GameInformer has posted a video showcasing gameplay of a new Call of Duty: WWII MP Map: Gibraltar, which will be available to play during the beta.

GameInformer says that the player in their gameplay video is a Call of Duty pro player, who now works for Sledgehammer Games. GameInformer states Activision will not let them reveal the identity of this pro player as of now.

SHARE
  • JeronimoPW

    The hitmarket sound is so much bo2

  • Anyone getting vibes from that Advanced Warfare map that was called Recovery (i think)?

  • the killstreaks look powerful and great, the guns look great, everything sounds great. This game has a really good chance to be one of the best CoD games in series since BO2.

    It still feels great that Call of Duty is Call of Duty again.

    • DEMOLITION12

      it could have been good, but they had to force the pc garbage

      • Thepsychoseries.

        You dumb retard. That stuff doesn’t affect the gameplay or anything at all. It doesn’t matter. You can choose to be female or male, white or black. Your comment could have been good, but you had to act like the other hundreds of idiots on the poop tube comment section.

        • DEMOLITION12

          that gameplay literally has women screaming in it. be quiet

        • Peewy 978

          They better not have Nigger Soldiers or im not buying!

        • BradyAlucard

          “That stuff doesn’t affect the gameplay or anything at all”

          Are you being serious? Nice excuse BTW.

      • Aymanizic

        Do the world a favour and don’t ever reproduce.

      • In a sense of the immersion and believability in this game, it’s ruined. And I can already tell that World at War is the better game.

        In a sense of gameplay, it looks really fun to play. Everything about it looks great and looks fun. It’s really what a Call of Duty game should look and play like.

        • Thepsychoseries.

          So then why is it not better than waw. I’m confused. Swastikas don’t make a game better.

          • Peewy 978

            Got that right

          • Didn’t say anything about swastikas. My point is that WaW did a Better job at being a believable game than WWII. Adding women to the game or putting them in a German out fit already takes away from the game being “believable” for me. I don’t think WWII is going to top WaW simply because of what I said and plus it being a classic anyway

          • Peewy 978

            How did they do a better job when u never played ww2 to judge u dumbass!

          • I’m just going to block because you are literally nothing but a waste of space that can’t offer any intelligent insight and you also fill my inbox with unintelligent rambling so it’s obvious you desperately need attention.

            Btw nice profile pic, I’ll be sure to report ya while I’m at it.

          • Peewy 978

            Snitchass thats s pic of u Dick Riding

          • Michael Romo

            Didn’t everyone already establish the fact that women and blacks were in WW2? How would that ruin the immersion?

          • >Didn’t everyone already establish the fact that women and blacks were in WW2?

            Please show me a black female Nazi. Please. I’m also certain women didn’t serve on the front lines on the American side either. The way it’s being presented in MP is not historically accurate.

            >How would that ruin the immersion?

            Because. Black. Female. Nazis. Didn’t. Happen.

            Did you want the come back for more? Because I thought you said you were done arguing with me

          • Michael Romo

            Oh so THAT’S where you got confused. They’re not trying to make MULTIPLAYER historically accurate, just the campaign. And I don’t think we’ll be playing as Nazis anyways.

            Here’s one link for the “black women” query you had: http://www.pacificwarmuseum.org/your-visit/african-americans-in-wwii/

          • >Oh so THAT’S where you got confused. They’re not trying to make MULTIPLAYER

            I didn’t get confused about anything. In every Call of Duty game campaign and MP have always been based off of each other. That’s not saying I’m not understanding their decision or where they are going with the MP in this game I get their customization idea. I just don’t think the game is going to be immersive. That was my point. Like seriously dude, do I have to spell everything out for you to get my already easy to understand comments?

            >Here’s one link for the “black women” query you had:

            The problem with that link is that it didn’t show anything about a Black German female in a German outfit with a gun in her hand in combat. You clearly don’t know how to read. I said it’s “not being presented accurately” of course there were women and black people in the war. And let me spell it out for your slow self like I always have to, it’s. Not. Being. Presented. Accurately.

          • Michael Romo

            It’s not a great idea to think that every element of MP has to align with the Campaign and setting of the story as well. This isn’t a WW2 simulator, it’s just a fictitious video game that happens to be based off of real events. And like I said: I highly even doubt that we’ll be playing as actual Nazis. So you don’t have to worry about Black Female Nazis because the Nazi part has been taken out for the most part. We’re not even getting swatstikas in the game. If you’re looking for a “believable” multiplayer experience, WW2 is not for you.

            And like I said: multiplayer is the one place where change and creativity is welcome. Otherwise WW2’s DLC season would be boring

          • >It’s not a great idea to think that every element of MP has to align with the Campaign and setting of the story as well.

            I didn’t say that idiot. I said they always been BASED off each other.

            >This isn’t a WW2 simulator, it’s just a fictitious video game that happens to be based off of real events.

            You act like I don’t understand that. I’m not asking for a realistic game by any stretch of the means. I would just prefer they got the simple things correct. It’s fine that they don’t. I’m more than fine with MP the way it is. Like seriously I thought I made this clear numerous times.

            >And like I said: I highly even doubt that we’ll be playing as actual Nazis. So you don’t have to worry about Black Female Nazis because the Nazi part has been taken out for the most part.

            I swear to fucking God dude, and you wonder why you get insulted. Please point to me a black female or a female in a German or American outfit with a gun in her hand in combat. That’s my fucking point.

            >If you’re looking for a “believable” multiplayer experience, WW2 is not for you.

            I swear, DO YOU EVEN KNOW HOW TO FUCKING READ? Holy fucking hell. Are you honestly that fucking dumb, dude? I have said numerous times that I am FINE with this game. I AM HAPPY WITH IT. I AM EXCITED WITH IT. IS IT ANY MORE CLEAR FOR YOU? IS IT THROUGH YOUR THICK SKULL? All I said is that this game is not going to immerse me like WaW and which I stated it’s not a big deal because i am still overly excited for this game. Holy fucking hell. God damn.

            >And like I said: multiplayer is the one place where change and creativity is welcome. Otherwise WW2’s DLC season would be boring

            Subjective.

          • Michael Romo

            Holy hell where’d that little outburst come from? I’m just conversing. And I can’t seem to tell if you’re understanding your own words as they are being presented. I already understand that you’re happy with WW2 the way it is. I even understand that you think a black female Nazi is fictitious (which it is). Lemme break it down a little more so what I say is as simple as day:

            You did say that MP has always been based off of Campaign. That’s correct; I’m not fighting that point. But why do you think that MP would be an immersive WW2 experience when you have a system that determines your support based on how many kills you get? CoD has always had some historical inaccuracies. Last time I checked, BO1 MP had a few flaws like the fact that you had an M16 in 1961. (Side note: The M16 wasn’t even in service until 1967. Also, the ACOG sight was in BO1 multiplayer even though it wasn’t made until the 2000’s) WaW had you toting around a PTRS, a 37 pound gun, on the battlefield. No fuckin way is that actually possible: it’s an anti-tank weapon. You could set off bouncing betties by just passing by them. Little did you know (or maybe you already did) that bouncing betties in WW2 had to be STEPPED ON to trigger the explosive. Did that make the experience any less immersive? Not at all, unless you’re a history nut. The point is, you should just forget about the immersiveness of the MP because there’s no way it’s not going to have a few major flaws. I guarantee that bouncing betties, if put into the game, will have the same problem as they did in WaW

          • >Holy hell where’d that little outburst come from? I’m just conversing.

            Because the fact I have to make myself for clear for and baby you makes me outburst. It doesn’t help when you tell me shit I AM ALREADY AWARE OF or you twisting my damn words.

            >your own words as they are being presented. I already understand that you’re happy with WW2 the way it is. I even understand that you think a black female Nazi is fictitious (which it is). Lemme break it down a little more so what I say is as simple as day:

            If you already understood I was excited with the game you wouldn’t say shit like “this game isn’t for you” or “this isn’t a WW2 simulator” that tells me right there you didn’t understand that.

            >You did say that MP has always been based off of Campaign. That’s correct; I’m not fighting that point. But why do you think that MP would be an immersive WW2 experience when you have a system that determines your support based on how many kills you get? CoD has always had some historical inaccuracies

            Again, idiot, I never said Call of Duty was 100% correct or 100% historically accurate. But I would prefer they get the simple things right to make the game more believable.

            Your Black Ops 1 example is dumb considering the game has always been well known to be completely fictional. They have way more creative freedom with that game

            >The point is, you should just forget about the immersiveness of the MP

            It’s almost like that’s what I have been saying in each comment regarding this subject. And you still wonder why you get insulted. Honestly dude, you have some nerve. You blow my mind.

          • Michael Romo

            You honestly do fascinate me. I’m trying to be civil, and yet I still get insulted? Smh whatever.

            I’m only telling you this because this was your initial comment: “Didn’t say anything about swastikas. My point is that WaW did a Better job at being a believable world war 2 game than WWII. Adding women to the game or putting them in a German out fit already takes away from the game being “believable” for me. I don’t think WWII is going to top WaW simply because of what I said and plus it being a classic anyway.” I was trying to point out that your statement in WaW doing a better job at being believable WW2 game is false. I already pointed out two big mistakes that WaW made. Is it the fact that you just don’t like seeing women or blacks in war? I’m not trying to judge. But if seeing a woman or a black person in WW2 multiplayer honestly “takes away from the game being ‘believable'”, you have a complete misunderstanding of what’s believable in WW2.

            I’m just trying to correct you so you don’t view this aspect of the game the wrong way. I’m trying to help you appreciate it a little more.

          • >You honestly do fascinate me. I’m trying to be civil, and yet I still get insulted? Smh whatever.

            Because you do nothing but insult my intelligence and tell me things I’m already aware of and then even proceed to get my words twisted?

            >in WaW doing a better job at being believable WW2 game is false.

            Except its not. It’s not 100% correct but it sure as hell did a better job than WWII so far.

            > already pointed out two big mistakes that WaW made. Is it the fact that you just don’t like seeing women or blacks in war?I

            You’re comparing equipment and guns to people in the war. The things you mentioned were still used in the War. Is it used in the game like it as in real life? No, and that’s for gameplay reasons so I can turn a blind eye. The way a bouncing betty is used in WaW isn’t immersion breaking like adding a black female German solider. If you can’t see how these two are vastly different, there is no hope for you.

            >But if seeing a woman or a black person in WW2 multiplayer honestly “takes away from the game being ‘believable'”, you have a complete misunderstanding of what’s believable in WW2.

            Pretty sure that’s not the case. Anyone with a basic knowledge of World War 2 can see a major flaw in the game with American and German female soldiers in combat as odd and totally off putting. The way a bouncing betty works? Pretty sure mostly everyone isn’t going to be able to tell how a bouncing betty works. But I’m fine with it being there because it was actually used and in the war and I can understand the change of it for gameplay purposes. Adding different options for genders and race in a WWII game does nothing for gameplay. All it does is add customization. And let me state again, I have ZERO problem with the customization options in WWII. Zero. I’m fine with it and I’m fine with SHGames stance on it. All I said is that it takes away from the immersion. Nothing more, nothing less.

            >I’m just trying to correct you so you don’t view this aspect of the game the wrong way. I’m trying to help you appreciate it a little more.

            I don’t need you to tell me anything or how I should feel. You’re comparing Apples to oranges. And I’m not viewing the game in the wrong way. I accept the game for what it is, and I’m excited for it. And I appreciate everything SHGames has done so far. For doing a WWII game in 2017, for going back to BOTG. I am already appreciative for this game and I can tell I’m going to enjoy it.

            You did nothing but try to correct me (which as I stated you compared apples to oranges. You didnt do shit) that’s your only concern. You aren’t out for my best interest in this game.

          • Michael Romo

            I’m not being hostile or calling you an idiot or even IMPLYING that you’re an idiot at all. I just don’t want to see anyone disappointed even slightly because of some minor detail.

            So I’ll do this: I will give you a couple reasons why WaW is less accurate than WW2, based on “basic knowledge”.

            1.) First of all, Marines being held prisoner on Makin Atoll. This is completely falsified. “Carlson’s Raiders” didn’t land on Makin to free POW’s. The attack on Makin was nothing more than a diversionary attack for the Marines to assault Guadalcanal, later that day.

            2.) Recoil. There are so many guns that deserved so much more recoil… The game only played smoothly because of the lowered recoil.

            3.) The MGs. These didn’t even slow you down as much as they should’ve. Like the PTRS, they weighed too much for a typical Marine to be lugging around.

            4.) The use of dogs. Yes, dogs were used in WW2, but only to detect bombs. They weren’t deployed in battalions to maul the enemies.

            These are all significant details that honestly have more impact on immersion than what color or gender you are playing as. WW2 hopefully did these right.

            Oh, and Americans and German soldiers in combat is real.

          • >’m not being hostile or calling you an idiot or even IMPLYING that you’re an idiot at all. I just don’t want to see anyone disappointed even slightly because of some minor detail.

            And I told you numerous times I am NOT disappointed by anything and I’m fine with the game as it is. Like I said, you aren’t replying to me for my best interest in this game. You are literally only replying for a sake of argument. Because if you weren’t, you understand that I’m not disappointed by any stretch. I just said WWII isnt going immerse me like WaW. This is why youre stupid.

            Even then, you still attempt to try to correct me despite me saying that I am fully aware of WaW being not being 100% accurate or any game for that matter.

            You know you’re failing this argument when you have to bring in recoil, MGs, and Dogs. Things that are obviously not 100% accurate and is obviously altered for gameplay. You are talking realistic use here.

            You are literally comparing equipment and what which was literally used in the war, it’s just not be used realistically in the game and you’re comparing to people that weren’t even in the war. Do you see how wrong are you are? Or are you just that retarded and close minded that you are everything black and white like that?

            >These are all significant details that honestly have more impact on immersion than what color or gender you are playing as. WW2 hopefully did these right.

            Actually they don’t and I already explained this. And let me give you an example because I know youre retarded and I have to repeat things for you 1000 times.

            My sister does not play Call of Duty. But she had a basic knowledge of World War 2. I showed her this game last week and I said point to what’s wrong with this game, she said “pretty sure there weren’t women in combat in World War 2”

            Now imagine if I sat my sister down and asked her the same question about how the bouncing betty is used or the recoil and I asked her what’s wrong with them?

            She probably isn’t going to be able to tell me.

            Like honestly dude. I’ll say it again. You’re comparing Apples to oranges here. Your argument is retarded. The fact you think the way equipment is used in this game is more immersive breaking than women in combat in this game just shows how retarded you are. And it’s ironic when you sit there and say “hurr sure this isn’t a WW2 simulator”

            >Oh, and Americans and German soldiers in combat is real.

            That was a typo and I went and edited. I meant American and German females in combat did not happen. Not surprising you jumped on that considering you’re clutching for straws here.

          • BradyAlucard

            It’s sad that the WWII game I wanted isn’t even believable enough to be considered a WWII game. Doesn’t mean it won’t be a fun game, though.

          • BradyAlucard

            They weren’t on the American side and they were a vast minority. It’s unrealistic because we all know many people will choose the black females just because they can.

          • BradyAlucard

            They make a WWII game better IMO.

        • Peewy 978

          It looks like MwR reskinned u idiot! How dumb and Gullable are you? They haven’t used a new game engine since way back in the day! SMH

          • I’m honestly baffled by your stupidity that I don’t even know what to say. Who said anything about an engine? Lol

          • Cod Fishing

            He’s talking gameplay wise idiot sXrGreatness cares about gameplay and the fact he’s not playing a cod with flying robots

          • Chocobooo!

            Oh you’re wrong.. sXe do play BO3 and IW a lot.

          • I played every CoD a lot since I started playing.

        • Elite Predator

          I think this game, the graphics, the guns, the animations already killed World At War. People talk about the older cods (and I’ve played them all) as if they can’t get out bested. I’m glad you cleared yourself out. But tbh, it doesn’t take away from the immersion for me. That’s the way how you feel. My views on it changed.

          • The graphics being better than a game in 2008 is a given. Doesn’t mean anything.

            >We have customization. If you can be a female then let a player be a female. Who cares dude. That’s how you gotta look at it and the immersion will be right there.

            Never said I did care or that WWII is a bad game. It’s just not going to have a good immersion factor. The minute you get a common thing wrong in a historical game either being the guns, the people, the locations, you already killed the immersion. It doesn’t take away from WWII being a good game. Because I’m sure its going to be, I just don’t think it’s going to be a Better World War 2 game than World at War.

            And what do mean live and let live? That’s exactly what I’m doing. What

          • i always play as a female in anyone online game lol idk why. Sad they removed the nazis though doubt anyone would’ve been offended

          • Elite Predator

            Dude, too realistic historically and less people will buy it. Because that would start with them removing Respawn and auto health Regen. I don’t see anybody bitching how a person can walk right away from a grenade blast but you see gore when a frag gets one and an enemy’s leg gets blown off so let’s just play and have fun !!!
            That was where your conclusion was is that you don’t doubt it’s going to be a good cod with fun in it? How can it be fun when the war was scary?? That right there is historically in accurate. I just can’t judge a game based on it’s past advancements. It’s just a game it’s WW II I don’t see why this affects people. I’m just grateful we are looking at a great game perhaps and if you want historical inaccuracy, go play the Campaign instead of bitching out here like everybody else. You don’t regenerate health. Once you’re shot you need a medic and that brings us closer to what the war was like. This game already killed World At War and you don’t even see it. It’s Multiplayer..

          • Peewy 978

            Again just your opinion but it means nothing

          • BradyAlucard

            Are you implying that putting black female Nazis in a WWII game without a single swastika in sight is immersive? Oh well, at least the graphics are immersive enough.

          • Elite Predator

            Yeah, dude I’m bummed I was looking forward in hope that they would work on the fronts and the areas where players will get to witness who fought here and why is this battle so important while experiencing Russian language and all the other frontiers. I’m Arabic so I’m very cultural and love to learn other cultures and I begin to admire where this country is and the language it’s folks speak, but this is America and everybody needs to feel included so Devs have a hard time in making what’s believable while keeping inclusiveness an important aspect behind their development cycle so ppl could feel included and idky it’s so fuckin important to include the women in a WW II video game but it’s included and I’m just not gonna let that ruin a game for me and who knows.. WW II could be marvelous

        • Agree

          I agree. The immersion and darkness and the whole feel of WaW was so good, it felt like you were in a war. While WW2 looks pretty and good gameplay so far as what I have seen, still have to play it and see. The immersion in WW2 is ruined when you start seeing and hearing black German soldiers running around with their weird camos that’ll be in the game and WW2 looks darkish but doesn’t look as dark and gritty as WaW.

      • ToonToons22

        Hey, at least there’s a use for it. I can’t wait to get the game and make my character a black Nazi woman so I can piss off and humiliate all the history buffs and politically incorrect types!

        • Elite Predator

          ???

        • jordanxbrookes

          I’m triggered LOL

        • BradyAlucard

          As someone who’s very politically incorrect and despises Sledgehammer for being politically correct, that’s rather funny and doesn’t offend me at all lol.

    • Peewy 978

      Looks can be Deceiving!

    • Peewy 978

      We got another Activision Dick Rider!!!

      • Lol. The nerve on some people, man. It blows my mind, haha.

        • Peewy 978

          Yeah See he likes it when stuff Blows his Mind Lol

          • Diego Diniz

            Another Marijuana cock sucker

          • Peewy 978

            Another Illegal Immigrant!

          • Diego Diniz

            I live in Brazil BITCH!

          • Peewy 978

            Eho De Puta!

      • Thepsychoseries.

        Why do people always say that people who like cod are cod cock suckers. I just don’t get it. This must mean, people who like battlefield are battlefield cock suckers. This idiotic logic implies that any thing you enjoy doing or like is you riding the d****. Please someone explain this childish insult.

        • Peewy 978

          Oh yeah fuck battlefield

        • Peewy 978

          Nice reply Captain Save a Ho

          • Tesswpooley

            Last month i managed to pull my first five figure paycheck ever!!! I’ve been working for this company online for 2 years now and i never been happier… They are paying me $95/per hour and the best thing is cause i am not that tech-savy, they only asked for basic understanding of internet and basic typing skill… It’s been an amazing experience working with them and i wanted to share this with you, because they are looking for new people to join their team now and i highly recommend to everyone to apply… ➤check
            ➜➜➜http://www.GoogleFinancialCashJobs327GroupCloud/Home/Wage….
            ✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤::::ah37..

          • Catalinawleister

            my roomate’s step aunt makes $81 an hour at home. she has been unemployed for 6 months but the previous month her pay check was $17981 just working on the internet for four hours per day… ➤see➤ this
            ➜➜➜http://www.GoogleFinancial306CashJobsHomeAcademy/Home/Wage….
            ✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪::::su16.

          • Debrarmiler

            Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family!!!
            On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it .
            ➽➽
            ➽➽;➽➽ TopIncJobsSiteCenter…

        • Maryjbuzzard

          Tek98j

          Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! :!al38d:
          On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
          :!al38:
          ➽➽
          ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash328MediaBrain/Pay$97/Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!al38l..,.

        • Arlenerpounders

          Next92c

          Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! :!al222d:
          On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
          :!al222d:
          ➽➽
          ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash512ShopNext/Pay$97/Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!al222l..,…

      • How does someone being excited about the game translate to them getting bummed by Activision?

        When even waste your time posting here?

        • Peewy 978

          Cuz idiots on here comment on their opinion about things that aren’t facts about a game that didnt even come out yet thats why

          • Comment an opinion about things that aren’t facts? So people aren’t allowed to have an opinion on something that isn’t a fact? That doesn’t even make sense

          • Peewy 978

            Cod community is nithin but trolls like u that buy a Reskinned copy of the game year after year

          • You’re here calling people faggots, dick riders and queers and you’re calling me a troll for calling you out? Rich coming from the guy that visits a CoD fansite to sit whinging about how much he hates CoD all day.

            Either you’re a brilliant troll or emotionally stunted

          • Peewy 978

            Hater

          • Ok there’s no way you’re real, lmao

          • Peewy 978

            I never said i hate cod u idiot

          • Jon

            Clearly English is not your native language. So maybe you shouldn’t say such ignorant things.

          • Cod Fishing

            He just said that he’s excited for the game and sees potential in it asshole

          • Peewy 978

            Fuck battlefield and titanfall u idiot

        • BradyAlucard

          He’s a troll.

      • jordanxbrookes

        We got another attention seeker looking for likes.

        • Peewy 978

          Kiss my ass Dick Rider

      • Cod fishing

        We got another salty titan fall 2 or battlefield 1 fan!!!

    • Cod Fishing

      I know I’m excited though I hope they put the amount of support as they did as BO3 into this game

      • Cod Fishing

        Sorry I meant on PC

        • RdJokr

          Much as I’d like to be positive about that, let’s not get our hopes up too much. Let’s wait until the PC beta arrives and then see how things go.

          • Peewy 978

            I agree

          • Qaotik

            There is no PC beta

          • RdJokr

            “Beta starts August 25, 2017 on PS4 system; other platforms to follow.”

            Platforms, in PLURAL.

          • Qaotik

            It’s about time we get PC beta

    • jordanxbrookes

      I agree, that Turret Gunner killstreak looks so much better than the crappy Warbird we got in AW. Also the TTK seems to be a lot quicker which puts a smile on face. Hope it’s not just the fact that it’s on LAN and it will be similar or the same as online. The engine still looks clunky, but if the game is fun, then I’m sure I’ll be able to bypass it.

      • BradyAlucard

        I’m worried about fast TTK. AW’s was way too fast unless you used an extremely weak gun that was put in the game for no reason other than to lazily toss in a gun to make it look like it had more content.

    • MW3* idk why everyone loves bo2 it wasn’t even any good. Only thing that puts it up there for me was zombies it had the best zombies ever minus tranzit of course that was a piece of shit

      • Lol MW3 better than BO2? No.

      • Michael Romo

        Putting aside opinions, BO2 was objectively the better game. The multiplayer was more balanced, the co-op mode was better (of course), and the DLC was filled with maps that had great structure (besides the remakes).

        That said, MW3 was more visually stunning. It had a few other things going for it as well. But alas, you’re allowed your own opinion. I’m just stating facts

        • I will agree with you on that because bo2 had one of the best dlcs if not the best dlc, but i’ll still put mw3 ahead it’s just me though

          • Michael Romo

            I’ve always personally hated MW3 because it just felt like extended DLC to MW2. But I can see why you’d find it so fun. What about MW3 exactly do you like above the other games?

          • Campaign is number one just the feels and everything
            Infected then was fun af
            Maps in general were good and i liked it all
            The guns sounded and looked good
            Just a few off the top of my head right now

          • Michael Romo

            I can agree on everything except the maps. MW3’s maps were terrible. Even the DLC maps were pretty bad, except for that oil rig one. That one was kinda fun

        • BradyAlucard

          Quality isn’t objective, quantity is.

      • BradyAlucard

        I like Tranzit.

    • Michael Romo

      Call of Duty has always been Call of Duty. I had just as much fun in IW as I did in all the past games.

      People like you have just convinced each other that WW2 is going to be the best game ever because it’s a “return to roots.” I guarantee you will be trashing this game for something miniscule 2 weeks in

      • >Call of Duty has always been Call of Duty

        Sure, if you want to look at it black and white like that.

        > I had just as much fun in IW as I did in all the past games.

        Good for you?

        >People like you have just convinced each other that WW2 is going to be the best game ever because it’s a “return to roots.”

        Uh yeah, why wouldn’t we be excited about that. Lol, what even is your point?

        >I guarantee you will be trashing this game for something miniscule 2 weeks in

        The only way I’ll trash this game is if it sucks. But even then don’t try too hard to assume things. You just make yourself look incredibly stupid. Oh wait. That’s not the first time you have done that.

        It’s funny how time and time you have jumped down my throat with retarded comments because I raised concerns and complained in the past, but seeing how I have been consistently excited for this game you still jump down my throat with your same idiotic comments.

        Hey, at least you’re consistent with your stupidity.

        • Michael Romo

          I don’t see how I’m making myself look stupid. I didn’t say anything that isn’t or won’t be true. When are you going to stop talking about setting and other insignificant bullcrap like “boots on the ground” and express why you think WW2 will be great based on game structure?

          You started a comparison to BO2. Tell me how and why you think that BO2 was great, how WW2 could match up to it, and what kind of game elements you look for to define Call of Duty. I honestly would like to know, because I’m curious to see what exactly what you think is appealing about WW2. To be clear, I’m not trying to hate on WW2, I just want a reason besides what I’ve seen so many times from retards like TmarTn and such: “hUr duR WW2 booTS on tHE gRouND clASsIC cOD”

          • >I don’t see how I’m making myself look stupid

            That’s because you do it all the time..and you’re stupid.

            > I didn’t say anything that isn’t or won’t be true.

            You didn’t. You made ignorant ass assumptions and literally got offended because I was being positive.

            >When are you going to stop talking about setting and other insignificant bullcrap like “boots on the ground” and express why you think WW2 will be great based on game structure?

            Except my comment didn’t say anything about BOTG. I said the game looks great, sounds great, looks fun and looks similar to how Black Ops 2 played. And why wouldn’t anyone bring up BOTG anyway? CoD plays better with it and or course people wanted it. Lol what a tard you are.

            >I just want a reason besides what I’ve seen so many times from retards like TmarTn and such: “hUr duR WW2 booTS on tHE gRouND clASsIC cOD”

            Lol, what are you doing? “Hurr durr how dare you say something POsTiVE HuR I think I sMaRT hUR DuR I mAKE AsUmptiOns I LIKE CRAYONS”

            All I said was from the looks of gameplay, it looks great and fun and reminds me how fun it is. I’ll let you know my full detailed comparison when I actually play the beta while I’m sure you type out another retarded reply. I honestly don’t know why you bother. You literally make an ass out of yourself without fail. Every. Time.

          • Michael Romo

            Are you seriously that dense? I’m not even trying to be hostile; I just want an honest opinion from you. And you saying I’m stupid just to say it is a terrible ad hominem, the worst actually, because it makes your argument that much more invalid. Also, try not to cherry pick statements, because you did so in a way that completely avoided what I was trying to point out.

            And I technically didn’t assume the BotG part because I’ve seen you say it before. Saying that CoD plays better with BotG is honestly just an opinion. Give me some statistics to show how BotG is FACTUALLY better than “jetpacking.”

          • >Are you seriously that dense? I’m not even trying to be hostile; I just want an honest opinion from you

            I’M DENSE? Dude, you literally just sat there and said you’re presenting “facts” when you did nothing but try to tell me how I’M GOING TO FEEL. Dude, fuck you. Why would I even attempt to keep it cool with you when you act like a moron?

            >And you saying I’m stupid just to say it is a terrible ad hominem, the worst actually, because it makes your argument that much more invalid

            This is coming from a guy that got legit pissed because people were excited to play BO2 on the Xbox One then proceed to insult people and say they were stupid to get rid of their Xbox 360 and PS3 then brags because he still has his old consoles. It doesn’t make shit invalid because not only did I insult you, I responded to your points.

            Honestly, I feel like when you’re in the minority in something or you don’t get excited about the things that makes everyone excited, you get angry about that. And to that, I suggest you go work on yourself.

            >Also, try not to cherry pick statements, because you did so in a way that completely avoided what I was trying to point out.

            I didn’t cherry pick or avoid anything you said.

            >And I technically didn’t assume the BotG part because I’ve seen you say it before

            “When are you going to stop talking about setting and other insignificant bullcrap like “boots on the ground” and express why you think WW2 will be great based on game structure?”

            Yes you did. Nothing about BOTG was said in my original comment. And like I said before, why wouldn’t I be excited about it in the past or still excited now? Like seriously, it baffles me a human can be a dense as you.

            >Saying that CoD plays better with BotG is honestly just an opinion.

            Where did I say it wasn’t an opinion? It obviously is, Jesus, you are a literal retard.

          • Michael Romo

            You know what? I forgot that I shouldn’t argue with you. You don’t even make any sense in your arguments because all you do is use ad hominems. Did you pass 11th Grade English? They should have taught you the proper way to argue if you did. Whatever. Since I’m done trying to argue, I might as well conclude this discussion by saying that you honestly have no fucking idea how to converse intellectually with another intellectual human being.

            Go back to being ignorant you stuck up piece of shit.

          • >You know what? I forgot that I shouldn’t argue with you.

            Good, because you can’t argue worth a fuck.

            >You don’t even make any sense in your arguments because all you do is use ad hominems.

            I don’t make sense, yet you just sat there and said you did nothing but present facts and then you ended with your original reply with telling me how I’m going to feel. Youre either just big troll or you are a unaware hypocrite that doesn’t even read the shit you type.

            >Did you pass 11th Grade English? They should have taught you the proper way to argue if you did

            That’s grand. When you literally did nothing but assume all fuck then said you were presenting facts. Are you in any position to tell people they don’t know how to argue? Like dude, use that pink thing in your head called A FUCKING BRAIN once in awhile.

            >I might as well conclude this discussion by saying that you honestly have no fucking idea how to converse intellectually with another intellectual human being.

            You are literally the same guy that insulted people for being excited about BO2 BC. You don’t know how to talk to a human let alone how to have an intelligent conversation.

            >Go back to being ignorant you stuck up piece of shit.

            Ironic.

          • Peewy 978

            Get a girl bro looks like u need one cuz its seems like all u do is play games in your mommas house all day long with no real friends

          • Peewy 978

            I agree that Dumbass sXeGreatness is nuthing but a shithead who shit on people who disagree with her opinions!

          • Peewy 978

            Exactly! Like i Said u idiot Looks can be deceiving its just a reskinned game year after year! How does this game look that different from previous games when they use the same game engine u dumbass!

          • Guest

            LOL at everyone feeding this guy exactly what he wants. The dude is a legit troll which means his real life is sad and pathetic so he comes and takes it out on people on the internet. Stop giving him a reason to hate himself more and leave him be…

            There is actually a study linking trolling and psychopaths.. Just reading..

      • People love when things return to the roots because most of the time the roots are when things were at their best. Years of evolution and attempts at being fresh and original tends to branch too far from what made it great in the first place (when you look at AW/BO3/IW and compare to the classic CoD games it shows). Perfect example is Sonic the Hedgehog, that franchise has been an absolute trainwreck for years and people are getting excited again because of Sonic Mania, which is essentially a complete rewind to the original games but with new content.

        We all knew the hype would be huge when someone finally had the balls to go back to WW2, and what I’ve seen so far looks like it could be brilliant. It probably won’t be the best game ever but I’m hoping it’ll be better than anything that came out since BO2.

        • Michael Romo

          There’s just a slight problem with WW2, and I can explain it perfectly because you brought up Sonic Mania:

          First of all, both Sonic Mania and WW2 are bringing their respective series’ to their originality. Both have mechanics and gameplay that honestly feels like their predecessors. Hopefully, WW2 is just as proportionally good if not better than Sonic Mania because CoD really needs a win after IW’s unpopularity and the disaster that was MWR.

          Now I already bought and played Sonic Mania and finished pretty much all of it besides the PSN trophies that require you to do some random stuff, and it is a fantastic game. I won’t go into too much detail of the game itself, but what I did notice was that it lacked the creativity that made Sonic 2 and Sonic 3 and so on SO GOOD. Most of the zones in Mania were just revamped versions of past zones, and even the boss fights were hardly different. The Chaos Emerald stages (the bonus stages) were the only thing that really stood out to me about Mania, and they’re honestly the only thing I’ll remember about the game in the future. Because that’s the problem with these types of games: if they’re too much like their predecessors, you might as well play the predecessors because the experience isn’t going to be that much different.

          Likewise, I can see WW2 being at least a bit forgettable in the future because of the lack of change. HQ is honestly the one thing I’m looking forward to the most, because I could barely care less about the rest of Multiplayer. It looks like Sledgehammer took WaW and CoD 3 and mashed them up with better graphics. Hopefully, they give us a memorable zombies experience, because I don’t think doing another 3arc system with unlimited rounds, perks, and a mystery box is going to cut it. If you’re not going to improve upon a game, you might as well just not make a full priced sequel

          • Great point, I think it’s down to finding that perfect balance of nostalgia and innovation that people seem to struggle to grasp. Like Duke Nukem 3D World Tour, I was so hyped for that game but after the thrill of the nostalgia rush I was pretty disappointed with the new content and had more fun with the original remastered levels.

            Glad you enjoyed Mania, I’m looking forward to playing it soon, haven’t actually tried it yet, but I’ll bare what you said in mind before getting too excited, haha.

            I’m also riding on Zombies not being too close to Treyarch’s, but since the majority of people seem to want another Treyarch clone I’m dreading that the awesome trailer and visuals will end up being a mask for more of the same. Time will tell I guess

      • snake56

        If CoD WWII really was a return to roots, then it would have vehicles, a class system, no perks, no killstreaks, no death 5 sec after you respawned, no revisionist view of the war (no United Colors of the Wehrmacht).

      • Elite Predator

        Dude, coming from me I loved Advanced Warfare and Black Ops III. Infinite Warfare.. I play time to time. The futuristic vibe and play style died for me after Black Ops III. That doesn’t go to assume that I hate Infinite Warfare although it’s by far my least favorite cod and from a preferable point of view, I’d highly rather play Advanced Warfare better than Infinite Warfare. You don’t need to know why just yet, but that’s my fuckin opinion. Now, if I want to enjoy a game boots on the ground and is based in WW II (because I love shows and games that take place during the Medieval times and history) I’m gonna be fuckin thrilled to play it and you could sit on your couch with your triggered fingers typing on hating everybody about it. I just wanna troll you because you act like you know it all.. Take a douchebag and merge it with an exaggerated arrogant bastard and call him Mike Romo.

    • You have no idea if ‘Call of Duty is Call of Duty again’. It’s because of posts like this that they add weapon variants and fuck up the game after launch – they know people like you will buy it no matter what.

      • >You have no idea if ‘Call of Duty is Call of Duty again’.

        Yeah I do, I watched the gameplay. It looks like a Call of Duty game again. This isn’t rocket science.

        >It’s because of posts like this that they add weapon variants and fuck up the game after launch

        Are you really that retarded to actually say it’s because of my comment that weapon variants exits? Where are all these stupid people coming from.

        >they know people like you will buy it no matter what.

        Ah, I still see you still don’t know how to actually make any arguments so you still do the whole “hur dur ppl lyke u buy no matter what!!” It really shows your ignorance, kid.

        I advise before every replying to me again that you actually makes some decent points instead of sounding like a complete rare.

        • Peewy 978

          Your just like a baby crying when n one agrees with u then u go shit on people, Go eat a Dick!

    • BradyAlucard

      I’m just worried that Sledgehammer is too e-Sports focused. Like they’re shoving it in our faces by doing things like forcing it into Headquarters. But if that’s the only negative thing I can point out, then they did a good job.

  • Dunio

    Scorestreak Fighter Pilot for Axis is Ju-87. Ok…

    • keithuniman

      That is one of the things that doesnt bother the average player who knows little about ww2 history

      • Dunio

        Yep and then ppl talking things like “polish death camps”, “WWII starts in december 1941”, “soviets are good guys, they liberate Europe!” or “how could you blame germans for starting WWII?”

    • Group_935

      >Not having an authentic Ju 87 siren.

  • ToonToons22

    You know, I think I’m going to miss the days of boost-jumping and wall-running and laser guns and future settings! Nah, I’m just kidding.

    The game looks great and fun. Lots of cool new weapons and attachments to use. The ending War Mode cutscene is a nice touch as well. Headquarters is something I’m also looking forward to.

  • Peewy 978

    You cant Judge the Game unti you Played it whether its Good or Bad! You can only hope its Good!

  • Zaya.sn

    This is gonna be game of the year, not everyone will agree but most will

    • Peewy 978

      Best shooter but not game of the year

    • Roscoe

      If you don’t think Breath of the Wild’s not gonna win GOTY from multiple gaming sites, surely WW2 isn’t gonna win. Lmao.

      • Chocobooo!

        Nahh.. Crash Bandicoot shit on BOTW..

        • Roscoe

          How so?

        • Michael Romo

          Sadly Crash Bandicoot can only win REMAKE of the year. BOTW is the best new and original game of 2017

        • BradyAlucard

          A basic linear game beats a vast open world with a variety of options? It’s a classic, but I don’t think so. We’ll remember BOTW for a long time.

    • I’m sorry, but it won’t even be the best shooter game this year because battlefront 2 already has that title

      • Zaya.sn

        Please tell me you’re joking,
        If you’re not joking then am gonna laugh my a** out

        • I mean i always preferred iw to 3arc so i’m biased in that sense

        • Michael Romo

          Most likely Battlefront 2 can steal the title. It’s made such an improvement over its prequel, and it honestly looks way more fun than any shooter we’ve seen this year.

          • BradyAlucard

            Agreed. Although PUBG might be the best Shooter. Who knows? There are always Shooters I’ll like… the market is just too flooded with them, so it’s hard to pick the best. Wolfenstein 2 is also a great contender.

    • Michael Romo

      Actually, I’d have to say that title goes to either Crash Bandicoot, Sonic Mania, or Super Mario Odyssey. WW2 is just not going to be as great.

      Edit: Actually, I gotta give it to TLoZ: Breath of the Wild. That game is a masterpiece

      • Zaya.sn

        At least best fps ?

      • BradyAlucard

        A remaster won’t ever get GOTY, but at least you have some sort of taste in games. For me I think once I play Persona 5 that’ll be my GOTY, but there have been so many great games that came out this year that I simply can’t choose.

  • Group_935

    Better have good maps and Killstreaks!

    • Peewy 978

      I doubt it

  • Peewy 978

    This Queer sXeGreatness comments on every CharlieIntel Post and if you read them, they’re nothing but Him Wanting Activision to stick their Dick down his throat while he thanks them!

    • It amazes how a “Whatever you say, buddy” comment can make a man act like child, lol

      If you honestly think I am an “Activision cock sucker” I advise you to go through my comment history.

      • jordanxbrookes

        He’ll probably call me that next lmao.

    • Duke of hazard

      You seem obssed with him. Im sorry he wont fuck you, but you should let it go.

    • “Please! Someone give me attention!”

    • RdJokr

      What a sad, strange little man you are, picking on a stranger on the Internet. Sit your ass down, keyboard warrior.

    • Robert GTO

      I am a big fan to this game but sometimes people like you in the cod community makes me put a 45.ACP in the head

      • Peewy 978

        Keep buyin the same game year after year and keep complaining

      • Peewy 978

        Then blow your head off already and stop commenting bitch

        • Robert GTO

          Nah bro, i changed my mind I should do a Holocaust for people like you

          • Peewy 978

            U a pussy for backin out of wat u said

    • Jon

      I am sure your daughter would be proud of you for saying such wonderful things.

  • Cod fishing

    I just hope they put a good amount of support in PC

    • Roscoe

      There’s not even a PC beta, the one platform that needs more optimization time than anything, and you’re going to need a ton of different setups to test the game.

      • RdJokr

        There will be a PC beta. The date has not been announced yet though.

        • Roscoe

          Unless you can provide a source, I’ve read otherwise.

        • Jon

          Actually there is no PC beta.

  • Roscoe

    I wonder if 1 hit marker and a melee still kills.

  • Emre

    I hear old gun sounds and familair reloads.

  • djml9

    That was a really long final killcam

  • XtrM. Frosty

    why cant i play the video. its just stops the video when i press play in both iphone and pc??

  • XtrM. Frosty

    please help 🙂

  • Dick Rider

    He is a Dick Rider

  • reamerb .

    Loving the look of the maps.

  • reamerb .

    Has anyone ordered on amazon?

  • Is there sliding in the game? or anything like that because i haven’t been keeping up with my ww2 new mainly because i’m too broke to get it until it’s on sale for christmas so i haven’t bother with it

  • Tayler Hammond

    The hit detection looks terrible. I see A LOT of bullets hitting targets with no hitmarkers. This might be a problem down the road.

    • Jon

      try again

  • Xenosapien

    I just can’t wait for supply drops, who in the world would spend 800 dollars on a wrench bo3

  • Maryjbuzzard

    Tek98j

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! :!al38d:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    :!al38:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash328MediaBrain/Pay$97/Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!al38l..,..

  • Michael Romo

    Last time I arrived at Gibraltar, a Hanzo main wouldn’t fucking switch to someone useful

  • Jheri La’curl James

    This game is just a reskin MW3. Not buying.

    • Jon

      Funny Kid

    • lunator100hd .

      Not good enough, try again.

    • BradyAlucard

      Only similarities this has to MW3 are the sprint animations that I don’t prefer very much at all.

  • ScOott

    When do we get the email with our beta codes ? Or should i have it by now ?

    • reamerb .

      Did you order it from Amazon?

      • ScOott

        No from in store at Game, they gave me a a code to redeem, did it n they said they would send me beta codes by email nearer the time…

        • reamerb .

          Oh ok, I normally pre-order from Game, but they reached their limit at my store. Not sure how amazon pre-order works?

  • TheWaffleState

    This game is gonna be awesome! Can’t wait! Ahhh! Haha

    • Peewy 978

      Cant wait for More Supply Drops!!! (Sarcasm)

  • Tested

    Are the supply drops full with weapons going to be in the beta? Or are they going to add them a month later after the game is out?

  • Tesswpooley

    Last month i managed to pull my first five figure paycheck ever!!! I’ve been working for this company online for 2 years now and i never been happier… They are paying me $95/per hour and the best thing is cause i am not that tech-savy, they only asked for basic understanding of internet and basic typing skill… It’s been an amazing experience working with them and i wanted to share this with you, because they are looking for new people to join their team now and i highly recommend to everyone to apply… ➤check
    ➜➜➜http://www.GoogleFinancialCashJobs327GroupCloud/Home/Wage….
    ✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤✤::::ah37…

    • Aidan

      I’m convinced.

  • Diego Diniz

    COD players…always complaining about something!
    “Tanks are OP! Nerf this…”

    • Aren’t you always complaing about how some sound effects aren’t loud enough

  • DJ3K

    Bros this time next week, we’ll be well on our way into WW2 beta!!! At least the ones on PS4.

  • Catalinawleister

    my roomate’s step aunt makes $81 an hour at home. she has been unemployed for 6 months but the previous month her pay check was $17981 just working on the internet for four hours per day… ➤see➤ this
    ➜➜➜http://www.GoogleFinancial306CashJobsHomeAcademy/Home/Wage….
    ✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪::::su16..