duty back to its roots.’

    • BradyAlucard

      Vietnam would have been nice but this is even better.

      • Im probably banking on Treyarch to do Vietnam now

        • BradyAlucard

          Seems kind of predictable since they made Black Ops, and that had the Cold War in it. But I’d be down for it, we need a Vietnam-related AAA Shooter. We’ve never had one like this before, the only one I’ve known of were old games, Indie games, and Battlefield Bad Company 2 DLC.

      • Vanilla_Gorilla

        I mean yeah,a Vietnam game would have been great….I guess I can’t knock a game that ain’t even out yet ……it’s just that I started playing fps back in the Medal of Honor days on ps2….lol….so there have been a ton of shooters in that era….let’s do something different…

  • Vape Nation

    For the people say this is fake, Call of Duty said it themselves that they would be taking it back to their roots, and the original Call of Dutys were based in WW2, CoD 1, 2, and I’m not sure about 3. So for all of you idiots that don’t know anything about the original Call of Dutys, you’re most likely wrong

    • grimm joww

      well said my friend

    • BradyAlucard

      BAM. lol

      • Miller

        Lol what if they fooled us all and are making advanced warfare 2

        • MAtt

          Miller????

        • BradyAlucard
        • The Classic Gamer

          I would probably hate them and give up on cod for good

        • Gabriel Adrian Nava Guzman

          that’s already made, infinite warfare

          • Noahjac360….the youtuber

            Did you even play both of those games, without blindly jumping on the hate wagon…infinite warfare is not only the most beautiful cod game I’ve ever played, but one of the best balanced multiplayers, and the second best zombies mode…but in my opinion from a cod OG who’s played every cod during their life cycle, the best campaign ever, definitely in years… Its in lamens terms a better black ops 3….mcshuggamacunt

          • Vanilla_Gorilla

            It is pretty good…I like it.

          • FaZe D4WN

            No that’s not true, infinite warfare and black ops 3 are basically the same game you fucking infinite warfare hater. Only difference being guns, maps and characters. Oh and infinite warfare has a more realistic movement system. Though bo3 had better gameplay. Advanced warfare is just really bad. And technically Black ops 3 is advanced warfare 2 because it was the first cod to rip off advanced warfare’s futuristic movement system. Gabriel since you cannot afford to buy infinite warfare and play it yourself do not believe in shitty reviews of the game until you play it yourself.

        • Nesba571

          I actually liked AW but I would even be disappointed if the next game in the series was AW2. I do not want another COD set in the future nest but nor do I want a run of 3 COD games set in the past. I’d rather they stagger the games so that they produced a mix of past, present and future.

    • Element115Will

      “Im not sure for CoD3” yet its set in WW2 based from 3ARC. So yea, it is a DEFINITE SURE.

      • The Classic Gamer

        Cod 3 Is based on real battles like saint lo the mace and chambonis it’s a pretty good game so what’s not to like about it.

    • David Zagar

      Getting a lil defensive over CoD huh?

    • The Classic Gamer

      3 and waw are both ww2

    • DJSaviD

      Calling people idiots when you don’t even know how many WWII CoD games there were. And why in the fuck would they EVER call it “CoD:WWII” when they already have 4 WWII games? If ANYTHING it would just be called Call of Duty and serve as a reboot.

      • The Classic Gamer

        Probably to base it off the whole war different divisions nations battles different prespectives.

    • Dorki

      Thank you for telling this and the best CoD that was ever created in my opinion is Call of Duty 2

    • this was also leaked by the same guy who leaked infinite warfare a year back and guess what happened….

    • KX virus

      Not only that but COD was made because of Medal of Honor, a WW2 series, so roots of COD are definitely WW2 and nothing else.

      • Vanilla_Gorilla

        The ww1-2 genres have been overdone…..maybe sledgehammers fresh take on a next gen console will change my mind about ww2 shooters….

    • Ghosts was brought to roots as was IW. Retard

  • ♎Pedro Indalecio♎

    woow

  • RT21UT

    Are we going to get to use gladiator swords and hot pink camos in this one too?

  • nick

    If this is legit i will take a guess and say that treyarch is making a vietnam call of duty

  • AlexK489

    We had nothing but World War 2 shooters up until World at War and all the community did was COMPLAIN, why are we wanting this AGAIN??
    Hope this is fake.

    • Did you forget that World at War came out almost a decade ago and since then Call of Duty has done like 5 or 6 futuristic games?

      • AlexK489

        No i do know that, but i also know that when every shooter was a WWSomething shooter all everyone did was bitch and complain until Modern Warfare came out.
        A WWWhatever shooter on these new consoles would be a gigantic step back, there’s literally nothing new that can come out of the same crap we had from the early CoDs, the only thing that even makes it remotely interesting is the fact that Sledgehammer’s a new CoD dev and has only ever done 1 CoD.
        I see no positives in a WWWhatever CoD on the new consoles.

        • >No i do know that, but i also know that when every shooter was a WWSomething shooter all everyone did was bitch and complain until Modern Warfare came out

          Yes, you’re right. Because at that time, WW2 was played out. But since 2008, we barely seen any World War 2 games in the mainstream part of gaming.

          >A WWWhatever shooter on these new consoles would be a gigantic step back, there’s literally nothing new that can come out of the same crap we had from the early CoDs

          I disagree. Pick 10, score steaks. Just two off the top of my head. There is much more I’m sure.

          • burrgee

            Are yous two high? wtf are youse even arguing about.? kids these day’s.

          • I’m not arguing about anything. It’s called having a disagreement there kiddo.

          • AlexK489

            WW2 doesn’t strike me as the type of game where there’s be tons of score streaks, weapons and weapon attachments to make a Pick 10 work unless they play with the time period and do the “alternate WWWhatever” bs Battlebore 1 did but i’d love to hear how you think that could possibly work in any capacity outside of wishful thinking.

          • burrgee

            He finished the argument 26 mins ago and you’re still going.

          • I mean, I’m sure there is a lot to explore in WW2 and able to make some scorestreaks. Its not like its WW1 or anything. However, I’m not a game dev or anything and I’m pretty sure Sledgehammer is making this WW2 game with the today’s standard of a Call of Duty game.

          • AlexK489

            But what i don’t see, again, and this can be directed at Brady as well, is how do you do something new with a franchise when you literally strip the game of everything that allows for even the potential of new ideas to make sense? Aside from a “prettier” game with better graphics, we’ve literally seen everything that WW2 has to offer in terms of gameplay mechanics and technology, so unless Sledgehammer is playing with the time period and doing the alternate time bs, there literally is nothing new that can come of a current gen WW2 game, unless CoD’s turning into a different game altogether this year and will be a real time strategy game instead…
            Wait that’s been done too….

          • I’m not really focused on innovation because that’s a little buzz word thats meant nothing especially coming from Activision. However, it seems to me you want something never done before, which I get. That’s cool. But I’m more or less talking about how this game is going to live up to the today’s standard of Call of Duty and how well they execute it.

            I’m perfectly happy with this because it’s Call of Duty. Truly Call of Duty. It’s something I wanted. I’m pretty excited for it. So the only thing I can really say to you is maybe let’s wait and see because I’m pretty curious like you.

          • POWERSBOOTHE77

            I’m glad your butthurt, ppl like you are the reason COD turned into a ADHD kid’s game with bullshit toy cars and wall running

        • BradyAlucard

          WWII with current gen graphics? Sign me up, I don’t care what the technology of that era was, it’s going to be fresh and exciting. EA (DICE) made World War I work, and that could have been a potato of a game. Going back to go forward? Now that’s interesting!

      • AlexK489

        And to be fair they’ve done like…4 futuristic games;
        BO2, BO3, AW and IW.
        (Before anyone comments about Ghosts that shit was modern as hell compared to the rest of these).

        • BO2 – Futuristic
          Ghosts- can be argued, but the game is set in 2026. If anything it’s more of a broken down futuristic game. Thats what I can say I about it .
          AW – futuristic
          BO3 – Futuristic
          IW – Futuristic

          So youre looking at about 5. Where there is only 4 WW2 games in the main series.

          • BradyAlucard

            Aren’t spinoffs canon and therefore “main series”?

          • I don’t know if The Big Red One is part of the main series or not.

      • POWERSBOOTHE77

        like saying i’m fed up with christmas on dec 31st… now let’s never have christmas again!

    • Lachlan Hunt

      fuck up you infinite warfare loving faggot

  • imBATMAN

    Call of Duty: WWII with advanced movement.

  • Cold Zombie

    I wasn’t going to do SHIT tonight but after seeing this, I got myself a 5th of Rum and playing Battlefield 1 to celebrate.
    This is such happy/great news and Sledgehammer made a fun game with unique weapons/great story. I can’t wait to see it in a older setting. PRESS F TO PAY RESPECTS and PRESS F FOR BOOTS ON THE GROUND!!

    • Keshav Bhat

      Have a great night!

    • James Kingly

      Are you Scottish.? 🙂

  • Gato con Botas

    If this is true…
    SHG>Treyarch>>>IW

    • ccrows

      lol no.

      Especially if SHG brings back SBMM then:

      Treyarch>>Raven>IW>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>SHG

      .
      .

      Besides, have you forgotten that AW is one of the most hated games in the entire series?

      Whatever, I’m willing to give SH a chance, just as long as they give “Connection Based Match Making” a chance…

  • Aidan
  • Mitch

    I hope I’m wrong, but I don’t believe it for the following 3 reasons:
    1. The name is about as unoriginal as it gets.
    2. The same person said IW would have a Loyalty System for people who played and
    prestiged in Ghosts, AW and BO3, said there’s something called Friday Night Fights, said Quarry (MW2) and Fallen (MW3) would return and said Assault, Support and Specialist Streaks would return.
    3. It seems quite early for these kinda quality leaks to come. I know some people theorize that this CoD might be revealed earlier because IW was a disaster, I was one of those people, but with Destiny 2 recently being leaked that’s obviously being announced very soon and I doubt Activision is gonna reveal 2 games of that size extremely close to each other. I also doubt stuff like this would leak like a month in advance.

    Also, a lot of people are saying this person also leaked the Infinite Warfare posters which turned out to be true, but this person has never provided proof he was also behind that. The real Infinite Warfare posters were leaked by Reddit user /u/infinitewarfareleaks, this leak comes from Reddit user /u/rTwGNaywaoaLh. /u/rTwGNaywaoaLh has never provided proof he’s also behind /u/infinitewarfareleaks, just claimed it.

    • chris ugx

      its not really too early for this type of thing to be leaked, its practically April and last year the name “infinite warfare” was leaked in may. right now its actually the perfect time that leaks would be starting to surface

  • Mr. EverGreen

    Cant Wait

  • Exo-X Hood

    Why call it WW2 when ww1 wasn’t your game ?

    • Aidan

      …what?

      • GinsuVictim
        • Aidan

          Jokes are supposed to be funny

          • GinsuVictim

            I never said it was funny, but he found it funny, posted it as a joke, therefore, it’s a joke.

          • BradyAlucard

            Are you saying jokes are supposed to be funny? Did you just assume my humor?

            In all seriousness, humor is subjective. What’s not funny to you may be funny to someone else, like @GinsuVictim.

          • Aidan

            I agree with you there. That joke didn’t make much sense at first, but now I actually understand. Personally, I don’t think it’s all that funny, but if someone else does, good for them.

    • The Classic Gamer

      Probably to base it of battles of the second world war but the name could have been better.

  • brayden

    i can not wait for this and when it comes out for PC oh the graphics will be insane im so hyped

    • BradyAlucard

      Not to downplay consoles because I can’t wait to see an amazing-looking WWII game this generation period.

    • RdJokr

      Have you been playing COD on PC at all? PC graphics usually don’t go beyond what consoles can do, only slightly better.

      And I wouldn’t be so quick to jump on PC if I were you. Need I remind you of SHG’s support for AW on PC? Or rather, the sheer lack of it?

  • Batman

    Best.News.EVER

    Should have called it just “call of duty”, so its like a reboot

    • BradyAlucard

      Oooooh that would have been pretty cool. Not needed but maybe all of the games would be part of the same timeline? Nah I don’t think people would agree with that but it’s just a thought.

  • Tolgun

    Hmmm, I have a 50/50 feelinf for this leak. At some point I believe it. But at the other hand I dont. We will just have to wait I guess.

    About the leak it self. Yeah.. a WW2 game. I WISH. Since I played call of duty series on the PS2. But a nam’ cod would be good aswell.. but still hoping for a ww2 genre.

    • Batman

      Call of Duty: Return to Glory

  • DEMOLITION12

    the wwII isn’t even centered lol

  • Disclaimer: THIS IS ALL IMO, PLEASE DON’T TAKE IT AS “THIS WILL HAPPEN” BUT MORE LIKE “I BELIEVE THIS COULD HAPPEN”

    I believe one thing; They’ll fuck it up.
    I’m sorry, but after years of stating advanced movement was a bad thing, I don’t believe that’s strictly true any more. They added it because Call of Duty was getting too “samey”, much to the same reason why the move from WW to modern times happened.
    Change may not straight away be a good thing, but once perfected, it can be a good thing. I don’t think going back to the past THIS YEAR will produce a good game, far from it. Yes, everyone’s been asking for COD to “remove advanced movement”, some stretching it to “go back to the past”, but I truly believe it takes many cod games to perfect it’s particular setting. Look at advanced warfare and look at black ops 2. Advanced Warfare is quite possibly the most hated COD game of all time because of the sudden addition of a new game mechanic which didn’t work right. Black Ops 2 had the sudden change to a future setting, not many would have said they liked that idea at the time it was revealed.

    Now, I could just post this comment here and be done, it’s already practically a book at this point, but I want to give my opinion too. Those which love, hate, or don’t care about Infinite Warfare, I invite you to read on…

    Now, while a lot of you would melt and be “triggered” if I even thought about saying Infinite Warfare isn’t such a bad game, but I’m going to say it anyway. Infinite Warfare isn’t such a bad game.
    As I said before, settings take time to perfect – it’s a jump from an Earth setting to a Space setting which people have a problem with most, while others are still hooked up on the idea of advanced movement. However, while Infinite Warfare may have jumped into a new setting, be that space, in my opinion it has perfected the advanced movement. Think about it, I can’t say I’ve heard anyone complain in a large amount about it in Infinite Warfare. Yes, there are and always be those few that do and always will complain about something no matter the perfection achieved, but I can’t say I have heard anywhere near as much as I did for Black Ops 3, not to mention Advanced Warfare and the spam of hate about that particular topic.
    I just think if Infinite Warfare had stuck to Earth, about 99% of all complaints wouldn’t be there, and at most we’d dismiss it as another “advanced movement” game. The timing of a new setting on top of an already hated mechanic in game was poor on Infinity Ward’s part.

    Oh, and PS; I want a future setting. Not because of the advanced movement, no – all I really want is the slide movement really – but because of the interesting settings and environments and interesting weapons and enemies you can make in such a game. World War has been done to death imo.

    Let me know what you think (and don’t comment like “FUCK YOU I THINK YOU’RE WRONG” or “YOU’RE A TWAT FOR THINKING THIS”, just give me your opinion without all the hate because I’m genuinely interested. Less of the arguments as well, I really don’t care for keyboard warriors trying to “troll” or annoy people, I just want to know what you guys think. Feel free to add anything to my comment as well and tell me if you disagree with me.

    • Wow, just realised how long that comment was XD.
      For TL;DR people, I think cod this year won’t be as good as it could be if this post is correct. For more opinions and points to back my opinions up, read it all. Don’t comment blindly.

    • >I believe one thing; They’ll fuck it up.

      Well, it depends. No one knows for sure really. I’m personally excited.

      >I’m sorry, but after years of stating advanced movement was a bad thing, I don’t believe that’s strictly true any more. They added it because Call of Duty was getting too “samey”, much to the same reason why the move from WW to modern times happened.

      I disagree. Advanced movement is bad for Call of Duty as it simply doesn’t fit the Call of Duty style. It’s too random and way too fast paced. Which generally, Call of Duty is already a fast paced game. It doesn’t need to be more fast and random. I’m perfectly fine with Call of Duty being the same and sticking to what Call of Duty does.

      >Change may not straight away be a good thing, but once perfected, it can be a good thing. I don’t think going back to the past THIS YEAR will produce a good game, far from it.

      And change isnt necessarily always going to be good no matter how many times they try this advanced movement. It was a miss three times in a row, most didn’t like it including myself. And Call of Duty going back to the past doesn’t mean its going to be bad at all.

      >but I truly believe it takes many cod games to perfect it’s particular setting.

      The setting itself is not the problem is doing the same setting over and over. It happened when CoD first started and now it’s happened again with the futuristic setting. I’m sorry, I strongly disagree here. They SHOULDN’T do the same setting over and over. That hurts it more than anything.

      > I’m going to say it anyway. Infinite Warfare isn’t such a bad game.

      It’s not a bad game. By itself, its an alright game. But it’s a mediocre Call of Duty game.

      >but because of the interesting settings and environments and interesting weapons and enemies you can make in such a game. World War has been done to death imo.

      Futuristic settings has been done to death just like World War. The difference is, we haven’t seen a World War 2 game from Call of Duty since 2008. And if this year they did another futuristic game yet again, it would have been anything but refreshing. Just done to death.

      • Agreed, no one knows for sure, but I’m 99% sure these “leaks” are fake, simply because of the jagged and unprofessional flaws graphically with the art.
        I agree Advanced Movement doesn’t fit in with Call of Duty, but neither does rigs or score streak combustibility or voting for maps if you look at it from COD 4 or World at War’s point of view. Call of Duty has changed since then, admittedly not all for the better, the 2 words “supply drops” proves that, but some of it has been for the better. Not going to indulge, because everyone has their own opinions and you’ve already read mine.
        As for doing the same setting over and over, yes it does hurt Call of Duty, which is perhaps what worked so well with the early Modern Warfare titles; the constant switch between modern and history settings; Treyarch did history, Infinity Ward did Modern, providing a change every year. And imo the advanced movement was perfected in infinite Warfare as much as it could have been, adding it into the next game would be a mistake in terms of the backlash, adding it into the next game and trying to perfect perfection would be a mistake in terms of gameplay. If they don’t add it, I feel the gameplay could slow down a large amount, potentially to the point where many multiplayer players will get bored and / or simply not play, and I hate to say it, but they won’t buy supply drops or DLC which is – in the end – what Activision want and they will listen if that doesn’t happen. anyway, we’ll have to wait and see.
        Infinite Warfare is probably my favourite cod released since MW3 (not better than, of course, MW3 was the best cod ever made imo). But, this is coming from someone who thinks Ghosts was an OK game so I guess my opinion is questionable as it stands anyway.
        TL;DR –
        All I’m saying is, maybe they shouldn’t stick to just one game setting for all 3 devs, maybe they should alternate like they used to around cod’s high point. Treyarch doing futuristic, Infinity Ward doing modern and Sledgehammer doing historical (god I hope so on that modern one)

        • >Agreed, no one knows for sure, but I’m 99% sure these “leaks” are fake, simply because of the jagged and unprofessional flaws graphically with the art.

          This leak here is probably the most legit one. I’m under the opinion this is one is real, but until something is officially announced, it’s up in the air.

          > I agree Advanced Movement doesn’t fit in with Call of Duty, but neither does rigs or score streak combustibility or voting for maps if you look at it from COD 4 or World at War’s point of view. Call of Duty has changed since then, admittedly not all for the better, the 2 words “supply drops” proves that, but some of it has been for the better.

          Rigs do not belong in Call of Duty either and I think voting for maps also belong in CoD. Its been there since Black Ops lol. But I agree, Call of Duty has changed a lot since Call of Duty 4 and World at War and every one of those games up until Advanced Warfare, most of the changes were good, made sense to gameplay, etc. Supply Drops aren’t necessarily bad it’s just bad the way it’s set up. (Examples: AW, BO3, and maybe IW)

          As long as SHGames, Treyarch, Infinity Ward just duplicate the system from MWR, I can’t see why supply drops would ever be a problem again.

          >As for doing the same setting over and over, yes it does hurt Call of Duty, which is perhaps what worked so well with the early Modern Warfare titles; the constant switch between modern and history settings; Treyarch did history, Infinity Ward did Modern, providing a change every year

          I definitely agree here. If all developers just did a different setting, each Call of Duty would feel fresh each year. If we saw nothing but WW2 games these three years, it would get boring. Just like we saw with these last three games.

          >If they don’t add it, I feel the gameplay could slow down a large amount, potentially to the point where many multiplayer players will get bored and / or simply not play, and I hate to say it, but they won’t buy supply drops or DLC which is – in the end – what Activision want and they will listen if that doesn’t happen. anyway, we’ll have to wait and see.

          There is plenty of ways to make gameplay fast. BO2, MW3 and even to an extent Ghosts was fast paced. The problem with AW, BO3, and IW is gameplay is too fast and random. It simply doesn’t work in Call of Duty style maps.

          In all honesty I think players who are fans of advanced movement over exaggerate how slow Call of Duty is with BOTG. Its really not that slow. Call of Duty has always been a fast paced type of shooter. I dont think this game will suffer if this leak is true.

          >Infinite Warfare is probably my favourite cod released since MW3 (not better than, of course, MW3 was the best cod ever made imo). But, this is coming from someone who thinks Ghosts was an OK game so I guess my opinion is questionable as it stands anyway.

          I’ll probably go with MW3 being the best game out of all three. I don’t think Infinite Warfare is necessarily a bad game at all, just like with Ghosts, I think it’s pretty mediocre. But I do enjoy Infinite Warfare to an extent.

        • Batman

          Lmao watch you get roasted when they reveal it.
          The leak is real, charlie intel is having a talk with atvi as we speak, they are already hyping the game, creating a hashtag and gathering information about fan reception, they updated their bio and profile pic and said that they talked to atvi.
          Charlie Intel doesnt even report rumors unless its 99% acxurate

    • Nick Ramirez

      Nobody talks about the movement cuz nobody plays IW except for lil squeakers and try hard you tubers going for nukes theres no balance the spawns seem broken and the rigs are more reliable than the score streaks and i didn’t even mention the supply drop system yet zombies isn’t on par with treyarchs zombies and the campaign is ok overall though a pretty shitty cod to say the least

      • Agreed, the campaign isn’t what it should have been, but if you buy an FPS game to play campaign then there’s something wrong with you. And imo they killed Zombies after BO2, but not including BO2 because the DLC zombies for that game was top notch.Can I just say, I have no problem with supply drops until the point where they add weapons into them, then I have beef. MWR did it correct, until they added guns. I’ve done a lot better on Infinite Warfare’s Multiplayer than any other game, it just reminds me of the battle pace MW3 had in it’s multiplayer which imo is the best multiplayer. I agree with you on the rigs though, there’s only 2 worth my time and that’s the armour and dimension jump ones, the others are a waste of HDD space. As for the spawning, I haven’t experienced spawn killing myself, but I have took part in it so I completely understand what you’re saying; I shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near the opposition’s spawn, and that terrible side-based TDM game mode is no solution either.

    • Batman

      Except BO2 wasnt futuristic dumbass, it still had real life equipment, weapons, streaks, attachments.
      Mw3 was set in 2020 as well.
      It was just mw3 with an orange futuristic paint

  • MultiplayerCop
    • Aidan

    • GinsuVictim

      That’s not even close to the same.

  • Thank you for featuring our material on your site! Much appreciated!

    • jordanxbrookes

      You should tell us more info when you get it 😉

    • joesta

      I hope you guys credited the reddit poster that dug this up

      • No need to since they got the details from us by privately messaging us. We are the original leakers.

        • Element115Will

          Explain how you got this then?

          • Dont need to. That is in the video. Also, The email came to me weeks ago (check the date in the video. We made the video and sat on it. We dont leak things but we had consulted some media outlets that helped us come to a decision to post the video. A friend posted my video to reddit (i dont use reddit, not until yesterday anyways) and a moderator from reddit contacted me. I sent them the material I had and that is how it got on Reddit.

          • Element115Will

            Damn. Nice. Very well thought out and planned. Bravo.

  • AcePhoenix007

    I honestly would’ve liked another Vietnam or Cold War-based game like Black Ops. Treyarch nailed it with the campaign and multiplayer with that one. Sledgehammer could have one-upped them on that imo.

  • LichaelTheShift

    Will it have supply drops tho

    • djml9

      Definitely

      • LichaelTheShift

        Doesn’t really matter if it’s old school or not then eh

  • djml9

    Wouldve prefered vietnam since it had more modern weapons. Not a big fan of WW2. I’ll have to wait and see the gameplay.

    • They said they’d never do a Vietnam game again back in 2014

  • The Classic Gamer

    By looking at the pictures the game might take place during operation overlord aka d day I hope it does and I hope we get to play as 2nd battalion rangers or 29th infantry can’t say 101st because they were not on the beaches.

  • jordanxbrookes

    This actually put a smile on my face. It’s simple, to the point and smart of Activision from a marketing and business standpoint. There’s still plenty of work to be done, but I’m remaining optimistic.

  • I don’t mind the setting or the lack of hover jumps and wall running. I just hope the game isn’t slow paced like MWR i.e. losing momentum when jumping, taking 4 years to climb objects, and aiming/moving while ADS like a turtle.

    I just want a very fast paced game with quick ADS times, fast movement, and infinite sprint. Then I’ll be happy, even without the exo suits/advanced movement.

  • DJSaviD

    This looks incredibly fake. “WWII”? Yeah even CoD wouldn’t have a name that generic.

  • Battlefield

    COD WWII WITH SUPPLY DROPS

    • The Classic Gamer

      More like field supplies drop out of a plane.

  • RdJokr

    I’m not a fan of this, tbh. I know a lot of people are begging for WW2, but considering the state of COD in the past few years, it should not revisit WW2 at all, unless they want to keep things serious. And dabbing Nazis carrying MP40s with bright neon camos is exactly why it will kill the serious tone of WW2 before it even begins.

    That said, I don’t plan to buy this game in the first place anyway, since Sledgehammer’s PC support for AW was straight up ass. I might if they show some proper support (starting with including PC in the beta test for one), but there’s still the point I mentioned above. Plus the co-op mode (which is inevitably going to be Zombies). It’s gotta be fun to play, otherwise it’s a no-go for me.

    • I think SHGames will have the sense to not have Nazi soldiers dabbing with weed camos. We haven’t seen anything crazy in MWR yet so.

      • RdJokr

        I’m hoping for that as well. If they can keep the bullshit emotes out and do what Raven is doing with the customization, I think we might have a winner. Keep the weapon inspection, keep the Weapon Kits, maybe combine it with BO3 attachment variants, and we can have a healthy supply drop system for once.

        • Yeah if they just take the supply drop system from MWR, I’ll be more than happy with this game. To be honest, i kinda chuckled when I typed “Nazi solider dabbing with weed camos” but yeah I wouldn’t be too happy if they do that. But i would hope they understand to keep this game serious and to the theme.

  • colorfulbirds

    If there was a dislike button, I would be smashing it right now…

  • Gabriel Adrian Nava Guzman

    The only franchise that can make World War II is Battlefield

  • Gabriel Adrian Nava Guzman

    The only franchise that can make World War II awesome is BattleField

    • Thatlazykid

      Cod could make an awesome ww2 campaign tbh. However I could see why you would think that especially if they make an Operation gamemode map to re-imagine the beach invasion of Normandy. Damn that would be glorious if battelfield does it.

    • Huhhhh? This has to be a joke or you’ve never played a WW2 FPS ever.

  • Dante Fuller

    Judging from the cover art, it may take us back on fighting nazis because the art resembles somewhat the landings of D-Day on June 6, 1944 were the US push the Nazi forces off of France and onto Germany. There may also be a chance that Nazi Zombies would come back. Whatever it is, as long as it takes place during the second world war it’s fine by me.

    • SHGames version of Nazi Zombies with their own story would be pretty interesting.

    • Thatlazykid

      Was hoping Treyarch would make a ww2 cod, not sledgehammer. Oh well, i personally wanted Sledgehammer to do a cod taking place during vietnam or possibly recent (Iraq War) but lets see what happens.

      • Maybe Treyarch is doing Vietnam

        • RdJokr

          Mhhhh, a game about the Vietnam War made by my favorite COD dev… It’s satisfying just thinking about it.

    • DEMOLITION12

      or maybe the fact that activision is largely jewish?…

  • Rebeccamconnors

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours & have longer with friends and family! !dt50c:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !dt50c:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs340WebNextGetPaid$97/Hour ★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫::::::!dt50c:….,…..

  • Sprint

    What if it’s an alternate universe and the nazis win?…. Like you’re just playing the first 2 missions and its towards the end of ww2 and BAM! plot twist Hitler wins, the nazis bomb the U.S. and the remaining soldiers have to get the country back….

  • Caleb Geysbeek

    If this is the case I might actually get a COD game this year 🙂

  • Wizga

    I got all excited then I remembered that there’s Activi$ion. They’re going to ruin the next title too with microtransactions. Oh they will find a way, they always do.

  • Roscoe

    And knowing the CoD community….

    they’ll hate it.

    • yeah, if it’s shit.

      • GinsuVictim

        No, even if it’s great, a large portion will call it shit and troll these boards daily saying so.

        • we

          give me some examples of great COD games that had a large portion calling it shit?

          • ccrows

            In Ginsu’s case, that would be Ghosts.

            However EVERY COD (post MW2) has had lots of trolls criticizing each game at launch, just for the sake of trolling and hating on “COD”…

          • But Ghosts isn’t great.

        • ccrows

          Sadly that is so true…

        • No, only if it’s shit. Ghosts, AW, and IW weren’t good CoD games, sorry my dude

          • Mario Rivera

            but BO3 was good?! LOL, no. AW was ambitious, fresh (relative to COD) and took all kinds of shit from people who didn’t enjoy its frantic pace of play (I loved it). It allowed talented players to spread their wings and fly. BO3 was a watered-down compromise with as many skill gap-compressing measures as it had “netcode” issues, which it had PLENTY of. I understand why certain players preferred it, but most of them are probably spending tonight playing HCTDM, lying flat on their titties, waiting for someone to run by so they can pop ’em with their damn NV4.

          • Black Ops 3 was indeed a solid game. Its easily the better out of all the games.

            While AW, IW are turds.

          • Fraser // Turmoil

            sXe What you aren’t getting is Infinity Ward spent 2 and a half years on the campaign and only 6 MONTHS on the multiplayer, and the thing is, multiplayer is actually decent.

          • Do you have any facts to back up your statement there or that something you just made up to say “hey mp is decent here is a made up statement to support that”

          • Fraser // Turmoil

            Watch the OpTic podcast episode with Scump, Crimsix and Karma. Scump mentions it partway through the video.

          • Does Scump work for Infinity Ward? These don’t sound like devs from Infinity Ward as I never heard of these guys.

          • Fraser // Turmoil

            Not Scump but former pro player Rambo Ray nV works for SHG, so he gets behind-the-scenes information. I’m pretty sure IW even said it in a livestream once as well. Stop being a jackass too, doesn’t work for you pal.

          • How is that being a jackass you fucking retard? I was asking a legit question. I legitimately never heard of these people you brought up.

            I highly doubt Infinity Ward spent six months on MP. I HIGHLY doubt that and you need more actual hard evidence to prove your statement.

          • Fraser // Turmoil

            How’s it being a jackass? Because you’re being a sarcastic tard over something I’ve just proven. Even Parasite, and other pro COD players have tweeted about being pissed. They’re still trying to finish the game like 5 months after launch lmao. They need to either sort their shit out or not make another COD game again. 6 months on the most important part of their game is abysmal from a dev.

          • >How’s it being a jackass? Because you’re being a sarcastic tard over something I’ve just proven.

            Except that wasn’t sarcasm or even me implying sarcasm you fucking idiot. Maybe you should probably learn what a question is or what an interaction is. You brought up three people I legit never heard of and say they know that IW MP took 6 months. So my first reaction is “who are these guys and do they work for Infinity Ward?”

            If anyone is a jackass, it’s you.

            >Even Parasite, and other pro COD players have tweeted about being pissed. They’re still trying to finish the game like 5 months after launch lmao.

            I REALLY don’t care what esports pro is pissed or not pissed.

            >They need to either sort their shit out or not make another COD game again. 6 months on the most important part of their game is abysmal from a dev.

            If this is true, then that’s even more embarrassing from Infinity Ward and further validates my opinion on the game being subpar.

          • Mario Rivera

            what’s your playstyle?

          • Run and gun just like always

          • Mario Rivera

            Then how could you hate AW?! You could boost sideways, change directions in the air and accelerate your descent (unlike BO3 and IW, where you float back to earth like Mary Damn Poppins with her umbrella). You could run with your gun barrel raised, which is HUGE. Eliminating or dulling these abilities was every bit a measure to compress the skill gap that those absurd specialist weapons were (AW only had exo abilities, not weapons).

          • AW felt more random than Black Ops 3 did. Thats the problem I had with it, and I wasn’t a fan of the maps either in AW, even though I did like some of them. Weapon variety was poor in that game as everyone mostly used the BAl and ASM1. But that’s a common complaint.

            Overall both AW and IW are unnecessarily fast paced and random where as I always that BO3 had a middle ground. Not only that I just like the style of BO3 as well.

          • Mario Rivera

            unnecessarily fast-paced? what do you mean?

            random? yeah, that’s impossible to deny. the spawns were absurd. there was little possibility for team strategy. it was essentially a mad shooting gallery.

            i just happened to enjoy it. also, i never played the earlier CODS. was a BO1 casual, got hooked BO2 (which i discovered during ghost’s cycle. then AW.

          • Meaning the game is too fast for my liking that’s what I mean by unnecessarily fast paced.

            I don’t necessarily hate AW either, I did put a lot of time into it, and I do think it’s a decent game on its own. SHGames did a solid job with what they had, but when I compare to other CoDs, I do think it’s pretty mediocre.

            I did enjoy AW for what it was and I accepted it, and I do think SHGames is going to pull off something great this year. I always thought they were talented devs.

          • Batman

            Lmao BO3 is the second worst cod ever, only losing to IW, exact same shit as BO2 but with F2P P2W models, dabs, colorful gay shit, watered down streaks, no map interaction, and every single map had the same shitty 3 lane symmetrical layout, all the maps were the same, added specialist power rangers super powers that are worse than deathstreaks.
            Treyarch fanboys are too blind to see or admit that 3arc fucked up.

            BO3 Sucks

            Players were demanding true innovation, and only SHG had the balls to do it.

            New engine, map design, movement, grenades, exo abilities, create a class system, weapon variants, melee animation, exo grapple mechanic, mapstreaks and interactivity
            They completely changed everything, and now they will do it again

          • >Lmao BO3 is the second worst cod ever, only losing to IW, exact same shit as BO2 but with F2P P2W models, dabs, colorful gay shit, watered down streaks, no map interaction, and every single map had the same shitty 3 lane symmetrical layout, all the maps were the same, added specialist power rangers super powers that are worse than deathstreaks.

            Except Black Ops 3 isn’t the worst Call of Duty ever. The taunts were stupid, but they didn’t affect my opinion on the game. I mean it’s futuristic so, doesn’t matter to me. Funny you bring up that point yet AW has plenty of stupid crap there, so hilarious right there.

            Supply Drop system is probably the worst thing ever along with AW, but as far as the maps go, I loved the base maps in BO3. DLC, not so much.

            >Treyarch fanboys are too blind to see or admit that 3arc fucked up.

            Except they really arent. Treyarch makes great games, BO3 was no exception. Granted I dont think it’s their best title,but I enjoyed BO3.

            >BO3 Sucks
            No it doesn’t

            >Players were demanding true innovation, and only SHG had the balls to do it.

            AW was different, but far from innovation. Sorry.

            >New engine, map design, movement, grenades, exo abilities, create a class system, weapon variants, melee animation, exo grapple mechanic, mapstreaks and interactivity
            They completely changed everything, and now they will do it again

            Pretty sure the engine is a modified IW engine. Map design was garbage, movement made gameplay too random and fast paced. Ooo melee animation huh? A super man punch? Wow innovation huh.

            Ghosts also had mapstreaks before AW LOL.

            Thats also not to say I completely think AW is bad. I do think AW is pretty fun at the time, and I like SHGames. I have the full confidence in them making something great this year but as far as AW goes,

            BO3>AW

          • tuby

            Totally agree. I only play bo 3 and mwr at the moment

          • Source Reserve

            Finally a competent comment out of you.

            BO3 was an easy to learn, easy to play, skill gap compressing, colorful, childish (look at my dab, I’m so cool now) P2W game. Maps were so easy to learn because of the 3 lane system they always seem to use nowadays. Feels like this game was designed for handicapped children. I can’t even call it a military shooter.

            AW/IW are shit.

          • Batman

            AW was freaking awesome, a breath of fresh air with amazing post launch support, the majority of the community liked it until the BO3 beta, then the hate started

          • Pretty sure the hate didn’t start at the BO3 beta, it was before it.

            AW is an alright game by itself, but it’s a mediocre Call of Duty game. Like IW, like Ghosts.

  • Vibez ス

    fuck no
    nonononono

  • Burgerplayer .o30

    please we need omaha beach if it’s going to be ww2

  • I’ve forgotten.. again!

    Won’t this be something completely different.. With it not being world at war 2.

  • Faith In Super Fusion

    How will kill streaks be in play and also will it have vehicles to access like the old COD little things like these can change the game big time

    • Why ask that as if anyone here knew?

  • Gojiro

    Do Anzio and the fight through Italy. Lots of troops from India and Pakistan fought there. It would be pretty cool to fight in a Gurkha unit. Or show the Chindits in Burma.

    Of course you could do a riff on the film director Sam Fuller who was in the actual Big Red One. (He made the film with Mark Hamill in early 1980’s Called The Big Red One.) He got paid $10K for a story he wrote then told everyone in the squad that the man who came up with the most debauched way to spend it would win the money. That would be a cool side quest, maybe even multiplayer?

  • MurkN101

    Charlie Intel usually don’t post rumors since their basically Activision puppets. I’m guessing Activision leaked this on purpose to hype up the next game after realizing only 10 people bought the $15 MWR Variety pack.

    • They do, it’s just that Activison sees this and has asked multiple times before to delete it. This is likely either a fake or as you said, a purposeful leak.

      • Batman

        Its made on purpose, CI would never post it, change their profile pic and bio on twitter, start a hashtag, hype it up, and gather feedback from polls if they were not 100% sure.
        They confirmed to be in touch with ATVI

        • You can never be 100% sure, remember COD Stronghold?

  • EMRE

    RAMBO BABA A MATIE: KOM NIET MET BLA BLA HOOF IN HA ZARA

    • ccrows

      Huh?…

  • Polys

    I won’t be buying any COD game this year , i bought both IW and MwR and i hated both of them , the new game doesn’t feel challenging and the old one isn’t a remastered as they added new shit to it and it’s far less satisfying to play than the original one , also has less features … i’m moving on to new games that are actually worth my money and time … but i will say this , this year cod will get so hyped and advertised , and midway through it’s life cycle they will add some shit in supply drops altering the game so much that people will abandon it again … just like they did with MwR and IW this year … dead games …

  • Kyle Emery

    They are doing this because the community are complaining about the future of call of duty, like Infinite Warfare for an example, they failed badly on there game? Battlefield 1 Started all this off because BF1 was a Sucess, now Cod are trying to do it! Welcome back boots on the Ground we missed you dearly..

    • GinsuVictim

      This has been in development for three years.

  • Mikey9835

    Firstly I have no issues whatsoever with the setting, it’s finally going back to it’s roots.
    But a couple things: 1. What kinda uninspired title is that? I bet a lot of people will think it’s a WAW sequel. Couldnt they think of a better title like ” The People’s War ” or something? 2. How will killstreaks work? WAW only had 3 streaks that fit the theme, there are no attack helicopters or Drones in WW2 so what are they going to do? Chickens strapped with C4? One of the things that sets CoD apart is the killstreaks, otherwise we would all play Battlefield.

    • Kyle Emery

      They’ll probably do what battlefield did or have ground based scorestreaks like ghosts had lol

    • .Monkey

      They’ll think of something.

    • ccrows

      There will be plenty of ways to come up with say 10+ killstreaks.

      AKA a Kamikaze high end SS kinda like the Swarm, or an Atomic Bomb as the nuke. Let your imagination run wild my friend… 🙂

    • The9tailedgamer

      They could do streaks like jug or body armor, stuff like that

      • Mario Rivera

        bingo. if they split things up by country (or axis vs alies) i happen to know a certain streak that the japanese made famous (in conjunction with whatsoever battleship or carrier they crashed into).

        speaking of which, how badass would a map that takes place on the ocean? or a mission mode that entails one side capturing a beach or island. streaks on the invading side would be easy enough (think of the london map streak in AW).

        • The9tailedgamer

          Yes, that would be great

    • Fraser // Turmoil

      “What kinda uninspired title is that? I bet a lot of people will think it’s a WAW sequel”
      Most of the Call of Duty titles have been really plain and straight to the point though. It’s better than the names we’ve been given since 2007 until now.

      Modern Warfare
      World at War
      Modern Warfare 2
      Black Ops
      Modern Warfare 3
      Black Ops 2
      Ghosts
      Advanced Warfare
      Black Ops 3
      Infinite Warfare

      See a pattern here?

    • Batman

      3 kills = recon plane
      4 kills = counter recon plane
      5 kills = airstrike
      6 kills = mortar strike
      7 kills = dogs
      8 kills = advanced recon plane(AKA blackbird/VSAT/HATR)
      9 kills = Juggernaut with flamethrower
      10 kills = Juggernaut with MG-42
      11 kills = Controllable gunner in a plane(kinda like chopper gunner, but on a plane)
      .
      .
      .
      25 kills = Nuke?

      Maybe add a care package to the list, but these are just some of the possibilities

      • Batman

        + specialist strike package poinstreaks from MW3
        + ballistic vests maybe?
        Possibilities are endless

      • Mario Rivera

        recon plane in ww2? pretty sure that would mean dudes in a plane looking down with binoculars.

  • Alex

    If this is real then I welcome it. I have played cod like I used to in 3 years.

  • Khaled Hassan

    OK fine but plz no more zombies as the 3rd mode and no sbmm

    • ccrows

      “and no sbmm”

      I’m awarding you a billion internet points for that… 🙂

      • Khaled Hassan

        What about zombies do you want more of that?

        • ccrows

          I haven’t really touched zombies since WAW. I could care less either way TBH.

          Part of me wishes that they would ditch zombies because it’s less to bloat DL and store on the HD, but I get that a lot of people love it and it helps to keep keep the population active… *shrugs*

    • Fraser // Turmoil

      Considering we’re going back to WW2 and you’re saying even if it’s Nazi Zombies, you wouldn’t want it? I’m going to faint.

    • Batman

      I can 100% confirm zombies will be in cod 2017

      A SHG developer had in his bio “bringing zombies, gore and grit in the next Call of Duty”
      He changed the bio last month

      • Khaled Hassan

        That’s disappointing

  • OMGits RainbowDoggy09

    Even if the game is going to be set in ww2 and its boots on the ground they will kill the game with supply drops

  • Issam Nasiri

    If the players now complain about a futuristic game then I don’t know it anymore.
    -______________________________________________________________-

    • ccrows

      There will still be that crowd, but if they cry for futuristic AND jetpacks I’ll lose it.

      BO2 (IMO) is a good example of futuristic with boots…

  • Павел Карпун

    I guess it will be again “as US Army won in WWII” and nothing about Red Army which actually won the war.

    • ccrows

      The majority of the COD community doesn’t care about what happens in the campaign.

      However, let’s look at the 2 biggest markets that buy COD. North America and the UK. You do the math… 😉

      • Павел Карпун

        Well, I see. Nobody cares about what happened in historical reality, everybody cares about money.

        • ccrows

          Welcome to Activision’s world. May I take your coat sir?… lol

  • Zyro

    I’m so hyped

  • The Classic Gamer

    I hope they add a tank mission like the original cod 1,2,3,5,aka waw

  • PoonjabMcDaddy

    This is awesome and I’m sure it’ll be fun to play at first but it’s a shame that they’re still going to kill the game with Supply Drops. Ethically I cannot give in and support it, Activision will never get another dollar from me, so I most likely won’t even experience this game. Looking forward to see some gameplay though!

  • Looks boring in my opinion. Modern or a BOTG futuristic game like BO2 would be more entertaining to me.

    • ccrows

      What if they make it a WWII shooter with the “pace” of BO2?…

      • I mean if it played like BO2 it would be weird but i’d play it.

        • ccrows

          Look at it like this. It’s already gonna play differently than say WAW, because I guarantee that they will keep the Specialist character system.

          Let that sink in for a second… 😉

          • If they keep that system i probably won’t buy it. Will likely just preorder it for the beta codes than refund it ASAP.

          • jordanxbrookes

            I highly doubt we’ll see Specialists in this game. If anything, we’ll probably see soldier pick-ups like in BF1, but I have a hunch Specialists aren’t happening this year in the way that we know it.

        • I can probably bank on sliding being in the game (i meam why wouldn’t it be) and unlimited sprint (either as a basic gameplay feature by default or as a perk again).

          I can definitely see perks like Quick draw and Stalker coming back (unless they want to keep it as attachments which i dunno how that would work)

          • Those i’m okay with but god no more specalist abilities and all these stupid superpower crap

          • Yeah, I agree. I really do not want to see specalist crap come back.

          • Batman

            Specialists are worse than deathstreaks

            Hope we get pro perks back

  • tuby

    Cross my fingers for a even better version of cod waw

    • ccrows

      If no SBMM, and weapons being balanced (no OP MP40), it will be…

      • tuby

        I also dont like sbmm like aw. I have u used the MP40 a lot back in the days it was a god gun. I also liked the rifles and the stg44 or how it called. But the mp was fun to play in general

  • Ed

    I personally dont like ww1 and ww2 era games anymore, but i can see why theyd Go there with the community how it is. I just dont see where it can go. I tried bf1 when its price dropped to 30 or 40 bucks and still immediately regretted the purchase.
    If this rumor turns out to be true, ill probably skip it. But ill wait and see for something official and some actual gameplay before i totally dismiss it.

    • ccrows

      Titanfall 2 sounds perfect for you then…

      • Ed

        Tf2 is ok. I dont prefer advanced movement stuff, tho.
        Ww2 was just beaten to death when i was younger. A lot moreso than the futuristic stuff has over the last few years.

        • ccrows

          “Ww2 was just beaten to death when i was younger.”

          ^ & I get that, but when was the last good WWII FPS made?

          The FPS market is saturated with futuristic stuff ATM, and even though you and I have played WWII to death, (for me) it’s gonna feel new again. Plus there will be “some game” that will fit your needs by this time next year, and if no then BO3/IW TDM is still always an option… 🙂

          • Ed

            Oh im not going into this bitter or upset about it. And definitely not worried about finding games to play. If the gameplay shows it can be something new and the movement isnt advanced movement, but also not slow and clunky, sort of along the lines of IW ttdm without the wallrunning, then i might give it a shot.
            The only ww2 game i have played recently was something in the sniper elite series. It was decent, although a bit slower paced than i usually play.

  • Whoa, you’re telling me I’m finally going to be able to buy and play a new CoD title?
    Fuck yeah

  • Le Forgeron

    Just finished to clean the logo : http://muusedesign.deviantart.com/art/Call-of-Duty-WWII-Leaked-Cleaned-Logo-HD-670941615
    You can use it free 😉

  • ccrows

    I call this a long time ago. (pretty much at the end of AW’s cycle) That SH’s game was gonna be WWII, due to Condrey pretty much gushing about his love for WWII and that it’s been a long time since we’ve had a WWII game.

    I know the YT comments kept thinking it was gonna be Cold/War Vietnam, but that’s probably gonna be Treyarch’s next game will be (and IMO they’ll do that era better anyway), and then Modern Warfare after that…

  • ccrows

    It’s definitely time to go back.

    WWII-Modern is what put COD on the map.

    FFS if the community starts crying for jetpacks (after 2+ years of crying for boots) I’m gonna pull my hair out!… <_<

  • Le Forgeron
  • TheWahGamer

    I hope this is real.

  • sander riska

    lol some of the photos are form saving private ryan

  • TheWahGamer

    Call of Duty, Call of Duty 2, Call of Duty 3, and World at War are some of the best in the series. World at War is arguably the best Call of Duty game ever. And am I the only one who likes United Offensive, Finest Hour, and 2 Big Red One?

    • ccrows

      WAW was flawed with the MP40 being OP. It may not have been a burst weapon, but it literally was Treyarch’s M16,

      With that said, I believe that there will be better weapon balance since COD tournaments weren’t really a thing back with WAW…

      • World at War is still one of the best in the series.

        • ccrows

          IDK, during its peak it really was MP40 of Duty. Plus for a while the under the map breaches really got out of hand…

  • i guess that one guy on the last thread was right after all, leaks are starting to emerge

  • Tolgun

    In my mind I accepted that the next cod will be ww2 now. I am going to be so mad or pissed of when they announce something different. Aaaand, I think many many people will agree with me..

  • Angry Tree Man

    I know I’m in the minority but I have no interest in boots on the ground COD with old guns.

    • ccrows

      I feel ya on that, but (IMO) if you keep the pace of the game like BO2, I honestly believe this could work out just fine.

      I get that WWII FPS should be more like the pace of WAW, but I think that slow pace would fail this soon coming off of advanced movement.

      Finally, NO SBMM, or it won’t matter which pace you use… <_<

    • Call_Of_Minions

      I agree with you. It’s going backwards. We’re the minority because we don’t whine as much.

  • Etahn

    Call of duty world at war took place in world War 2

    • GinsuVictim

      And?

  • Endless Marine

    I’m down for WW 2 but wouldn’t be surprised if the setting is still futuristic, continuing the setting of AW, but someone drops an EMP and Exos don’t work anymore.

  • If this is truly what we’re getting, I’m on board with it. Although, what I was hoping they’d do, it’s a whole lot better than futuristic. I just hope they can cover Operation: Market Garden and the Battle for Iwo Jima. Also, I hope they can remaster some more of the old COD games (Call of Duty, COD: United Offensive, COD: Finest Hour, Call of Duty 2, 2: Big Red One, Call of Duty 3, Call of Duty World at War, or World at War Final Fronts). Although, I was hoping for a Korean War game since that has never been done by anyone yet, this works too.

  • ccrows

    For anyone that’s still not convinced, let’s not forget that Michael Condrey said (at the end of AW) that he hopes to work on a WWII shooter, PLUS his Twitter Bio currently says:

    “Game Maker. Boots on the Ground.”

    https://twitter.com/michaelcondrey

    ^ Take that, plus Activision’s recent comments that they want to return to traditional combat, (IMO) it all adds up to being a boots on ground WWII shooter…

    • Hopefully, they’ll be smart about it and NOT put in Supply drops.

      • Aidan

        If implemented correctly, supply drops could really work. I think MWR nailed it, and if supply drops return, I’d like to see SHG use the same exact system.

        • We didn’t care what cool features the Supply Drops system had in Modern Warfare Remastered. IT SHOULD NOT HAVE been there. Especially weapons that weren’t in the original. That was the downfall of that game. If they want to put something that’s just cosmetic, sure I wouldn’t like it as much but at least it’s not a weapon that never belonged in the game from the get go.

          • Aidan

            I couldn’t care less, to be quite honest. I sitll enjoy the game. It doesn’t ruin anything for me.

          • And that is why COD sucks now.

          • Aidan

            No, Call of Duty doesn’t suck. It’s playable, it’s fun, and it’s quick. That’s what every Call of Duty game sets out to be, and it delivers every single year. what sucks is the community. Everyone is so overly critical and whiny, it’s no wonder the game gets shit on so much, even by the people who play it.

          • Respectfully, I disagree. The only reason, people are complaining is because COD Isn’t really COD anymore. It’s more like another game all together. Hence, one of the reasons people keep joking about it being the next “Titanfall.” They also can’t seem to take a hint especially if their launch trailer becomes the most DISLIKED video on YouTube that maybe Infinite Warfare wasn’t such a good idea. The reason IW sucks was because it was already done by other games. Plus, you can’t call it a “boots-on-the-ground” game when boost jumping still exists. Call of Duty used to mean something, it used to be a tribute to those who served in ACTUAL conflicts such as WWII, Cold War, Vietnam War, etc. Hell, Battlefield 1 made more money than Infinite Warfare did. Why? Because they actually covered a war that was a REAL conflict and has rarely been featured in a good game. I would’ve rather wanted them to make a game that depicts ALL FRONTS for WWI, Korean War (Which is becoming more and more forgotten these days), or a game that would act as a prequel for either the Black Ops trilogy or the Modern Warfare Trilogy focusing on how each character first met. For instance, Makarov and Yuri both served in the First Chechen War (1994-1996), Price met Kamarov in the 1982 Lebanon War (1982-1985), Lt. Jean-Guy Robiechauld, Maj. Stan Jackowicz, and the four zombies characters fought in WWI (1914-1918), and lastly, Frank Woods, Alex Mason, and Jason Hudson all met each other during the Korean War (1950-1953) and seeing as NO ONE has yet made a game depicting the Korean War, what better way than to have them cover it? You saw how successful Battlefield 1 was albeit it ha d a few weapons that should not have been there seeing as they were prototypes and many of them didn’t actually see combat during that war. Not to mention, Infinite Warfare had plenty of inaccuracies such as Nick Reyes being both a Commander and a Captain – which is impossible since both are two DIFFERENT ranks.

          • The only reason we still have this futuristic nonsense is mainly because most people,whom might I add shouldn’t even be playing this game because of their age, end up tainting the minds of others while the old-school guys like us who have played the games all the way back in 2003 despise it. Then there’s of course Zombies mode which personally, I feel only Treyarch should do it seeing as they started it and much better at making zombies than others, has now been pumped into every game now. No creativity whatsoever. The only mode that was somewhat original was Extinction, which I thought was refreshing seeing as it wasn’t zombies, but now they don’t even have that anymore. Besides, if you get so far into the future where there’s space travel *coughs* (Star Wars) it’s as far as you could go.

          • Think of the franchise as being a wax candle. Each time a good game comes out, the wax doesn’t melt off as fast, but when a bad game comes out (Examples: Ghosts and Infinite Warfare), the wick melts off more wax. If and when this franchise’s light eventually burns out, I want it to end on a good note instead of a bad one.

          • Aidan

            I don’t see what’s so bad about Ghosts. IW is alright. It’s not perfect, but it’s a ton of fun. In my opinion, the only “bad” Call of Duty game is BO3.

          • The only problem I had with Black Ops III was that there are now TOO MANY supply drop weapons (40+) and I haven’t been able to get them.

          • Aidan

            I hated pretty much all of it. The campaign was stupid, Multiplayer was dull and rage-inducing (more so than any other CoD game), I thought Zombies was overrated. The only redeemable quality were the maps, and even then I only really liked a few of them (Hunted, Berserk, Citadel & Outlaw).

      • ccrows

        I’d love to not have supply drops just like everyone else, but sadly supply drops are here to stay. Activision made 3.6 billion of in-game content from 2016.

        What we can realistically hope for is that they keep the Salvage system, and hopefully no variants. AKA just make it like MWR’s SD system…

        • That game was better when they just added the 6 missing maps. After that, the game has gone downhill for me. Weapons that weren’t in the original, a supply drop system put in a game that was made 10 years ago that never had it, and all the stupid stuff that came with it. If they want their crummy system to stay, put in new games ONLY not a game that gets remastered.

          • ccrows

            The supply drops started actually when they added the remaining 6 maps (although mostly cosmetic – sans melee).

            However I completely agree with everything else. It’s MW-Remastered not MW-Reimagined.

            With that said though, it’s still the best SD system that we’ve seen up to this point (salvage/no variants) and since it’s never going to leave, I hope that MWR’s SD system stays or gets even friendlier with in game challenges to get DLC weapons… 🙂

    • jordanxbrookes

      And his bio in April of 2016 said “Call of Duty MW3, AW, & ####” with #### likely WWII.

  • August

    They are gonna have eco supply drops. HEY GUYS PAY TO WIN AM I RITE?!!

  • Gamerazor247

    Lol, just WWII? Really?? Okay, I guess…

  • TreyarchPLZWW2

    hopefully it will be in WW2 pleas treyarch go back in time again!!! pleas! we hate that jumping and all kind of that future things!

    • GinsuVictim

      Who’s we? I enjoy boots on the ground and advanced movement.

      • The we is the majority of the community that said “dont like advanced movement”.

    • ccrows

      F&F – Your username:

      ^ SH will be doing WWII, not Trey.

      2nd – I guarantee that Trey will do boots as well, since they are already working on their next game, and Activision (currently) wants to go back to boots. My guess,Trey will do Cold War/Vietnam, (and unless the community does a complete U-turn on boots), then IW will do a Modern Warfare setting…

  • דוד וסילייב

    PRO TIP: Don”t add exosutis

    • ccrows

      or SBMM…

  • Orion

    This is fake because the real creator of world at war is Treyarch and sledge Hamer they cant do a world at war 2 sorry for my English I dont speak english

    • GinsuVictim

      This isn’t World at War II.

      • ccrows

        Beat me to it… lol

  • Kyle Soule

    I honestly hope this is true

    • ccrows

      It will be.

      BTW, long time no see. Hope all is well… 🙂

      • Kyle Soule

        Yeah Ive been good thanks for asking 🙂 I just haven’t been going on here cause the hype for cod died for me for a while but with this news I got that back

  • I can live with WWII. Anything earlier would be terrible.

  • Khalil Vennie

    That is a shit title for a Call of Duty… Wow. That’d be like if Medal of Honor 2010 just called itself Medal of Honor: Iraq.

    • Why Iraq? Plot takes place in Afghanistan

  • Yousef Haj zein

    I don’t think the name is world war 2 I think it’s world at war 2 and god do I hope it’s true

    • ccrows

      Look at it from SH POV. Would you rather start your own series, or ride the coat tails of somebody else?

      Who knows what the official name is going to be, but if I was SH I’d rather start my own series…

  • CallofAdvancement

    This is a step backwards. So stupid.
    Why don’t you guys just dust up your SEGA’s if you want to go back to WW II???

    • Former

      I can’t take this comment seriously with that ridiculous username. Lemme guess…AW was your favorite CoD?

      • CallofAdvancement

        Guilty ?

    • Fraser // Turmoil

      “This is a step backwards. So stupid.”
      I’m going to laugh so hard when they sell more copies in the first 24 hours over every other COD if this leak is real.

  • YoungMurf

    This would be awesome if true! Just hope they wouldn’t fuck it up with supply drops and such.

    Who am I kidding, of course they will.

  • Diego Diniz

    Why not CIVIL WAR???
    Like “The Last of Us” style
    Nail bombs, Molotovs, Dirty Jeans and shirts, Baseball Bats, Old Shotguns…

    • Aidan

      There’s a certain kind of charm about this comment that I can’t help but laugh at

  • I Don’t Read Replies

    It’s been upload for 2 days and has not been taken down. It’s fake.

  • Ptrain727

    Could be a controlled leak to create hype before the announcement.

  • Ty_2_Fly#TheGod$avage

    If this shit’s real, I’m bout to sell BF1 right now

  • nathan carter

    Its a fake guys. I heard it was called “chemical warfare”

    • Duke of hazard

      The chemical warfare one is fake.

  • Katlynmhammers

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours & have longer with friends and family! !dq4c:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !dq49c:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs339HomeClickGetPaid$97/Hour ★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫::::::!dq49c:….,….

  • Could easily be faked but it looks pretty genuine and usually someone would’ve ousted a fake by now.

    I really, REALLY hope this is real

  • Josh Mosse

    When was IW first teased last year?

  • Fraser // Turmoil

    I’m so happy to see a COD title going back to it’s roots. WOOOOOOO SO EXCITED.

  • V

    Anyone who says “omg please no”, you are the cancer of this community. Stay on infinite warfare or bo3, dont even bother buying this one. Fucking little exo suit jumping faggots

    • Ed

      Its attitudes like yours that is the cancer of this community, actually.

  • Cadence

    MP-40 available only in supply drops!

  • Vanilla_Gorilla

    We all know it’ll be teeming with supply drops…????????‍♂️

  • Jacob

    If there are going to be three steel book variants, I feel that it would be cool if each had one of the three allies, those being the British, the Americans, and the Soviets, plus the steel book with the game’s cover art. Idk, just me.

    • GinsuVictim

      If these are even real, they would be mock-ups for choices of steelbooks, not three variants being released.

  • They’ve definitely piqued my interest if this is true, but WW2 seems so… been-there-done-that. I like that Call of Duty is returning to the setting it started out with, but a full fledged Vietnam game would be a lot more fresh, in my opinion.

  • Ty Craaybeek

    Yay! We get to climb up the Berlin Wall that doesn’t yet exist because call of duty is way ahead of it’s time.

  • tarheels_forever

    i hope its Vietnam, not WW2. Vietnam = better guns.

  • tarheels_forever

    please please please be Vietnam. WW2 was played out a long time ago.

  • BradyAlucard

    I’d even take a Wolfenstein-esque game, as in the alternate history route. Anything as long as it’s boots on the ground.

  • Drank Bleach

    The trailer is gonna look good but I’m pretty much done with cod, I’ve lost hope already in Activision and they’re greedy micro transaction ways.

    • Aidan

      You could just ignore the micro-transactions entirely, and it won’t make any difference. Seriously, there’s no point in whining about it anymore. It’s been 3 years, and nothing’s changing. Either suck it up and ignore it, or find something else to complain about. It’s tiresome.

      • Drank Bleach

        I suspected there was still dumb fucks like you who are willing to give money to a company who shells out an incomplete game…

        • Aidan

          I completely ignore the supply drop system. Why do you think I brought that up in the first place?

  • Loverofcod2_2bigredone_and3

    Please tell me what boots on the ground means. I’m only interested because I was and still am a huge fan of the first cod games, the modern warfare series was okely dokely but after that it’s shit.

  • Angelarfranks

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours & have longer with friends and family! !dg36c:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !dg36c:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs326DigitalOfficeGetPaid$97/Hour ★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫::::::!dg36c:….,……

  • Hitman

    Cant wait to get Hitler’s mustache in supply drops

  • Fábio C. Gomes

    I hope that it dont to be a trash as cod4 remaster.

    • ccrows

      Up to this point, MWR is still good.

      Just as long as they never add in the COD Online attachments, it’s a good game…

  • Can we get Operation Market Garden and Iwo Jima this time please? *crosses fingers*

  • JoyFear

    I don’t really like World War CoD’s that much, but my only concerns are…..Will the campaign have the same beautiful graphics that AW had, and will the game have the sliding feature since Ghosts?

  • GhostT

    we have waited 9 years for world war 2 setting and now i think we should all shut up and for once let the game makers make the game because none of us know how to make a game all we know how to do is play it so play it or not its up to u if u do so now just let them make the god dam game and play it if u want to

  • Source Reserve

    Kinda hoping for a modern-day CoD but whatever. Guess I’m not buying this year’s CoD.

    • GinsuVictim

      That would pretty much be the MW series, just with less tech. Things haven’t changed that much.

  • Marc Grierson

    Mannnnnnnnnn I hate WW games 🙁 boring as hell. Might actually be the first COD I skip in years if it doesn’t pull something extraordinary out of the bag.

    • Berkay Mert

      Bro Don’t be sad. This will be better than Infınıte Futuristic garbage. Give a chance WW2

      • Marc Grierson

        Yeah it probably will be to be fair – tried to get into Infinite multiplayer and it was absolutely terrible. The campaign was great though. Hopefully this one entices me but I like the Modern Warfare stuff! 🙂

  • Eddie Tupy

    guaranteed no matter what they sell, people will find something to whine about. As for me ill buy it and play it because i love cod and i have money to spend.end of story. As long as they have good bots and pc settings i will buy for sure.

    • Former

      That’s kinda true for anything in life. People look for mistakes – it’s human nature. Just gotta deal with it.

  • Diego Diniz
    • awlagfare

      me neither

  • Diego Diniz

    What we want:
    – Fast Paced
    – Good Maps
    – Good ScoreStreaks
    – Vibrant Colorful Maps
    – Good Guns
    – Hit Detection + NO LAG

    The rest is perfumery…

    • TheSkrillexKill

      Colorful maps are what you want, if you ask the community most would say that they want a gritty look for WW2 (because that’s how WW2 was).

  • Yami Bakura

    Yeah and you’ll be able to buy new ss taunts and gestures with cod points. Also some swastika accessories from the QuarterMaster.

  • Jonniewhudson

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours & have longer with friends and family! !dg167c:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !dg167c:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs457NetworkStuffGetPaid$97/Hour ★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫::::::!dg167c:….,…..

  • Mick

    It’s been confirmed! Holy shit this is awesome!!

  • WORLD AT WAR IS THE BEST CALL OF DUTY GAME EVER

  • Anthony Pintabona

    Xbox needs to get the marketing deal back. Looking back, Sci-Fi and Playstation anime days will be forever considered the dark days of COD.

    Don’ fuck this up Activision, the real fans want WW2 and Xbox.

    • Ptrain727

      Lmao marketing has nothing to do with what setting is in the game. With that logic Xbox started the “dark days” with Ghosts and AW.

  • Cesar

    I wonder which War this game will take place because COD World at War took place in WWII….so is this one going to take place in WWI? Or gulf war?

  • Sentinel

    This is no surprise after the feedback they got back when IW was officially annouced lol I was hoping for a Modern era but I take WW2 too. Interesting to see back in the days in a more improved PS4 Pro with a much better COD engine!

  • Gabriel Al-numairi

    Sounds fun but how long is it gonna last the hype. Gonna be like BO3.

  • EDX

    I hope there’s no bs like Supply Drops, had enough of their Micro DLC bs and unfinished game (IW)

  • Ethan Fredrick

    I think it could be really cool, and it’s something that us fans have been wanting forever. But you know damn well that Activistion will make the game have supply drops, so that is something to watch out for.

  • gfhyn540

    <-From the day I started my online business, I earned 62 dollars every 15 minutes. I know it sound absolutely incredible,but you just cannot lose the possibility.Check Out What I Do…………………….. http://savesnowden.ch/jobhub11

  • Jack Donovan

    Im ready to buy supply drops…

  • ApolloSlayys

    oh great i cant wait for the people who hate exo suits because they cant adapt to advanced movement and those same people are gonna be the ones who camp on a head glitch with a fucking bouncing betty behind them at the door. Good Idea. Also maybe in this game they are gonna make the fucking terminator tanks tha twere in waw

  • thar

    let me guess playing as mericans vs big bad germany AGAIN?UGGGGGGGGGGGH FUCKING BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORING jeezus fuck just make the game from the axis point of view you cowardly shits i can even count how many fucking ww2 games i played in past were its always the same bullshit story

  • Daniel Lewis

    It kinda bothers me because I feel like treyarch should of made this as a sequel to world at war, but now that sledgehammer is doing it we may never seen a cod waw2..